Continuous Stirrer Tank Reactors in Series.

Dpeartment of Chemical Engineering
NWFP UET PESHAWAR

Pakistan
Mini Project Cstrs in series

Group Members
Muhammad Azeem
Muhammad Shakir
Qazi Muhammad Ali
Sami Ullah
Mehfooz Ur Rehman
Jehangir Khan

Supervisor:
Engr. Ihsan ullah

Mini Project
Continuous stirrer tank reactors in
series.

Summary of previous work.
1. Introduction
2. Commissioning
3. Calibration of pumps

Results of calibration of pumps.
Pumps calibration.
100
Flowrate (ml/min)
80
60
Series1
40
20
0
2 4 6 8 10
Potentiometer speed

Time constant calculation for
different flow rates.
For liquid level system time constant is

given by
T = V/q
Where V is the operating volume of tank
And q is flow rate.

Determining the operating volume
of one tank.
Fill the first two tanks until the second tank
overflows.
Open the drain valve and collect all liquid in a
graduated beaker.
Divide this volume by 2 to get the operating
volume of single tank.
Results
Total volume = 1350ml
thus V1 = 1350ml/2 = 675ml
Now T can be found by our adjusted flow rate.
Experimental work to be performed.
Section 1:
Dynamics of stirred tank.
Section 2:
Chemical reaction in stirred tank reactors
in series

Dynamics…
The way how the system responds when
any type of changes in its input are
introduced is known as its dynamic
behavior.

Experiments performed on CSTRs
Section 1:
Effect of step input change.

Response of tank concentration to an impulse
Change.
Influence of flow rate on a three tank system
following a step change in input concentration.
Response to step change in input concentration
of system comprising on one stirred vessel and
dead time module.

Time constant
The value of Y(t) reaches 63.2 percent of its

ultimate value when the time elapsed is
equal to one time constant T. When the time
elapsed is 2T,3T, and 4T, the percent
response is 86.5, 95, and 98, respectively.
From these facts, one can consider the
response essentially completed in three to
four time constants.

Experiment no 1:
Effect of a step input change.
Procedure:
1. Make up 5 litres of 0.1M potassium chloride solution.
Formula of potassium chloride = KCl
Molecular weight of potassium ,K= 39gm
Molecular weight of Chlorine, Cl= 35.5gm
Molecular weight of KCl = (39+35.5)gm
Molecular weight of KCl = 74.5gm
For .1M KCl solution
as KCl is in solid form
.1M KCl solution = Molarity *Molecular weight of KCl
= .1*74.5gm = 7.45gm (for 1litre solution)
For 5 litre solution;
5 litres of 0.1M KCl solution = 5lit * 7.45gm = 37.25gm KCl

Procedure
1. Dissolve 37.25gm of KCl in 5litre water to make.1M KCl solution.
2. Fill one of the reagent feed vessel with this solution.
3. Half fill the other feed vessel with demineralised or deionised water.
4. Pour this water into each of the reactors until they are full to standpipe
overflow levels. This is to save time as it would take several minutes to fill
the reactors using the feed pumps.
5. Start the water feed pump and set to 6.0 on speed adjust dial.
6. Start the stirrers and set to 8.0 on speed adjust dial.
7. Start taking conductivity reading after every 30sec for period of 45min
8. After few minutes, when water is flowing from the tank, through each
reactor in turn and eventually out to drain. Stop the water feed pump and
immediately start the KCl pump with the speed set to 6.0 on the speed
adjust dial.
9. When experiment is complete, use Microsoft excel to plot graphs of
conductivity vs. time and explain their shape.

Effect of step input change in tank 1,2 and 3
respectively by using experimental data.
Effect of step input change in tank 1.

14
Conductivity (ms)
12
12
10
Conductivity (ms)
10
8
Series1 8
6
4 6 Series1
2 4
0 2
18.5
24.5
30.5
0.5
12.5
36.5
42.5
6.5
0.5
30.5
5.5
10.5
15.5
20.5
25.5
35.5
40.5
Time (min)
Time (min)
8
7
Conductivity (ms)
6
5
4 Series1
3
2
1
0
20.5
25.5
30.5
35.5
40.5
0.5
5.5
10.5
15.5
Time (min)

Finding time constant from
experimental data.
First method:
Potentiometer speed = 6
Corresponding flow rate = 54.1 ml/min
Volume of one tank = 675 ml
since,
Time constant = T = V/q
Time constant = T = 675ml/54.1(ml/min)
T = 12.5min

Continued…..
Graphical method:
In step response curve the time
constant is achieved when ordinate of graph
Y(t)/A = .632
Where,
Y(t) = K (conductivity)
And,
A = ultimate value of K = 11.5(.1M KCl)

Calculating T for each tank.
Tank 1:
K(t) = .632 * 11.52
kt = ks +7.3
= .56 + 7.3 = 7.84mS
Corresponding time from experimental data:
T1 = 15min
Tank 2:
K(t) = .632 * 11.52
k2 = ks +7.3
= .5 + 7.3 = 7.8mS
T2 = 32min
Tank 3:
K(t) = .632 * 11.52
k3 = ks +7.3
= .45 + 7.3 = 7.75mS
T3 = 49min

Experiment no 2:
Response of tank concentration to an impulse
Change.
Procedure:
2. So we have to dissolve 37.25gm of KCl in 5litre water to 5 litres of .1M KCl solution.
5. Pour this water into each of the reactors until they are full to standpipe overflow levels.
This is to save time as it would take several minutes to fill the reactors using the feed
pumps.
7. Set 5.0 as the flow rate on the salt feed pump.
9. Start taking conductivity reading after every 30sec for period of 60min.
10. An impulse change is applied by switching off the water feed pump and instantly
switching on the salt solution feed pump.
11. Allow the salt solution to be pumped into the first reactor for 15 minutes then instantly
switch back to water again.
12. When experiment is complete, use Microsoft excel to plot graphs of conductivity vs. time
and explain their shape.

Effect of impulse change in tank 1,2 and 3
respectively by using experimental data.
Effect of a impulse change in tank 1.
Effect of impulse change in tank 2.
Conductivity (ms)
8
7 5
6
Conductivity (ms)
5 4
4 Series1 3
3 Series1
2 2
1
1
0
26.5
39.5
52.5
13.5
0.5
20
33
46
7
39.5
52.5
0.5
7
13.5
20
26.5
33
46
Time (min)
Time (min)
Effect of impulse change in tank 3.
3.5
3
Conductivity (ms)
2.5
2
Series1
1.5
1
0.5
0
7
20
33
46
0.5
13.5
26.5
39.5
52.5
Time (m in)

Experiment no 3:
Influence of flow rate on a three tank system
following a step change in input concentration.
Procedure:
2. So we have to dissolve 37.25gm of KCl in 5litre water to make 0.1M KCl solution.
5. Pour this water into each of the reactors until they are full to standpipe overflow levels. This is
to save time as it would take several minutes to fill the reactors using the feed pumps.
8. Start taking conductivity reading after every 30sec for period of 45min
9. After few minutes, when water is flowing from the tank, through each reactor in turn and
eventually out to drain. Stop the water feed pump and immediately start the KCl pump with
the speed set to 6.0 on the speed adjust dial.
10. Repeat the experiment twice with a KCl flow rate set 6.0 and 8.0 on the speed adjust dial.
11. When experiment is complete, use Microsoft excel to plot graphs of conductivity vs. time and
explain their shape.
12. Determine time constant and verify that they are inversely proportional to respective flow
rates.

respectively when KCl feed pump set on 4.0 on
speed adjust dial.
Effect of step change input in tank 1.
Effect of a step input change in tank 2.
10
Conductivity (ms)
Conductivity (ms)
8 5
6 4
Series1
4 3 Series1
2
2
1
0
0
35.5
40.5
0.5
5.5
10.5
15.5
20.5
25.5
30.5
15.5
20.5
30.5
40.5
0.5
5.5
10.5
25.5
35.5
Time (min) Time (min)
3
Conductivity (ms)
2.5
2
1.5 Series1
1
0.5
0
0.5
5.5
10.5
15.5
20.5
25.5
30.5
35.5
40.5
Time (min)

experimental data.
First method:
since,
T =19.2min

experimental data.
Graphical method:
Y(t)/A = .632
Where,
And,

Tank 1:
K(t) = .632 * 11.52
kt = ks +7.3
= .58 + 7.3 = 7.88mS
T1 = 39.5min
Tank 2:
K(t) = .632 * 11.52
k2 = ks +7.3
= .56 + 7.3 = 7.86mS
This response is not achieved in the process period.
Tank 3:
K(t) = .632 * 11.52
k3 = ks +7.3
= .54 + 7.3 = 7.84mS
This response is not achieved in the process period.

speed adjust dial.
Effect of step input change in tank 1. Effect of step input change in tank 2.
14 12
Conductivity (ms)
Conductivity (ms)
12 10
10 8
8
Series1 6 Series1
6
4
4
2 2
0 0
0.5
30.5
5.5
10.5
15.5
20.5
25.5
35.5
40.5
0.5
6.5
12.5
18.5
24.5
30.5
36.5
42.5
Time (ms) Time (min)
8
7
Conductivity (ms)
6
5
4 Series1
3
2
1
0
20.5
25.5
30.5
35.5
40.5
0.5
5.5
10.5
15.5
Time (min)

experimental data.
First method:
since,
T = 12.5min

Continued….
Graphical method:
Y(t)/A = .632
Where,
And,

Tank 1:
K(t) = .632 * 11.52
kt = ks +7.3
= .56 + 7.3 = 7.84mS
T1 = 15min
Tank 2:
K(t) = .632 * 11.52
k2 = ks +7.3
= .5 + 7.3 = 7.8mS
T2 = 32min
Tank 3:
K(t) = .632 * 11.52
k3 = ks +7.3
= .45 + 7.3 = 7.75mS
T3 = 49min

speed adjust dial.
Effect a step input change in tank 1.
12
Conductivity (ms)
12
Conductiity (ms)
10 10
8 8
6 Series1 6 Series1
4
4
2
2
0
0
35.5
40.5
0.5
5.5
10.5
15.5
20.5
25.5
30.5
15.5
20.5
30.5
35.5
10.5
25.5
40.5
0.5
5.5
Time (min) Time (min)

Conductivity (ms)
10
8
6
Series1
4
2
0
35.5
10.5
15.5
20.5
25.5
30.5
40.5
0.5
5.5
Time (min)

experimental data.
First method:
since,
T = 9.1min

Continued….
Graphical method:
Y(t)/A = .632
Where,
And,

Tank 1:
K(t) = .632 * 11.52
kt = ks +7.3
= .58 + 7.3 = 7.88mS
T1 = 13.5min
Tank 2:
K(t) = .632 * 11.52
k2 = ks +7.3
= .56 + 7.3 = 7.86mS
T2 = 27.5min
Tank 3:
K(t) = .632 * 11.52
k3 = ks +7.3
= .54 + 7.3 = 7.84mS
T3 = 39.5min

Relation between flow rate and
time constant.
Flowrate vs Time Constant(T1)
45
Time constant,T1 (min)
40
35
30
25
Series1
20
15
10
5
0
35.1 54.1 74.1
Flowrate (ml/min)

Experiment no 4:
Response to step change in input concentration of system
comprising on one stirred vessel and dead time module.
Procedure:
1. Prepare 5 litres of 0.1M and 0.01M KCl.

2. Fill tank no. 3 and the dead time coil up to the overflow level with 0.1M KCl
solution.
3. Connect the feed pump discharge to the tank no. 3 inlet fitting.
4. Start the pump from the 0.1M feed tank and adjust the flow to position 8.0 on the
speed adjust dial.
5. Switch on the agitators and adjust the speed the speed to position 5.0 on the
speed adjust dial.
6. Adjust the overflow height to give an operating level in tank no. 3 almost at the
standpipe overflow height.
7. Start taking readings of conductivity after 30sec over a 45 minutes period.
8. Stop the 0.1M feed pump and immediately start the 0.01M feed pump adjusted to
same flow rate.
9. Convert conductivity readings to concentration.
10. Plot curves relating concentration level (conductivity) and time for tank no. 3 and
dead time coil.

Response to step change in input concentration of system
comprising on one stirred vessel and dead time module
using experimental data.
R e s p o n s e to a s te p c h a n g e in
Response to a step change in
in p u t c o n c e n tra tio n in ta n k 3 .
input concentration in deadtime
coil module.
14
12
Condictivity (ms)
10 15
8
Conductivity (ms)
S e rie s 1
6 10
4 S eries1
2 5
0
0
1
6
11
16
21
26
31
36
1
6
11
16
21
26
31
36
T im e (m in )
T im e (m in)

experimental data.
First method:
since,
T = 9.1min

Continued….
Second method:
Graphical method:
Y(t)/A = .632
Where,
And,

Calculating T for tank 3.
Tank 3:
K(t) = -.632 * 2.1
kt = ks -1.33
= 11.42 - 1.33 = 10.09mS
T3 = 11min

Finding time constant from experimental
data for dead time coil.
Graphical method:
Y(t)/A = .632
Where,
And,

Calculating T for dead time coil.
Dead time coil:
K(t) = -.632 * 2.1
kt = ks -1.33
= 11.42 - 1.33 = 10.09mS
T4 = 15min

Response of tank 3
C3=Co(Ku-K3/Ku-Ko) (a)
Concentration vs. time.
0.1
C3 (mol/L)
0.08
0.06
0.04
Series1
0.02
0
10
13
16
1
Time (min)

Response of dead time coil
C4=(Cb-Ca)*(1-exp(t-T4)/T3)+Ca (b)
C4 vs t
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
C4 (mol/L)
0.05
Series1
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
10
13
16
19
22
1
4
7
Time (min)

Research paper
Process improvement approach to the saponification reaction by using statistical
experimental design.
Author:
Nihal Bursali a, Suna Ertunc b, Bulent Akayb,∗
a Yenimahalle Municipality Precidency, 06170 Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey
Work:
The saponification reaction yields ethyl acetate and ethyl alcohol
which are very useful products.
Therefore, it is quite demanding to determine best operating
conditions for the maximum production. Present study is made for
this purpose for the batch saponification reaction. The factors
examined are:
Temperature.2.Agitation rate. 3. Initial NaOH concentration. 4. And
initial CH3COOC2H5 concentration. Selected process response is
conversion of NaOH.
”Statistical design of experiments” method has been used to plan
the experiments to fulfill the purpose of optimization. This is divided
into three phases:
1-Screening 2-Comparing 3-and influence of significant
parameters.

Continued…
At very first, the most effective parameters for process response are detected. The
screening is planned by using the full-two-level factorial experimental design. This
made convenience for evaluating the number of experiments to be performed in a
mathematical way. For the four parameters, it gives 2^4=16 experiments.
Randomization of experiments is made by using Gnumeric programme of Linux
operation system. Temperature and agitation rate were declared to have no effects
on the process response. Sum of squares of factors by using Yates’Alogrithm was
used to get the magnitude of effected parameters. Lastly, Variance analysis is made
for comparison. Then, response surface method (RSM) is applied to get optimal
conditions by using the quadratic second order polynomial model. In the response
surface method design, Face-centered central composite technique is used to identify
the second order polynomial model. This helped to illustrate the dependence of
response on significant factors.
The results yielded by the constructed models in this study were checked for
adequacy with the help of an efficient model validation test method known as
“Graphical residual analysis”.
The maximum conversion of NaOH for the optimum conditions that are
Conc. Of NaOH = 0.01M and Conc. Of CH3COOC2H5 = 0.1M
is 98%.

Section 2:
Chemical reaction in stirred tank reactors in series
Sponification reaction:
NaOH +CH3COOC2H5 = CH3COONa +

C2H5OH

Section2:
Chemical reaction in stirred tank reactors
in series.
Experiments to optimize the
saponification reaction:
Demonstration of the progress of a
second order chemical reaction
through three continuous stirred tank
reactors in series and optimization of
the operating parameters for maximum
conversion .

Experiment no 5:
demonstration of the progress of a second order
chemical reaction through three continuous stirred
tank reactors in series.
Procedure:
1. Make up 5 litres batches of 0.05M sodium hydroxide and 0.05M
ethyl acetate.
2. Fill the reagent feed vessels with reactants and refit the lids
carefully.
3. Switch on both feed pumps and agitator motor with specific
settings.
4. Start recording the conductivity with respect to time
5. The conversion is evaluated using the steady state
concentration of sodium hydroxide.
6. These conductivity measurements at the drain through the dead
time coil are now to be translated into degree of conversion of
the constituents.

Conclusions and future
suggestions
Continuous stirred tank reactors in series have been studied experimentally in detail for
their dynamic behavior. By introducing the step and impulse input changes in
concentrations and flow rates of reagents, the system is confirmed to be first order.
The step and impulse response curves are found to be the sigmoidal and exponential
respectively. Furthermore, saponification reaction is carried out and the effects of
parameters are analyzed using the factorial design of experiments method. Best
operating parameters for saponification reaction in CSTRs in series recommended
are:
NaOH Feed Rate = 45 ml/min,
CH3COOC2H5 Feed Rate = 85 ml/min
and Agitators Speed = 9.
This combination of factors yielded 96.4 % Sodium Hydroxide conversion.
The ‘reagents concentrations’ and ‘system temperature’ effects have been neglected
during the analysis for optimization, but these may affect the process response
considerably. Taking these into account for optimization of process parameters, one
may get more beneficial values of conversion.
First two and the third reactors may be connected in parallel, but obviously will have a low
performance than the existing ones in series.

Future work
Finding rate constant for sponification

reaction.
Summarizing of whole work.
Report preparation.

Reference:
www.armfield.org.uk
PROCESS SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND CONTROL , Donald R.

Coughanowr , 2nd edition.
Equation (a) and (b) , taken from manual of CSTRs in series.

Thanks

Any question.

Continuous Stirrer Tank Reactors in Series.

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Continuous Stirrer Tank Reactors in Series.

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Dpeartment of Chemical Engineering

NWFP UET PESHAWAR

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Engr. Ihsan ullah

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

For liquid level system time constant is

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Effect of step input change.

Mini Project Cstrs in series

The value of Y(t) reaches 63.2 percent of its

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Effect of step input change in tank 2.

Effect of step input change in tank 3.

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Effect of impulse change in tank 3.

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Effect of a step input change in tank 3.

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Time (ms) Time (min)

Effect of step input change in tank 3.

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Effect of a step input change in tank 3.

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

1. Prepare 5 litres of 0.1M and 0.01M KCl.

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

NaOH +CH3COOC2H5 = CH3COONa +

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series

Mini Project Cstrs in series