Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
As the Interstate Highway System evolved in the 1950s, one of its goals was
to transport military vehicles. The Alternative Military Load (also referred to
as Interstate Load) was created to cover axle loads from heavy military
equipment. This new load, shown in Figure 3, consists of two axles 4 feet
apart with each axle carrying a load of 24,000 pounds.
In recent years, AASHTO has created the document titled LRFD Bridge
Design Specifications. The current 3rd edition was published in 2004 with a
2005 interim. The purpose of the LRFD (Load and Resistance Factor Design)
document is not to make all existing bridges obsolete, but to provide a
design of new bridges that includes benefits from statistics, research and
new materials. Load and resistance coefficients are slightly different, but the
results are similar. The Federal Highway Administration has endorsed the
new LRFD method and encouraged its adoption for new bridge designs
after 2007. As a result, precast concrete manufacturers are seeing contract
documents that require AASHTO HL93 truck loads.
The HL93 designation consists of a design truck plus design lane
load or design tandem plus design lane load, whichever produces
the worst case. A design truck is identical to the HS20 load
configurations shown in Figure 2. The design tandem is the same as shown
in Figure 3 except that the axle load is 25,000 pounds rather than 24,000
pounds. The term lane load is new and applies to design of above
grade bridge decks. It does not apply to below ground structures.
This is confirmed in ASTM C1577, which states that the tables were created
using the AASHTO HL 93 live load without the lane load as permitted by
AASHTO.
Many precast manufacturers pose the question, How does the new HL93
load affect design of structures that were designed with wheel loads
specified in the old document Standard Specifications for Highway
Bridges? The term wheel load is used because spans on most underground
structures are so small that only one wheel can be on top of the structure at
any given time. A wheel load is one-half of the axle load.
A comparison of old versus new indicates that the difference is very small.
The HL93 design truck wheel load is the same as the HS20 wheel load. The
HL93 design tandem wheel load is 12,500 pounds compared with the
Alternate Military Load of 12,000 pounds. The extra 500-pound wheel load
is not a large increase and will only affect those designs that did not have
excess capacity.
Designs that were based on HS25 loads can in some cases be capable of
carrying the new design truck load. A 20,000-pound wheel load for HS25 is
larger than the 16,000-pound design truck load in HL93.
Wheel loads affect the top slab design more than wall and bottom slab. This
is especially true where the slab is less than 2 feet below grade. The effect of
the wheel load on the slab decreases as depth of cover increases. Wall
design in the majority of cases will not be affected by the small increase in
loads required by the LRFD Bridge Design Specification. The same is true of
the bottom slab design.
It can be concluded that the new loads may affect existing designs, but the
difference between old and new does not mean that all designs need to be
updated. The small increases will not affect designs that have excess
capacity. Those designs that minimized reinforcing steel and slab thickness
to create a structure that was just good enough may need to be reviewed.
These conclusions are based on a comparison of wheel loads and do not
include the many other factors used in design. Items such as impact, depth
of cover, load and resistance coefficients all play a part in the final design. A
true comparison of designs must be made based on criteria used in the
precasters previous calculations.
A comparison of two ASTM specifications demonstrates that old designs are
not inferior to new designs using LRFD. ASTM C1433 was written for box
culverts using the older load factor design (LFD), while ASTM C1577 was
written for box culverts using the newer LRFD design. Some of the steel
areas required in the newer specifications are less than steel areas required
in the older specification. This comparison confirms that the new HL93
loading is not meant to cause redesign of underground precast structures.
.