Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Or
U.JIIAL
A variety of treatment procedures have been advocated in the past for the management of avulsed or
exarticulated teeth (1). The majority of these were
directed at the prevention of root resorption associated witli inflammation or ankylosis, the major
causes of tooth loss following replantation. However,
many treatment methods have been unsuccessful,
and tooth loss following replantation is a disconcerting but not uncommon clinical observation. It is
apparent that a basic understanding of the cellular
interactions occurring at the root surface and within
the periodontal membrane is essential to the successful management of the avulsed tooth. The following
discussion aims to examine these interactions in the
context of recent replantation and attachment
studies.
The normal periodontium
been focused upon the complex nature of the outermost layers of the root: the granular layer of Tomes,
the intermediate cementum and, closest to the periodontal membrane, the dental cementum. It has
been suggested that the intermediate cementum,
forming an effective barrier between the dentin and
the periodontal membrane, is critical to the progress
of root resorption (4,5). Furthermore, it can not be
regenerated once it has been damaged. An appreciation of the development and function of these layers is essential to the understanding of periodontal
repair.
Root resorption associated with inflammation or ankylosis:
The major causes of tooth loss following replantation
Under normal circumstances, invasion of the periodontal membrane by bone, and dentoalveolar
ankylosis (union between tooth and bone) are not
observed. However, these tissues are not static. The
bone socket surface is continuously remodelled in
response to functional demands, and cementum,
although not normally resorbed, grows slowly but
continuously throughout life.
In contrast, pathological resorption of the dental
root is often found on the external surface of replanted teetli in association with trauma and infection or with dentoalveolar ankylosis. In the past,
root resorption has been subdivided into static and
separate entities which, labelled accordingly, inferred a difference in the basic resorptive mechanisms. This has become somewhat misleading and
1
Hammarstrom et al.
the following discussion attempts to focus on resorption as a dynamic and unified process.
Root resorption, although an e.ssentially pathological process, apparently differs little from its osseous homcostatic counterpart. There are, however,
some notable differences between the cells responsible for resorption of the different tissues (6). Although both are of hematogenous origin, dentinresorbing cells (Fig. 1) are usually smaller and contain fewer nuclei than osteoclasts (7). Furthermore,
the well-developed clear zones evident in activelyresorbing osteoclasts contrast with those observed in
dentin-resorbing cells, which are either very small
or non-existent (6,8). It has been suggested that
the appearance of resorbing eells is affected by the
nature of the tissue being resorbed and that the cells
should be designated accordingly, as in the terms
dentinoclast and osteoclast (6).
During the actual avulsion and replantation procedures, small areas of mechanical damage to the
cementum surface are sustained, and these result
in the shallow resorption lacunae observed after
replantation and termed surlace resorption
(9,10). Under ideal conditions (that is, where the
vitality ol the periodontal membrane has not been
compromised, and the pulp or dentin is not contaminated by bacteria), rapid periodontal healing
and root surface repair occur. Apposition of reparative cementum within these resorption lacunae is
usually completed within 14 days (11).
The status of the dental pulp is critical to the
root resorption process. The pul|3 invariably loses its
vascular supply following avulsion and, except in
the case of an immature tooth with an open apex,
revascularization rarely occurs (12,13). Necrosis
generally proceeds and the pulp is often infected as
a result of contact with saliva or extra-oral debris
(1,12). Nevertheless, as long as the eementum covering the root surface remains intaet, the bacteria and
products of pulp tissue degradation remain reasonably confined to the root canal. Once the cementum
and intermediate cementum are penetrated by the
surface resorption referred to earlier, the dentinal
tubules provide a pathway for the passage of bacteria and their toxic products from the pulp
chamber to the root surface. An inflammatory response is subsequently evoked within the periodontal membrane, and root substance and bone are
destroyed. This proce.ss is accelerated in the younger
patient in whom the dentinal tubules, often sealed
with the progress of years, are still patent (1,14).
This sequence of events has been termed inflammatory root resorption (15,16) and, if not resolved,
can cause rapid destruction of the dental root. If,
however, the inflammation subsides, ankylosis often
results from the fusion of ingrowing bone to dentin
exposed by the resorption process.
Tooth replantation
Hammarstrom et al.
Fig. 2. The histomorphometric evaluation technique. A predetermined number of radii were superimposed over each section
taken from a step-serial sectioned tooth. At the intersections of
the radii and the root surlaee (at 8 points shown in this Figure)
the appearance of the periodontium was elassified according
to defmed criteria (normal periodontium, surface resorption,
inflammatory resorption, ete). The percentage area of root surface showing a defined criterion was caleulated by dividing the
product of the number of observation points showing the defmed
criterion X 100, by the total number of observation points.
Although it is most desirable to replant the exarticulated tooth as quickly as possible, this may not
always be feasible. In these situations, it is essential
to ensure maximal viability of the periodontal metnbrane attached to the root surface. Accordingly, the
tooth must be prevented from drying, and it is
important that its storage medium is of the correct
osmolality and pH (27,28). It has been shown that
after 60 min of dry storage very few periodontal
cells retain their vitality (22,29). Such a situation
guarantees the onset of extensive pulpally-derived
inflammatory resorption or of ankylosis and subsequent replacement root resorption of endodontically treated teeth (1,19,22). Storage in tap water
is equally as damaging as dry storage, the hypotonic
eonditions resulting in rapid cell lysis (27). Experimentally available media, such as physiological culture media, preserve cell viability well, but these are
rarely available at the site of accident (27,28,30).
Saliva allows storage of teeth for about 2 h (31).
However, its hypotonicity augers poorly for cell survival and, furthermore, the compromised cells demonstrate a lowered resistance lo the bacteria normally found in saliva (22,27,28,32). Recent studies
have established that milk is an excellent storage
medium, and teeth stored for up to 6 h demonstrate
the same low index of resorption as teeth replanted
immediately following avulsion (30,31), The pH
The role of rigid and semi-rigid fixation in the treatment of the replanted tooth has been investigated
and it was concluded that minimal splinting permits
Tooth replantation
T^z'fj. J?. Schematic drawing and photomicrc^graphs illustrating the most common periodontal re])air patterns observed during re|)lantation studies.
Hammarstrom et al.
I M M I D I A l I Kl PI \ N 1 ,\1 K ) \ '
Ih
42%
86%
MILK (ih
SAtlVA
21%
79%
Fig. 4. Periodontal healing patterns after variotis extraoral treatments of an avulsed tooth. The drawings summarize results (Voni a
number of studies (17,21,27,30,31,34,41). I'-ndo indicates that the teeth were treated endodontically with gutta percha root fillings
extraorally. The periodontal ccjnditions were evaluated after a healing period of 8 weeks. The figures indicate the relative area (in
%) of the root stnlace showing the tiiost common periodontal re])air patterns indicated in Fig. 3.
Tooth replantation
Conclusions
7.
8.
9.
10.
1. Radiographie and elinieal study of 110 human teeth replanted after accidental loss. Acta Odontot Scand 1966; 24:
263-86.
16. ANDREASEN J O , HIORTING-HANSEN 1',. Replantation ol teeth.
Hammarstrom et al.
H. Histological study of 22 replanted anterior teeth in humatis. Acta Odontol Scand 1966; 24: 287-306.
17. HAMMARSTROM L, BI.OMLOF L, FEIGLIN B, ANDERSSON tj,
HAMMARSTROM L. Eflect of masticatory stimulation on dentoalveolar ankylosis after experimental tooth replantation.
Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; /. 13-6.
42. HAMMARSTROM L, BLOMLOF L, FEIGLIN B, LINDSKOG S. The
elTect of calcium hydroxide on root resorption and periodontal repair. Endod Dent Traumatol (in press).