Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(Part
1)
Health
Problem
Birth
defects,
low
birthweight,
and
preterm
labor
are
important
factors
that
affect
overall
infant
health.
Birth
defects
are
serious
health
conditions
that
are
present
at
birth
which
can
change
the
shape
or
function
of
one
or
more
parts
of
the
body.
Birth
defects
can
cause
problems
with
overall
health
over
time
and
causes
issues
with
the
way
the
body
is
developed
and
how
the
body
functions
(Birth
Defects,
2015).
According
to
The
March
of
Dimes
global
report,
each
year
an
estimated
7.9
million
children
are
born
with
a
serious
birth
defect
from
genetic
and/or
partially
genetic
origins
(Christianson,
Howson,
&
Modell,
2006).
This
accounts
for
nearly
6
percent
of
total
births
worldwide.
In
the
Unites
States,
1
in
every
33
babies
born
are
affected
by
birth
defects.
This
translates
to
approximately
120,000
babies
affected
by
birth
defects
each
year
(The
Centers
for
Disease
Control
and
Prevention,
2014).
According
to
the
State
Center
for
Health
Statistics,
in
2010
there
were
4,446
babies
born
with
birth
defects
in
North
Carolina
(NC
SCHS,
2010).
Birth
defects
accounts
for
approximately
20
percent
of
all
infant
deaths
in
the
United
States,
which
makes
it
one
of
the
leading
causes
of
infant
mortality
(Matthews
&
MacDorman,
2012).
Some
common
birth
defects
are
heart
defects,
cleft
lip
and
cleft
palate,
hearing
loss,
and
spina
bifida.
Additionally, in relation to birth defects posing serious health issues for babies, low
birthweight
is
also
an
important
health
problem.
Low
birthweight
babies
are
defined
as
being
born
weighing
less
than
5
pounds
and
8
ounces.
In
the
United
States,
low
birthweight
babies
account
for
1
in
every
12
babies
born
(Low
Birthweight,
2015).
The
two
main
causes
of
low
birthweight
are
premature
birth
and
fetal
growth
restrictions
(Low
Birthweight,
2015).
Preterm
labor
is
labor
that
begins
before
37
weeks
of
pregnancy
(Preterm
Labor
&
Premature
Birth,
2015).
Approximately
1
in
12
babies
born
in
the
United
States
are
born
prematurely
(Low
Birthweight,
2015).
Babies
born
in
preterm
labor
are
at
an
increased
risk
for
health
problems
and
long
term
health
effects
such
as
problems
affecting
the
brain,
lungs,
and
vision.
Fetal
growth
restriction,
or
growth-restricted,
is
defined
as
a
baby
that
has
not
gained
the
weight
it
should
during
birth
(Low
Birthweight,
2015).
Fetal
growth
restriction
can
be
due
to
the
weight
of
the
parents
(lower
weight)
or
due
to
complications
during
the
pregnancy
which
slowed
or
stopped
the
growth
of
the
baby
such
as
an
infection
(Low
Birthweight,
2015).
The risk factors that increase the chances for birth defects and low birthweight babies can
be
a
combination
of
factors
including
genetics,
environmental,
and
lifestyle
behaviors
(Facts
about
Birth
Defects,
2014).
The
causes
of
some
birth
defects,
such
as
genital
and
urinary
tract
defects,
remain
unknown
and
further
research
is
still
needed
in
these
areas.
Chronic
health
conditions
such
as
hypertension
and
diabetes
are
medical
risk
factors
that
increase
the
chances
of
preterm
labor
and
low
birthweight.
Negative
lifestyle
behaviors
such
as
smoking,
alcohol,
and
drug
use
can
strongly
increase
the
chances
of
preterm
labor
resulting
in
birth
defects
and/or
low
birthweight.
According
to
the
American
College
of
Obstetricians
and
Gynecologists,
smoking
can
increase
the
risk
of
a
low
birthweight
baby
by
20
percent
(ACOG,
2013).
Other
risk
factors
include
heredity
or
having
someone
in
the
family
who
has
a
birth
defect,
pregnancy
that
occurs
younger
than
17
or
older
than
34,
and
improper
weight
gain
during
pregnancy.
According to The March of Dimes website, the organization was founded during the era of
World
War
II
in
1938
by
Franklin
D.
Roosevelt,
originally
named
The
National
Foundation
for
Infantile
Paralysis
(NFIP).
The
purpose
of
the
organization
was
to
fight
the
rising
polio
epidemic
that,
at
the
time
did
not
have
a
cure.
Basil
OConnor,
the
organizations
first
president,
assisted
in
running
the
organization
and
creating
a
network
of
local
chapters
to
raise
funds
to
support
polio
research
and
to
deliver
aids
to
those
affected
by
the
virus.
During
this
time
more
than
3,100
county
chapters
were
established
in
the
United
States.
The
March
of
Dimes
became
the
title
for
the
organizations
yearly
fundraising
events
in
support
of
research.
In
1946,
Franklin
D.
Roosevelt
was
memorialized
on
the
United
States
dime
(A
History,
2010).
In
1954,
Dr.
Jonas
Salk
created
the
polio
vaccine.
After
the
Salk
vaccine
was
licensed
for
use,
it
resulted
in
a
rapid
decline
of
polio
(Salk
Institute
for
Biological
Studies,
2015).
After
accomplishing
its
original
mission
to
cure
polio,
the
organizations
choice
was
to
continue
to
focus
on
disabilities
and
disorders
occurring
in
infancy
and
childhood.
Under
the
direction
of
Basil
OConnor,
the
organization
then
shifted
its
new
mission
to
birth
defects
prevention
in
1958.
In
1976,
the
NFIP
changed
its
name
to
The
March
of
Dimes
Birth
Defects
Foundation.
The
focus
of
the
organization
then
shifted
to
research,
prevention
of
birth
defects,
and
reducing
premature
and
low
birthweight
babies
(A
History,
2010).
Search strategies employed to locate this information included searching peer reviewed
journals
and
respected
sources.
Using
keywords
and
phrases
such
as
birth
defects,
low
birthweight,
preterm
birth,
incidence/prevalence,
polio,
and
The
March
of
Dimes
history
were
reviewed.
These
search
strategies
were
used
to
find
history
and
evidence
in
identifying
a
health
problem
and
non-
health
problem
related
to
The
March
of
Dimes
Foundation.
Non-Health
Problem
The March of Dimes regional coordinators are responsible for conducting Provider
Education
trainings
in
their
specified
region
throughout
the
year
for
the
North
Carolina
Preconception
Health
Campaign.
Those
who
participate
in
the
Provider
Trainings
are
doctors
and
healthcare
workers.
Participants
who
complete
the
trainings
receive
free
continuing
education
credits.
The
Centers
for
Disease
Control
and
Prevention
(CDC)
has
developed
10
recommendations
aimed
to
improve
the
health
of
women,
men,
and
couples,
before
conception
of
a
pregnancy.
The
March
of
Dimes
Provider
Education
trainings
are
centered
on
6
of
the
10
CDC
(2014)
recommendations.
The
6
recommendations
are:
1)
Individual
Responsibility
across
the
Lifespan,
2)
Consumer
Awareness,
3)
Preventative
Visits,
4)
Interventions
for
Identified
Risks,
5)
Interconception
Care,
and
6)
Pre-Pregnancy
Check-ups
(Johnson,
Posner,
Biermann,
&
Cordero,
2006).
After discussion of the Provider Education Trainings with Brenda Stubbs (2015), Triad
Regional Director, she stated that participants receive an evaluation form upon completion of the
training
that
is
used
to
determine
strengths,
weaknesses,
and
improvements
for
future
training
sessions.
Following
the
immediate
evaluation,
there
is
no
formal
follow
up
evaluation
completed
with
participants
who
received
the
training
to
determine
if
the
information
covered
in
the
training
session
is
used
as
it
was
intended.
Due
to
The
March
of
Dimes
being
a
fairly
small
organization
in
North
Carolina,
the
organization
may
not
have
the
capacity
to
conduct
an
in-depth
follow
up
evaluation
with
providers.
A
subsequent
evaluation
would
be
critical
in
determining
the
effectiveness
of
the
provider
training
programs.
The
non-health
problem
to
be
addressed
during
my
internship
is
the
lack
of
a
formal
evaluation
of
the
Provider
Education
trainings.
Relevance
to
the
Organization
The specified health and non-health problems, birth defects and lack of a formal evaluation,
are
two
very
important
and
relevant
issues
to
The
March
of
Dimes
organization.
As
mentioned
previously,
the
current
mission
and
focus
of
The
March
of
Dimes
is
preventing
and
decreasing
birth
defects,
preterm
labor,
low
birthweight
babies,
and
the
overall
prevention
of
infant
mortality.
The
goals
of
the
March
of
Dimes
North
Carolina
Preconception
Health
Campaign
(NCPHC)
are
to
reduce
infant
mortality,
birth
defects,
premature
birth,
and
chronic
health
conditions
in
women,
while
also
aiming
to
increase
intended
pregnancies
in
North
Carolina
(About
the
March
of
Dimes,
2012).
In
communication
with
Brenda
Stubbs
and
Kweli
Rashied-Henry
(2015),
NC
Coordinator,
both
expressed
the
need
for
a
formal
follow
up
evaluation
of
the
Provider
Education
training
program.
Kweli
Rashied-Henry
stated
that
concrete
data
from
evaluations
following
the
Provider
Education
trainings
would
greatly
benefit
the
organization
because
there
is
no
current
data
supporting
that
the
information
from
the
program
is
beneficial
and
useful.
The
SWOT
analysis
listed
below
examines
the
initial
thoughts
and
ideas
for
addressing
the
health
and
non-health
issues.
Strengths
An
evaluation
tool
is
currently
used
to
collect
feedback
from
Provider
Training
participants.
Therefore,
providing
information
to
begin
a
thorough
follow-up
evaluation.
The
current
evaluation
tool
can
be
used
to
determine
the
needs
for
the
follow-up
evaluation.
Weaknesses
There
has
not
been
a
formal
follow-up
evaluation
completed.
No
one
is
currently
addressing
the
follow-up
evaluation
issue
for
Provider
Trainings
in
NC.
The
current
evaluation
tool
may
not
be
electronic
which
could
be
a
time
consuming
process.
Opportunities
Developing
an
in
depth
evaluation
that
could
be
used
to
improve
the
quality
of
the
Provider
Education
training
program.
Developing
partnerships
between
The
March
of
Dimes
and
providers
to
increase
educational
materials
that
are
presented
in
the
trainings
which
would
potentially
develop
the
program
and
organization.
Providing
a
blueprint
evaluation
tool
that
could
be
used
for
future
follow
up
evaluations.
Potential
growth
of
the
organization
to
hire
an
internal
evaluator
to
conduct
evaluations
for
Provider
Trainings
for
NC.
Threats
Failing
to
produce
an
adequate
evaluation
due
to
lack
of
response
from
Provider
Training
participants.
Not
receiving
the
initial
evaluation
information
to
determine
factors
that
should
be
addressed
in
the
follow-up
evaluation.
Lack
of
financial
resources
to
conduct
an
evaluation
for
all
Provider
Trainings
throughout
NC.
Risk
of
not
reaching
all
Provider
Training
participants
within
the
specified
time
period
to
collect
the
data.
Ethical
Analysis
Ethical
concerns
associated
with
this
evaluation
are
cultural
and
socioeconomic
barriers
which
would
affect
patients.
CDC
preconception
health
recommendations
such
as
individual
responsibility
across
the
lifespan
and
preventative
visits
may
be
an
underlying
issue
for
patients.
Cultural
barriers
could
interfere
with
the
dietary
consumption
of
Folic
Acid
but
this
issue
may
not
be
addressed
through
providers.
Socioeconomic
factors
such
as
transportation
and
income
could
prevent
patients
from
making
preventative
visits.
Other
ethical
issues
may
become
apparent
after
conducting
the
in-depth
evaluation.
If
ethical
concerns
are
discovered
during
the
internship
evaluation,
it
will
be
presented
through
the
evaluation
presentation.
(Part
2)
This
section
will
be
used
to
further
analyze
the
health
problem
and
non-health
problem.
The
approach
to
analyzing
the
health
problems
of
birth
defects,
low
birth
weight,
and
premature
birth
is
to
look
at
the
issues
in
a
broad
sense.
Analyzing
the
non-health
problem,
lack
of
evaluation,
will
provide
a
link
between
the
health
problems
and
non-health
problem
to
provide
a
more
in-
depth
understanding
of
the
follow
up
evaluation
when
beginning
the
internship.
A
conceptual
model
was
developed
to
create
a
graphic
representation
of
these
issues,
which
forms
the
connections
and
relationships
of
these
causal
factors
affecting
the
health
and
non-health
problems.
The
first
three
phases
of
PRECEDE-PROCEED
was
used
as
a
guide
to
analyze
the
health
problem.
The
conceptual
model
is
seen
below.
Problem
Analysis
The
first
phase
of
PRECEDE
consists
of
social
assessment
and
situational
analysis.
These
components
involve
assessing
the
overall
high
priority
problems
and
an
overall
scan
of
determinants
and
resources
(Cottrell,
2012).The
conceptual
model
is
read
by
beginning
on
the
far
right
with
birth
defects
and
low
birth
weight,
which
are
the
overall
health
problems
that
are
covered
within
the
mission
of
The
March
of
Dimes.
Phase
two
consists
of
epidemiological
assessment
which
is
an
assessment
of
the
extent
and
causes
of
the
health
problems
(Cottrell,
2012).
As
previously
mentioned,
the
causes
of
some
birth
defects
result
from
genetics
and
heredity
(Centers
for
Disease
Control
and
Prevention,
2015).
According
to
the
CDC
(2015),
having
someone
in
the
family
who
has
a
birth
defect
could
increase
the
risk
during
pregnancy.
Age
is
also
a
factor
because
the
risk
of
birth
defects
and
low
birth
weight
are
increased
when
pregnancy
occurs
in
women
younger
than
age
17
and
older
than
age
34
(CDC,
2015).
As
seen
in
the
conceptual
model,
genetics
and
heredity
can
directly
lead
to
birth
defects
and
low
birth
weight.
Additionally,
age
which
is
a
genetic
factor,
can
increase
the
risks
of
preterm
labor
which
results
in
premature
birth.
Preterm
labor
is
labor
that
begins
before
37
weeks
of
pregnancy
(Preterm
Labor
&
Premature
Birth,
2015).
Babies
born
in
preterm
labor
are
at
an
increased
risk
for
health
problems
and
long
term
health
effects.
Thus,
as
seen
on
the
conceptual
model,
preterm
labor
has
a
direct
connection
to
low
birth
weight
which
in
turn
could
also
result
in
birth
defects.
These
factors
are
important
to
consider
when
analyzing
the
overall
health
problems,
but
will
not
be
addressed
during
the
internship.
Phase three of the PRECEDE planning model is educational and ecological assessment. This
phase
assesses
factors
that
predispose,
enable,
and
reinforce
behaviors
as
well
as
assessing
social
and
physical
environment
factors
that
influence
behaviors
to
produce
health
effects
(Cottrell,
2012).
As
illustrated
on
the
conceptual
model,
barriers
to
prenatal
care
have
a
direct
connection
to
birth
defects
and
low
birth
weight.
Barriers
to
prenatal
care
are
also
linked
to
premature
birth.
One
of
the
most
important
steps
in
ensuring
a
healthy
pregnancy
is
obtaining
early
and
accurate
prenatal
care.
According
to
the
Maternal
and
Child
Health
Bureau
(2013),
in
2009-2010
within
a
thirty
state
area
17.2
percent
of
pregnant
women
reported
that
they
were
not
able
to
receive
early
prenatal
care.
9
Factors
that
result
in
delayed
prenatal
care
are
listed
to
the
left
of
barriers
to
prenatal
care
on
the
conceptual
model.
These
factors
include:
failure
to
adhere
to
doctors
visits,
unintended
pregnancy,
transportation,
and
health
insurance.
Unintended
pregnancy
accounts
for
about
51
percent
of
the
6.6
million
pregnancies
in
the
United
States
each
year
(Guttmacher
Institute,
2015).
In
2008,
it
was
reported
that
unintended
pregnancy
rates
were
lower
for
women
with
more
years
of
education
and
higher
for
women
who
had
not
obtained
a
high
school
degree
(Guttmacher
Institute,
2015).
When
pregnancy
is
unintended
and
if
the
mother
is
uninsured,
it
could
pose
difficulty
in
receiving
recommended
prenatal
care
visits.
According
to
the
US
Institute
of
Medicine
Committee
on
the
Consequences
of
Uninsurance
(2002),
uninsured
women
receive
fewer
prenatal
visits
than
women
who
are
insured.
Additionally,
uninsured
newborns
are
more
likely
to
suffer
from
adverse
outcomes
such
as
birth
defects
and
low
birth
weight
babies.
In
North
Carolina,
Community
Care
Network
contracts
with
practices
and
clinics
across
the
state
to
serve
as
a
Pregnancy
Medical
Home
(Module
15:
The
Pregnancy
Medical
Home,
2015).
Medicaid
patients
are
eligible
to
receive
ongoing
prenatal
care
services
at
the
designated
Pregnancy
Medical
Home.
Additionally,
participating
practices
receive
financial
incentives
such
as
rewards
for
quality
improvement
and
engagement
in
preterm
birth
prevention
among
Medicaid
patients.
Continuing
with
Phase
3
of
the
PRECEDE
planning
model,
assessment
of
predisposing
factors
aids
in
determining
factors
that
contribute
to
a
health
problem.
Chronic
health
conditions
are
illustrated
on
the
conceptual
model
linking
to
low
birth
weight.
Negative
lifestyle
behaviors
related
to
diet
and
obesity
can
strongly
increase
the
risks
of
preterm
labor
resulting
in
birth
defects
and/or
low
birth
weight
(CDC,
2015).
According
to
the
National
Institute
of
Health
(2013),
management
of
blood
glucose
levels
prior
to
pregnancy
is
important
because
high
blood
glucose
levels
can
cause
birth
defects
during
the
first
few
weeks
of
pregnancy.
Furthermore,
factors
such
as
obesity
and
being
overweight
can
increase
the
risks
of
developing
diabetes
during
pregnancy
(gestational
diabetes)
and
preeclampsia.
Income
and
socioeconomic
status
also
have
links
to
10
chronic
health
conditions
on
the
conceptual
model.
Low
income
results
in
a
low
socioeconomic
status,
which
in
turn
can
impact
the
same
factors
that
are
listed
for
barriers
to
prenatal
care.
In
addition
to
these
factors
including
diet,
alcohol
and
drug
use,
and
obesity
can
all
be
affected
by
socioeconomic
status.
Current
Programs
to
Address
the
Health
Problem
The
North
Carolina
Center
for
Birth
Defects
Research
and
Prevention
is
a
research
center
funded
by
the
CDC
that
currently
conducts
research
in
33
counties
in
North
Carolina
(About
the
North
Carolina
Center,
2015).
The
purpose
of
the
research
center
is
to
reduce
the
incidence
of
birth
defects
by
identifying
maternal
exposures
that
may
occur
during
the
early
phases
of
pregnancy
and
to
provide
information
to
the
public
about
birth
defects
prevention
(Centers
for
Birth
Defects
Research,
2015).
The
March
of
Dimes
currently
works
to
advocate
and
address
factors
included
in
the
category
of
barriers
to
prenatal
care.
The
Pregnancy
and
Newborn
Health
Education
Center
located
on
the
March
of
Dimes
website
has
Health
Education
Specialists
available
to
answer
questions
related
to
finding
prenatal
care,
health
insurance
options
with
the
Affordable
Care
Act,
and
scheduling
prenatal
visits
(March
of
Dimes
Foundation,
2015).
As
it
was
previously
mentioned
in
Part
1,
the
curriculum
of
the
Provider
Education
trainings
is
centered
on
6
of
10
CDC
(2014)
recommendations
for
conception
health.
One
of
the
six
recommendations,
interventions
for
identified
risks,
encompasses
the
category
of
lifestyle
behaviors
within
the
Provider
Education
training.
The
March
of
Dimes
currently
addresses
the
factors
of
chronic
health
conditions,
obesity/overweight,
poor
diet,
and
alcohol/drug
use
through
the
Provider
Education
trainings.
Additionally,
The
March
of
Dimes
currently
works
to
increase
the
education
promoting
the
benefits
of
folic
acid
intake
among
women
of
childbearing
age.
Folic
acid
and
unintended
pregnancy
are
factors
that
are
also
related
to
adherence
to
recommended
prenatal
doctors
visits.
In
the
past,
these
factors
have
been
addressed
during
the
Provider
Education
training
but
a
formal
follow
up
11
evaluation
has
not
been
completed
to
determine
if
these
factors
are
used
by
trainees
as
it
is
intended.
Impact/Outcome
Objectives
The
Provider
Education
trainings
curriculum
currently
addresses
the
issues
of
reducing
unintended
pregnancies,
the
importance
of
folic
acid
intake,
and
reinforcing
the
importance
of
recommended
prenatal
visits.
There
is
a
lack
in
data
to
determine
if
the
information
the
providers
receive
in
the
trainings
is
being
discussed
with
their
patients.
The
first
objective
for
the
evaluation
is
to
identify
the
current
program
model
used
for
the
Provider
Trainings.
If
no
program
model
is
currently
in
place,
then
the
next
step
is
to
develop
a
program
model.
The
second
objective
is
to
create
baseline
data
from
the
current
evaluation
forms
that
are
completed
immediately
after
the
Provider
Training
session
to
assess
the
current
data
that
the
organization
has
collected.
The
third
and
fourth
objectives
are
to
identify
questions
to
be
answered
from
the
follow
up
evaluation
by
the
March
of
Dimes
Triad
director
and
assess
current
data
in
order
to
create
follow
up
evaluation
materials.
The
final
objectives
are
to
create
the
follow
up
evaluation
tool
and
create
a
plan
to
deliver
the
evaluation
to
participants.
By
the
use
of
the
conceptual
model,
The
March
of
Dimes
overall
broad
health
problems
and
factors
contributing
to
birth
defects
and
low
birth
weight
were
assessed
using
the
first
three
phases
of
PRECEDE-PROCEED.
The
factors
of
genetics/heredity
are
less
related
to
the
Provider
Education
trainings
and
will
not
be
addressed
during
the
internship.
There
does
appear
to
be
more
room
for
growth
within
the
organization
in
advocating
and
addressing
factors
associated
with
barriers
to
prenatal
care.
The
evaluation
will
assist
in
providing
data
to
support
that
the
Provider
Education
trainings
are
making
an
impact
in
addressing
the
overall
broad
goal
and
mission
of
The
March
of
Dimes.
(Part
3)
12
The
following
section
pertains
to
the
activities
and
methodology
of
the
internship.
The
purpose
is
to
provide
a
step-by-step
description
of
the
process
and
plans.
A
logic
model
is
used
to
summarize
the
processes
of
completing
the
internship.
According
to
Knowlton
and
Phillips
(2009),
the
pieces
of
a
program
logic
model
consist
of
the
recipe
for
a
specified
result.
As
seen
below,
the
logic
model
has
four
different
categories:
inputs,
activities,
outputs,
and
outcomes.
The
model
is
read
from
left
to
right.
The
outcomes
column
is
the
overall
goals
to
be
achieved
during
the
internship
by
completing
the
items
that
are
listed
in
the
three
subsequent
columns.
Inputs
Triad
Director
State
Coordinator
Time
spent
by
intern
Triad Director
Provider
Education
training
curriculum
Time
spent
by
intern
Curriculum
materials
Triad
Director
Past
evaluation
forms
Time
spent
by
intern
Evaluation
forms
Activities
Communicate
with
Triad
Director
and
State
Coordinator
to
determine
a
plan
for
the
evaluation
Identify
previous
evaluation
materials
Review
Provider
Education
training
curriculum
Determine
the
evidence
based
strategies
and
methods
within
the
current
curriculum
Outputs
Completed
final
evaluation
plan
Outcomes
An
evaluation
plan
and
blueprint
for
future
evaluations
Program
model
developed
for
evaluation
of
Provider
Education
training
program
based
on
the
current
curriculum
Knowledge
of
an
evidence
based
program
model
for
program
personnel
identified
for
future
evaluations
for
the
organization
Collect
past
evaluation
forms
from
in-person
Provider
Trainings
Compile
data
in
spreadsheet
Determine
statistical
tests
to
be
used
and
analyze
data
using
Greater
understanding
for
the
Triad
Director
and
State
Coordinator
of
program
data
from
the
current
evaluations
13
Computer/stat
istical
software
Triad Director
State
Coordinator
Time
spent
by
intern
Computer
statistical
software
Generate
informal
report
with
data/findings
from
evaluation
forms
Determine
the
questions
to
be
answered
from
the
follow-up
evaluation
Collaborate
with
staff
to
determine
the
best
method
for
the
evaluation
Develop
follow
up
evaluation
tool
Evaluation
delivery
plan
Increased
knowledge
and
understanding
for
the
intern
and
for
the
organization
personnel
about
completing
the
follow
up
evaluation
Internship
Activities
and
Methods
The
first
row
of
the
logic
model
shows
the
initial
portion
of
the
internship
evaluation.
The
first
step
of
the
evaluation
is
to
create
a
plan
to
follow
for
completing
an
evaluation.
This
will
be
done
through
meetings
with
the
Triad
Director
and
State
Coordinator
to
collaborate
and
brainstorm
on
the
pieces
that
need
to
be
included
in
the
evaluation
process.
The
activities
in
this
section
also
include
identifying
previous
evaluation
materials
that
have
been
used
for
Provider
Trainings.
The
overall
outcome
of
this
section
is
the
development
of
an
evaluation
plan
which
will
create
the
blueprint
for
executing
the
actual
evaluation
when
the
internship
is
complete
and
provides
a
plan
for
future
evaluations
that
can
be
used
by
the
organization.
The second input is to identify or create a program model that is used for the Provider
Trainings.
It
is
not
currently
known
whether
the
Provider
Trainings
are
centered
on
an
existing
evidence
based
program
model.
If
there
is
not
a
program
model
in
place,
the
next
step
is
to
review
the
Provider
Training
curriculum
to
help
determine
the
best
program
model
that
correlates
with
14
the
information
in
the
curriculum.
Also
within
this
step,
another
activity
listed
in
the
logic
model
is
to
assess
the
evidence
based
strategies
and
methods
used
in
the
Provider
Trainings.
This
assessment
will
be
done
to
further
understand
which
program
model
is
most
relevant
to
the
trainings.
The
output
for
this
section
is
the
development
of
a
program
model
for
the
Provider
Trainings.
The
overall
outcome
is
the
knowledge
of
an
evidence
based
program
model
identified
for
program
personnel
for
the
development
of
the
evaluation
and
for
future
evaluations
with
this
organization.
The next input listed in the logic model is to obtain information from data of the past
evaluations.
As
it
was
mentioned
in
parts
one
and
two,
there
has
not
been
a
follow-up
evaluation
for
the
Provider
Trainings.
Immediately
after
a
training
session,
participants
complete
an
evaluation
form
about
the
session,
but
there
has
not
been
a
follow
up
evaluation
completed
to
determine
if
the
information
from
the
sessions
are
being
used
as
intended.
The
information
from
the
immediate
evaluation
forms
has
also
not
been
analyzed.
Therefore,
in
this
section
the
first
activity
is
to
collect
the
past
evaluation
forms
from
the
in-person
Provider
Trainings.
After
all
the
forms
are
collected,
the
data
will
be
compiled
into
a
spreadsheet
and
analyzed
using
SPSS,
a
statistical
software.
The
exact
data
collection
plan
and
data
testing
analyses
are
to
be
determined.
Once
the
data
is
analyzed,
it
will
be
presented
to
the
Triad
Director
and
State
Coordinator
and
information
about
questions
to
be
answered
for
the
follow
up
evaluation
tool
will
be
decided.
The
outputs
of
this
section
are
a
collection
of
data
from
the
immediate
evaluations.
Also,
a
list
of
questions
to
be
answered
during
the
evaluation
tool
will
be
a
result
of
these
activities.
The
overall
goal
in
this
section
is
greater
understanding
for
the
Triad
Director
and
State
Coordinator
of
the
program
data
from
the
immediate
evaluations.
The final input is to create an evaluation tool in either the form of paper, mail, electronic
survey,
or
in-person.
The
activities
for
this
section
include
collaborating
with
The
March
of
Dimes
staff
to
determine
the
best
method
of
evaluation
and
use
information
gathered
from
evaluation
data
15
to
create
the
follow
up
evaluation
tool.
This
will
include
suggestions
made
from
the
analysis
of
the
immediate
evaluation.
The
output
for
this
section
is
to
have
a
plan
in
place
to
deliver
the
evaluation
once
the
internship
is
complete.
The
overall
outcome
of
this
section
is
increased
knowledge
and
understanding
about
completing
an
evaluation
for
the
intern
as
well
as
having
an
actual
evaluation
ready
for
dissemination
upon
completion
of
the
internship
for
the
organization.
If
the
organization
chooses
to
deliver
the
evaluation
upon
completion
of
the
internship
it
will
provide
concrete
documentation
of
progress
on
program
goals
and
effectiveness
(CDC,
2012).
Project
Timeline
A Gantt chart is used to illustrate the sequencing of the project timeline in which the goals
and
objectives
are
to
be
accomplished
(What
is
a
Gantt
Chart,
2012).
The
activities
are
listed
on
the
left
of
the
chart
and
along
the
top
is
the
project
timeline.
16
17
References
18
Cottrell,
R.,
Girvan,
J.,
&
McKenzie,
J.
(2012).
Theories
and
Planning
Models.
In
Principles
and
Foundations
of
Health
Promotion
and
Education
(5th
ed.,
p.
102).
San
Francisco,
California:
Pearson
Education.
Facts
about
Birth
Defects.
(2014,
October
20).
Retrieved
October
8,
2015,
from
http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/facts.html
Guttmacher
Institute.
(2015).
Unintended
Pregnancy
in
the
United
States.
Retrieved
from
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-Unintended-Pregnancy-US.html
Health
Insurance
is
a
Family
Matter.
Institute
of
Medicine
(US)
Committee
on
the
Consequences
of
Uninsurance.
Washington
(DC):
National
Academies
Press
(US);
2002.
Johnson,
K.,
Posner,
S.,
Biermann,
J.,
&
Cordero,
J.
(2006).
Recommendations
to
Improve
Preconception
Health
and
Health
Care
---
United
States
A
Report
of
the
CDC/ATSDR
Preconception
Care
Work
Group
and
the
Select
Panel
on
Preconception
Care.
Mortality
and
Morbidity
Weekly
Report,
55(RR06),
1-23.
Retrieved
October
11,
2015,
from
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5506a1.htm
Low
birthweight.
(2015).
Retrieved
October
8,
2015,
from
http://www.marchofdimes.org/complications/low-birthweight.aspx
March
of
Dimes
Foundation.
(2015).
Prenatal
Care.
Retrieved
from
http://www.marchofdimes.org/pregnancy/prenatal-care.aspx
March
of
Dimes
Foundation.
(2012).
Take
folic
acid
before
youre
pregnant.
Retrieved
from
http://www.marchofdimes.org/pregnancy/take-folic-acid-before-youre-pregnant.aspx
Maternal
and
Child
Health
Bureau.
United
States
Department
of
Health
and
Human
Services.
(2013).
Child
Health
USA
2013.
Retrieved
from
http://mchb.hrsa.gov/chusa13/health-
services-utilization/p/barriers-to-prenatal-care.htm
19
Mathews,
T.,
&
MacDorman,
M.
(2012).
Infant
Mortality
Statistics
From
the
2008
Period
Linked
Birth/Infant
Death
Data
Set.
National
Vital
Statistics
Report,
60(5),
1-28.
Retrieved
October
8,
2015,
from
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60/nvsr60_05.pdf
National
Institutes
of
Health.
(2013).
What
are
the
factors
that
put
a
pregnancy
at
risk?.
Retrieved
from
http://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/high-risk/conditioninfo/Pages/factors.aspx
Preconception
Health
and
Care.
(2014,
September
12).
Retrieved
October
11,
2015,
from
http://www.cdc.gov/preconception/hcp/recommendations.html
Preterm
labor
&
premature
birth.
(2015).
Retrieved
October
8,
2015,
from
http://www.marchofdimes.org/complications/preterm-labor-and-premature-baby.aspx
Program
Performance
and
Evaluation
Office-
Program
Evaluation.
(2012,
May
11).
Retrieved
November
21,
2015,
from
http://www.cdc.gov/eval/guide/execsummary/index.htm
Rashied-Henry,
K.
(2015
September
30).
March
of
Dimes
overview
interview
with
Chelsea
Whitfield.
The
University
of
North
Carolina,
Greensboro.
Stubbs,
B.
(2015,
September
19).
March
of
Dimes
provider
training
interview
with
Chelsea
Whitfield.
The
University
of
North
Carolina,
Greensboro.
Tobacco,
Alcohol,
Drugs,
and
Pregnancy.
(2013,
December
1).
Retrieved
October
20,
2015,
from
http://www.acog.org/-/media/For-
Patients/faq170.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20151020T0911007255
What
is
a
Gantt
Chart?
(2012).
Retrieved
November
21,
2015,
from
http://www.gantt.com
Wyatt
Knowlton,
L.,
&
Phillips,
C.
(2009).
Creating
Program
Logic
Models.
In
The
Logic
Model
Guidebook
(pp.
36-37).
Thousand
Oaks,
California:
SAGE
Publications.