Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
11/30/2015 9:46:47 AM |
https://reportstst.opi.mt.gov:1443/ReportServer//CSIP/Reports/rptScori
1 of 5
Scoring Rubric Annual Progress Report | SC1228 |State Fiscal Year: 2016
SC Math
Analysis of Data
What student data did you use to evaluate the effectiveness of your 2012-2013 Action
Plan? What did you observe in the data? (growth, trends, differences among
subgroupls, variation in performance among standards, etc.)
To evaluate effectiveness, we used scores from MAP assessments and assessments
from our curriculum as well as teacher made/directed assessments and
observations. We continue to see improvements in our student population as a
whole as well as in most subgroups. Economically disadvantaged males continues to
be one subgroup that falls behind the rest of our population. We will continue to
focus on this subgroup to improve their scores.
2016 (Current Year) Action Plan
Define the specific measurable objectives for math.
90% of students whom take the CRT test will be proficient or higher.
90% of Economically disadvantaged students whom take the CRT test will be
proficient or higher.
90% of students Limited English Proficient whom take the CRT test will be proficient
or higher.
11/30/2015 9:46:47 AM |
https://reportstst.opi.mt.gov:1443/ReportServer//CSIP/Reports/
rptScoringRubricAnnualProgressReport
2 of 5
Scoring Rubric Annual Progress Report | SC1228 |State Fiscal Year: 2016
Describe the school's strategies for assessing student progress toward meeting all
content standards.
We will use DIBELS assessments, MAP assessments, curriculum assessments, teacher
created assessments that accompany our alignment project, and teacher
observations to assess and monitor our students' progress toward meeting all
content standards.
2016 (Current Year) Action Plan
Describe the school's integration of Indian Education for All into all areas of the
curriculum.
Every teacher in our school is integrating Indian Education for All into all subject
areas throughout the year. Teachers are using local resources (museums and
community members) as well as informational files, texts, and novel collections in
our school and classroom libraries. Teachers have also constructed units of study for
their specific grade levels using these resources.
11/30/2015 9:46:47 AM |
https://reportstst.opi.mt.gov:1443/ReportServer//CSIP/Reports/
rptScoringRubricAnnualProgressReport
3 of 5
Scoring Rubric Annual Progress Report | SC1228 |State Fiscal Year: 2016
SC Reading
Analysis of Data
What student data did you use to evaluate the effectiveness of your 2012-2013 Action
Plan? What did you observe in the data? (growth, trends, differences among
subgroupls, variation in performance among standards, etc.)
We used scores from MAP and DIBELS assessments as well as curriculum
assessments and teacher created/directed assessments and observations to
evaluate our progress. Our economically disadvantaged subgroups continue to fall
behind the progress or the rest of our student population.
2016 (Current Year) Action Plan
Define the specific measurable objectives for reading.
90% of students whom take the CRT test will be proficient or higher.
90% of Economically disadvantaged students whom take the CRT test will be
proficient or higher.
90% of students Limited English Proficient whom take the CRT test will be proficient
or higher.
11/30/2015 9:46:47 AM |
https://reportstst.opi.mt.gov:1443/ReportServer//CSIP/Reports/
rptScoringRubricAnnualProgressReport
4 of 5
Scoring Rubric Annual Progress Report | SC1228 |State Fiscal Year: 2016
11/30/2015 9:46:47 AM |
https://reportstst.opi.mt.gov:1443/ReportServer//CSIP/Reports/
rptScoringRubricAnnualProgressReport
5 of 5