Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Having immigrated to new countries, Jews tended to congregate in particular areas of a town or
city even when no longer forced to do so, for the reasons already stated. That was a matter of
choice. The Nazis eliminated that choice. Although
ghettoisation as such was never introduced in
the Reich itself, and only slowly appeared in the
countries occupied by Germany, its effect was intentionally lethal. As will be detailed, whilst
ghettos might be open, permitting some communication with the outside world, or closed,
virtually sealed off from all exterior contact, almost all of them shared certain features in
common.
Dilapidated housing, appalling sanitary conditions, inadequate and poor quality food, absence of
medical supplies and facilities this was the lot of the ghetto dweller. And most of those ghetto
dwellers also shared a common end. They died of starvation, disease and exhaustion within the
ghetto, or at shooting pits and death camps outside of it.
The first Nazi ghettos were never intended to be
more than temporary, an interim concentration of
Jews pending a decision concerning what the Final Solution of the Jewish Question was going
to be. That decision went through many convoluted changes before its ultimate determination.
The policy towards the incarcerated Jews also changed as the realisation dawned on the Germans
that a captive labour force could be put to better use than sweeping snow, or breaking rocks.
Later, the ghettos served as convenient points at which to concentrate that Jewish labour force
prior to its liquidation.
Not every town had a ghetto. Reinhard Heydrichs strategy was to remove Jews from small
villages and towns to larger conurbations. In some cases, ghettos were formed before the initial
killing spree, in other cases afterwards. Hundreds of ghettos were established in Nazi occupied
Europe, ranging in size from the 445,000 inhabitants of the Warsaw ghetto to those containing
just a few families in rural quasi-ghettos.
In short, despite Heydrichs instructions, there was no consistently discernible pattern to
ghettoisation, and policy decisions were frequently taken at a local level. As it became
increasingly apparent where Nazi policy towards the Jews led, underground movements began to
form in the ghettos. They were not always successful in organising resistance, and even if they
did, none had a hope of success, but their dignity, courage and sacrifice were to provide an
inspiration to generations as yet unborn.
Today, the term ghetto has acquired a somewhat different meaning. It is no longer applied
solely, if at all, to Jews. Any ethnic minority residing near to each
other in a specific area of a city create what is often described as a
ghetto. It may be that the choice of accommodation is forced
upon them for economic reasons, but by and large, these communities congregate for the same
reasons that Jews once did.
It is comforting to be surrounded by ones peers, religious or racial. But in no way can these
modern ghettos be compared to the Nazi version. The ghettos of the Holocaust were described
by one inmate as a prison without a roof.
But they were much worse than that. A prison sentence offered at least the prospect of survival.
For those interned in the ghettos, there was no such prospect. Slow and lingering, or swift and
brutal, their fate was likely to be the same.
There were of course survivors, and it is from their evidence and the extraordinarily detailed
archives and personal diaries of those who did not survive, that it is possible to construct some
kind of historical record of individual ghettos. No writing can begin to adequately describe the
misery and despair of life in the ghettos established by the Nazis.
But compelled by an ancient tradition to Schreibt un farschreibt! Write and record! a
legacy was left which at least enables us to attempt to do so.