Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

The Lesson of the Kaibab

Introduction: The environment may be altered by forces within the


biotic community, as well as by relationships between organisms and
the physical environment. The carrying capacity of an ecosystem is the
maximum number of organisms that an area can support on a sustained
basis. The density of a population may produce such profound changes in the
environment that the environment becomes unsuitable for the survival of
that species. For instance, overgrazing of land may make the land unable to
support the grazing of animals that lived there.
Objectives:

Graph data on the Kaibab deer population of Arizona from 1905 to


1939
Determine factors responsible for the changing populations
Determine the carrying capacity of the Kaibab Plateau

Background
Before 1905, the deer on the Kaibab Plateau were estimated to number
about 4000. The average carrying capacity of the range was then estimated
to be about 30,000 deer. On November 28th, 1906, President Theodore
Roosevelt created the Grand Canyon National Game Preserve to protect the
"finest deer herd in America."
Unfortunately, by this time the Kaibab forest area had already been
overgrazed by sheep, cattle, and horses. Most of the tall grasses had been
eliminated. The first step to protect the deer was to ban all hunting. In
addition, in 1907, The Forest Service tried to exterminate the predators of
the deer. Between 1907 and 1939, 816 mountain lions, 20 wolves, 7388
coyotes and more than 500 bobcats were killed.
Signs that the deer population was out of control began to appear as early as
1920 - the range was beginning to deteriorate rapidly. The Forest Service
reduced the number of livestock grazing permits. By 1923, the deer were
reported to be on the verge of starvation and the range conditions were
described as "deplorable."
The Kaibab Deer Investigating Committee recommended that all livestock not
owned by local residents be removed immediately from the range and that
the number of deer be cut in half as quickly as possible. Hunting was
reopened, and during the fall of 1924, 675 deer were killed by hunters.
However, these deer represented only one-tenth the number of deer that had
been born that spring. Over the next two winters, it is estimated that 60,000
deer starved to death.
Today, the Arizona Game Commission carefully manages the Kaibab area with
regulations geared to specific local needs. Hunting permits are issued to keep
the deer in balance with their range. Predators are protected to help keep
herds in balance with food supplies. Tragic winter losses can be checked by
keeping the number of deer near the carrying capacity of the range.

DATA TABLE
DATA
1. Graph the deer population data. Place time on
the X axis and "number of deer" on the Y axisut
maybe a little too
Analysis
1. During 1906 and 1907, what two methods
did the Forest Service use to protect the
Kaibab deer?
The forest Service killed large amounts of
the Kaibabs predators and they prevented
hunting to prevent hunters from killing the
deer.
2. Were these methods successful? Use the
data from your graph to support your
answer.

Year

Deer
Population

1905

4,000

1910

9,000

1915

25,000

1920

65,000

1924

100,000

1925

60,000

1926

40,000

1927

37,000

1928

35,000

1929

30,000

1930

25,000

1931

20,000

1935

18,000

1939
10,000
Those methods were successful, but maybe
a little too successful. Because of these changes, the deer population
grew exponentially, causing the population to rise too high to manage.
3. Why do you suppose the population of deer declined in 1925, although
the eliminated of predators occurred?
The deer were hunted one again by humans instead of predators, and
most of the population starved to death by lack of food in the
environment.
4. Why do you think the deer population size in 1900 was 4,000 when it
is estimated that the plateau has a carrying capacity of 30,000?
The deer population could not grow and thrive because of competition
in the area. Just because they can have 30,000 deer doesnt mean
nature would provide it.
5. Why did the deer population decline after 1924?
They were being hunted and were slowly starving to death because
there was no food in the area for them to feed on. Then the Forest
Service began to install regulations and procedures to keep the deer
population in check.
6. Based on these lessons, suggest what YOU would have done in the
following years to manage deer herds.
1915: I would form a small, secluded, and shielded area for the deer to live
in for a time. This protects (most of them) from predators and humans can
help with increasing the population to a maintainable amount.

1923: If the deer population showed any signs of getting out of control, we
would have hunters or deer managers to kill the least needed deer and sell
the meat and hide to increase funds for the park.
6. It is a criticism of many population ecologists that the pattern of
population increase and subsequent crash of the deer population would
have occurred even if the bounty had not been placed on the
predators. Do you agree or disagree with this statement. Explain your
reasoning.
I disagree with that statement. If the predators have not been killed,
the deer population would not have rose so high, and the grass and/or
deer diet wouldnt have gone out so quickly.
8. What future management plans would you suggest for the Kaibab deer
herd?
I would suggest to first grow the deer population a bit by cancelling hunting for a while. Then,
when its a manageable amount, maintain the population by having a hunting season annually and
make sure the amount killed does not go over the quota. If the deer population starts to drop
again, stop hunting for a while.

Human Population Growth


Objectives:
You will create a graph of human population growth and use it to predict future growth.
You will identify factors that affect population growth.
Statisics on Human Population
Year A.D.

Number of People (in


billions)

1650

.50

1750

.70

1850

1.0

1925

2.0

1956

2.5

1966

3.3

1970

3.6

1974

3.9

1976

4.0

1980

4.4

1991

5.5

2000

6.0

2004

6.4

Instructions for creating your graph.


Place time on the horizontal access. Values should range from 1650 to 2020.
Place number of people on the vertical access. Values should range from 0 to 20 billion.
Make sure that your graph is a full page in size and you have the correct labels for the X
and Y access and a title for your graph.
Analysis
1. It took 1649 years fro the world population to double, going from .25 billion
people to .50 billion people. How long did it take for the population to double
once again?
100 years
2. How long did it take for the population to double a second time? 100 years A third
time? 75 years
3. Based on your graph, in what year will the population reach 8 billion? Around 2050
4. Based on your graph, how many years will it take for the population of 2004 to
double? About 96 years
The Earth's Carrying Capacity
Prior to 1950, the death rate was high, which kept the numbers of humans from
increasing rapidly. In the 19th Century, the agricultural revolution increased food
production. The industrial revolution improved methods of transporting food and other
good. In the 20th Century, advances in medicine, sanitation and nutrition have decreased
the death rates further. These factors combined to produce the rapid growth of the human
population in the 20th century.
As with any population, humans are also limited by factors such as space, amount of food
and disease. The carrying capacity is the number of individuals that a stable environment
can support. Authorities disagree on on the maximum number of people that the earth can
support, though the numbers generally range for 8 to 10 billion. As the population
approaches its limit, starvation will increase. Some countries have a much higher growth
rate than others. Growth rate is the number of people born minus the number of people
that die. Compare the growth rates of the following countries
Most countries are trying to reduce their growth rate. Zero population growth means that
as many people are being born as there are dying - to achieve zero population growth,
each couple would need to have no more than two children (to replace the parents). Even
if this number is achieved, the population will continue to grow because the parents will
still live on for decades, as their children have children and their children have
children..and so forth. The United States reached zero population growth in the 1980's,
and yet the overall population of the US still increases.

Analysis
1. What factors contributed to the world's overall population growth in the last 150
years.
The advancements of medicine, medical practices, medical supplies, nutrition (food
processing), and sanitation.
2. Why does a population not level off during the same year it reaches zero
population growth?
A population does not level off during the same year it reaches zero population
growth because even though there is the same amount of people dying as there is
being born, the parents keep on living for a time and the children have there own
children and so forth.
3. If the carrying capacity of the earth was 9 billion people, when would this number
be reached (according to your graph)?
Around the year 2060
4. What will happen when the human population exceeds the earth's carrying capacity?
Like the deer, humans will struggle to feed and care for everyone, so they will start to die
off. No food to eat, no space to live, and no medical help to go around. This will in turn
affect the animal and plant population, for we will try to consume and hunt them all until
nothing is left.

Вам также может понравиться