Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
Severa! advances have been made in human population genetics since our
book was completed in 1969. though most of the fundamentals of the
subject as we presented it then have not changed. Here we shall highlight
briefly sorne of the majo relevant developments and give appropriate
references so readers can pursue these topics further.
At the time our book was first published there were major developments
in
techniques for distinguishing different chromosomes by patterns of
banding; these have revolutionized human chromosome studies. Each
chromosome has its own highly characteristic banding pattern and can
be easily distinguished from ali the others. Furthermore. the banding
patterns are sufficiently detailed that translocations, invcrsions. and
deletions frequently can be defined precisely with respect to their position
on the chromosome in relation to these banding pauerns. Two major
techniques are used: First, Caspersson and colleagues developed techniques
dependent on fluorescent intensity staining differences ; second, a number of
laboratories throughout the world simultaneously developed techniques for
simple staining with Giemsa under mild conditions of incubation. As a
result of these developments. there has been much more research on the
incidence and effects of a large variety of human chromosome changes and
even documentation of polymorphisms for small inversions around the
centromere. For an elementary account of these developments, see
Genetics. Evolution and Man by Bodmer and Cavalli-Sforza, 1976, especially
Chapters 4 and 8; whereas detailed original reports can be found in journals,
such as Cell and Cytogenetic, and also in Population Cytogenetic: Studies in
Humans, edited by E. B. Hook and l. H. Porter (Academic Press, New York,
1977).
Another major advance in human genetics has been the development of
somatic cell genetics through cell fusion techniques; this advance has
extraordinarily in- creased our knowledge of the human gene linkage map.
Well over a hundred genes are now mapped, many of them down to the
level of specific chromosome bands, and all chromosomes have at least one
gene assigned to them. An elementary account of these developments can
be found in Chapter 5 of Genetics, Evolution and Man, while up-to-date
accounts are published periodically in Proceedings of the Human Gene
Linkage Workshops of which Volume 3 was published in l 977, edited by
McKusick et al. Birth Defects Original Article Series, the National Foundation,
Vol. XII, No. 7, 1976. Enzyme polymorphisms have been detected and, of
course, associated studies of heterozygosity levels have advanced. A new
edition of the book Human Biochemical Genetics by H. Harris was published
in 1975 by North-Holland, and is a valuable general reference.
We have furthered our understanding of the HLA system. There are now three
loci-HLA-A, B, and C-with approximately twenty alleles at the HLA-A and B
loci, and seven at the HLA-C locus, each determining serological
specificities detected on most tissues. In addition, there is a fourth locus,
HLA-D, first deter- mined by mixed lymphocyte culture reactions and
recently correlated with serological determinants identified specifically on B
lymphocytes. Three international histocompatibility workshops have been
book is almost entirely theoretical but <loes contain a few examples and a
chapter at the end on selected human applications.
Considerable discussion of quantitative inheritance and continuous variation
has been stimulated mostly by the problems of individual, race, and social
class differences in IQ. Interpretations of existing data have ranged widely. L. J.
Kamin, in The Science and Politics of IQ (Erlsbaum, Hillsdale, N .J., 1977), has
challenged the contention that the available data prove the existence of a
genetic component of IQ. Among the several inconsistencies and flaws in
the data analyzed by Kamin were those concerning the contributions of
the late Sir Cyril Burt. Later developments of this story have made
headlines in the newspapers. At the opposite end of the spectrum, A. R.
Jensen (Genetics and Education, Methuen, London, 1972; and Educability
and Group Differences, Harper & Row, New York,
1973) has maintained a staunch hereditarian position. In spite of minor flaws
in the analysis, C. Jencks et al. tine quality, Basic Books, New York, 1972;
gave what is perhaps the most balanced account of the inheritance of IQ.
(See also Race Differences in Intelligence, Loehlin, Lindzey and Spuhler, W.
H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1975). Jencks and coworkers used path
coefficients, a method developed by S. Wright in the l 920s; it became
popular in sociology and econometrics but had few applications in genetics.
D. C. Rao and colleagues have also applied path analysis extensively to data
on IQ and other continuous variates (American Journal of Human Genetics,
26:331-59, 1974; 26:767-72, 1974;
27:509-20, 1975; 28:228-42, 1976; Behaviour Genetics, 7:147-59, 1977).
Different fitting techniques and slightly different models have been used by L.
J. Eaves and others (for a summary see J. Royal, Stat. Soc. Series, A General,
140 :324-55,
1977).
lt would be impossible to review here these and many other contributions from
other sources. In general the heterogeneity of the available data and the
assumptions implicit in the models used for fitting make the results of the
analyses un- convincing. Among the problems is the complexity of
expectations of cultural transmission, theoretical models and probes for
which were initiated by one of us in collaboration with M. Feldman
(Theoretical Population Biology, 4 :42-55,
1973; 9:238-59, 1976; 11 :161-81, 1977; American Journal of Human
Genetics,
25:618-37, 1973; Annals of Human Biology, 2:215-26, 1975; Proceedings of
the N.A.S., 73:1689-92, 1976; Genetics, 1978, in press). Sorne discussion of
current ideas and controversies can be found in a symposium on genetic
epidemiology held at the University of Hawaii in 1977 (now in press). This
symposium will also contain information on recent developments in the
techniques of segregation analysis and in the now developing art of pedigree
analysis.
One area that was dealt with only briefly in our book has subsequently become
notorious under the name of "sociobiology," and in particular through the book
1
The Basic Concepts of Genetics
Darwin formulated his theory of evolution by natural selection without
knowledge of Mendelian genetics. The most widely held theory of
inheritance in Dar- win 's time was the blending theory, according to which
the heritable potentialities of the parents were simply mixed, or blended, like
liquids in the offspring. Once blended, the parental attributes could never
again be separated. Darwin realized that such a theory would rapidly
eliminate the heritable variation that was an essential ingredient of his
theory, unless there was a very high rate of spontaneous production of new
variability. As a result he sought, unsuccessfully, to find a more suitable theory
of inheritance than the blending theory. He never, apparently, carne in contact
with Mendel's great work. Had he been aware of it and recognized its
importance, he right have changed, even further, the course of modern
biology.
Those scientists who rediscovered Mendelism at the turn of the century did
not at first realize that it was entirely compatible with Darwin's theory of
evolution by natural selection. It remained for R. A. Fisher, J. B. S. Haldane,
and Sewall Wright to show how many of the phenomena of evolution could
be readily explained in terms of Mendelian inheritance. An understanding of
Almost all our readers will have had, at one time or another, some instruction
in Mendelism and the concepts of modern biology; some may welcome a
review of these fundamental subjects. Knowledge of the concepts of
molecular biology has developed over the last 10-20 years, and only recently
have they been introduced into high school and college courses.
Appreciation of these concepts can help greatly in understanding basic
genetics. The following short introduction to basic genetics with reference to
molecular biology is intended to serve as a refresher and also as a compact
guide or annotated glossary to the genetics needed for the study of the
human population genetics.
The real subject of this book starts in the second chapter, to which readers
not wishinq to review the general concepts of genetics can proceed directly,
1.1
THE NUMBER AND VARIETY OF CELLS THAT FORM ONE HUMAN INDIVIDUAL
A man can, theoretically, be resolved into his constituent cells which
number about 1014 (one hundred thousand billion) in an adult individual.
Many of these cells can be cultured in vitro. All of them have a number of
common features. They all have an outer envelope whose contents, the
cytoplasm, include various organelles, which are common to most cell types.
Every cell potentially able to reproduce has a nucleus, that is, a spherical body
usually centrally located with a membrane around it, containing the material
chemically known as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) organized in bodies
known as the chromosomes. In other respects, the shape, size, internal!
structure, composition, and function of various cell types may differ
greatly. Almost all cells are highly differentiated and have specific
functions. In spite of their differences, almost all cells of an organism contain
the same amount and type of DNA.
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF DNA
lt is known from experiments in microorganisms, the essentials of which have
a/so been shown to be true for higher organisms, that DNA contains the
information needed to make new cells essential/y identical to their parents.
DNA also contains the information for producing the various specific types of
cells and for making sure the right ones are available at the right time. Thus
every cell contains all of the same information but uses only a fraction of it to
develop its specific activities.
1.1 Ceils, DNA, and Protein
The amount of DNA per human cell is of the order of 6 x 10-12 grams. This is
a very small quantity, but the information contained is nevertheless enormous
and sufficient for the purpose of directing the synthesis of a human
individual. DNA molecules constitute one class of large molecules, A molecule
of DNA is usually a very long double strand. Each strand is made of a series
of elements attached one to the other in a linear sequence. These elements
are called nucleotides, of which there are four types. They are distinguished
by the presence of the substances adenine (whose symbol is A), guanine (G),
thymine (T), and cytosine (C). The two strands carry substantially the same
information in complementary forms and are strictly paired along their length.
Structural reasons restrict which nucleotides can be opposite each other in the
complementary strands. The rules of complementarity are that if in one strand
there is an A at a given position, in the other strand there can only be a T at
that position, and vice versa; and that if in one strand there is G at a given
position, there can only be C in the other, and vice versa. These rules make
the total quantity of G equal to that of C, and that of A equal to that of T. The
nucleotide pairs AT, TA, GC, and CG are generally the only allowable
combinations in double-stranded DNA. We may consider, as an example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
TAATCTGTT
The cytoplasm and the nucleus contain other important chemical constituents,
many of which belong to another class of large molecules, the proteins.
Enzymes are proteins capable of increasing enormously the rate of, that is
catalyzing, some special reaction. For example, the attachment of
phosphoric acid to glucose, which is the first step in the utilization of this
sugar, can be facilitated by a particular enzyrne, which is called a kinase.
Other enzymes mediate later steps in the utilization of glucose. 1 n general
there is a specific enzyme for each step of each of the many biochemical
Hemoglobin and myoglobin take up, store, transport, and release oxygen;
ferredoxin has a similar function with iron; haptoglobin binds hemoglobin, and
so on. Sorne proteins have mechanical functions such as the role of collagen
in connective tissue or that of elastin in elastic fibers. Still others have special
protective functions. For example, there is a Large class, probably numbering
at least several thousands, of slightly different proteins, the gamma globulins,
which have the property of binding with specific foreign substances, antigens,
and serve to protect the body against them and to facilitate their capture
and elimination. Antigens can, for instance, be substances present on the
surface of bacteria or other parasites. Gamma globulins thus participate in a
major way in the body's defense against infections.
1.2
that there are from one to six triplets, coding for each of these. The
remaining three triplets out of the 64 determine termination of the
polypeptide chain.
The genetic code given in Table l.l is that of the bacterium Escherichia coli.
lt
B though there is no
a
b from that
A of man,
probably differs very Iittle,
if at all,
direct evidence for this. We have a unique perspective from which to view the
unity of life when we consider the closeTyr
similarities,
even
identities, of
Cys
b
Phe
Ser
many of the basic
phenomena
common
toend
all living
chain organisms.
end
A
Leu
Ser
chain
a
6
TABLE
b
1.1
Leu
Ser
chain end
Try
Leu
Leu
Pro
Pro
His
Gin
Arg
Arg
Leu
Arg
b
A
B
lle
lle
Thr
Thr
Asn
Lys
Ser
Arg
Met
Thr
Lys
Arg
Val
Val
Val
Ala
Ala
Ala
Asp
Glu
Glu
Gly
Gly
Gly
b
A
B
...
..."'
...
]
'.E....
a= Adenine
b= Guanine
A= Thymine
B = Cytosine
A= Adenine
B = Guanine
Alanine (A)
Arginine (R)
Asparagine (N)
Aspartic acid (D)
Cysteine (C)
Glutamic acid (E)
G!utamine (Q)
Glycine (G)
Histidine (H)
Isoleucine (1)
Leucine (L)
Lysine (K)
Lys
Methionine (M)
Met
Phe
Phenylalanine (F)
Pro
Proline (P)
Ser
Serine (S)
Thr
Threonine (T)
Try
Tryptophan (W)
Tyr
Tyrosine (Y)
Val
Valine (V)
Chain End.
For example the triplet bAB stands for Gin= Glutamine. This implies
that Guanine-Thyrnine-Cytosine codes for glutamine in DNA and
Cytosine-Adenine-Guanine codes for glutamine in RNA. The letters
in parentheses are a shorthand single-letter code often used for the amino
acids.
1 .2
. Protein synthesis has been reproduced in the test tube and been shown to
depend on three kinds of ribonuc/eic acids (RNA).
Ribonucleic acids are similar to DNA. They differ mainly in the sugar
component of the nucleotide, ribose, which is analogous to the deoxyribose in
DNA; in the fact that T (thymine) is replaced by U (uracil), which has the
same pairing properties (U pairs with A); and in that they may occur as
relatively short single strands. There are three forms of RNA.
Messenger RNA (m-RNA). DNA does not act directly, but through an
intermediary form of ribonucleic acid called messenger RNA. Messenger RNA is
formed by the action of an enzyme, RNA polyrnerase, which copies the
sequence from one strand of DNA and forms an RNA strand of the
complementary sequence. Only one of the two DNA strands is generally
active as a "template" for m-RNA synthesis, the other DNA strand remaining
uncopied. The m-RNA sequence is identical to that in the uncopied strand of
DNA except that T is replaced by U. Messenger RNA remains single stranded.
One molecule or strand can generally be used for the manufacture of a large
number of protein molecules, each with the amino acid sequence
corresponding to the m-RNA 's nucleotide sequence. The number of
nucleotides in an m-RNA strand is three times the number of amino acids in
the polypeptide chain copied from it plus three nucleotides to indicate the
termination of the chain, and possibly, another triplet for its initiation. The
mechanism for chain initiation is still not entirely clear.
Ribosomal RNA (r-RNA). Alignment of the t-RNA and the m-RNA and the
progression of polypeptide synthesis along the m-RNA, which is "read" from
beginning to end, is mediated by special particles, the ribosomes. These are
present in the cell in large numbers. A ribosome is made from a third form of
ribonucleic acid called ribosomal RNA (whose structure is not yet well
determined) together with a large number of protein molecules, twenty or
more, whose detailed function is also not yet clear.
FIGURE 1.1
1.2
they are useful. Some such mechanisms have been shown to operate in
microrganisms during transcription, that is, by stopping the production of the
specific m-RNA when the proteins coded by it are not needed. The information
about the presence or absence of the chemical substances in the environment
is conveyed to the DNA by other specific "regulatory" proteins coded for by
other DNA segments, as is shown diagrammatically in Figure 1.2.
FIGURE 1.2
Enzyme induction, a phenomenon investigated in bacteria, may help the
understanding of the regulation of protein synthesis in higher organisms,
which is largely unknown. A: The substance i, utilized in the reaction chain
promoted by enzymes e1, e2, e3 is absent. The regulatory protein r
produced by the regulator gene R, in that absence of i,
combines with an end (O) of the DNA region that produces enzymes e1. e2,
e3 and inhibits formation of the m-RNA required for their synthesis.
Therefore genes E,, E2, E3 making these enzyrnes are inactivc and the
enzymes are not formed. B: Substance i is present and combines specially
with r, which is now unable to combine with the region O. Messenger RNA
from E,, E2, E3, and the corresponding enzymes
e., e2. e3 are produced.
cells and tissues. Evidence from various sources shows that various proteins
are formed, and correspondingly, that various portions of the DNA are
active in different tissues and cells at different times during development.
1.3
DNA has a central role in the life process in both supplying the information for
the synthesis of proteins and the basis for duplicating this information.
In the preparation for cell division, each individual chromosome has its DNA
split internally into two separable threads called chromatids, each presumably
constituted from one of the two new DNA double strands. The division is,
however, not initially apparent and a human cell starting mitosis still has just
46 visible chromosomes. Then follows a complex process of preparation within
the cell for the precise division of each chromosome into two equal parts. Each
daughter cell must receive one copy of each chromosome, and thus a
complete set of the 46 chromosomes. A specific part of the chromosome that
contains visibly less DNA, the centromere, is attached to the double thread of
DNA contained in each chromo- some at this stage. The centromere splits in
two with each of the resulting new centromeres attached to a different one of
the two chromatids.
Metaphase: the new cell poles are shown on the left and on the right. The
nuclear membrane has dissolved; the centromeres, attached to the equator of
the spindle defining the major axis of cell division, have not divided, but the
rest of each chromosome has.
Anaphase: migration toward the poles. Each half has followed the
centromeres. which are migrating to the opposite poles.
Telophase: separation. Two new cells identical to the original one have been
formed.
FIGURE 1.3
Mitosis in a cell of a hypothetical organism that has one pair of identical
chromosomes and one pair whose members are different.
12
At this stage a spindle has formed in the cytoplasm that extends along the
major axis of division and defines the two poles of the cell. The nuclear
membrane has disappeared so that the chromosomes can move freely through
the cytoplasm. They attach by their centromere to the central or equatorial
region of the spindle. Each chromosome is separated visibly into two moieties.
One of the two centromeres of each dividing chromosome moves to one pole
and the other to the other pole. This assures that the daughter chromosomes
separate in a balanced way to form the two daughter cells (Figure 1.3).
of the sperm and that of the egg fuse to form a single nucleus that has 46
chromosomes. The new cell is called a zygote, and its multiplication gives rise
to all the cells of the new organism. An organism whose cells contain pairs
of chromosomes formed in this way is called diploid. Gametes are haploid:
that is, they have one set of chromosomes instead of two.
Both a man and a woman have 46 paired chromosomes (see Figure 1.5), with
one pair in the female being different from the corresponding pair in the male,
as aired y mentioned. Ali the other 22 pairs are made of two members that
are like each other in shape and size. There are, however, practical! limitations
to recognition of chromosomes dueto the fact that, at least in man, some pairs
are so similar to others that it is usually impossible to tell them apart. In
practice, one can easily
recognize in man the seven groups indicated in the figure by letters A-G,
using the relative position of the centro mere and possible other peculiarities
as distinguishing features. The pair that differs between males and females
is responsible for the sex of the individual, and the members of this pair
are called the sex chromosomes The sex chromosomes present in the
female, conventionally called X chrornosomes, are intermediate in size among
the human chrornosomes, while in the male there is one X and one
differentiated sex chromosome responsible for maleness, the Y
chromosome, which is one of the smallest of the human set. Chromosome
arrange- ments, such as those shown in Figure 1.5, are called karyotypes.
1.4
The human zygote and almost all the cells of an adult that are derived from it
have 46 chromosomes. There must, therefore, be a process that reduces
their number to 23 during gamete formation in order that the union of two
gametes will produce a new individual with 46 chromosomes. This special
process, called reduction, or meiosis, is a successive pair of modified mitoses.
lt assures the formation of gametes each of which contains one member only
of each pair of chromosomes. One chromosome from each pair must be
included in each garnet because each pair of chromosomes has a unique
DNA sequence and those special set of functions. The complete set of
instructions is necessary for the formation of new cells and organisms that
are like their precursors.
The meiosis represented in Figure 1.6 is that of the same hypothetical
organism used in Figure 1.3; the organism has one pair whose members are
identical and one whose members are different, which could be the sex
chromosomes. At the begin- ning of the first meiotic division, DNA double
strands divide, but centromeres do not. This is followed by separation of the
members of each homologous pair. The phenomenon that assures an equal
distribution of the members of each pair, one to each daughter cell is
pairing between homologues. Pairing serves as a guide for the centromere of
one member of the pair to move to one pole, and that of the other
member to the other pole. lt is presumably based on similarity or identity in
nucleotide sequence. J n pairs whose members are not identical, such as the X
and Y at least a part of the two chromosomes must be similar, or homologous,
enough to assure pairing.
Jf pairing did not take place, the regular distribution to the two poles, and
hence
to the daughter cells would not be assured. The two members of one pair
might migrate to the same pole, giving rise to unbalanced gametes, one of
which would contain both members of the pair, and the other none. This