Rubric: Individual Presentation

0,,,. Vonar*^ V-D

Date

CATEGORIES

GRADE

Clarist of Eryrcssion
Ciearly states role in project; focuses on topic
assigned; presents assigned topic in a logical
manner; ability to convey presented information
with depth delivers information clearly
Knowledge of Materiol

Ability to answer questions (did not simply stand

back and let others answer questions); thoughtful
analysis of information (not simply reiterating
information); able to make inferences based on
gathered information; provides and explains
important facts or points to audience

Research
Research is pertinent to assiped topic (no
tangential topics); bibliography; in depth research
(avoided the trite and obvious); assigned part of
research was actually done by presenter

Appearunce
Groomed; in costume, in professional dress, or in
neat unifomr; minimal dishacting hand gestures;
minimal distracting facial expressions; ope,n and

COMMENTS

ffi)e876

\J

s4321

urrl

10 ,07

gww

543

f 0rrr ruorJe;

{ou'."

&,

*;(TTffi

Ox\

10987.I
5432'\

\-

r,x\

87

43

21

non-hostile countenauce; presence commands

audience's attention

Etiqudte
Intoduces herself; does not dominate the Q&A
portion, but allows others to answer questions

Ce87
4

Voice and Language

Voicg is audible; delivery (smooth or hesitant);
appropriate language (forrnal - no colloquialisms);
appropriate word usage

Contributions to Proj ect

Collaborative effort; preparation; Q & lg research

Made use of the Web 2.0 tools as best as possible;

part ofthe presentation was "outside the proverbial

box"

54321

3e8

43
X2=

Exemplary perfonnance in this area

Commendable (very good, but has minor flaws)
Above Average (good, but requires further instruction)
Satisfactory (sufficient for audience's understandine)
Below Average

Limited

Needs definite improvement

Minimal skill level in this area

Unsatisfactory
Unbearable

10
9
8

87

9
5

SCORE =

21

10 e 8 @@
5

Crealivily

21
6

21

t200

httturr

drr*$b

Ot)eaf

.rJoflls