Annapurna Corner

Restaurant Feedback

Parameters

Gender
Age
Quality
Service
Hygiene
Ambinence
Value for money
Time of arrival
Frequency of visit
Bill Amount
Number of persons

X Axis: Ratings
Y- Axis: Number of
responses

Quality of Food Analysis

Average
Median
Mode
Maximum
Minimum
Quartile 1
Quartile 2
Quartile 3
Standard Deviation
Variance

3.7818181
82
4
4
5
2
3
4
4
0.7623285
26
0.5705785
12

Service Analysis

X Axis: Ratings
Y Axis: Number of
responses

Average
Median
Mode
Maximum
Minimum
Quartile 1
Quartile 2
Quartile 3
Standard Deviation

3.7272727
27
4
4
5
2
3
4
4
0.8267416
06
0.6710743

Place Hygienic Analysis

X Axis: Ratings
Y Axis: Number of
responses

Average
Median
Mode
Maximum
Minimum
Quartile 1
Quartile 2
Quartile 3
Standard Deviation
Variance

3.70909090
9
4
4
5
2
3
4
4
0.85359213
2
0.71537190
1

Ambience Analysis

X Axis: Ratings
Y Axis: Number of
responses

Average
Median
Mode
Maximum
Minimum
Quartile 1
Quartile 2
Quartile 3
Standard Deviation
Variance

3.58181818
2
4
4
5
2
3
4
4
0.78624539
3
0.60694214
9

Value For Money Analysis

X Axis: Ratings
Y Axis: Number of
responses

Average
Median
Mode
Maximum
Minimum
Quartile 1
Quartile 2
Quartile 3
Standard Deviation
Variance

3.763636364
4
4
5
2
3
4
4
0.859880189
0.725950413

Time of Arrival of the

customers
Service Time
Average
Median
Mode
Maximum
Minimum
Quartile 1
Quartile 2
Quartile 3
Standard Deviation
Variance

23.4
23
20
46
10
20
23
27
7.721063062
58.53090909

Frequency of Visit
Average
Median
Mode
Maximum
Minimum
Quartile 1
Quartile 2
Quartile 3
Standard Deviation
Variance

2.381818182
2
2
5
1
2
2
3
1.045110469
1.072396694

Average
Median
Mode
Maximum
Minimum
Quartile 1
Quartile 2
Quartile 3
Standard
Deviation

Average Bill per Person245.988210

Average
Median
Mode
Maximum
Minimum
Quartile 1
Quartile 2
Quartile 3
Standard Deviation
3.418181818
3
Variance
2
9
1
2
Number persons
3
4
1.739422095

7
250
300
600
77.4
161.666666
7
250
300
100.609670
5
9938.26387
8

in a group

Relation Between Customer Age Bill paid:

0.258

700
600
500
400

X Axis: Age
Y Axis: Bill Per Person

300
200
100
0
10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Relation between Age Frequency : -0.0544

6
5
4
3
2

1
X Axis: Age
Y Axis: Frequency of Visit 0
10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Relation between Age - No. of persons:

0.350

10

X Axis: Age
Y Axis: Number of Persons

9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Relation Between Quality Service:

0.58
6
5
4
3

X Axis: Quality
Y Axis: Service

2
1
0
1.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

Relation between Quality VFM: 0.2023

6

X Axis: Quality Rating

Y Axis: VFM Rating

5
4
3
2
1
0
1.5

Relation Between No. of persons to Service

Time: 0.067
2

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

10
9
8
7
6
5

X Axis: Service Time

Y Axis: Number of persons

4
3
2
1
0
5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Relation between Quality Hygiene: 0.412

6

X Axis: Quality Rating

Y Axis: Hygiene Rating

5
4
3
2
1
0
1.5

Relation between Hygiene - Frequency of

visit: 0.106
2

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

6
5
4
3

X Axis: Hygiene Rating 2

Y Axis: Frequency of Rating
1
0
1.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

Relation Between Service - Frequency of

Visit: 0.2942

6
5

X Axis: Service Rating

Y Axis: Frequency of Visit

4
3
2
1
0
1.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

Relation Between Frequency of Visit - Bill

paid: -0.164
700
600
500
400
300

X Axis: Frequency of Visit

Y Axis: Bill

200
100
0
0.5

1.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

Relation between Service Bill:

0.0386

700
600

X Axis: Ratings
Y Axis: Bill Per Person

500
400
300
200
100
0
1.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

Relation between Quality of Food Bill

paid: 0.00
700
600
500
400
300

X Axis: Ratings
Y Axis: Bill Per Person

200
100
0
1.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

Relation Between Ambience - Bill: 0.057

700
600

X Axis: Ratings
Y Axis: Bill Per Person

500
400
300
200
100
0
1.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

Relation between Hygiene - Bill: -0.355

700
600
500

X Axis: Ratings
Y Axis: Bill Per Person

400
300
200
100
0
1.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

Relation between Service time - Bill: -0.164

700
600

X Axis: Ratings
Y Axis: Bill Per Person

500
400
300
200
100
0
5

10

15

Relation between Frequency - No. of

persons: -0.181
20

25

30

35

40

45

50

10
9
8

X Axis: Frequency
Y Axis: Number of Persons

7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0.5

1.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

Conclusion
Target smaller groups, serve quickly
to increase the bill amount
Target the older groups to increase
the bill amount
Better the service, more is the
frequency

Thank You