Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 134

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Page 6

Page 7

Page 8

Page 9

Page 10

2/16/2016

Agenda Item History - 2016.BD65.2

Item
Tracking Status
This item was considered by Bid Committee on January 13, 2016 and was adopted without
amendment.

Bid Committee consideration on January 13, 2016

BD65.2

ACTION

Adopted

Ward:6

Award of Request for Proposal No. 9118-15-5070 to Baird, Sampson


Neuert Architects for Professional and Technical Services for a New
Pavilion in Humber Bay Park East
Committee Decision
The Bid Committee adopted the following:
1. Bid Committee grant authority to award the contract in accordance with the Contract Details
set out in the report (January 6, 2016) from the Director, Purchasing and Materials
Management:
Call No:

RFP No. 9118-15-5070

Description:

Engage an Architectural consulting team to provide professional and


technical services for the design and construction of a new pavilion in
Humber Bay Park East, and associated works.
The contract is expected to start on date of award and end on November
30, 2018, including period for Pre-Engineering and Preliminary Design,
Detailed Design and Tender, Construction and Post-Construction.

Recommended
Proponent:

Baird, Sampson Neuert Architects

Contract Award
Value:

$597,949.00 net of all applicable taxes and charges


$675,682.37 including all applicable taxes and charges
$608,472.89 net of HST recoveries
The contract is expected to start on date of award and end on November
30, 2018.

Origin
(January 6, 2016) Report from the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2016.BD65.2

1/3

Page 11

2/16/2016

Agenda Item History - 2016.BD65.2

Summary
Ward No:

6 - Etobicoke

Call Dates:

Issued: Sept. 11, 2015, Closed: Oct. 20, 2015

No. of Addenda
Issued:

Two (2)

Number of
Proposals:
Fourteen (14)

Firm Names
Abstrakt Studio Architecture
ATA Architects Inc
Baird Sampson Neuert Architects
Bortolotto Design Architect
Brooke McIlroy Architects
GH3
Gow Hastings Architects
Kongats Architects
Montgomery Sisam Architects
Oleson Worland Architects
RDH Architects
Taylor Smyth Architect
Teeple Architects
Ventin Group Architects
Fourteen (14) proposals were received.

Range of Scores
Division Contacts

High Score: 83.7; Low Score: 60.6;


Joanne Kehoe, Manager
Construction Services
Purchasing and Materials
Management
Telephone: (416) 392-7323
e-mail: jkehoe@toronto.ca

Daniel McLaughlin, Manager


Capital Projects
Parks, Forestry and Recreation
Telephone: (416) 395-7908
e-mail: dmclaug@toronto.ca

Background Information
(January 6, 2016) Report from the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management on Award
of Request for Proposal No. 9118-15-5070 to Baird, Sampson Neuert Architects for
Professional and Technical Services for a New Pavilion in Humber Bay Park East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/bd/bgrd/backgroundfile-87238.pdf)

Motions
Motion to Adopt Item (Carried)
That the Bid Committee grant authority to award Request for Proposal No. 9118-15-5070 to
Baird, Sampson Neuert Architects for Professional and Technical Services for a New Pavilion
in Humber Bay Park East, in accordance with the Contract Details set out in the report (January
6, 2016) from the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, moved by Wendy Hoare.

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2016.BD65.2

2/3

Page 12

2/16/2016

Agenda Item History - 2016.BD65.2

Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2016.BD65.2

3/3

Page 13

%'
BID COMMITTEE
CONTRACT AWARD
Award of Request for Proposal No. 9118-15-5070 to Baird,
Sampson Neuert Architects for Professional and Technical
Services for a New Pavilion in Humber Bay Park East

Date:

January 6, 2016

To:

Bid Committee

From:

Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

RECOMMENDATIONS
The Director of Purchasing and Materials Management recommends that the Bid Committee grant
authority to award the following contract:
Call No:

RFP # 9118-15-5070

Description:

Engage an Architectural consulting team to provide professional and


technical services for the design and construction of a new pavilion in
Humber Bay Park East, and associated works.
The contract is expected to start on date of award and end on
November 30, 2018, including period for Pre-Engineering and
Preliminary Design, Detailed Design and Tender, Construction and
Post-Construction.

Recommended
Proponent:

Baird, Sampson Neuert Architects

Contract Award
Value:

$597,949.00 net of all applicable taxes and charges


$675,682.37 including all applicable taxes and charges
$608,472.89 net of HST recoveries
The contract is expected to start on date of award and end on
November 30, 2018.

Report to Bid Committee on a contract award of RFQ No. 6038-15-3118

1
Page 14

Financial Impact:
The contract award identified in this report is $675,682.37 including all applicable taxes
and charges and $597,949.00 net of all applicable taxes and charges. The cost to the City
is $608,472.89 net of HST recoveries.
Funding in the amount of $608,472.89 is included in the 2016 Preliminary Capital Budget
and 2017-2025 Preliminary Capital Plan for Parks, Forestry and Recreation.
Funding details are provided below:

WBS Element

Description

Date of Award to
Dec. 31st, 2016
(Net of HST
Recoveries)

January 1st, 2017


to Dec. 31st, 2017

January 1st 2018 to


Dec. 31st , 2018

(Net of HST
Recoveries)

(Net of HST
Recoveries)

Total
(Net of HST
Recoveries)

CPR-117-44-90

Master Planning PF&R


FY2014 -2015

$ 31,110.07

CPR-116-46-06

ORC 346 Humber Bay East


New Pavilion S37/S45

$ 430,110.00

$ 87,252.82

$ 60,000.00

$ 577,362.82

Totals

$ 461,220.07

$ 87,252.82

$ 60,000.00

$ 608,472.89

$ 31,110.07

CALL SUMMARY
Ward No:

6 Etobicoke

Call Dates:

Issued: Sept. 11, 2015, Closed: Oct. 20, 2015

# of Addenda Issued:

Two (2)

Number of
Proposals:
Fourteen (14)

Firm Names
Abstrakt Studio Architecture
ATA Architects Inc
Baird Sampson Neuert Architects
Bortolotto Design Architect
Brooke McIlroy Architects
GH3
Gow Hastings Architects
Kongats Architects
Montgomery Sisam Architects
Oleson Worland Architects
RDH Architects
Taylor Smyth Architect
Teeple Architects
Ventin Group Architects
Fourteen (14) proposals were received.

Range of Scores

High Score: 83.7; Low Score: 60.6;

Report to Bid Committee on a contract award of RFQ No. 6038-15-3118

2
Page 15

Division Contacts

Joanne Kehoe
Manager, Professional Services
Purchasing and Materials
Management Division
Telephone: (416) 392-7323
E-mail: jkehoe@toronto.ca

Daniel Mclaughlin
Manager, Construction Management
Capital Projects Section
Parks, Forestry & Recreation
Telephone: (416) 395-7908
E-mail: dmclaug@toronto.ca

COMMENTS
For the recommended contract award, the following requirements have been met:
(a) The firm recommended for award is the lowest bidder meeting specifications or to
the highest scoring proponent based on the evaluation criteria included in the call
and meeting the requirements of the call;
(b) the appropriate Division has reviewed submissions and found the price to be
reasonable, within available budget and concurs with the recommendation;
(c) the total contract value is less than $20 million dollars (excluding applicable
taxes) and the contract terms is
i.
ii.

for a contract funded by the Operating Budget, 5 years or less including


any option years; or
for a contract funded by the Capital Budget, within the projected term of
the capital funding for the project as set out in the Capital Budget,

being within the authority of the Bid Committee;


(d) there are no material written objections to the award;
(e) the call document was advertised on the Citys internet website and bids or
proposals were opened publicly; and
(f) the Fair Wage Office confirms the recommended firm understands the Fair Wage
Policy and Labour Trades requirements and has agreed to comply fully.
Additional details and information for the above calls are on the file in the Purchasing
and Materials Management Division.

_________________________________________________________

Michael Pacholok
Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division

Report to Bid Committee on a contract award of RFQ No. 6038-15-3118

3
Page 16

Proposal (RFP) Evaluation


Parks, Forestry and Recreation
Parks Development & Infrastructure Management
Proposal Evaluation for

Project:

Professional Services for:


NEW PAVILION IN HUIMBER BAY PARK EAST

PROPONENT RATING RESULTS:

RFP No. 9118-15-5070

TEAM LEADER /
EVALUATION
FACILITATOR:

TEAM:

PETER
KLAMBAUER

CHERYL AELONGSPRY

Non-Responsive Information Removed

MABRUCK
MENGELE

NETAMI STUART

AVERAGE OF
TOTAL
SCORES

TEAM AVERAGE*

FEE

RANKING BY
FEE

RANKING BY
TEAM
AVERAGE
EVALUATION

GH3
TAYLOR SMYTH ARCHITECT
RDH ARCHITECTS
BORTOLOTTO DESIGN ARCHITECT
ATA ARCHITECTS INC
KONGATS
GOW HASTINGS
OLESON WORLAND
MONTGOMERY SISAM
VENTIN GROUP

BAIRD SAMPSON NEUERT

82

83.2

81.6

82.7

82.4

83.7

597,949

11

TEEPLE ARCHITECTS
BROOKE McILROY
ABSTRAKT STUDIO ARCHITECTURE

* "Team Average" is computed according to the average of individual total scores per proponent,
instead of being averaged by category. Individual team scoring is shown separately to illustrate range
of scores, which were generally in close proximity.
Criteria for Scoring:
0 No Value: Fails to address the component.
1 Poor: Minimally addresses the component, but one or more major considerations of the
component are not addressed.
2 Fair: The response addresses the component adequately, but minor considerations may not
be addressed.
3 Good: The response fully addresses the component and provides a good quality solution.
Good degree of confidence in the Bidder's response or proposed solution met.

Non-Responsive Information Removed

4 Very Good: All considerations of the component are addressed with a high degree of
confidence in the Bidder's response or proposed solution.
5 Excellent: All considerations of the component are addressed with the highest degree of
confidence in the Bidder's response or proposed solution. The response exceeds the
requirements in providing a superior response or proposed solution.

Page 17

Page 18

Page 19

Page 20

Page 21

Page 22

Page 23

Page 24

Page 25

Page 26

Page 27

Page 28

Page 29

Page 30

Page 31

Page 32

Page 33

Page 34

Page 35

Page 36

Non-Responsive Information Removed

Page 37

Page 38

Page 39

Page 40

Page 41

Page 42

Page 43

Page 44

Page 45

Page 46

Page 47

Page 48

Page 49

Page 50

Page 51

Page 52

Page 53

Page 54

Page 55

Page 56

Page 57

Page 58

Page 59

Page 60

Page 61

Page 62

Page 63

Page 64

Page 65

Page 66

Page 67

Page 68

Page 69

Page 70

Page 71

Page 72

Page 73

Page 74

Page 75

Page 76

Page 77

Page 78

Page 79

Page 80

Page 81

Page 82

Page 83

Page 84

Page 85

Page 86

Page 87

Page 88

Page 89

Page 90

Page 91

Page 92

Page 93

Page 94

Page 95

Page 96

Page 97

Page 98

Page 99

Page 100

Page 101

Page 102

Page 103

Page 104

Page 105

Page 106

Page 107

Page 108

Page 109

Page 110

Page 111

Page 112

Page 113

Page 114

Page 115

Page 116

Page 117

Page 118

Page 119

Page 120

Page 121

Page 122

Page 123

Page 124

Page 125

Page 126

Page 127

Page 128

Page 129

Page 130

Page 131

Page 132

Page 133

Page 134

Оценить