0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
36 просмотров4 страницы
In this April 27, 2016 case, a federal district judge ruled that a lawyer's "Notice of Unavailability," which sought to discourage or prevent the scheduling of depositions during the purported period of unavailability, was insufficient to stop discovery.
Оригинальное название
Leitzke v Kelsey - "Notice of Unvailability" May Not Suffice to Stop Scheduling of Depositions
In this April 27, 2016 case, a federal district judge ruled that a lawyer's "Notice of Unavailability," which sought to discourage or prevent the scheduling of depositions during the purported period of unavailability, was insufficient to stop discovery.
In this April 27, 2016 case, a federal district judge ruled that a lawyer's "Notice of Unavailability," which sought to discourage or prevent the scheduling of depositions during the purported period of unavailability, was insufficient to stop discovery.