Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
9 "770 23 4"573007
2'2010
""
. ., 2010, . 55, 2
[13].
1. 3. . . .: . .
(.). . .: ; 1985:
106-152.
2. . .
. .: . ., . . (.).
. .:
; 1981: 200-260.
3. Rivard G.-E. Chemical synovectomy in haemophilia: status and
challenges. Haemophilia 2001; 7(suppl. 2): 1619.
4. Black C, Batorova A., Street A. et al. Comprehensive care for
haemophilia around the world. Haemophilia 2004; 10(suppl. 4):
47-54.
5. Evatt B. L. The natural evolution of haemophilia care: develop
ing and sustaining comprehensive care globally. Haemophilia
2006; 12(suppl. 3): 13-21.
6. Batistella L., Souza N., Guerra . Synoviorthesis with rifocin
a good choice. Haemophilia 1996; 2(suppl): 29.
. . , 2010
616.151.5-07:616.153:577.152.344
. .
" - "
- , -
.
.
,
- .
: , ,
THROMBIN GENERATION TEST AS AN INTEGRAL INDICATOR OF THE BLOOD CLOTTING SYSTEM
STATUS
Yu. A. Namestnikov
Russian Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology, St. Petersburg
Summary. This review presents data on the diagnostic value of thrombin generation test. The
test values characterize the velocity and intensity of formation of thrombin, the key hemostasis enzyme.
These data can be used for objective evaluation of hypo- or hypercoagulation status.
Key w o r d s : thrombin generation, endogenous thrombin potential, calibrated automated thrombogram
in vitro .
:
, . , " - " - .
: 191024, -, 2- ., . 16.
: 8 (812) 717-35-82. E-mail: namestnikov@inbox.ru
32
. . , ,
[1, 2].
, -
. ., 2010, . 55, 2
.
.
, ,
,
.
1953 . R. Macfarlane R. Biggs [3]
,
, .
37.
,
.
, . ,
,
.
.
,
.
. , , ,
.
.
.
. ker [4]
, .
.
. Hemker [5] ,
. , ,
, - .
, R. Macfarlane R. Biggs [3], -
,
,
. , . Hemker [6] ,
, 7--4- (ZGly-Gly-Arg-AMC).
. Hemker [6]
Fluoroskan Ascent ("ThermoFisher
SCIENTIFIC"), . 96-
.
() :
20% , 20% 60% .
37 ,
, . ,
.
, . . , ,
.
.
[7], , [8].
,
. .
[6].
.
" ",
. Hemker . (Calibrated Automated Thrombogram, "Thrombinoscope") [7], . ,
,
,
33
. ., 2010, . 55, 2
.
Lag time; Peak
thrombin; ; D
Time to peak/ttPeak.
. -2-, ,
.
. , . R. Macfarlane R.
Biggs [3], . ,
, .
[9].
" " - 10%
,
[6, 10]. . Baglin .
[8], " " , .
Technothrombin TGA ("Technoclone") [9].
34
.
.
. ,
, ,
Y. Dargaud . [11], , . Hemker.
,
, ,
. ,
, , .
.
Lag time ( , ) ,
,
2
. Peak thrombin (
, /) , . Time to peak/ttPeak ( , ) , .
(endogenous thrombin potential
, )
.
. Hemker [12]
.
:
, .
[13], ,
, . 4 ,
.
V. Regnault .
[14]
.
, , .
-
. ., 2010, . 55, 2
(1 /). Peak
thrombin Lag time [16].
.
Peak thrombin.
, , in vivo
. ,
.
in vitro
[1820].
,
[21, 22].
Peak thrombin
,
. N. Hezard
. [22]
() (G20210A). ,
.
Y. Dargaud . [18]
. ,
. , , .
()
(G20210A).
S.
150%. [2325]
Y. Dargaud
(), S, .
35
. ., 2010, . 55, 2
(-). ,
, Lag time , Peak thrombin ,
-
[26]. S. Tchaikovski . [21]
- ,
.
2- 3- ,
3- .
.
, , .
OVIII 1 [3, 27].
Lag time , Peak thrombin .
[2830].
, [2931]. , ,
OVIIa .
, , [3234].
. , L. Rugeri . [35] Peak thrombin Lag time
53 , .
, , .
OVIII, , ,
.
,
[36, 37].
S. Cauwenberghs . [38] , ,
36
, .
, , . , , , , , [39].
,
, ,
,
[40].
[41].
,
.
. Jackson . [42].
,
(MHO)
. , A. Gatt . [43],
MHO.
,
:
MHO, ,
, .
,
[44], [45, 46]
[47]. Lag time Peak thrombin .
.
,
.
.
, /IIIa
[48, 49]. , ,
, Lag time ttPeak,
.
, -
. ., 2010, . 55, 2
, .
-
.
[18]. .
Peak
thrombin ,
OV {)
(G20210A). , .
. 6
19% 2
[50].
, , ,
[51].
()
D-. . Legnani .
[52],
0,9
17,5%,
1,05 7,5%.
. , D- 1
[5355]. 4 . D- 16,6% , D- 7,2% [56].
1,05
D-, 7,5 7,2%
.
, . . Besser
. [26] ,
. ,
, .
D-: 30%
D- , 65%
D- .
[57, 58]. , 53% 13% 16% [57].
.
,
, , . ,
, , , , . ,
.
,
. :
, .
.
.
37
. ., 2010, . 55, 2
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
38
. ., 2010, . 55, 2
51.
52.
53.
54.
. . , 2010
615.45:547.962.4].012.6
-
. .
""
"" ",
. -
() , --
, , -80 (),
-100 -45 (). .
. - . , - , , ,
.
, - ,
,
SOLVENT/DETERGENT METHOD FOR VIRUS INACTIVATION IN THE IMMUNOGLOBULIN PRODUCTION
TECHNOLOGY
N. V. Zubkova
"ImBio" Affiliated Department of Nizhny Novgorod Firm for Bacterial Preparation Manufacture, Microgen Firm for
Medical Immunobiological Preparations, Nizhny Novgorod
Summary. This review of literature presents the characteristics of various solvent/detergent (SD)
methods for the treatment of immunoglobulin preparations, including the use of tri-N-butylphosphate in
combination with a detergent - for example, sodium cholate, Twin-80 (polysorbate), Triton X-100 or X-45
(octoxynol). Technology of the removing of the mixtures is described. Permissible residual levels of the
reagents in ready dosage forms are substantiated. Stages of validation of the SD processing and methods for evaluating the virus reduction are presented. It is shown that the safety of SD processed preparations is provided by inactivation of enveloped viruses and by sparing the biological characteristics of
the preparations and activities of specific antibodies.
Key w o r d s : immunoglobulin preparations, solvent/detergent processing, chromatographic purification, virus reduction
: :
, . . , .
"" ""
".
: 603000, , . , . 44.
: (831) 296-91-16 . 2230. E-mail:
zubkova@imbio.ru
, .
. ,
, ,
90-
""
() [1, 2].
39