1|Page

From

To

MANIKANDAN VATHAN

T.S.THAKUR

ADVOCATE, 60 Law Chambers,

CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA

High Court, Madras.

New Delhi.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dear Brother Shri.Thakur,

Sub Grave charges of criminal misconduct against Shri.Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Chief Justice, Madras High Court, & his coterie, including inter alia,
(1) Encouraging Fake-Advocates & Fake-Courts in Tamilnadu,
(2) Exploiting Judges of the Supreme Court, including a former CJI (Chief Justice of India),
(3) Actively Encouraging & Aiding Criminalisation of the Bar,
(4) Ensuring Criminalisation of the Bench,
(4) Promoting Sectarian autocracy in judicial administration,
(5) Appointing criminals, and persons with criminal antecedents as Judges & Prosecutors,
(6) Usage of printed forms as bail orders & filling-up cause-title and sections of law,
(7) Rigging murder-trials to shield criminals,
(8) Sacrificing honest-judges to protect murderers & contract-killers,
(9) FIXING, SETTING, TRAPPING & IMPERSONATING honest judges & entangling them in corruption
charges, doctored audio-video tapes & PLANTING a compliant judge to try a sensational murder.
(10) Vendetta & illegal suspension of 44 genuine lawyers who questioned the above evils, etc.

IN-HOUSE / OPEN INQUIRY REQUEST - REGARDING

1) Your ex-colleague Shri.Markandey Katju has disclosed in his electronic publications, as to
how he had prepared the list of candidates for appointment as judges to the Madras High
Court, during his tenure as Chief Justice. Sadly, his choices were most unfortunate, as you are
fortunately well aware-of, and the root cause lay in his innovation - namely consulting a few
senior members of the bar, and recommending names, which were common in their
respective lists. Brother katju - a silver-spoon kid, new to the state, was apparently too nave
to know of the traditions of syndicate-bidding which Tamilnadu has been adopting since it
ventured into the liquor trade in the 70s & 80s. The so-called SENIOR ADVOCATES muzzled
into the selection-list, a coterie of their own juniors, who continue to rule the roost till date.
But what you are not aware-of is that, Chennai judges and lawyers have already predicted
(calculated), as to who would be Indias Chief Justice, 20 to 25 years from now. Even DJ
(District Judge) selections are based on who would, or would not become CJI at the end of
their careers. Accordingly, District Judge selections are rigged to ensure that favorites
become future CJIs.
2) When Shri.Sanjay Kaul assumed office as Chief Justice, he got prepared a list of names for
appointment as judges to the Madras High Court, from God knows, who. But a senior
advocate Shri.Gandhi, who manages to infiltrate at least a handful of juniors every time a
selection list goes through, apparently had no say in Sanjays scheme of things. Hence,
Gandhi in league with a quack who calls himself Captain.S.Prabakaran, the self-styled CoChairman of the BCI (Bar Council of India) where no such post exists, deftly played the caste
card, and commenced a series of agitations in the Madras high court premises claiming that
there was inadequate representation for non-brahmins in the selection list. His machinations
and scheming manipulations led to popular revulsion and deception, so much so that even
Justice Shri.Karnan had to walk into a court-room hearing a challenge to the proposed list
and lodge a formal protest. Eventually, the list had to be scrapped in toto.
1|Page

2|Page
3) Captain.S.Prabakaran, whom nobody knows as a law student, and whose law degree is from
Utopia, specializes in the very unique business of inviting successive Chief Justices and
Supreme Court judges to staged functions in star hotels. These functions are nothing but
photo-ops to generate business business of the kind, which is hitherto unheard-of, and too
repulsive to pen down. His event-management skills, have thence been adopted by several
core-criminals, who are now wining and dining with sitting Madras High Court judges,
awarding them bogus degrees including Ph.Ds and cheating not only the police &
government machinery, but the gullible public en masse. I shall provide photos to show how
Prabakaran & company entices Chief Justices & puisne judges to functions, clicks pictures with them, and fools
the public. I shall also provide photos of several judges of Madras High Court recreating themselves, in
functions hosted by habitual criminals. The fraternity will be shocked to know their identities.

4) Prabakarans partner in crime, Shri.Selvam, (Chairman of the State Bar Council) too seems to have
never seen a law college. Apart from the bogus law degrees of these 2 bar council leaders, it
is to be noted that several fake advocates have been infiltrated into the Tamilnadu bar, by
these 2 persons, for extraneous reasons, and electoral gains. Unconfirmed reports even
indicate that the higher judiciary too has been thus infiltrated, and if this is true, it is a
challenge that even you may not be able to overcome, with all the might at your command,
as Chief Justice of this great nation. The irony is that most of these fake-advocates, do not
know what a court-room even looks-like. They were criminals (including detainees serving
multiple preventive detentions) earlier, or who have taken to crime pursuant to their new
found lawyer-status. These bands of thugs move around in cities, challenging the police and
judiciary, wearing black and white, and bullying them to release criminals. Most of them are
running crime-syndicates, with a hapless judicial machinery merrily playing ball.
5) Not satisfied with this, several of them made it to the posts of public prosecutors, and
themselves became accused as well as prosecutors. Successive Chief Justices merrily signed
on the dotted line and welcomed them into the fraternity, in violation of the statute (CrPC)
which prescribes their manner of appointment. Resultantly, even robbery & theft case
accused who were habitual criminals became public prosecutors in trial courts and began
conducting murder-trials etc. The same police-officials who once arrested and prosecuted
them were now forced to wait at their door, and seek appointments in connection with
pending cases, and/or for legal opinions.
6) The depravity went even further. Several lawyers, both bogus and real began to conduct
FAKE-COURTS in Tamilnadu, calling themselves as judges. Their court-halls had
paraphernalia that would put to shame the lawfully established constitutional courts under
your current leadership. The modus operandi is to run organisations claiming to be Human
Rights Commissions, and Arbitrators. These JUDGES issue notices under the Arbitration Act
on a fomented litigation between strangers, and usurped property by passing decrees and
registering the decrees with the registration department. Legitimacy is lent to these
CRIMINALS-TURNED-JUDGES by hosting functions with sitting high court judges & retired
supreme court judges, organized by Prabakaran & Co. Unwittingly & wittingly, regular
members of the bar began filing vakalats in these fake courts and exploited the public.
District Judges functioning under your leadership shamelessly began hearing appeals from
these FAKE-COURTS. When I moved a writ petition, the otherwise sensible Chief Justice of
the Madras High Court, was very disturbed by the fact that FAKE-JUDGES used red beacons
atop their vehicles, and began issuing a series of directions vis--vis use of beacon lights.
Realising the futility of requesting the court to exercise its powers vis--vis FAKE-COURTS, I
moved the Supreme Court, after the petitioner withdrew his writ petition in the Madras High
Court. But the Supreme Court was no different, since it directed me to approach the Madras
high Court once again. Hence the High Court was moved again, this time on its criminal side,
due to the previous bitter experience before the Chief Justice. But it kept the matter in cold
storage, for over a year, thus allowing the fleecing of the public, who felt that quick-justice
was purchasable in the FAKE-COURTS, rather than the REAL-COURTS, such as the High Court
established by the constitution - since issues ranging from service matters, to rent control to
property disputes and even criminal cases, including non-existent disputes were
adjudicated, decreed and even enforced through government departments, whereas even
orders of the Supreme court & High court are not enforced by the local government.
2|Page

3|Page
7) It is in this background that yet another shocking dimension enters the picture. One
Shri.Sankararaman who dared to question the financial & sexual sleaze in the renowned
Sankara mutt in Kanchipuram town, was bumped-off by hired assailants, inside the historical
Varadaraja Perumal temple. 5 unconnected persons were made to surrender in the case, to
mislead the investigations. However, police found that one of them was actually in prison on
the date of the murder, and hence disbelieved their version. Detailed investigations revealed
that Sankararaman was murdered inside the temple by hirelings organized by the head of
the mutt Shri.Jayendra. This mutt was a symbol of the majority religion in this country, and
its head was venerated as divine by Hindus, and served as the leader of the Brahminical cult.
Hindus in general, and Brahmins in particular were aghast and infuriated when Jayendra was
arrested. Several people raised a war-cry of religion-in-danger, fundamentalists attacked
lawyers inside the Madras High Court, where the bail plea was heard directly, superseding
the lower courts.
8) However a near-perfect investigation, reinforced by 164 statements of all prime witnesses,
and an approver, led to prosecution. But the case was sabotaged due to prosecution
connivance after a change in government so much so that that the CIO (Chief Investigating
Officer) was denied access to the case diary prior to his examination, and had to move a writ
petition in the Madras High Court to access it. The man who denied him the records was a
mere DSP called Shri.Veeramani, whereas the CIO was an SP called Shri.Shaktivel, an official 2
ranks higher in a uniformed force. This clearly meant that the entire prosecution including
the unqualified Public Prosecutor (who used to address the accused as SWAMIKAL (GODS)), and
the police force had entered the payrolls of the accused. Witness after witness was coaxed,
bribed, bullied & intimidated into turning hostile, including the approver who was tendered a
pardon. Yet the existence of prima facie evidence in the form of video-footage, 164
statements, etc, unnerved the accused, and they made an attempt to de-seat a noncompliant trial-judge Shri.Ramasamy. With this sinister objective (which was brought to my notice only
recently), several persons, cooked-up audio-tapes (a telephonic conversation) and videos to get the
trial judge shifted. The clips pertained to electronic-tapes discussing a bribe-payment and a
promised pending payment between the trial judge, and the prime-accused. How much
money was originally paid by the prime accused, to whom and through whom, remains
speculative till date. The tapes, peddled by a leading-journalist close to Captain Prabakaran
was brought to my notice, informing me that the trial-judge had been purchased, and that I
had to do something for justice to prevail.
9) Hence a complaint was preferred to the Vigilance cell of the High court, and due to media
pressure and adverse publicity, a summon was received calling upon the complainant to
appear for enquiry at the chamber of the Registrar (Vigilance). In response, when we visited
the venue, the gentleman who was present therein declined to divulge his identity or
designation, even as he sought to know our identity. His attire made us all the more
suspicious since his tie-knot was at chest level, and his left shoe lay upside-down in the right
corner of the room whereas his right shoe lay scattered on the left corner of the enquiry
room. It was only much later, after we walked out protesting his misconduct that we came to
know that his name was Shri.Authinathan, a judge of the lower court, and that he was
deputed to conduct the enquiry. Since his cowardice and abnormal behavior could serve no
purpose, and since the functioning of the office of the registrar (vigilance) was even worse,
we moved a writ petition against the Registrar (Vigilance) seeking a direction to conduct a
police investigation into the veracity of the tapes, and if found to be authentic, to order a retrial of the murder case.
10) In an unprecedented action, a single judge of the High court, Ms.Suguna not only entertained
the writ petition but also STAYED the murder trial at my request. The accused intervened
through 2 proxy proceedings in the name of a fictitious person, called Thirumurugan, with a
bogus address, and visibly forged signatures. Furthermore, they purchased/procured a courtslip (used for urgent processing & listing of cases) from the court of another judge (21st court), and
bribed their way through the registry to list it before Suguna (10th court). When the aforesaid
frauds were exposed, their counsel, Shri.MV.Muralidharan backed off.
3|Page

4|Page
11) In the meantime, one Shri.Raja, an advocate, approached me seeking a copy of the affidavit
(pleading), stating that the entire case record in the High Court was being kept a secret. I
promptly gave him a copy, and he approached the accused at the mutt, and secured their
brief. He filed an impleading petition in the name of the 3rd accused Mr.Sundaresa Iyer and
sought dismissal of our writ petition. The co-counsel in the case, whom I had never seen was
one Shri.Arivunithi, through whom Mr.Raja reportedly contacted the mutt and gained their
confidence by presenting the affidavit collected from me. The role of the absentee Arivunithi
is significant on account of the influence of the accused with a judge called
V.Ramasubramaniam who is the aspirant to the office held by you, namely CJI. This issue of
Arivunithi has been elaborated at length, in the succeeding para 32.
12) Upon hearing news of the STAY, and the bribe-tapes, Mrs.Padma, the widow of slain
Sankararaman and her son-in-law (both prosecution witnesses) approached the Chief Justice
of the High Court, with a representation narrating the manner in which they were terrorized
and forced to turn hostile during trial. Padma had sought action against the prosecution for
their connivance with the criminals, and also action against the trial judge vis--vis the
bribe-tapes. But the Chief Justice reportedly forwarded her plea to the very same Registrar
(Vigilance). Hence she sued the Chief Justice in his administrative capacity to grant sanction
to register an FIR against the trial judge. The Chief Justice then invited me to his chamber
through the then Registrar General, but I declined to meet him without the Registrar General
assigning reasons for the proposed meeting. I was then persuaded to meet him as a
humanitarian gesture, since I was told that that the Chief Justice was on a fast (Friday or
Ramzan, or both, I cant recollect), and was waiting for a long time to meet me before going for a
late lunch, that he was a diabetic etc. In fact, I was tricked into meeting the Registrar
General in the first place, and had rushed to her chamber upon the request of a friend who
secured my presence claiming to be in urgent need of some assistance.
13) So, when I met the Chief Justice at his chamber, he placed before me a file comprising
various representations sent to him from time to time (over several years), seeking several
reforms in court administration, and tried to please me by saying that he had directed the
registry to look into and take action on all my representations, immediately. He then
requested me to remove his name from the array of respondents (sole respondent) on the
petition filed by Mrs.Padma. When I asked him as to why he was making such a request, he
stated that it would create an obstacle for his elevation to the Supreme Court. I countered
him, stating that there were no personal allegations against him and all that was sought was
an exercise of an administrative duty, which was improperly exercised. The Chief Justice
insisted that there were personal allegations, and when I asked him to show the same, he
declined to go into the same, and insisted on my removing him from the cause title. I
declined to do so, and left his chamber. His parting statement was a personal but
insignificant appeal, and since I gave my word, I cannot reveal it to you or anyone.
14) At the final hearing of the writ petitions, the division bench comprising Gandhis erstwhile
junior Shri.Paul Vasantha Kumar & another, persuaded me for over 2 hours to withdraw the
writ petitions, and proceeded to hear me only after I lodged a strong protest at its conduct.
Eventually, it devised a safety-valve whereby, although it ordered a police-probe into the
bribe-tapes to be done by the cyber-crime cell, it lifted the stay on the trial, virtually allowing
the bribery or the attempt to fructify. But, the criminals had the last laugh, as the trial-judge
who allegedly featured in the tapes, was removed in the interregnum (through administrative
orders), and a compliant man of choice was brought- in. As for our request for a re-trial, the
court held that the family of the deceased could move appropriate petitions to assist the
prosecution etc before the new trial judge, and even partake in the appeal, if the judgment
based on the trial was not appropriate. Most interestingly, veiled threats against us
(counsels) were found in the orders passed on Padmas petition etc, vis--vis her suing the
Chief Justice etc.
15) In other words, even the powers conferred upon the Chief Justice by the Supreme Court,
(vis--vis criminal prosecution of a bribe-taking judge) was sought to be found-fault with, so as to
favour the bribe-givers and bribe-takers in this case, and all quoted precedents (wherein the
administrative actions of various Chief Justices were challenged), were simply brushed aside.
4|Page

5|Page
16) When the trial resumed, due to prosecutorial hostility the widow of the deceased
Mrs.Padma herself filed 2 petitions (Crl MPs 551 & 574 of 2012), seeking to recall and
re-examine the hostile witnesses (who were not declared as such by the prosecution), and also to take
action against hostile witnesses, including the hostile approver. She had also sought an
interim direction for police protection for her family, since she claimed that she had earlier
turned hostile due to threats in the court campus. But she was now allegedly intimidated this
time by the new trial judge Shri.Murugan himself (who is believed to have been PLANTED & FIXED
by/for the accused) and told to withdraw the 2 applications, whereupon he would grant police
protection. Murugan was bent upon hearing arguments and rendering a judgment,
notwithstanding the pendency of the 2 petitions and also the 308 CrPC petition filed in the
year 2010 against the sole-approver who had turned hostile (Crl MP 668/10). Furthermore,
when the deceaseds son Shri.Ananda Sharma sought copies of the depositions, the PP & trial
judge started playing musical chair, to dodge issuance. So the son of the deceased moved the
Madras High Court (Crl OP 10606/12), with the above claims and sought police protection
besides a direction to dispose the 2 petitions. But Mr.Nagamuthu a judge of the high court,
illegally heard the same PP Shri.Devadass of the trial court, overlooking the statutorily
appointed PP of the Puducherry government in the High court (who stayed away deliberately), and
directed that the 2 MPs should be decided by the trial judge Murugan himself. Nagamuthu
purposely overlooked the misconduct of Murugan who intimidated the old widow, and also
his action of denying her the case records.
17) Hence, even after Nagamuthus order, the deceaseds family was once again intimidated by
the trial judge Murugan, who was hobnobbing with defence counsel such as Shri.PN.Prakash
etc, and hence the son of the deceased filed a Crl OP No 17602/12 U/s 407 (1) (c) (IV) seeking
to transfer the trial to the High Court itself. But again the Puduchery state PP (appointed as per
the CrPC) abandoned the case, and the same Devadass who was the trial court PP was made to
appear in violation of the CrPC. Shri.Arumugasamy, a judge of the Madras High Court
declined to grant any hearing to the petitioners counsel. So the counsel narrated his
misconduct and recused herself in writing. The judge allowed the recusal, virtually indicting
himself and authenticating his misconduct, and dismissed the petition without even hearing
anybody on behalf of the petitioner. The counsel then wrote about this misbehaviour to the
Chief Justice, and requested him to train the puisne judge to notify the parties before
deciding cases, in the event of counsel recusing.
18) Similarly, when the son of the deceased Mr.Anand Sharma filed a copy application seeking a
copy of the tapes which were marked as M.O.s 15 to 24, (instead of exhibits), trial judge
Murugan issued notice on the copy application (to the prosecutor Mr.Devadass, and all the 24
accused), and secured replies-in-opposition. Curiously enough, PP Devadass filed a reply
stating that the tapes could not be issued, since they were virus-infested. The fact that the PP
is objecting to issuance of documents marked during trial to the deceaseds son who is a
prosecution witness, speaks for itself, but the claim that it is virus-infested is highly
malicious, since it is in the custody of the court, and not the prosecutor, and the PP can have
no knowledge whatsoever, as to whether it was virus-infested or not. Furthermore it forms
part of the evidence which needs to be viewed by the trial judge before rendering judgment.
Hence, Anand moved the High Court, and the very same judge Arumugasamy misbehaved
with the counsel, and the counsels recusal from this case was followed by issuance of notice
to the said Anand, as per the counsels earlier letter requesting the Chief Justice to train
Arumugasamy on procedures. But in order to defeat the petition in the High Court, the trial
judge cunningly issued an order granting a copy of the tapes to the accused counsel,
PN.Prakash, even before the petitioner was made aware of such an order.
19) The copy applicant (deceased Sankararamans son) was not aware of this order since he was
denied access to the court and also being taunted, mocked and abused by the trial judge in
open court to please the accused (including comments about his IAS exam preparations), and was in
fact awaiting orders from the High court to access the tapes. Utilising the copy of the order,
PN.Prakash moved the High Court and got the order STAYED, without our knowledge.

5|Page

6|Page
20) When the son of the deceased Sankararaman moved an RTI application before Murugan,
seeking to know under what authority/order Mr.Devadass was functioning as Special PP for
his fathers murder trial alone, the trial judge Murugan wrote back stating that,
(A) The judiciary does not come under the RTI,
(B) That he does not know the basis on which the said PP was functioning in his
court for this murder trial alone, and
(C) That he does NOT even know, where the said information was available.
This information was sought, since it was widely believed that the Special PP was a puppet
set up by the accused after getting the case transferred from Tamilnadu to Puduchery.
Furthermore, the accused who got the Sankararaman murder case transferred to Puduchery
did not seek transfer of the Radhakrishnan attempt to murder case. The Sankararaman
murder was only a sequel to the Radhakrishnan attempt to murder case, and all the grounds
for inter-state transfer remained common to both cases. The suspicions about Special PP
Devadass arose from his conduct in conducting the case, non-declaration of hostile witnesses
as such, and not cross-examining them as per 154 IEA, etc. His legal qualification itself is
suspect since he,
(A) Does not even know how to file pleadings,
(B) Does not even know that pleadings should be prepared para-wise,
(C) Does not even know that the paras should be assigned paragraph numbers, and
(D) Does not even know that investigating officers should sign the pleadings, etc.
But despite several representations and even a writ petition challenging his appointment,
judges such as Mr.Sasidharan simply tossed away the cases, from bench to bench, to protect
the culprits.
21) In the meantime, PP Devadass is suspected to have negotiated a deal with the son of the
deceased, and he abruptly withdrew all the proceedings filed by him both in the high court as
well as the sessions court, in lieu of suspected blood-money. This was followed by a written
complaint signed by several members of the Puduchery bar addressed to several judges of
the supreme court as well as the high Court besides various journalists claiming that a sum of
Rs.20 crores was paid as a fresh bribe to trial judge Murugan through the Registrar General
Shri.Chockalingam and an advocate called Alaganandam. These complaints to various
members of the higher judiciary & journalists were ignored, and even hushed-up. When I
wrote to the said Chockalingam seeking a copy of the cyber-crime report, he wrote back
stating that it cannot be issued, as it was in the purview of the administrative committee.
22) It was over 2 years since the cyber-crime enquiry was ordered and report submitted, and
since the writ petition was refused to be listed, I moved a fresh writ petition seeking to
disclose the contents of the cyber-crime report and also to probe the 20 crore bribe charge.
This writ petition was refused to be numbered by the Registrar General, and it began to get
tossed around from bench to bench. Mr.CT.Selvam, a known DMK man & Karunanidhi
follower sitting on the bench claimed that the administrative committee cannot be sued and
added the Registrar General as a party to the writ petition to enable the High Court to
respond to the writ petition. Thereafter it was posted before Mr.V.Ramasubramaniam a
devotee of the Sankara mutt, and due to our objection vis--vis his proximity to the prime
accused, it was re-assigned to another bench.
23) By this time, the lead counsel for the assassins, namely PN.Prakash was elevated as a High
court judge, amidst stiff opposition from the bar due to his partisan and communal (casteist)
mindset, and within a month, Murugan rendered his judgment acquitting all the accused
including those who surrendered as FAKE-ACCUSED. The judgment cited PN.Prakash as
being both a counsel for accused as well as a sitting high court judge. On the night of the
acquittal I was interviewed by SUN TV, in a panel discussion and I narrated most of the above
facts. The writ petition which was being kept in cold storage was listed overnight, before the
bench of Mr.Sudhakar, and when told that the interim prayer for STAY has become
infructuous due to the acquittal, Sudhakar feigned ignorance about the acquittal and started
all over again stating that the administrative committee cannot be sued etc. He then
complained that the papers were mixed-up and not in order, and I responded by stating that
the registry has mixed up the papers since it was originally filed as a single judge matter, but
was now before a division bench, and that if I was provided access to the record, I would sort
it out, for the convenience of the bench.
6|Page

7|Page
24) Sudhakar then recorded the discussion on 14.2.14, but cunningly instructed the SAR (SubAssistant Registrar Mrs.Sowbagyalakshmi, not to allow me access to the case records so as to
prevent it from being re-arranged & organized. This was done to prevent the case from being
listed for hearing. Whenever I approached Sowbagyalakshmi, (I had to approach her because, unlike in
lower courts, Madras high courts daily orders are not known/shown to the public or even counsels unless they are interim or
final orders)

she replied that she could not show the case papers to me because of Sudhakars
orders. When I asked her to show atleast the written order passed by the bench, she
declined to do so and promised to secure a copy with Sudhakars permission. This was also
declined, and finally after a year, she went to the extent of issuing an unofficial copy, sans
any court seal, and lamented about her being subjected to servile treatment, despite her
graduating from the prestigious Stella Maris college. Be that as it may, the unofficial copy of
the 14.2.14 order was issued by Sowbhagyalakshmi on 6.2.15, WITHOUT the court seal, and I
was shocked to notice that as per the contents therein, I was supposed to amend portions of
the pleadings. Hence I wrote to her officially to open up the case record for carrying-out the
court order, but she again parroted the same story vis--vis Sudhakar. Finally on 12.6.15,
while I was out of station, Sudhakar cunningly got it listed and despite my junior expressing
my absence due to the sudden out-of-turn listing, he CLOSED the case, stating that I had NOT
complied with his orders to amend the petition, (viz. the petition which was directed to be amended, but
which petition was NEVER even shown to me for amendment, despite persistent demands).
25) Several of these events were being orchestrated at the bidding of Justice PN.Prakash, the
erstwhile counsel for the accused in the murder case who formed a cabal with a coterie of
Brahmin judges namely Ramasubramaniam (the aspiring CJI, who is mentioned earlier),
Vaidyanathan, Sathish Agnihotri and Chief Justice Sanjay Kaul. This quintette evolved under
the common sectarian ideology namely the brahmanisation of the judiciary, and
concentration of power for ulterior purposes. Towards this object, they mended fences with
the gangs of quacks of the ilk of Captain Prabakaran, etc, who were involved in all sorts of
criminal activities in Chennai city, and began to partake in a series of functions organized by
them, and published gigantic pictures in papers and as posters on Chennais public roads.
Several cut-outs and hoardings of the judges were erected, massive posters pasted, making
the Indian judiciary a laughing stock in the eyes of the public. The only saving grace is the
fact that the larger public did not know that the lawyers featuring therein are quacks and
also criminals. Even Sanjay Kaul was featured wearing massive garlands which even the most
publicity-hungry politicians of this state would be jealous of. I shall attach all the
photographic and videographic proof for your appreciation.
26) Taking a cue from the (mis)conduct of this coterie, a sitting high court judge by name,
Mr.Tamilvanan (discussed earlier) proclaimed to have received a doctorate at the hands of
one Selwyn, a dubious character running a fake TAMIL UNIVERSITY, based in the USA.
Selwyns criminal nexus and antecedents are beyond doubt, since they feature images with a
habitual cheat called POWER STAR who has several cheating cases against him, and a
habitual goonda called Varichiyur Selvam who too was reportedly awarded the same
doctorate. Varichiyur Selvam was detained not once or twice but several times under
preventive detention, and each time has managed to get out even without a habeas corpus.
Dr.Tamilvanan was greeted and felicitated by the judges, advocates and bar associations,
making a mockery of the Indian judiciary, and addressed as Dr.Tamilvanan in the official
cause list of the Madras High Court. This is not all about Tamilvanan. A formal written
complaint was preferred by his office staffer, alleging sexual assault by Tamilvanan, and the
High Court as an institution hushed it up by cautioning the victim about her career prospects
and remedying her, by transferring her out of Tamilvanans chamber.
27) Similar is the case with yet another judge by name Mr.Dhanabalan, who was working as a
telegraphic assistant in a full time job from 1976 to 88 and became a high court judge
claiming that he had done a full time law degree course between 1980 to 83. But despite
repeated & persistent complaints along with bounteous proof presented by none other than
a sitting judge of the Madras High Court, Sanjay Kaul not only ignored them but went to the
extent of joining hands with the accused judge. In an eccentric and sadistic act of retaliation,
Sanjay Kaul expressed total solidarity with Dhanapalan, rewarding him with plum portfolios
and helping him loot besides going to the extent of accompanying him to the Governor and
other dignitaries for various functions, thus conveying the message that Dhanabalan has his
complete blessings and support, and that he cannot be touched, no matter the forgery and
fraud. Similarly, when the complaint of Dhanabalans daughter-in-law alleging harassment,
dowry etc came up, Mr.Nagamuthu threw out a simple petition to register and investigate
her complaint. It is important to note that Dhanabalans son was promoted as a nonpractising lawyer, and allowed to loot without basic legal skills. A scrutiny of their assets and
IT returns will throw up an astronomical divide, and this boy had a cut-off limit. He could be
approached only for matters where the cutting is above 20 lakhs, for interim orders.
7|Page

8|Page
28) Another judge by name Justice B.Rajendran got himself felicitated by Sanjay Kaul, the bar etc,
as if he was APPOINTED as Regional Vice-Chairman of the CMJA (Commonwealth Magistrates
and Judges Association) based in London, and got this story to be published in all leading
newspapers of the city. As usual (similar to Tamilvanan) lawyers and bar associations felicitated
him, published pictures etc, and made it a gala affair. Sanjay Kaul conned the bar by saying
that, Rajendran got the recognition due to his knowledge, etc. Rajendran, in-turn fooled
us all by claiming that though there were at least 7 members from each country, only I
represented India. But surprisingly the Chief Justice of Canada nominated me which was
seconded by the Chief Justice of Sri lanka. The fact remains that CMJA is an association
which is registered as a charity in the UK, where one has to pay to even enroll as a member.
So the claim of appointment etc is pure humbug. This is the style followed by Prabakaran and
his guru namely Adish Agarwala, whereby they create such letter pad organizations and
invite judges for photo-ops & fool around with the public and governments, to earn money.
29) Similar is the case of another judge Mr.CT.Selvam who has been gracing functions and
playing guest to a fake Additional Director General of a bogus National Cyber Security
Council called Mr.Amar Prasad Reddy, a school drop-out. Besides, Selvam even appointed
this rascal to investigate a criminal complaint of woman harassment which was under
investigation by the state police. Even Sanjay Kaul as CJ of Punjab had written a letter of
appreciation honouring this cheat, and this fake ADG Amar has been using the letter to
deceive not only the public, but also bagging contracts etc, from various governments.
30) It is also alleged by a sitting judge of the Madras High that Justice Mr.ManiKumar had raped
an intern called Saraswathi (name changed) and that she had even borne a child out of the
rape. Instead of protecting young interns who are of their daughters age, and who are
appointed by the high court for learning and assisting the court, judges such as Manikumar
impregnate them, and get away. This judge Manikumar too is Sanjay Kauls favourite. I think
that the CJI should rehabilitate the victim and the baby, but dear brother Thakur, whether
you take on the rapist or not, depends on what legacy you wish to leave behind as CJI.
31) Similarly, even a former judge of the Madras High Court Shri.Ashok Kumar is alleged by a
leading former BBC journalist to have been an ex-convict. Yet he had been elevated to the
High Court, and the high court went hammer and tongs to defend him even as abundant
proof of his availing reservation benefits despite having converted to Christianity was
presented. If the IB can clear a convict, it simply means that even the IB (Intelligence Bureau)
is purchased by judges, so much so that your office viz. the CJI and the collegium is stumped
with FALSE reports even by the IB. From peons to judges, from state constabulary to IB, the
Chennai judiciary has corrupted everyone. The list of such Madras high court judges goes on
and on, but I wish to confine myself only to the tip of the ice-berg, since I would require
reams and reams of paper to pen down the entire picture.
32) While this is the state of affairs vis--vis the higher judiciary, selections to the lower judiciary
as well as appointment of District Judges has been even worse. The Brahmin coterie headed
by Mr.Ramasubramaniam ensured the total rigging of selection in District Judge
appointments, where a last minute addition or subtraction of a single mark or a couple of
marks made the difference between in and out. In a blatantly illegal manner 25 percent of
marks were set apart for the interview, and absolute favouritism ruled the roost,
compounded by the fact that several criminals were appointed as District Judges, with their
criminal antecedents having been suppressed in their application form itself, as well as by
securing a bogus police verification. It is even reported that the wife of Mr.Arivunithi (counsel
for Sundaresa Iyer, mentioned in para 12 above) was accommodated by Mr.Ramasubramaniam,
despite being absolutely ineligible on more scores than one. The criminals who were selected
and who are serving as District Judges were not only selected by suppressing their
antecedents, but even gave FALSE addresses on their applications to evade detection during
police verification. It is this man Mr.Ramasubramaniam, the author and architect of all this
rigging and fixing, who is moving around claiming that he is the future CJI, and there is no
denial of the fact of his relationship with the murder case accused namely the
Shankaracharyas of kanchi.
8|Page

9|Page
33) A scrutiny of several videos of police interrogation of the accused in the Sankararaman
murder case, and their contract-killers clearly betrays their might & clout, not only with the
political set-up, but also shows how judges of the Supreme Court had been queueing up to
them, and seeking favours. For the sake of decency, I am withholding release of most of
these tapes in the public domain, since several tapes recorded, recovered and seized during
investigations throw light not only on the misconduct of the religious functionaries but also
the politician-priesthood-judiciary nexus. It is to be borne in mind that the deceased
Sankararaman was more concerned about deterioration of the morals and values, and had
taken upon himself the task of exposing sexual sleaze. Since I do not intend to enter the
private lives of those who call themselves VVIPs, it is my endeavour to let sleazy bygones be
bygones, as they would not serve any useful purposes because almost all of them are retired
persons, and the damage they could have done to society can never be undone, and only
institutions of faith & governance will suffer an already deteriorating credibility. But I must
state (and even expose by publishing tapes) that, Mr.Appu the contract killer and his hooligans refer
to kanchi mutt as the Parliament on account of the fact several VVIPs used to have their
conclaves there, and it may not be out of place to see even sitting union ministers of 2015-16
bowing and sitting in darshan of the prime accused, who is still an under-trial. What is now
significant however is the role of the so-called parliament in deciding as to who makes it to
the judgeships of Madras high Court, since almost ALL those who aided them in the
telephonic transcript leak case which was probed by the cyber-crime cell, have been
recommended for elevation as High court judges. It is this criminalization of the bar and
bench (including prosecutorial-criminal nexus) at the altar of the clergy, that I am most
concerned about.
34) As soon as the brahminical quintette got rid of the writ petition seeking a disclosure of the
cyber-crime police report to be dismissed illegally, PN.Prakash and the quintette began their
sinister game of revenge. On 4.8.15, in Crl OP No 30502/14, in which my junior is the counsel
on record, PN.Prakash, deliberately pulled him up so as extract revenge upon me. This was a
case in which, a group belonging to a minority was attacked by a group of landgrabbers (who
had occupied their lands) in a village in Villupuram district. As soon as the injured victims got
admitted in hospital, the police brought the landgrabbers, (by applying red colour liquid (to
feign blood) on their own clothes) and admitted them also to the hospital. Police received a
complaint from the attackers branding the victims as aggressors and registered their case
and assigned it an earlier crime number. They organized the Public Prosecutor of Villupuram
namely Shri.PonSiva to move an anticipatory bail petition for the victims, and it was filed in
the name of the PPs junior, even without a single signature of any of the 7 petitioners. Even
the details of the petitioners such as age, etc were wrongly mentioned. At the hearing
(as deciphered by the eventual court order), the PP claimed that all the petitioners were minors,
and that the injured were discharged from hospital. The sessions judge who granted
anticipatory bail observed that although discharge from hospital does not warrant
anticipatory bail, he was still granting anticipatory bail. The PPs junior confronted the victims
with the bail (AB) order, and made them to surrender to comply with the conditions. Hence
my junior moved a petition (Crl OP) U/s 482 CrPC, seeking action for filing an anticipatory bail
petition without the knowledge of the petitioners. He sought action against the police, the
PP as well as the District Judge for these actions (impersonation, misrepresentation, forgery,
fraud, conflict of interest, etc) and the Crl OP was pending for nearly a year. As for the court
order, it was brought was brought to our knowledge that the District Judge does NOT pass
orders, but uses a

printed form, wherein his staff fill up the sections of law, and cause

title. That is how the order contained the statement regarding the minority (age) of the
petitioners, and discharge of victims has come about. The District judge had passed
hundreds and possibly thousands of such orders, without even adverting to the facts of each
case, or the arguments thereupon.
35) But, PN.Prakash started bullying my junior Shri.Mathan Kumar, and instead of taking action
against the District Judge and PP, prakash suo motu impleaded the junior of the PP
Shri.PonSiva, and secured an affidavit from him stating that he is a puritan etc. He also
bullied a high court staffer and secured a letter from him, stating that my junior had
threatened him to number this case.
9|Page

10 | P a g e

36) PN.Prakash called the illiterate petitioner Smt.Lakshmi and bullied her in open court, asking
her whether she wanted her bail to be cancelled, and whether she wanted to go to jail. All
these atrocities of PN.Prakash were time and again reported in writing to Chief Justice
Sanjay kaul, who kept promising that he would take action. Finally PN.Prakash passed an
order directing the bar council to take action against me and my junior for impleading the
District judge, and claimed that we wanted to keep a Damocles sword over his head, as he
was due for retirement etc. He also directed initiation of a suo motu criminal contempt
against us. PN Prakash went to the extent of quoting the intimidatory orders passed vis--vis
Padmas petition in the Sankararaman murder case. In fact during the hearing I exposed the
fact that due to such practices of the PP, even orders of the Supreme Court were forged as if
the Supreme Court had granted bail to convicts, and these FAKE-BAIL orders were used to
secure convicts out of Cuddalore jail. I also pointed out that, even after exposing these
frauds, although criminal cases were registered for forgery of the Supreme Court orders, no
action was taken, leading to continuance of such practices in bail matters. Thus, criminals
have been hopping in and out of jail on forged orders including those of the Supreme Court.
But PN.Prakash cunningly ignored all these aspects and had his revenge, damaging the
institutions of the judiciary beyond repair, with his fanciful and imaginary theories, instead of
ensuring that bail petitions are heard and decided properly instead of using printed forms to
pass orders. Any other judge would have taken action for forgery, fraud, impersonation,
committed by the PP and the cops, especially for filing a bail petition without the knowledge
of the petitioners. But Prakash avenged even the illiterate petitioner by cancelling her bail,
which she had never sought in the first place.
37) This was followed by another case (C.C.No.10717/2001, ACMM, Egmore), wherein the APP (Addl
Public Prosecutor) of the ACMM court Egmore, had dispensed with 83 witnesses in a case of
cheating involving a sum of Rs. 1.67 crores, collected from 87 persons. After examining 4
persons and settling their money, the APP and the judge closed the evidence and acquitted
the accused. Action was directed to be taken against the APP, but the judge was let off
because, he had retired. Similarly, in a case involving several hundreds of crores of rupees,
looted by one Vijayalakshmi & Rajendran of Udumalpet, with the connivance of the local
police, one Nachimuthu who lost 90 lakhs to the duo for a loan under a fictitious SC/ST
scheme, a case was registered in Cr No 35/13 of DCB Tiruppur. The accused was arrested, but
they were let-off on default bail, and not a penny was recovered. Several hundreds of people
were fooled due to police connivance, and when petitions were filed seeking transfer of
investigation, the public prosecutor Shanmugavelayudham,
(A) Not only declined to place the case diary before the court, as usual,
(B) He also fixed a criminal to negotiate with the victims and attempted to influence
the counsel through a criminal.
(C) He also filed a FALSE counter-affidavit by contacting a sub-ordinate official who
was not a party to the case, and the police-PP team prevented the recovery of case
properties, as well as,
(D) Concealed the complaints of hundreds of other victims.
(E) And also influenced the petitioner (through the respondent) to amend the prayer.
38) On

27.7.15, when I highlighted these aspects, and sought directions for a proper probe,

besides cancellation of bail granted to the accused, PN.Prakash, instead of probing the
veracity of the allegations, claimed that my office was consistently making such allegations
and directed the bar council to initiate disciplinary action against the counsel on record as
well as myself. By dismissing the petition on this score, PN.Prakash not only helped his good
friend Shanmugavelayutham (who had earlier helped him out in the Sankararaman murder case), but
also helped the accused to continue their loot of hundreds of crores. Not a word is uttered in
the judgment in Crl OP 28306/14, about what was argued, what was the response and so on.
Similarly not a word is uttered about the petition in Crl OP No 7278/15 being a bail
cancellation petition, except the prayer which was reproduced in the preamble to the order.

10 | P a g e

11 | P a g e
39) On the same day, in another petition bearing Crl OP No 27169/14, wherein implementation
of the Constitution Bench judgment of the Supreme Court (vis--vis registration of FIRs) was
sought, PN.Prakash claimed that the bar council rules were violated since we had averred
that The PP Sh.Shanmugavelayudham is duty-bound to place the entire records relating to
this case before the Honble court and cannot in his usual style avoid such placement in
defiance of the constitutional authority of this court. Citing this as illegal, PN.Prakash
directed the bar council to institute disciplinary action against another lawyer called Vinoth,
by claiming that he was my junior, and that I have been consistently making such allegations.
Not a word is uttered in the judgment about what was argued in court, in this case also.
40) On 14.8.15, PN.Prakash took up a set of 4 cases, pertaining to a TV journalist called
Panimalar, who was reportedly beaten up by her sister-in-law, who is also a TV news reader
cum part-time advocate. The incident happened in a mall, and it was alleged that the parttime lawyer intimidated judges to get bail etc. A series of allegations were leveled against
various persons including a judge called CT.Selvam, law-officers (of failing to act on a complaint of
obscenity depicting the Chief Minister), etc. The charges ranged from illegally usurping cases
assigned to other judges and favouring DMK persons including Ms.Kanimoli, (daughter of DMK
chief Mr.Karunanidhi) in the 2G case, connivance with a school dropout who claims to be an Addl
Director General, and involving this fellow in police investigations, etc. The allegations also
included theft of High Court records, forgery, fabrication, illegal access of mobile call records,
etc. No action was taken by the vigilance cell despite repeated complaints. Since allegations
were leveled against individuals, they were impleaded as parties so as to ensure that they
are offered a fair opportunity to defend themselves. But PN.Prakash not only directed the
bar council to institute disciplinary action, but also instituted criminal contempt proceedings,
once again without any rhyme or reason, solely on the ground that the PP, the AG & the
judge were impleaded as parties.
41) In yet another case in Crl OP No 6140/14, wherein the issue of FAKE-COURTS & FAKEJUDGES was directed by the Supreme Court, to be heard by the Madras High Court,
PN.Prakash without uttering a single word about what transpired in court, simply dismissed
the petition, stating that there were only GENERAL ALLEGATIONS and dismissed the
petition on

27.8.15.

This despite the pleading running into 17 pages, and 20

advertisements for FAKE-COURTS, 11 FAKE-JUDGMENTS & 7 complaints from victims,

besides notices, appeals, etc, totaling 160 pages, having been filed. So, it is clear that both
the Supreme Court as well as the High court is least interested in FAKE-COURTS being run
in this country, despite these courts claiming jurisdiction as being recognized by the
Government of India, and using sitting judges of the High court and even elderly former
judges of the Supreme Court and CJI as patrons, etc to gain legitimacy. In fact, photos of
former CJI Shri.PN.Bhagwati, & Justices Mohan, Tarun Chatterjee of the Supreme Court,
etc, were widely disseminated as patrons, to fool people into trusting these organizations.
PN.Prakash did not even have jurisdiction to hear the matter, since petitions in the nature of
Public Interest ought to be heard by a Division Bench, as per the rules of the court.
42) Lastly, in a case of alleged abduction and forcible bigamous marriage of the wife of one
Kumaresan, in Crl OP 28307/14, certain allegations were leveled against a woman inspector
Ms.Geetha, regarding disobeyal of the Constitution Bench judgment of Supreme Court
vis--vis registration of FIRs. The said Geetha reported in writing to the court that she had
conducted enquiry with the abductee (who is in France) over phone, and that the addresses
on the marriage certificates etc, are false. Shamelessly PN.Prakash ignored the fact that the
constitution bench judgment was violated even when he is seized of the matter, and also the
laughable fact that inspector Geetha examined an alleged abductee over phone. In this case
also, not a single word is uttered vis--vis arguments which took place in court, on either
side. He has extracted portions of the police reply, incorporated them in the judgment and
thrown out the petition. This was on 27.8.15.

11 | P a g e

12 | P a g e

43) In toto, as between 27.7.15 & 27.8.15, within a span of 1 month, PN.Prakash took up as
many as 6 cases, and instituted 2 criminal contempt proceedings and issued 4 directions to
the bar council to initiate disciplinary proceedings against me and my junior. In none of them
have arguments been recorded, or reasons assigned. Moreover in all these cases, he quotes
the observations made in the Sankararaman case bribe-tapes judgment, in which case, he
was my opposing counsel.
44) This was followed-up by a series of criminal contempt cases against any and every advocate
who dared to speak-up against corruption. 5 advocates of the Rameswaram bar had lodged a
vigilance complaint against their Judicial Magistrate, Mr.GN.SaravanaKumar, for notorious
corruption, alleging that between 10.6.14 to 6.12.14, he had without any admission petition
or appearance of accused, collected huge fine amounts, and embezzled them without issuing
receipt or accounting-for the money. In fact the judgments contain conviction details of the
FINE amount, as well as the receipt number for payment of fine, clearly pointing that the
judgments were fabricated, after collection of the fines.
45) But, instead of instituting a surprise check on the court, Sanjay Kaul and company instituted
criminal contempt proceedings against the complainant-advocates, without even informing
them of the charges under which they were proposed to be tried, and coerced them through
their stooge, Shri.Paul Kanagaraj (former President of the bar-MHAA) to file an affidavit of apology
and dropped the matter, solely to shield the corrupt magistrate. The said SaravanaKumar,
another eccentric fellow, had gone to the extent of seating pick-pockets & petty-criminals
who appear before him, in the seats meant for advocates, and these incidents are
documented on video.
46) Similarly when members of the Madurai bar went on a procession against judicial corruption
in Madurai town, their leaders namely AK.Ramasamy & Dharmarajan were summoned to the
principal bench at Chennai for alleged criminal contempt, where Chennai advocates led by
Shri.NGR.Prasad, and hundreds of others joined the protests. Instead of informing them what
they were charged-with, the bench comprising CT.Selvam and Tamilvanan (of the fake doctorate
fame) intimidated Ramasamy by questioning him about his alleged insolvency. Tamilvanan
tried to polarize the issue by getting a few fake-advocates belonging to a particular castegroup to implead as intervenors and even ordered police protection to them. When the
state police declined to declined to provide protection on account of their criminal activities
& antecedents, they were threatened with contempt and an affidavit of apology was
obtained from an IGP. Thus criminals are now roaming the streets and conducting their
trade in crime, with police guard.
47) Eventually after the bar leaders refused to apologise and demanded trial, a hearing was held
expending lakhs of rupees with giant TV screens installed in the court premises and telecast
live when the bench made a shameful recommendation namely TEMPORARILY SHUTTING
DOWN THE MADURAI BENCH. This goes to show that Sanjay Kaul is unable to run a small
bench of the High Court properly. If taken seriously, this means that there is a total
breakdown of the constitutional machinery. However the fact remains that a protest against
corruption was attempted to be avenged using the Contempt of Courts Act as an
intimidatory tool, which however failed.
48) Hence they (brahminical quintette comprising Sanjay Kaul, Sathish Agnihotri, Ramasubramaniam,
PN.Prakash & Vaidyanathan) evolved a new tool, by tying-up with the criminals namely
Prabakaran & Selvam, and got them to abuse their offices at the bar council by suspending
me and my junior, in what was euphemistically styled as a prohibitory order, restraining us
from practicing in any court of law, and gave wide publicity by issuing a press release and
intimating all court departments across the state. This was done knowing that it has no
sanction in law, both statutory and otherwise, and despite the Supreme Court clearly ruling
against such practice vide its judgment in (1998) 4 SCC 499. In other words Sanjay Kaul & his
brahmin company cares a damn for the Supreme Court of India, its wisdom, or supremacy
under the Constitution.
12 | P a g e

13 | P a g e
49) My suspension was immediately followed by the suspension of 14 advocates by the Bar
Council of India without any stated reason. All of them had protested corruption and taken
out a rally in Madurai city. But out of the 1000 odd lawyers, only 14 were chosen for
suspension, solely because several of them were instrumental in a series of litigations against
Prabakaran and his FAKE-ADVOCATE, FAKE-LAW-COLLEGE menace. Most interestingly,
pursuant to these suspensions, Sanjay Kaul snatched-away all these litigations vis--vis FAKEADVOCATES, pending in the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, and kept it in cold storage
in the principal bench at Chennai. In fact in one case, one of the few partly conscientious
judges of the Madras High Court called Mr.Kirubakaran had issued certain directions vis--vis
the rot in the bar councils. But Sanjay Kaul exercised the appellate jurisdiction of the
Supreme Court and stayed the order, at the bidding of Prabakaran & his partners in crime Yet another usurpation of the Supreme Court.
50) This was followed by suspensions of 10 more lawyers for protesting the non-implementation
of tamil as a court language. The fanatic Sanjay Kaul, retaliated by teaching tamils a lesson
or two, and brought in the CISF (hindi-speakers) under the guise of security, so as to
reportedly prevent TAMILS from entering the High Court. Lastly, yet another set of lawyers
numbering 8 were suspended for protesting against the deployment of CISF, in a campus
which saw police violence in 2009 including thrashing of several High Court judges.
Incidentally the brahmin quintette began using women as human shields, and procured
complaints from women to suspend these lawyers and institute multiple proceedings,
whereas the CISF personnels action which was originally protested was itself the
videographing of a woman lawyer. Judges of an independent India have stooped to such
pitiable levels of misusing women to achieve sinister designs. And this is not an isolated
incident, since there are precedents and repetitions of such claims, and victimization by the
Brahmin Taliban of the Madras High Court. Finally, the last set of 10 lawyers were suspended
for protesting inside the High Court campus when the contempt petition against the 2 bar
leaders was being heard. This protest was well documented on camera, and out of the 200
plus lawyers, Prabhakaran and Selvam singled out lawyers from Madurai most of whom were
again involved in litigations against his corrupt practices in the bar council especially vis--vis
permissions for fake law colleges and enrolment of FAKE-ADVOCATES. It is pertinent to
point-out that in all these cases, the leaders of the bar, were used as stooges to persuade
and deceive the affected lawyers into apologizing, etc. Shri.NGR.Prasad and several others
were intimidated into becoming turn-coats, with threat of suspension, since they were
themselves leaders of the protests and the same is well documented on multiple video clips.
Which Chief Justice other than Sanjay Kaul will shamelessly & schemingly leave-out the
leader of a protest and suspend his followers, and then blackmail the leader into betraying
the followers ? In order to avoid fraternal in-fighting I dont intend to release these videos
also in public domain, but shall produce them if required for enquiry.
51) Thus despite 44 lawyers being under illegal suspension in Tamilnadu for the past 5 months,
lawyers several FAKE-ADVOCATES who allegedly trespassed into the residence of the Chief
Justice Sanjay Kaul, and resorted-to, what is being termed as indecent behaviour, were not
suspended due to the nexus between Prabakaran, and Sanjay Kaul, and who were actually
attempting to grab land in a prime locality. Similarly Sanjay Kaul has awarded a free-run for
the FAKE-COURTS, FAKE-ADVOCATES, MURDERER-ADVOCATES, RAPIST-ADVOCATES,
EXTORTION-ADVOCATES, RACKETEER-ADVOCATES, and so on and so forth, not only
indirectly, but by direct participation in functions hosted by them, with titanic garlands, gifts,
etc. Even the most notorious bandits of contemporary India such as Sandalwood Veerappan
or Phoolan Devi could not command such privileges, from their followers. Till today, these
lawyers are looting the nation, with the blessings of Sanjay Kaul and the Brahmin quintette of
Ramasubramanian, PN.Prakash, etc, and their partners Prabakaran and Selvam. Justice
Nagamuthu, the pet shop boy of Sanjay Kaul quashed even attempt to murder cases against
the Prabakaran-Selvam duo by compounding them, notwithstanding that even the Registrar
General of the High Court had lodged those complaints. Not one judge outside of Tamilnadu
is capable of such unconscionable act, and no Chief Justice would dare to betray his Registrar
General if he was beaten-up in his chamber, by thugs & fake-advocates.
13 | P a g e

14 | P a g e
52) The Brahmin quintettes aim is to convert the Madras High Court into a brahmin court, in
which they have already succeeded, and to throw-out non-brahmins, from the judiciary. You
may evaluate their judicial orders, and not one of them would be based on reason. It is the
caste of the lawyer or the party which determines who wins the case. You will find the
strangest of reasonings (whenever reasons are given) which no common man can even
imagine of. Even the proceedings against the accused, who were secured aboard the
FLOATING-ARMOURY MV SEAMAN OHIO, comprising 35 crew, 35 fire-arms, 102 magazines
and 5682 ammunition was quashed by PN.Prakash, only to be overturned by the Supreme
Court. All cases of crimes committed by lawyers and all categories of heinous offences
committed by the rich and famous are quashed by PN.Prakash, whenever Paul Kanagaraj or
when any brahmin lawyer appears for the accused. The Supreme Court has no say in these
things, and nobody cares for orders of the Supreme court. Similarly the state authorities do
not care about the orders of the High Court due to the scant respect commanded by these
crooks, and Madras High Court leads the world in the number of contempt of court cases.
53) When I challenged my suspension, citing the law laid down by the Constitution Bench of the
Supreme Court in (1998) 4 SCC 409, Shri.Sathish Agnihotri and another judge called
Sasidharan whom I had held in very high esteem, were coerced into manipulating the
Constitution Bench judgment of the Supreme Court, and quoted an obiter therein and that
too devoid of any ratio, to deny revocation of suspension. In other words, Sanjay Kauls style
is to use the same weapon possessed by the opponent to defeat him through treachery and
deceit. No judge would shamelessly avoid the operative part of a Constitution bench
judgment (which was extracted by me in the written arguments) and extract an obiter from the same
to deny relief.
54) This is not the first time that this is happening. The Madras High Court had earlier passed a
judicial order excluding itself from the RTI. This is because of fabrication of records which the
High Court does NOT want to share, with the public, since it is the crime-centre of the state.
Several cases are decided on fabricated records, and once the task of securing orders is
completed the court records are destroyed without due orders for destruction. To that
extent, the order in the above case dated 3.11.15 in Sub- Application 828/15 in suo motu
contempt petition 1834/15 is yet to be issued to me, so as to prevent me from moving the
Supreme Court, whereas Sasidaran leaked the orders to various journalists from his chamber
e-mail Id, maintained by his PA.
55) This organized criminalization of the bench is not a solitary event. To give an example, when
the lottery baron called Martin was hounded by the Tamilnadu police, his brother-in-law who
was in hiding approached me stating that the Tamilnadu police was extorting him. Initially I
secured anticipatory bail, but the police could not digest it, and wanted to prevent him from
complying with the bail conditions. The IG who was the chief extortionist was stung and
caught on camera, and placed under suspension. However, when I moved a petition for
extension of time/relaxation of bail (I am unable to recollect) it was noticed that someone
else had already filed it in my case. So I was prevented from moving it, and resulted in a
deadlock. Enquiries revealed that a FAKE-ADVOCATE had done the mischief. When I lodged a
complaint in this regard I was informed that the then Chief Justice had directed
Mr.Nagamuthu, to conduct an enquiry and submit a report. But Nagamuthu was reportedly
silenced by unknown persons, and no action was taken.
14 | P a g e

15 | P a g e
56) This is not all. I am told that several life convicts, who had managed to come out on bail
pending disposal of their appeals, used to prevent the High Court orders from reaching the
police, in the event of the appeal failing. It is not known as to how many such convicts are
roaming free in the country. These stray incidents are only the tip of the ice-berg, and it
would require reams and reams of paper to disclose the real picture. However I shall cooperate with any inquiry, with all the materials, I place proof of the aforementioned claims.
The purpose of narrating the official and personal misconduct of various judges is not to
expose or shame them, but to make you realise the quality of the people whom you are
recommending and appointing as judges, especially vis--vis the Madras High Court, and to
prevent a repeat of such characters. Even as early as 2011, I rejected a request to sue
Sudhakar and his wife for a series of charges such as cheating, cheque-fraud and the like, all
because I was under a misconception that Sudhakar is incapable of such things. But now I
regret the said decision, as well as my inability to help the victims, based on an incorrect
assessment of Sudhakars character.
57) In so far as the Cyber-Crime report vis--vis the Sankararaman murder case is concerned, I
must add that it is a matter of record that the Tamilnadu Public Prosecutor
Mr.Shanmugavelayutham (Shunmugavelayutham) interfered in the Sankararaman murder
case at the behest of the accused, by deploying his sub-ordinate Mr.Maharaja to appear in
the Madras High Court on behalf of the prosecution, which was transferred out of Tamilnadu
and being conducted by the Puduchery government. When this contempt for orders of the
Supreme Court was pointed-out in writing, Shanmugavelayutham had the audacity to admit
that he took instructions from the CBCID DSP Mr.Veeramani to make submissions before the
High Court. Similarly, the Puduchery Public Prosecutor had written to me stating that the
Puduchery government has NOTHING to do with this case. So in effect, although the
Supreme Court had transferred the Sankararaman murder case to Puduchery, and although
the Supreme Court had issued a separate judgment stating that only Puduchery government
should prosecute the case, it is abundantly clear that it was the Tamilnadu government and
its prosecutors, who handled the case in connivance with defence counsel such as
PN.Prakash. That is why the prosecution intimidated all the witnesses including the family
members of the deceased, and all their complaints to the DGP etc, were ignored, in order to
make them turn hostile in the trial. The victims of crime were intimidated into silence, and
even the Governor of Pondicherry, who sanctioned the filing of an appeal against the
acquittal was thrown-out overnight. PN.Prakash still had a formidable difficulty to overcome.
Prior to the murder of Sankararaman, an attempt was made on the life of an auditor called
Mr.Radhakrishnan, believing that the exposes against the mutt were being done by the said
Radhakrishnan. This case remained undetected, till investigators stumbled upon the truth
while investigating the Sankararaman murder. This attempt to murder trial is still underway
in the Additional Sessions Court in Chennai, and they needed to overcome the same as well.
58) It must be borne in mind that all prosecutorial appointments including the present PP
Shanmugavelayutham, were rubber-stamped appointments, and even the appointment
manual of PPs is unavailable with the High court, which is to approve such appointments. It
is these very same PPs who decide who are the PPs for the other courts in the state and
rampant corruption and influence-peddling determines who become law officers, and the
High Court remains a mere post office. Resultantly PPs flourish in murder cases, economic
offences and the like, and give NO-OBJECTIONS even in minor girl rape-cum-murder cases. It
is well documented that Judges simply record these statements of PPs & let out criminals
on bail. But, when people and lawyers lamented and wrote to Sanjay Kaul, met him
desperately etc, the anti-people, pro-criminal, and mafia-friendly Chief Justice Sanjay Kaul,
ignored all such pleas, and permitted crimes and criminals to flourish. Examples abound, and
am consciously not listing them out for the sake of paucity, and witness-safety, but shall
furnish them during the enquiry. Similarly, with most of the judges having been elevated
from practice at the bar, FIXING-JUDGES, is rampant, and in bail petitions, successive bail
petitions are filed before different judges, with PPs being paid-off, not to object, even in
minor girl sexual offences, and let-off on bail, with a conducive judge playing ball, after
suppressing the pendency of other bail petitions, in the same court. These other petitions are
withdrawn once bail is secured from a FIXED-JUDGE. Even if there is still difficulty in getting
bail, the affluent ones can approach Sanjay Kauls favourites such as Shri.RC.Paul Kanagaraj
(A Narcotics lawyer & Ex-President of the HC bar) or the quack Prabakaran, who can go to
the extent of taking their bands of thugs, to the judge concerned, bully the judge to pass
orders, or even abduct remand prisoners from police vans parked inside the court campus.
15 | P a g e

16 | P a g e
59) Spitting on judges, assaulting judges, etc are rampant, so much so that as had been earlier
pointed-out, Prabakarans goons besieged the residence of Sanjay Kaul himself and
reportedly misbehaved with the inmates, pillaged the place, etc. While these activities
pertain to criminal matters, when it comes to education, most of the judges wield influence
with institutions, and favour unrecognized or errant institutions, so much so that Sanjay Kaul
threw out a PIL wherein it was alleged that a college had no infrastructure whatsoever.
However 3 teenage girls were murdered in the said institution for protesting the lack of
infrastructure, and the said college has now been sealed about a week ago. In any
investigation of this nature, Sanjay Kaul should have been added as an abettor-accused, but
for his official stature and legal technicalities he has not been so added. The same is the case
with another marine institution wherein Mr.Devadass a judge refused to come to the rescue
of a student who was ragged and brutalized, and fighting for his life, allegedly because a filmstar belonging to Devadass caste was the benamidar of the institution. Later, when the
matter came-up before PN.Prakash, he pulled-up the same PP Shanmugavelayudham for
registering an FIR upon the victims complaint, and misbehaved claiming that everyone is
afraid of me, etc. Similarly when a quack hotel management institution exploited students
with FALSE claims, and devoid of infrastructure, leading to the death of a student.
PN.Prakash threw out documented proof of fraud, so as to aid the criminals, to loot more
people. It must be recalled that all these things continue to happen in Tamilnadu, despite the
DD medical college scam, wherein over 100 students were deceived, when a known cheat in
the education sector issued full page ads claiming to run a 6000 crore medical college, and
collected huge sums for an MBBS course, even without a college. Everyone stayed mum and
eventually hundreds of students and parent who lost lakhs of rupees ended-up on the
streets, and the high court wasted not man-hours or man-days, but months of court-time
adjudicating these issues. Yet High Court judges continue to partake in functions organized
by educational institutions and the resulting nexus leads to issuance of judicial orders in
favor of fake institutions, leading to students being killed, quite literally. As already
mentioned, it is impossible to list out each case in this brief petition, but I shall furnish the
specifics during enquiry. Furthermore, huge crime-empires are patronized by the leaders of
the bar, such as Ex-President Paul Kanagaraj, Prabakaran etc, and bands of advocates (fake &
genuine), so much so that most of the property disputes are handled by them, including
khap-panchayat, intimidation, extortion, and possession etc. It is only disputes with lesser
value, that are heard and adjudicated by the Chennai City Civil Courts. It is in connection with
one such property dispute that Prabakarans boys ransacked Sanjay Kauls residence.
Similarly in connection with huge economic offences running into hundreds and thousands of
crores of rupees, these bands possess exclusive jurisdiction, from preventing and disbursing
hundreds of victims and driving them away from the police station, and threatening and
attacking them if they dare to enter court premises, and even preventing them from
instituting proceedings in the Madras High Court, the lawyer-gangs are well networked so
much so that even Sanjay Kaul is influenced to resort to silly habits such as preventing victims
from approaching the High Court, through the Registrar General of the Madras High Court
namely Kalayarasan, the author of the date of birth malpractice cum 20-crore bribe
intermediary in the Sankararaman murder acquittal. In every case involving hundreds of
crores and thousands of crores, these lawyers are not only indirectly involved, but they
themselves sit personally and operate the institution which commits the fraud. In other
words, most of these are operated by lawyers, and eventually when the bubble bursts they
obtain immunity not only because they are lawyers but by sheer mob-strength. The irony
remains that even in cases of paedophily and minor rapes, etc, despite the orders of
successive CJIs Sanjay Kaul and company have ensured a system of concealment of cases,
and indefinite non-listing of rape cases in particular through the Registrar General
Kalaiyarasan, so much so that even applications for certified copies of records are invariably
denied, because some influential lawyer is appearing for the accused, and is able to fend-off
such procurement of records, by sheer face-value. Sanjay Kauls connivance with crime and
criminals knows no bounds. For instance in a land matter valued at around 600 crores, the
trial judge was accused of issuing 4 different varieties of judgments for the same case, and
one was even issued prior to the issuance of the official copy to none less than the defendant
who happens to be a defendant. Alleging that this judgment was not only FIXED, but also
ghost-written, a vigilance inquiry was held. But the land-grabbers managed to influence
Kaul and his administration, so much so that although the records were shown to the
complainant, the court declined to issue copies under RTI. This was found fault with by the
CIC, and when directed to issue copies, Kauls sub-ordinates moved Kauls bench in violation
of the roster, and inspite of no STAY being granted, they lied to the CIC that there was a
STAY. Verification reveals that Kauls men somehow got a STAY later on, so as to protect the
land-grabbers. No other judge, leave alone a Chief Justice can stoop to such low levels as to
fabricate a STAY order, where none existed.
16 | P a g e

17 | P a g e
60) That is not the end of the story. While property matters, and economic offences in Chennai
city are monopolized and decided by gangs of lawyers and quacks belonging to the ranks of
Paul Kanagaraj and Prabakaran, the crimes against the body such as attempts to murder etc
are exclusively patronized by quashing them whenever Paul Kanagaraj or Prabakaran is
approached. Serial offenders, secure affidavits from victims, either forged or by coercion,
and secure quashments through PN.Prakash, who shamelessly secures money from the
hands of hooligans and pays it to victims not even in chambers, but in open court, and in
cash. Mortals facing lesser and even cooked-up charges have to struggle their way through
the maze of the judicial grind from magistracy to supreme court, hoping to see some light.
The frauds and malpractices thus galore, from MLMs to Mines and minerals, the Madras
High Court is a den of criminals, so much so that if it is shut down for a year, the crime rate in
the state would drop by 90 percent. As already stated, when several of these aspects were
analysed at length and directions were issued for reform of the bar councils etc, Sanjay Kaul
exercised the Supreme Courts appellate jurisdiction, and stayed them since it affected their
equations and economy. In fact the findings were based not only due to involvement of the
leaders of the bar in crime syndicates, but also due to the pumping of such ill-gotten wealth
in the bar council elections etc. A perusal of the telephone logs of Sanjay Kaul,
Ramasubramaniam and PN.Prakash would expose the nexus with the criminal-lawyers.
61) That, Sanjay Kaul is incapable of writing a judgment of a few pages, can be seen from the
judgments rendered by him in the past over one year. 99 per cent of his orders are less than
a single page in length, and almost all of them would be an abdication of duty rather than the
performance of a judicial function. He is such an indifferent person, that if you send someone
to observe him perform in open court, he would notice that even adjournment dates are
determined by his court clerk, and the clerk has the final word. In a building collapse case, at
a place called Mugalivakkam, Sanjay Kaul is yet to decide the case, after hearing it for over a
year, despite over 100 people dying in the illegal construction on a water-body. Similarly,
PILs in sensitive matters such as Indian fishermen being shot and killed by the hundreds
Koodankulam nuclear plant, etc are concealed from being listed for hearing, and without
admission (viz being listed even once) for years together, so as to please brahmin
sentiments. The nexus with his partners can be seen from the following criminal antecedents
of the bar leaders, with whom he poses & receives Himalayan garlands.
CRIMINAL CASES AGAINST Co-CHAIRMAN BCI Mr.PRABAKARAN
(1) B2 PS, Cr No 115/07, U/s 147, 341 IPC,
(2) B-4 PS Cr No 12/06, U/s 143, 147, 188 IPC, - Complaint of Justice Shri.M.Venugopal (then
Registrar General) who was attacked in his office by Prabakaran & Co.
(3) B-4 PS Cr No 26/04, u/s 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 307, 506(ii) IPC, - ATTEMPT TO MURDER,
inside the High Court Premises 3 DEADLY Weapons Seized & Accused caught RED-HANDED.
(4) B-4 P.S. Cr No 16/04 u/s 147, 323, 341 IPC,
(5) PRC.No.142/04, u/s 7 r/w 25(1-B) Arms Act.
(6) DGP office report dated 7/6/13 For ransacking the Tamilnadu DGPs office.

CRIMINAL CASES AGAINST CHAIRMAN BCT Mr.D.SELVAM

(1) B-4 PS Cr No 26/04, u/s 147,148, 341, 323, 324, 307, 506(ii) IPC, - ATTEMPT TO MURDER, inside
the High Court Premises 3 DEADLY Weapons Seized & Accused caught RED-HANDED.
(2) PRC.No.142/04, u/s 7 r/w 25(1-B) Arms Act.
(3) DGP office report dated 7/6/13 For ransacking the Tamilnadu DGPs office.
(4) B-2 P.S. Cr No 677/05 u/s 147, 323, 341, 427, 294(b) & 506(II) IPC, attacking the Bar Council
Secretary Mr.Dakshinamurthy, and complaint secured from hospital bed.

62) The following is a tentative list of L&O offences involving advocates, which were published,
i. Advocate A.M.Mohan, an accused in 2 murder cases has been detained under
the Goonda's Act on 2.9.2015 for having murdered one Alwar on 25.7.2014 in
Tanjore and one Abineshababu on 30.7.2015 in Chengalput.
ii. Advocate Kalaiselvan, from Madurai and Advocate Muthiah, from Coimbatore,
who are advocates committed triple murder on 27.8.2015 at Chintamanipudur
Signal, in Coimbatore.
iii. Advocate C.Stalin, a lawyer was beaten to death by a rival group of Advocates
after Egmore Bar Association elections in January 2015.
iv. Mr.Ranganathan, an Advocate, was murdered by another Advocate PonMuthuramalingam in Sivaganga Court Campus in daylight on 7.8.2015.

17 | P a g e

18 | P a g e
v. Advocate M.K.Raja, who himself was an accused in the murder of one
Selvakumar, was murdered by a gang near Kumbakonam, on 3.4.2015.
vi. S.Kamesh, an Advocate was shot down by his client and history sheeter
Easwaran in conspiracy with one Advocate Selvam, near Maduranthakam on
6.09.2015.
vii. Advocate Jamal Mohammed, was murdered on 7.9.2015 in a bar in
Chithayankottai, Dindigul.
viii. Advocate Sounder, was murdered by his friend who conducted Kangaroo Court
in a booze party on 28.08.2014 in Kilpauk, Chennai.
ix. Advocate Shanmugam, from Sankarapuram, who was an accused in four
cases including a murder case in Crime No.293/2012 Chinnaselam Police
Station was murdered by a gang in Kallakurichi on 13.09.2014.
x. Advocate Muthu Durai, who was said to have murdered his clerk Shanmugam,
was murdered on 08.08.2014 in Thiruppalai, Madurai.
xi. Mr.K.Tamil Anban was murdered in Thillai Nagar, Kovai Pudur on 20.1.2015.
This criminal having many cases was studying LLB through correspondence
course in a Bangalore College.
xii. Advocate Nithiyanandan, was murdered on 23.1.2014 in Chennai due to rivalry
regarding sand quarrying and previous enmity.
xiii. Advocates Basil and William murdered Dr.Subbiah attached to Billroth
Hospital, Abiramapuram, Chennai on 14.9.2014.
xiv. Advocate Rajinikanth (co-accused of Prabakaran & Selvam) was murdered by
another group of advocates in Egmore Court Campus, Chennai on 22.2.2008.
xv. Advocate Lakshmanan, stabbed one Mary regarding an illicit affair on
13.9.2014 in Arakkonam.
xvi. Advocate D.P.Kamaraj, who conducted Kangaroo Courts was murdered on
28.08.2014.
xvii. 3 advocates, Raja, Subramani & Gurumurthi, after consuming liquor in the
Court Campus, attacked another advocate Ambed Kumar with a knife inflicting
grievous injuries in October, 2013 in Egmore Court Campus.
xviii. Advocate Asaithambi, was arrested on 26th December, 2014 in connection
with robbery of 3 kilogram gold from a jeweller in Kancheepuram District.
xix. Advocate Mathialagan, Woraiyur, who used to conduct Kangaroo Court was
murdered on 05.05.2014.
xx. Mr.Manigandan @ Jahirmani, was murdered on 22.2.2014. He was involved in
many anti-social activities including a murder case under Section 302 IPC in
Crime No.451 of 2007 on the file of Koodal Pudur Police Station, Madurai and
after getting bail, he joined LLB course in Bangalore.
xxi. Another advocate was murdered in Salem in 2014 in connection with silver
robbery.
xxii. 3 Advocates M.Mukesh Sharma, K.Manisekaran & Balamurugan murdered
one Muthu Pandi on 18.09.2014.
xxiii. Advocate Saravanaperumal, murdered one Subbiah on 08.03.2011 in
Thetchanallur, Tirunelveli.
xxiv. 5 Advocates were murdered in Tamilnadu and they were themselves accused in
many criminal cases including murder in August 2014 alone.
xxv. Advocate Joseph Jayaseelan, who is a history-sheeter and detained under
Goonda's Act got enrolled as an advocate in 2013 (enrolment No.1305 of 2013).
xxvi. Advocate Karmegam, who is an accused in Crime No.78 of 2010, Central
Crime Branch, Madurai, got enrolled as an advocate in 2013 (No.1319/2013).

18 | P a g e

19 | P a g e
xxvii. Robbery of jewellery in Madurai was said to have been committed by a person,
alleged to be an advocate in 2014.
xxviii. Advocate Vijayanand, was a murder accused in the murder of one
Thangapandian, in 2006, in Madurai and he came out on bail and obtained LLB
degree from Karnataka and he was arrested in September, 2014 for land
grabbing.
xxix. Advocate Sridar, from Vellore, attacked a constable with iron rod in June, 2014
in Chennai.
xxx. An Advocate attacked the trainee Doctors of Government Hospital in Tirunelveli,
September, 2013.
xxxi. Advocate Sanjeevikumar, committed robbery along with others in Omalur Salem
District on 29.3.2015.
xxxii. A group of lawyers were said to have ransacked MKB Nagar Police Station,
Chennai on June, 2014.
xxxiii. A group of lawyers attacked Municipality staff at Kumbakonam, in June, 2013.
xxxiv. On 18.3.2014, A group of lawyers beat up one Pandi, Inspector of Police, in the
Human Rights Commission.
xxxv. Advocate Raja and one Premkumar, a law college student, in an inebriated
condition, were attacked doctors in Stanley Medical College Hospital.
xxxvi. A group of lawyers beat up one Thangaraj an Inspector of Police, in the Madras
High Court premises.
xxxvii. A group of lawyers attacked several litigants on several occasions in the family

courts in Chennai.
xxxviii. A group of lawyers spat on the face of the magistrate and beat him up in
Saidapet in Chennai, for refusing bail to a client.
xxxix. In March, 2015, Mr.Doraisami, a retired bank official from Lakshmi Vilas Bank
was kidnapped for ransom by a gang led by Mr.Arul, a Law College student,
pasting an advocate Sticker in the car used for kidnapping, to escape the police.
xl. Advocates Elango & Ali Siddick are having 14 & 7 criminal cases each to their
credit, when they were enrolled recently.
63) Yet, not 1 of these 40 advocates have been suspended. These L&O (Law & Order) offences
are only the tip of the ice-berg, and do NOT include property offences, such as land-grabbing,
and economic offences, which are their mainstay and which are the most lucrative. In fact,
the Tamilnadu DGP had presented a list of over 1500 criminal cases of the latter category to
Mr.Kirubakaran, a judge of the Madras High Court as early as 2012, but Kirubakaran has
secreted the same, and Sanjay Kaul has prevented any action on the list, out of FEAR & in
FAVOUR of Paul Kanagaraj and Prabakaran. The disclosures began with the case of one
R.Sathish whose shop called Sun Ceramics was evicted by an advocate team headed by one
Raja, and when a case was moved as Crl OP 31665/12.
64) In 2014 & 2015, there has been a spurt in these activities since both PN.Prakash and
Vaidyanathan handle criminal cases, Agnihotri & Sanjay Kaul head the top appellate benches
of the High Court, and Ramasubramaniam holds the Bar council portfolio.
65) In other words, the entire, crime & law portfolios are cornered away by the brahminical
quintette, and the crime empire in the state is at their disposal, so much so that even a
lawyer called Peter Ramesh Kumar a President of the Madurai bar has appealed for
protection to his life from this cartel headed by Ramasubramaniam. It is pertinent that Paul
Kanagaraj had himself personally visited the 3rd floor flat of the Vice-President of the Madras
Bar, Shri.Gini Liew Manuel and thrown him on to the road from the balcony, his head facing
the ground. Fortunately Gini survived the fall, after a week at the ICU.

19 | P a g e

20 | P a g e
66) Coming back to the core issue, it has now been disclosed from reliable sources that the
cyber-crime probe had ascertained that the taped bribe-conversation was not between A1
Shankaracharya and trial-judge Ramasamy. There are good reasons to believe that judge
Ramasamy was impersonated by a larger-than-life lobby, possibly including the criminals
themselves for 2 purposes, namely to first collect bribes by claiming to be Ramasamy, and
once the bribery fructified, to remove Ramasamy by revealing the tapes, and claiming that
Ramasamy had received the bribes. I cannot disclose the sources, in this communication
since their lives are at risk. But what is more significant is that, the High Court as an
institution covered-up for these larger-than-life persons, and continues to cover up, till date.
67) In other words, it is a case of hitting two mangoes with one stone, but what is nauseating is
that in order to remove an honest or non-amenable judge, an audio-conversation was
fabricated, peddled, and sought to be probed, and once the judge was removed, a pliable
judge was brought in, bribed again, and en masse acquittal obtained. In the process of
covering-up the cyber-crime report, several names were sullied. The journalist who was close
to Prabakaran, who gave me the audio-clip, and who was following up on the story by
publishing it in the newspapers, suddenly backed-off once the transfer of Ramaswamy was
effected. He then dissuaded me from pursuing it by using the names of various high court
judges including Shri.Mohanram etc, as being behind the cover-up of the cyber-crime report.
He also assigned various reasons, (including that both Mohanram & Ramasamy were both
Naidus a caste) although it took me a lot of convincing to believe such stories. I do not now
wish to publicly name the rest of the judges since I now know that they remained true to
their sterling reputations, and that the journalist is a liar & a crook, who has incorporated
Prabakarans name in every other article that he has written thus far, in both the leading
newspapers that he has thus far worked-for.
68) What is more important is that, I now know even who were the persons who impersonated
the trial judge Ramasamy, and the other individuals who partook in the bribe telephonic
conversation, and also the identity of the person for whom it was done, (as per the cyber-crime
report & even beyond).

But how much money changed hands, in total, and through whom,

remains a mystery. So, in order to help the Kanchi Shankaracharya secure an acquittal, a
drama was enacted, and the image & reputation of judge Ramasamy and a host of other high
court judges was allowed to be compromised (as being corrupt), solely to remove judge
Ramasamy who was non-compliant & a non-conformist. And the centrifugal force in the
entire bribe-for-acquittal tapes episode remains Captain Prabakaran & his inner ring. If the
conversationalists are arrested, and probed, the trail would lead much beyond Prabakaran.
69) You must bear in mind, that I had already referred to don Appus conversation describing the
Kanchi mutt as PARLIAMENT. It is now imperative to decipher the role of this parliament in
determining who the future judges of the Madras High Court are. The list proposed by Sanjay
Kaul when he assumed office included 3 names Shri.MV.Muralidaran, Shri.Authinathan and
Shri.Kalaiyarasan, all three of whom were involved in abetting the prime accused
Shankaracharya in the bribe-for-acquittal tapes. It is for these (and other persons)
determined by the Kanchi Shankara mutt, that Sanjay Kaul had been battling all along, and
failed - to get them appointed. It is the present endeavour of the Brahmin quintette that the
Chennai judiciary should be dumped with people owing allegiance to the Kanchi mutt. I can
even play video-tapes showing how Supreme Court judges prostrated before the accused
Shankaracharya for petty favours.

20 | P a g e

21 | P a g e
70) In case, you still do not know the might of the accused Shankaracharyas, you will have a feel
of things if I disclose a few more facts. After change in government in 2006, the sole
approver Mr.Ravi Subramaniam turned hostile, and yet, a petition was moved by the PP
before the trial court for recall of the pardon granted to the approver as per section 308 CrPC
(Crl MP 668/10). Since this action warrants the approval of the High Court, it is still kept in
cold storage even after 6 years, and even after the trial has ended. It is reported that fraud
was played to FIX a judge to get him out on bail, and it is a pastime of the rich brahmin
advocates, to FIX JUDGES who do not possess jurisdiction (portfolio) and obtain orders in
their favour. I even preferred a list of such FIXED-CASES and sought an explanation, in vain.
As recently as last year, the approver Ravi Subramaniam wrote to the Chief Minister that he
was intimidated into turning hostile, but no action was taken. In fact, the Governor of
Puduchery, who had sanctioned the filing of an appeal in the Sankararaman murder case,
was thrown out overnight, literally. In other words, by acting on this representation, you
might even be afraid of what might happen to you if you dare take on the Brahmin mafia.
The answer to that depends on what legacy, you choose to leave behind, as CJI of an infested
judiciary of this great nation, which was built on the blood and toil of its martyrs.
71) The entire drama of suspending 44 lawyers, etc, is to drive terror into the rest of the
fraternity so that the brahminical quintette can have its way in appointing judges to the
Madras High Court, and thence convert the democratic state into a state run by the judiciary,
or in the least, a crime empire totally run by the judiciary (which is now confined to Chennai city
alone).

In other words, your collegium receives selection lists from the collegium of

criminals conclaved at the Kanchi Sankara mutt. To that extent, if there is any semblance of
perceivable justice left in the Supreme Court, it should order a full disclosure of the cybercrime police report, and probe the atrocities of the brahmanical quintette so far. The Bar
Council Chairman Mr.Selvam has been assured of judgeship by Sanjay Kaul, notwithstanding
his mere matriculation qualification, leading to the arbitrary suspension of the lawyers who
challenged the corruption, and legal immunity extended to the murderer-extortionist
lawyers.
Hence you are requested to put an end to these organized-crimes, especially the
FAKE-ADVOCATES, FAKE-JUDGES, FAKE-COURTS, CRIMINAL-JUDICIARY NEXUS, etc, by ordering a
comprehensive in-house or open inquiry vis--vis the aforementioned allegations, and in the
interregnum, reinstate all 44 advocates in Tamilnadu, who are illegally placed under suspension for
the past 6 months, in contravention of the law laid down by the Supreme Court, and protect them
from further retribution by the robed-mafia.
REGARDS
Sd/V.Manikandan
13.2.2016

21 | P a g e