100%(3)100% нашли этот документ полезным (3 голоса)
595 просмотров1 страница
20 Jan 2009: As described in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress, Endnote 11, a "CERTIFICATE of Live Birth" birth certificate form (top form shown in the PDF file) is not a "CERTIFICATION of Live Birth" form (bottom form shown in the PDF file which was place on the internet by the Obama campaign).
Herewith in this PDF file is provided a downloadable and printable file showing examples of a true"CERTIFICATE of Live Birth (Birth Certificate)" from the state of Hawaii as compared to a "CERTIFICATION of Live Birth (COLB)". Obama has only provided an internet image of what he purports to be a birth certificate. But it is NOT one and he knows it. What he has proffered on line is an image of a computer generated CERTIFICATION form, shown on the bottom. This CERT form is NOT a birth certificate. And he has never even allowed any controlling legal authority to examine the underlying CERTIFICATION form that he depicts an image of on the net. What kind of evidence is that? And internet image and picture of a print out! We live in the age of PhotoShop and no image on the net can be trusted to be real. A digital image on the internet is Not sufficient in any court of law ... not by a long shot. This is one reason Obama is desperately fighting to not let any case go to trial on the merits. The evidence he has proffered to date on the internet would NOT be acceptable.
In addition to the images of the two documents being dramatically different, one is hand typed, the other is a laser printed print out (easily forged with PhotoShop as some say it was), the amount of information is also much greater on a real "Birth Certificate, aka Certificate of Live Birth" as compared to the basic "Certification" form Obama made an image of to put on the net. And note on Obama's CERTIFICATION form it says "FILED" in the lower left. That indicates his original birth registration was never fully "ACCEPTED". Thus revealing all the original vital record filings and any and all amendments is necessary to get the true facts and to learn what if any independent corroborative, contemporaneous evidence such as the name of a doctor or midwife can be gleaned from the original CERTIFICATE of Live Birth, if one exists.
Оригинальное название
Hawaiian CERTIFICATE of Live Birth (Birth Certificate) vs CERTIFICATION of Live Birth (COLB)
20 Jan 2009: As described in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress, Endnote 11, a "CERTIFICATE of Live Birth" birth certificate form (top form shown in the PDF file) is not a "CERTIFICATION of Live Birth" form (bottom form shown in the PDF file which was place on the internet by the Obama campaign).
Herewith in this PDF file is provided a downloadable and printable file showing examples of a true"CERTIFICATE of Live Birth (Birth Certificate)" from the state of Hawaii as compared to a "CERTIFICATION of Live Birth (COLB)". Obama has only provided an internet image of what he purports to be a birth certificate. But it is NOT one and he knows it. What he has proffered on line is an image of a computer generated CERTIFICATION form, shown on the bottom. This CERT form is NOT a birth certificate. And he has never even allowed any controlling legal authority to examine the underlying CERTIFICATION form that he depicts an image of on the net. What kind of evidence is that? And internet image and picture of a print out! We live in the age of PhotoShop and no image on the net can be trusted to be real. A digital image on the internet is Not sufficient in any court of law ... not by a long shot. This is one reason Obama is desperately fighting to not let any case go to trial on the merits. The evidence he has proffered to date on the internet would NOT be acceptable.
In addition to the images of the two documents being dramatically different, one is hand typed, the other is a laser printed print out (easily forged with PhotoShop as some say it was), the amount of information is also much greater on a real "Birth Certificate, aka Certificate of Live Birth" as compared to the basic "Certification" form Obama made an image of to put on the net. And note on Obama's CERTIFICATION form it says "FILED" in the lower left. That indicates his original birth registration was never fully "ACCEPTED". Thus revealing all the original vital record filings and any and all amendments is necessary to get the true facts and to learn what if any independent corroborative, contemporaneous evidence such as the name of a doctor or midwife can be gleaned from the original CERTIFICATE of Live Birth, if one exists.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF или читайте онлайн в Scribd
20 Jan 2009: As described in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress, Endnote 11, a "CERTIFICATE of Live Birth" birth certificate form (top form shown in the PDF file) is not a "CERTIFICATION of Live Birth" form (bottom form shown in the PDF file which was place on the internet by the Obama campaign).
Herewith in this PDF file is provided a downloadable and printable file showing examples of a true"CERTIFICATE of Live Birth (Birth Certificate)" from the state of Hawaii as compared to a "CERTIFICATION of Live Birth (COLB)". Obama has only provided an internet image of what he purports to be a birth certificate. But it is NOT one and he knows it. What he has proffered on line is an image of a computer generated CERTIFICATION form, shown on the bottom. This CERT form is NOT a birth certificate. And he has never even allowed any controlling legal authority to examine the underlying CERTIFICATION form that he depicts an image of on the net. What kind of evidence is that? And internet image and picture of a print out! We live in the age of PhotoShop and no image on the net can be trusted to be real. A digital image on the internet is Not sufficient in any court of law ... not by a long shot. This is one reason Obama is desperately fighting to not let any case go to trial on the merits. The evidence he has proffered to date on the internet would NOT be acceptable.
In addition to the images of the two documents being dramatically different, one is hand typed, the other is a laser printed print out (easily forged with PhotoShop as some say it was), the amount of information is also much greater on a real "Birth Certificate, aka Certificate of Live Birth" as compared to the basic "Certification" form Obama made an image of to put on the net. And note on Obama's CERTIFICATION form it says "FILED" in the lower left. That indicates his original birth registration was never fully "ACCEPTED". Thus revealing all the original vital record filings and any and all amendments is necessary to get the true facts and to learn what if any independent corroborative, contemporaneous evidence such as the name of a doctor or midwife can be gleaned from the original CERTIFICATE of Live Birth, if one exists.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF или читайте онлайн в Scribd