IeTRODUETORY HESAY. 3
2 ‘THE DEATH OF DEATA, TRO
s it itis tack is perhaps our most pressing
stating the difference between it and the old gospel is to say thatit is and practice bi is pea mont pressing
too exclusively concerned to be “helpful” to man—to bring resent need. Ant point that Owen
tele concerned to Fiemption can give u
very well to talc
ris defending
When you
speak of recovering the gospel, don't you mean that you just want
summé down an
depends for all good, both in
reference was unambiguously
id.
cof rference is man. This ie just to say that the old gospel was
religious in a way that the new gospels not. Whereas the chief aim tus all to become Calvinist doubt
of the old was to teach men to worship God, th® concern of the new ‘These questions are wor
seems limited to raking them feel better, ''The subject of the equ tomany, atthe mae
Reha nae Cat ae ee ent oth ne ‘imited atonement "—as rag all that a Reformed theologian
Teer peee St sang ‘the heart of the gospel could ever really want to do!
differen.
ie whale perapcetive and emphasis of gospel preaching has changed. ‘al to become Calvinists "—ap if Reformed
‘roan this change of interest has sprang a ehange of content, for ° é stor,
i i ‘a gians ha no interest beyond recruiting for their party, an
impor inte of" nas tnd ean at STheconing Cae wat tel stage of thle dpe,
helpfulness.” ingly, the themes of
election being the
fing specifically for His
sheep, are not pre sould be said, are not
“helpful”; they would drive sinners to despair, by suggesting to
not in their own power to be saved through Christ.
ry that such despair might be salutary is not con-
is taken for granted that it cannot be, because itis so
shattering to our self-esteem.) However this mi
say more about it la
the biblical gos
and had
the early seventeeni
V (known to history »s Armi
principles: first, that di
Ibiman.
that
‘masquereding as the whole truth becomes
Thus, we appeal to men as if they all had the
receive Christ at any time; we speck of His redeeming
work as if He had done no more by dying than make it possible for
2 speak of God's love as if it
‘were no more than a general willingness to receive any who
‘turn and trust; and we depict the Father and the Son, not as so
active in drawing sinners to themselves, but 38 waiting
spotence “at the door of our hearts ” for us to let them
snd practioe among us
urgent itis that we should review this matter. To
recover the old, authentic, biblical gospel, and to bring our preaching
Toreseeing that the
nesiod of Dort was convened in 1618 to pronounce on this
and the ints of Calvinism ” it
LT
Jacks all power to believe the
that may be extended to him.
, unconditional choice of
they come to glory. ‘Those five points aze conveniently denoted
by the mnemo: ‘Total depravity, Unconditional
Limited aton istible grace, Preservation of
man to save himself, Ono view presents the three great.
Holy Trinity for the refovering of lost mankind—election by the
‘Rather redemption by the Son, calling by init—as directed
towards the same persons, and as securing their salvstion infallibly.
‘The other view gives each act a diffrent reference (the objects of
zédemption being all mankind, of calling, those who hear the gospel,
and of flection, those hearers who respond), and denies that any
‘man’s selvation is secured by any of ‘The two theologies thus
conesive the plan of salvation in
salvation depend on the work
by believing operated it, Plainly, these differonces are important,
‘and the permanent value of the “five points,” as a summary of
"oni 9,
INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. 5
Calvinism, is that they make ol
certent to Which, these tro ¢
processes
‘no less, than the outworki
arch,
ing of His
The
icating that: Cal
F divine mercy. But infact the
isto safeguard the central
Redeemer who really does
‘lection that is conditional and
tended to safeguard the positive,
The real negations are those of
redemption and calling are
gations in order to
positive purpose of
Anninianism, whic!
seving acts of God. Cal
assert the positive content of t L
strengthening faith and building up the’