Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 33

29 HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES

29.1

INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................29-1

29.2

EROSION AND SCOUR PROTECTION......................................................................29-1

29.3

ENERGY DISSIPATORS........................................................................................29-2
29.3.1 Riprap Basins for Conduit Outlets............................................................. 29-3
29.3.2 Stilling Basins.........................................................................................29-3
29.3.3 Simple Energy-Dissipating Headwalls ..........................................................29-5
29.3.4 Design Criteria and Practices.....................................................................29-5

29.4

DROP STRUCTURES..........................................................................................29-5

29.5

STORMWATER DRAIN OUTFALLS...........................................................................29-10

29.6

TRANSITIONS AND CONSTRICTIONS.....................................................................29-13


29.6.1 Transition Analysis ............................................................................... 29-13
29.6.2 Constriction Analysis............................................................................. 29-13

29.7

BENDS AND CONFLUENCES.................................................................................29-15


29.7.1 Bends..................................................................................................29-15
29.7.2 Confluences..........................................................................................29-16

29.8

SIDE-OVERFLOW WEIRS...................................................................................29-17
29.8.1 Design Considerations .............................................................................29-17
29.8.2 Design Practices................................................................................... 29-17

29.9

FLOW SPLITTER..............................................................................................29-19
29.9.1 Design Consideration............................................................................ 29-20
29.9.2 Design Criteria .................................................................................... 29-20

29.10 FLOW SPREADER...............................................................................................29-20


29.10.1 General Design Criteria ......................................................................... 29-20
29.10.2 Design Criteria for Flow Spreading Options...................................................29-21
29.11 SIPHONS.......................................................................................................... 29-24
29.11.1 Single-Barrel Siphons..............................................................................29-25
29.11.2 Multi-Barrel Siphons ...............................................................................29-25
29.11.3 Design Criteria and Practices.....................................................................29-25

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

29-i

Hydraulic Structures

29.1 INTRODUCTION

Hydraulic structures are used to positively control water


flow velocities, directions and depths, the elevation and
slope of the stream bed, and the general configuration of a
waterway including its stability and maintenance
cha racteristics.

Where there is no well defined channel downstream of


the apron, the width, W, of the outlet and of the
apron (as shown in Figure 29.4) should be as follows:W = 3D, + 0.44, for T\W. D0/2
and
W = 3,00 + 44,

Many of there structures appear as specials and are


expensive, which require careful and thorough hydraulic
engineering judgement. Proper application of hydraulic
structures can reduce initial and future maintenance costs
by changing the character of the flow to fit the needs of a
particular project, and by reducing the size and cost of
related facilities.

On the contrary, where there is a well-defined channel


downstream of the apron, the bottom width of the
apron should be at least equal to the bottom width of
the channel and the lining should extend at least one
foot aboye the tailwater elevation and at least twothirds of the vertical conduit dimension aboye the
invert.
The side slopes should be 2:1 or flatter.

The bottom grade should be level.

There should be an overfall at the end of the apron or


culvert.

(ii) Apron Materials

When the flow velocity at a conduit outlet exceeds the


maximum permissible velocity for the local soil or channel
lining, channel protection is required. This protection
usually consists of an erosion resistant reach, such as
riprap, between the outlet and the stable downstream
channel to provide a stable reach at the outlet in which the
exit velocity is reduced to a velocity allowable in the
downstream channel. The design of such protection is
normally based on a 20 year design runoff event.

The median stone diameter, d50 is determined from


the following equation:
0.066(Q)4/3

(29.5)

d50 - TW(D0)

If protection is needed at the outlet, a horizontal (zero


slope) apron must be provided.

Existing scour holes may be used where fat aprons


are impractical. Figure 29.5 shows the general design
of a scour hole. The stone diameter is determined
using the following equatons:

(i) Apron Dimensions

0.041(Q)413

for Y = D0/2

(29.6)

u50 - TW(Do)

The length of an apron (La) is determined using the

the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1976): La =

(29.4)

29.2 EROSION AND SCOUR PROTECTION

following empirical relationships that were developed for

for TW < D0/2

The width of the apron at the culvert outlet should be


at least 3 times the culvert width.

The shape, size, and other features of a hydraulic structure


can vary widely for different projects, depending upon the
functions to be accomplished. Hydraulic design procedures
must govern the final design of all structures. This may
include model testing when a proposed design requires a
configuration that differs significantly from known
documented guidelines.

(29.3)

also

__________+ 7 D, for TW < D0/2

d=so

3.26Q

0.027(Q)4/3
TW(Do)

for Y = Do

(29.7)

(29.1)

D a3 / 2

where Y = depth of scour hole below culvert invert.

and
5.44Q
La _______+7
D, for TW > D0/2
D

3/2
0

(29.2)

Other riprap or gabion requirements are as


indicated in the previous sections for channel lining.

Aprons constructed of man made materials are often a

where:
D, =
Q=

maximum inside culvert diameter (m)


pipe discharge (cumec)

TW=

tailwater depth (m)

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

viable alternative. Refer to the aboye discussion of


man-made materials for design consideration.

29-1

Hydraulic Structures

Figure 29.1 Configuration of Conduit Outlet Protection (U.S. EPA, 1976)

PLAN

from supercritical to subcritical, or where the flow is supercritical and the tractive forces or flow velocities
A
are higher than
the maximum allowable values. The basic hydraulic parameter that
identifies the flow regime, and is used in connection with energy dissipaters in
general, and with hydraulic jump dissipaters in particular, is the Froude number
(Chapter 12).
1
o

lon3

3D0

lon3

m z

La

The Froude number is a ratio of the flow velocity and wave celerity. In
rectangular channels, the equation may be rewritten in the
La following form:

W = 3D0+ 0.4L a
( Tailwater > 0.5Do)

W = 3D0+ 0.41_ o
( Tailwater < 0.5Do)

(a)

SECTION

F2 -

Figure 29.2 Preformed Scour Hole (ASCE, 1975)

(29.8)

'___3

Bd

29.3

Do
ENERGY

Varies
DISSIPATORS

3 _________________

Energy dissipaters are required in the immediate vicinity of


hydraulic structures where high
(b) impact loads, erosive
forces, and severe scour are expected. In other words,
they are usually required where the flow regime changes

where,
B = width of channel (m)
Q

discharge (m3/s)

g = acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s2)


dm = hydraulic mean depth (m)
Energy dissipation structures act as transitions, which
reduce high flow velocities that may exist under a range of
flows. Energy dissipaters localise hydraulic jumps and act
as stilling basins. The use of energy dissipaters is very
common downstream of hydraulic structures where
common channel protection cannot be used alone because
of potential damage. If riprap or other protection is used

29-2

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Hydraulic Structures
for energy dissipation, it should be confined in a basin and
secured in place with grout or mesh.
The primary difference between energy dissipaters in
general and drop structures is that the former are used to
reduce high velocities at critical locations by hydraulic
jumps, while the latter are vertical structures used for
controlling velocities in channel reaches by reducing
channel slopes. Because of various appurtenances such as
sills, baffles, and weirs, and because of variations in the
geometry of stilling basins, a wide variety of energy
dissipaters may be used.
29.3.1 Riprap Basins for Conduit Outlets
The most commonly used energy dissipaters are riprap
basins (Figure 29.3). Their advantages include simplicity,
low cost, and wide application.
The riprap placed in the basin must be inspected and
repaired, if necessary, alter major storms. The median
stone diameter can be estimated based on the exit velocity
of the pipe or culvert as shown in McLaughlin Water
Engineers (1986) and the AASHTO Drainage Handbook
(1987). The length of the basin is estimated based on the
width or diameter of the conduit. The depth of the basin is
based on the median stone diameter.
29.3.2 Stilling Basins
If a hydraulic jump is used for energy dissipation, it should
be confined to a heavily-armoured channel reach, the
bottom of which is protected by a solid surface such as
concrete to resist scouring. Since the cost of concrete
structures is relatively high, the length of the hydraulic
jump is usually controlled by accessories that not only
stabilise the jump action and increase the factor of safety,
but also reduce the cost of the structure.
(a) Design Considerations
There are several considerations that should be included in
designing hydraulic jumps and stilling basins (Chow, 1959;
US DOT, 1983):
1. Jump Position:

There are three positions or

alternative patterns that allow a hydraulic jump to


form downstream of the transition in the channel.
These positions are controlled by tailwater.
2. Tailwater Conditions: Tailwater fluctuations due to
changes in discharge complicate the design procedure.
They should be taken into account by classification of
tailwater conditions using tailwater and hydraulic jump
rating curves.
3. Jump Types: Various types of hydraulic jumps that
may occur are summarised in Figure 29.4. Oscillating
jumps in a Froude number range of 2.5 to 4.5 are best
avoided unless specially designed wave suppressers
are used to reduce wave impact.

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

The greater the Froude number, the higher is the effect of


tailwater on the jump. Therefore, for a Froude number as
low as 8, the tailwater depth should be greater than the
sequent depth downstream of the jump so that the jump
will stay on the apron. When the Froude number is
greater than 10, the common stilling basin dissipater may
not be as cost-effective as a special bucket type dissipater
(see Peterka, 1958).
(b) Control of Jumps
Jumps can be controlled by several types of appurtenances
such as sills, chute blocks and baffle piers. The purpose of
a sill located at the end of a stilling basin is to induce jump
formation and to control its position under most probable
operating conditions. Sharp crested or broad crested weirs
can be used to stabilise and control the jump.
Chute blocks are used at the entrance to the stilling basin.
Their function is to furrow the incoming jet and lift a
portion of it from the floor, producing a shorter length of
jump than would occur without them.
Baffle piers are blocks placed in intermediate positions
across the basin floor for dissipating energy mostly by
direct impact action. They are useful for small structures
with low flow velocities. High flow velocities may result in
cavitation action on the piers and basin floor downstream.
(c) Basin Categories
The following three major categories of basins are used for
a range of hydraulic conditions. Design details can be
found in the AASHTO Drainage Handbook (1987), Chow
(1959), and US DOT (1983).
The SAF ("St. Anthony Faiis" Stilling Basin) ( Chow
1959) : This basin, shown in Figure 29.5, is
recommended for use on small structures such as
spillways and outlet works where the Froude number
vares between 1.7 and 17. The appurtenances used
for this dissipater can reduce the length of the basin
by approximately 80%. This design has great
potential in urban stormwater systems because of its
applicability to small structures. Stilling Basin III
developed by the US Bureau of Reclamation (UBSR) is
similar to the SAF basin, but it has a higher factor of
safety.
The UBSR Stilling Basin II: This basin, shown in
Figure 29.6, is recommended for use with jumps with
Froude numbers greater than 4.5 at large spillways
and channels. This basin may reduce the length of
the jump by a third and is used for high-dam and
earth-dam spillways. Appurtenances used in this basin
include chute blocks at the upstream end of the basin
and a dentated still at the downstream end. No baffle
piers are used in this basin because of the cavitation
potential.

29-3

Hydraulic Structures

300 mm Free Board


Minimum

Dissipator Pool

Apron

10 Ds or 3 Wo Min

-5hs or Wo Min

Top of Berm Top of


Riprap

Note B

illt
Oh.
...

.., .1.

--

'Mb

......

..... . .".,b
0.,"-.1..r.".......
. . . . f e. d e . 1 1 - . .. .. . 7 . . . . . . . T 1
.01 .....,._
..., lb . go. 1". e. . w. *o ...W. 01 ."-.
......
t. ......2 ....pm...1...m
i,...
II /V.

+.11

Ihr ;::

"1 , - .. m .

"...IP

... m.

Top of Natural Channel

Note A

'NI

340 or 2d Max

2d50 or

2c150 or

1.5d Max 1.5d Max

1.5 Min

Thickened or sloping Toe optional Construct if downstream channel


degradation is anticipated

(a) Centreline Section

Note B

D 1 .e 0

.pra9

pop
,.51-ote'

,----

'1'' 01

\c' 4'

----

c;'-'
. ., ;IN
',1 1 ---

...,-.
\N
---------11

atel

ege

'

Symmetrical About
Centre Line

Culvert 11N i 2:1,_Horizontal


il\ ._i D

....- - '

2:1

Apron --)=- _.--

(b) Half-plan

Figure 29.3

Typical Riprap Basin: (a) centreline section and (b) half plan: W0 = diameter

for pipe culvert, barrel width for box culvert, or span of pipe-arch culvert
(US Federal Highway Administration, 1983).
Note

Berm as required
2c1s0 or 1.5dmax to Support Riprap

Notes for Figure 29.3:

Natural Channel

Excavate to this Line


(1) If a maximum allowable exit velocity, Ve , from the basin is specified,
extend
the
basin as required to obtain sufficient
Backfill
With
Riprap

cross-sectional
area
for C-C
the specified velocity
Sec
A- at section A-A (i.e. AA_A = QI Ve)Sec
A
(2) Warp the basin to conform to the natural stream channel. The top of the riprap in the basin floor should be at the
same elevation or lower than the natural channel bottom at section A-A
2d5 or 1.5dmax

W
o

Berm as required
to Support Riprap
29-4

Sec BB

Excavate to this line


backfill with Riprap

2d5 or 1.5dmax

Sec DD

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Hydraulic Structures

Oscillating Jet
Roller
7

= 1 - 1.7 Undular Jump

/ /////////////

Fl = 2.5 - 4.5 Oscillating Jump


////////////

//

F1 > 9.0 Strong Jump


y

//

Fl = 1.7 - 2.5 Weak Jump

77

F1 = 4.5 - 9.0 Steady Jump

M
M

MEM
E
ME=E

L5
Y2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 91111,11
20
F1 = V1 /,/gyi

Figure 29.4 Lengths and

MER MIMIMEI
MEME=ME
,-EZZ

MEMIEM
E
EZ
E

E 1 Undul. Weak
Jump Jump
Steady Jump
Strong Jump
Jump
Performance
rough
Best
surface conditions-

EMZEIltaL
111111111
ZEZZERE
magrag

iiiiiii

II

Types of Hydraulic
Jumps in Horizontal Channels (Bradley and Peterka, 1957; Chow, 1959)

The UBSR Stilling Basin IV: This basin, shown in


Figure 29.7, is used where jumps are imperfect or
where oscillating waves occur with Froude numbers
between 2.5 4.5. This design reduces excessive
waves by eliminating the wave at its source through
deflection of directional jets using chute blocks. When
a horizontal stilling basin is constructed without
appurtenances, the length of the basin is made equal
to the length of the jump.

29.3.3 Simple Energy-Dissipating Headwalls


Another simple type of energy dissipater that can be used
at culvert outlets is an energy dissipating headwall. Three
typical headwalls are shown in Figures 29.8 to 29.10.
29.3.4 Design Criteria and Practices
Most of the design criteria for stilling basin dissipaters are
included in the previous paragraphs. Table 29.1 provides a

summary of selected parameters, and may be used for


preliminary identification of alternative types of energy
dissipaters. Because of the great variety and combination
of types of energy dissipaters and appurtenances, the
designer should review available references in sufficient
detail to arrive at a design that is suitable for specific field
conditions.

29.4 DROP STRUCTURES


Vertical drop structures are controlled transitions for
energy dissipation in steep channels where riprap or other
energy dissipation structures are not as cost effective.
Drop structures used for stormwater drainage can be
categorised primarily as either open channel transitions
(drop spillways) or transitions between open channels and
closed conduits (drop shafts).
Drop structures should be constructed of concrete because
of the forces involved; however, riprap or gabion stilling
basins may be used where physical, economic, and other
conditions permit.

F1

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Hydraulic Structures

LB ,,71
P1100
V

B3=B1+2LB/D1

-LB/3=m
O

VI

ro
1:3

al

Q1

<

cT2

(a)Rectangular Stilling Basin Halfplan Side Wall

1
Vare
s
Chute Blocks
Floor Blocks
-

Vare
s

End
Sill
Cut-off
Wall

(b)
Trapezoidal Stilling Basin Elevation
Trapezoidal Stilling Basin Rectangular Stilling Basin
-Side
Wall
Wing
Top Slope is
1:1
YZ Z

Vare
s
Downstream Section
( c ) C e n t r e l i n e S e c t i o n Figure 29.5
Proportions of the SAF Basin (Chow, 1959).

29-6

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Hydraulic Structures

Figure 29.6 Proportions of the USBR Basin II (Chow, 1959)


Dentated Sill

Fractional Space

ff

= Maximum Tooth Width D1


Saf Space = 2.5w
2D1 Min

OO

Figure 29.7 Proportions of the USBR Basin IV (Chow,


1959)

sormwd.,-

- Sil I Optional

l.3 F i Top2DSurface on 5-deg slope


1 r l
1

II

Figure 29.8 Standard Energy

o
0
O

Conduit

Dissipating Headwall Type I (Chow, 1959)

300 mm Square Solid Concrete Block Formed

and Poured in Place, Reinforced by


R8 Re-bars Dispersed Every 100 mm Throughout
Headwall

E
E

111

300 mm 300 mm300 mrnl,

300 mm 300 mm 300 mm'


R8 Re-bar
Urban Stormwater Management Manual

(a) Plan

100
mm

750

600

(b) Side Elevation

.00

29 7
-

Hydraulic Structures

NOTE:

Height of Energy Dissipators


should be 0.5 D

Headwall

300 mm
R8 at 300 mm
Centres

300 mm Minimum

Figure 29.9 Standard Energy Dissipating Headwall, Type II

(ASCE, 1992)

A
0.5D
V
D

R8 at 300 mm Centres y
(a) Front Elevation
R8 200 mm Centres Precast Concrete

25 mm Minimum
0.5D
1

im

D
0.25D

450 mm

(b) Side Elevation

Figure 29.10 Standard Energy Dissipating Headwall, Type III (ASCE, 1992)

29-8

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Hydraulic Structures

Table 29.1 Dissipater Criteria (U.S. Department of Transportation, 1983)

Allowable Debris

Froude Number
Dissipater Type

Tailwater

Special

TW

Considerations

Silt and
F

Boulders

Floating

Sand
Free Hydraulic Jump

>1

Required

4% < .51,< 25%

Check Outlet

Increased Resistance
USBR Type II

4 to 14

USBR Type III

4.5 to 17

UBSR Type IV

2.5 to 4.5

SAF

1.7 to 17

Desirable

Q< 11 m3/s,

Desirable

V<900
15 m/s
y<
mm

Required

Drop < 5 m

< 0.5D

- I Z

Forest Service

Required

Control HW

Desirable

Z -

Required

1.8 to 3

USBR Type VI

Required

Hook

<3

Contra Cost

Required

>1

Tumbling Flow

<3
2 Z - 1 - 1

CSU Rigid Boundary

<1

Manifold

Corps Stilling Well

Riprap

Drop Structure

<3

Desirable

Note: N = none, L = low, M = moderate, H = heavy

Drop structures in open channels change the channel slope


from steep to mild by combining a series of gentle slopes
and vertical drops. Flow velocities are reduced to nonerosive velocities, while the kinetic energy or flow velocity
gained by the water as it drops over the crest of each
spillway is dissipated by an apron or stilling basin.

Open channel drop structures generally require aerated


nappes and subcritical flow conditions at both the
upstream and downstream section of the drop. The stilling basin
can vary from a simple concrete apron to baffle blocks or
sills as described previously.
Figure 29.11 shows the flow geometry and important
variables at a vertical (straight) drop structure. The flow
geometry at such drops can be described by the drop
number, DN, which is defined (Chow 1959) as:
DN

92
h3

= discharge per unit width of crest overfall (m3/s/m)

= acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s2)

h = height of drop (m)


The drop functions are:

Yp

= 4.30 DN 0.27

(29.10a)

= 1.00 DN 0.22

(29.10b)

Yi = 0.54 DN 0.425 h
Y2

= 1.66 DN 0.425

where,
(29.9)

Ld = drop length (m)


yp = pool depth under the nappe (m)

where,

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

(29.10c)

(29.10d)

29-9

Hydraulic Structures
(b) Box Inlet Drop Structure

yl = the depth of the toe of nappe (m)


Y2 = tailwater depth sequent to yl (m)
For a given drop height, h, and discharge, q, the drop
length, Ld, and the sequent depth, y2 , can be estimated
by Equations 29.10(a) and 29.10(d), respectively. The
length of the jump can be estimated by techniques
discussed in Section 29.3. If the tailwater is less than y 2 ,
the hydraulic jump will recede downstream. Conversely, if
the tailwater is greater than y 2 , the jump will be
submerged. If the tailwater is equal to y 2, no supercritical
flow exists on the apron and the distance Ldis minimum.
When the tailwater depth is less than y 2, it is necessary
(according to the US Department of Transportation 1983)
to provide either (1) an apron at the bed level and a sill or
baffles, or (2) an apron below the downstream bed level
and an end sill.
The choice of a design type and dimensions depends on
the unit discharge, q, drop height, h, and tailwater depth,
TW.
The design should take into consideration the
geometry of the undisturbed flow.
If the spillway
(overflow crest) length is less than the width of the
approach channel, the approach channel must be designed
properly to reduce the effect of the end contractions to
avoid scour.
The two most common vertical open channel drops are the
straight drop structure and the box inlet drop structure.
(a) Straight Drop Structure
Figure 29.12 shows the layout of a typical straight drop
structure and hydraulic design criteria developed by US Soil
Conservation Service. McLaughlin Water Engineers (1983)
provides specific criteria and reviews design considerations
related to the hydraulic, geotechnical, and structural
design of drop structures.

Figure 29.11

The box inlet drop structure is a rectangular box open at


the top and downstream end as shown in Figure 29.13.
Water is directed to the crest of the box inlet by earth
dikes and a headwall. Flow enters over the upstream end
and two sides. The long crest of the box inlet permits
large flows to pass at relatively low heads. The width of
the structure should not be greater than the downstream
channel. Box inlet drop structures are applicable to drops
from 0.6 to 3.6 m.
Design data and criteria for these structures, based on
US Soil Conservation Services and St. Anthony Falls
Hydraulic Laboratory, are available (US Department of
Transportation 1983; Blaisdell and Donnely 1956). The
parameters to consider for the hydraulic design of the drop
are:

section (length) of the crease of the box inlet

opening of the headwalls

discharge, discharge coefficients, and flow regime


changes

box inlet length and depth

minimum length and width of stilling basin

29.5 STORMWATER DRAIN OUTFALLS


All stormwater drains of a locality have an outlet where
flow from the local drainage system is discharged. The
discharge point, or outfall, can be either a natural river or
stream, or an existing or proposed stormwater drain or
channel. The procedure for calculating the hydraulic grade
line through a storm drainage system begins at the outfall.
Therefore, consideration of the outfall conditions is an
important part of storm drain design.

Flow Geometry of a Straight Drop Spillway (Chow, 1959)

q2

q
///// ////tV/////
Aerated
29-10

SS/ ///

_______Ld

P____

gh
Urban Stormwater Management Manual

L
///////////////77/777//////////
////////////////////////////Y ////////////

Hydraulic Structures

<

3
S+ 300 mm

(1200 mm
Minimum) T

2
1 i/ Sidewall

F+S
h

Wing Wall

C (1200 mm Minimum)

s=h/3
150 mm Fillets
(a) Section on Centreline

150 mm

Headwall Extension
Headwall

Wing Wall
_7

(b) Downstream Elevation

(c) Plan

Footing

o
Apron
'1,<"
'9

Longitudinal
100 mm

Sills

o
_
Level Area

V
A
Transverse
iSill

dei

Symmetrical
about
CL
E = Minimum length of headwall extension = [3h+0.61] or [1.5F] whichever is greater

3 = Height of wing wall and sidewall at junction = [2h] or [F+h+s-( L g+ 0.13)] or [t+1]
whichever is greater
V
2
LB= Length of basin = [F (2.28 h + 0. 52)
M = [2 (F+ 1.3 h-3)]
K = [(LB+ 0.13)- M]
(d) Criteria
Figure 29.12

Typical Drop Spillway and Some Hydraulic Design Criteria (US Soil Conservation Service, 1954).

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

29-11

Hydraulic Structures

7\
Toe of Dike
WA

w2 - -

wi
I

Headwall

_______L1_

L2

__________= <
__________L3_

(a) Plan

Free Flow
yo
y

(b) Section on Centreline

y
h3 =
3
3

Figure 29.13 Box Inlet Drop Structure (US Dept. of Transportation, 1983)

Several aspects of outfall design must be given serious


consideration. These include the flowline or invert (inside
bottom) elevation of the proposed stormwater drain outlet,
tailwater elevations, the need for energy dissipation, and
the orientation of the outlet structure.
The flowline or invert elevation of the proposed outlet
should be equal to or higher than the flowline of the
outfall. If this is not the case, there may be a need to
pump or otherwise lift the water to the elevation of the
outfall (see Chapter 46).
The tailwater depth or elevation in the storm drain outfall
must be considered carefully. Evaluation of the hydraulic
grade line for a storm drainage system begins at the
system outfall with the tailwater elevation. For most
design applications, the tailwater will either be aboye the
crown of the outlet or can be considered to be between
the crown and critical depth of the outlet. The tailwater
may also occur between the critical depth and the invert of
the outlet; however, the starting point for the hydraulic
grade line determination should be either the design
tailwater elevation, or (c/c+ D)/2, whichever is higher.

29-12

h4=

An exception to the aboye rule would be for a very large


outfall with low tailwater where a water surface profile
calculation would be required to determine the location
where the water surface will intersect the top of the barrel
and full flow calculations can begin. In this case, the
downstream water surface elevation would be based on
critical depth or the design tailwater elevation, whichever
was higher.
If the outfall channel is a river or stream, it may be
necessary to consider the joint or coincidental probability
of two hydrologic events occurring at the same time to
adequately determine the elevation of the tailwater in the
receiving stream (see chapter 46.7.2 for details).
Energy dissipation may be required to protect the storm
drain outlet. This is to prevent erosion of the outfall bed
and banks. Riprap aprons or energy dissipaters should be
provided if high velocities are expected.
There may be instances in which an excessive tailwater
causes flow to back up the storm drainage system and out
of inlets and manholes, creating unexpected and perhaps
hazardous flooding conditions. The potential for this to
occur should be considered. Flap gates placed at the

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Hydraulic Structures
outlet can sometimes alleviate this condition (see chapter
46); otherwise, it may be necessary to isolate the storm
drain from the outfall by use of a pump station (see
Chapter 46).
The orientation of the outfall is another important design
consideration. Where practical, the outlet of the storm
drain should be positioned in the outfall channel so that it
is pointed in a downstream direction. This will reduce
turbulence and the potential for excessive erosion. If the
outfall structure cannot be oriented in a downstream
direction, the potential for outlet scour must be considered.
For example, where a storm drain outfall discharges
perpendicular to the direction of flow of the receiving
channel, care must be taken to avoid erosion on the
opposite channel bank. If erosion potential exists, a
channel bank lining of riprap or other suitable material
should be installed on the bank. Alternatively, an energy
dissipater structure could be used at the storm drain
outlet.

29.6 TRANSITIONS AND CONSTRICTIONS


Channel transitions (Figure 29.17) are typically used to
alter the cross-sectional geometry, to allow the waterway
to fit within a more confined right-of-way, or to purposely
accelerate the flow to be carried by a specialised high
velocity conveyance. Constrictions can appreciably restrict
and reduce the conveyance in a manner which is either
detrimental or beneficial. For example, a bridge, box
culvert, or other constriction may increase upstream
flooding by encroaching too far into the floodplain
conveyance, whereas in another situation, a hydraulic
control structure can be employed to purposely induce an
upstream spill into a storage facility.

addition of an energy loss at the transition. The loss is


expressed as a function of the change in velocity head
occurring across the contraction or expansion transition
(from upstream to downstream locations). Figure 29.14
illustrates some of these transitions. Loss coefficients
shown in Table 29.7 are applied to the difference in the
velocity head, as shown is Equation 29.11.
Table 29.2 Subcritical Transition Energy Loss Coefficients

Contraction

Expansion

0.00
O to 0.10

0.00
O to 0.10

Warped Type

0.10

0.20

Cylindrical Quadrant Type

0.15

0.25

Modest Transitions

0.30

0.50

Straight Une Type

0.30

0.50

Square Ended Type

0.30+

0.75

Less than 100 mm between


centreline and tangent lines
Less than 12.5 between
centreline and tangent lines

Analysis of transitions requires careful water surface profile


analysis including verification of effective channel hydraulic
controls. It is not uncommon to have a transition which is
first thought to be performing in a subcritical mode, but
subsequently found to produce a supercritical profile with a
hydraulic jump.
Energy Loss (m) = Coefficient (17,1 /7,2)
where,
(/7,1 hv2)=

The purpose of this section is to briefly outline typical


design procedures for transition and constriction structures
that may be required for engineered waterways.

(29.11)

/22
2g 2g
1

flow
velocity upstream of transition
14 = flow velocity downstream of transition

29.6.1 Transition Analysis


(b) Supercritical Transition Analysis
(a) Subcritical Transitions

Transitions for subcritical flow frequently involve localised


or bank lining configurations which allow change in the
cross section and produce a water surface profile based on
gradually varied flow. The energy lost through a transition
is a function of the friction, eddy currents, and turbulence.
The intent is often to minimise friction losses and/or The
intent is often to minimise friction lossess and/or erosion
tendencies. Examples include transitions between
trapezoidal and rectangular sections, modest transitions at
bridges where little change takes place in cross section, or
slight encroachments into a channel to allow for utilities.
Standard water surface profile analysis is applied, with the

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Supercritical transitions are beyond the scope of this


manual and require special analysis when used. The
configuration of a supercritical transition is entirely
different from subcritical transitions. Improperly designed
and configured supercritical transitions can produce shock
wave patterns which result in channel overtopping and
other hydraulic and structural problems.
29.6.2 Constriction Analysis
(a) Constriction with Upstream Subcritical Flow
There are a variety of structures that are constrictions.
They can include bridges, culverts, drop structures, and
flow measurement devices. Constrictions of various types
are used intentionally to control bed stability and upstream

29-13

Hydraulic Structures
water surface profiles. For example, a constriction may be
used to cause water to back up or overflow into a
detention basin.
The hydraulic distinction of constrictions is that they can
cause rapidly varied flow. The upstream transition loss
coefficients in Table 27.9 apply, but other factors come
into play. Significant eddies can form upstream and
downstream of the constriction depending upon the
geometry. Flow separation will start at the upstream edge
of the constriction, then the flow contracts to be narrower
than the opening width. Typically, the width of contraction
is 10% of the depth at the constriction for each side
boundary. For example, at a typical drop with an abrupt
crest contraction and assuming critical depth of 1.0 m, the
constriction on each side would be 100 mm, or 200 mm
total contraction from the opening width. Based on this
contracted width and an assumption of critical conditions

at that location, the upstream water surface profile may be


computed.
In certain cases, the flow regime will remain subcritical
through the constriction. Chow, 1959, presents guidelines
developed by the USGS for constrictions where the Froude
number in the contracted section does not exceed 0.8.
These cases are generally mild constrictions.
A phenomenon of abrupt contractions (and abrupt
expansions) is that the velocities can be much higher in
the centre and change significantly across the constriction
throat section. This results in a large energy coefficient
and a further drop in water surface over what is first
anticipated. This condition can produce strong eddy
currents with a high erosion potential. A constriction in an
open channel needs to be carefully evaluated for velocity,
scour, water surface, and related problems.

g.

Straight Line

Cylindrical Quardrant

Warped

Abrupt

~h
~W
it

Wedge

Abrupt

Figure 29.14 Transition Types (UDFCD, 1969)

29 14
-

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Hydraulic Structures
Constrictions used for flow depth control or flow
measurement devices require a high degree of accuracy.
The design information available that can be used for
ensuring a high degree of accuracy is limited. It is
advisable to use models tested or proven prototype
layouts. As a secondary option, adjustable edge plates or
other components can be provided to allow later changes
at minimal cost if the constructed facilities should need
refinement.
(b) Constriction with Upstream Supercritical Flow
This situation is highly complex and beyond the scope of
this manual. Possible shock waves or choked flow causing
high upstream backwater or a hydraulic jump are major
concerns. The situation is to be avoided in urban drainage
because of inherent instabilities.

29.7 BENDS AND CONFLUENCES


General considerations for lined channels and conduits are
discussed in Chapters 26 and 25. Additional emphasis is
added herein for certain situations. Channels and conduits
that produce supercritical flow may require special
structural or design considerations. This discussion is
limited since these types of structures are associated with
hydraulic performance that generally exceeds the
recommended criteria for most engineered waterways.
Extensive study, specialised modelling, and/or analysis may
be required for these situations.
Channel confluences are commonly encountered in design.
Flow rates can vary disproportionately with time so that
high flows from upstream channel can discharge into
downstream channel when it is at high or low level.
Depending on the geometry of the confluence, either
condition can have important consequences, such as
supercritical flow and hydraulic jump conditions, and result
in the need for structures.
The main emphasis in this section is on subcritical flow
conditions. Since supercritical conditions can occur in
various situations, some conditions are generally reviewed;
however, supercritical flow analysis is not described in
detail.
29.7.1 Bends
(a) Subcritical Bends
Subcritical bends are required to have certain minimum
curvatures described in Chapters 25 and 26. It is
important that the designer recognise the consequences of
approaching and exceeding these criteria. Chow, 1959,
Rouse, 1949, and others illustrate flow patterns,
superelevation, and backwater or flow resistance
characteristics. Superelevation refers to a rise in the water
surface on the outer side of the bend. Effectively, the
bend can behave like a contraction, causing backwater

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

upstream and in accelerated velocity zones, with high


possibility of erosion on the outside of the bend and other
locations. Significant eddy currents, scour, sedimentation,
and loss of effective conveyance can occur on the inside of
the bend.
Concrete lined channels can be significantly affected by
superelevation of the water surface. The designer should
always add superelevation to the design freeboard of the
channel. The equation for the amount of superelevation of
the water surface, Ay, that takes place is given as:
Ay = C ( V2 T

(29.12)
gr

where,
C= coefficient, generally 0.5 for subcritical flow
V= mean channel velocity (m/s)
T= width of water surface in channel (m)

g= acceleration of gravity (9.81 m/s2)


r = channel centreline radius (m)
(b) Supercritical Bends
As with supercritical transitions, the hydraulics for
supercritical bends are completely different from the
hydraulics for subcritical bends. Supercritical channels are
generally not desirable in urban drainage. However,
special situations may occur where supercritical flows enter
a curved channel, for example:

at confluences where one channel is largely empty,


and the entering flow expands and becomes
supercritical

at a sharp bend in a conduit whose slope inherently


leads to supercritical conditions

at a channel drop that unavoidably ends up on a curve

The key phenomenon to be aware of is shock waves, of


which there are two types, positive and negative. On the
outside of an angular bend, a positive shock wave will
occur which results in a rise in the water surface. The
wave is stationary and crosses to the inside of the channel,
and then can continue to reflect back and forth. Where
the flow passes the inside angular bend, a separation will
occur and a negative shock wave or drop in the water
surface will occur. This stationary negative shock wave will
cross to the outside of the channel. Both shock waves will
continue to reflect off the walls, resulting in a very
disturbed flow pattern.
A basic control technique is to set up bend geometry to
cause the positive shock wave to intersect the point where
the negative wave is propagated. A bend usually requires
two deflections on the outside and one bend on the inside.
A beneficial aspect of the shock wave is that it turns the

29-15

Hydraulic Structures
flow in a predictable pattern, and thus the channel walls
have no more force imposed on them other than that
caused by the increased (or decreased) depths. This
technique is described by Ippen (Rouse, 1949 and Corps of
Engineers, 1970) and is also reported by Chow, 1959.
Other control techniques include very gradual bends, super
elevated floors, and controls sills, but these methods are
generally less efficient. There is limited data on channels
with sloping side banks, but it is clear there is a great
tendency for shock waves to propagate up side slopes and
divert flow out of the channel.
Chow, 1959 shows several good photographs of these
problems. SCS, 1976 presents a documental report of a
curved spillway on a modest flood control storage.
During an overflow event, a shock wave pattern was
produced that resulted in no flow on one side of the
spillway and great depths on the opposite.
A special problem with long conduits used for flood control,
particularly large box culverts, is that they will have an
inherent tendency towards supercritical flow conditions at
less than full capacity. When the flow encounters bends,
shock waves can occur which hit the ceiling and can
lead to either pressurised conditions and/or unstable
conditions where the flow fluctuates between
supercritical and pressure conditions, often exacerbated
by surging, air flow, and other problems. Very gradual
bends and air vent provisions are desirable and the
designer should use
caution anytime should
supercritical flow encounter a bend.

2. The bottom slopes are equal for the main channel and
side channel
3. Flows are parallel to the channel walls immediately
aboye and below the junction
4. The depths are equal immediately aboye the junction
in both the side and main channel
5. The velocity is uniform over the cross-sections
immediately aboye and below the junction
Assumption No. 3 implies that hydrostatic pressure
distributions can be assumed, and assumption No. 5
suggests that the momentum correction factors be
equal to each other at the reference sections.
The equation governing flow conditions for a vertical
walled channel, with the main channel width being
constant, is (Figure 29.15(a)):
(92
2
sc 3

12

+cos8

(29.13a)

Yi

Or for a vertical walled channel; main channel width vares


(Figure 29.15(b)):
/12
'13 4. b ,2

g A3

2
Ii

Q1
3, 3

c o s O ___ + b 3 Y1
gA2
2
2

(29.13b)

Or for a trapezoidal channel; main channel


width constant (Figure 29.15(a)):
Z

4'1132

g A3

y3 v 2

Q12
3

2 3

g Al

+ cos8

+Z Y1j3d

C2

g A2

(29.13c)

29.7.2 Confluences

Or for a trapezoidal channel; main channel width vares


One of the most difficult problems to deal with is
confluences where the difference in flow characteristics
may be great. When entering the combined channel, the
flow can diverge and drop in level if the flow capacity is
suddenly increased. This can result in high velocity or
unstable supercritical flow conditions with a high erosion
potential. When significant sediment flows exist,
aggradation can occur at the confluence, resulting in the
loss of capacity in one or both upstream channels.
(a) Subcritical Flow Confluence Design
The design of channel junctions is complicated by many
variables such as the angle of intersection, shape and
width of the channels, flow rates, and type of flow. The
design of large complex junctions should be verified by
model tests.
Figure 29.15 illustrates two types of junctions.
The
following assumptions are made for combining subcritical
flows:
1. The side channel cross-section is the same shape as
the main channel cross-section

29 16
-

(Figure 29.15(b)):
_______ t 5 Z Y 3
g A3+

2 ___

3 ;

gA1

+ COSO

()2 2
,
c

A2

ts

where,
b = bottom width of the trapezoidal cross-section
Z = side slope, Z(H):1(V)
Momentum computations for a confluence involve a trial
and error process. Starting with a known depth aboye or
below the confluence, one iterates with an assumed depth
on the unknown side of the confluence until the
momentum has been balanced upstream to downstream
(b) Supercritical Flow in Confluences
In contrast with subcritical flows at junctions, supercritical
flows with changes in boundary alignments are generally
complicated by standing waves (Ippen, 1951, Rouse,

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Hydraulic Structures
1949).
In subcritical flow, backwater effects are
propagated upstream thereby tending to equalise the flow
depths in the main and side channels. However,
backwater cannot be propagated upstream in supercritical
flow and flow depths in the main and side channels cannot
generally be expected to be equal. Junctions for rapid
flows and very small junction angles are designed
assuming equal water surface elevations in the side and
main channels.
Standing waves (Ippen, 1951) in supercritical flow at open
channel junctions complicate flow conditions. These waves
may necessitate increased wall heights in the vicinity of the
junction. The studies by Bowers, 1950 indicate that a
hydraulic jump may form in one or both of the inlet
channels, depending on the flow conditions. Behlke, 1966
completed a model study and presented design
guidelines to address these problems.
Wave conditions that may be produced by rapid flow in
and downstream of a typical junction are shown in
Figure 29.19. One area of maximum wave height can
occur on the side channel wall opposite the junction point
and another on the main channel right wall downstream
from the junction. Behlke, 1966 has conducted a series of
laboratory tests which indicate that wave pileup against
the channel walls can be up to seven times the initial depth
for a flow Froude number of four. The design of walls to
contain these wave heights over long channel distances is
usually not economical. The practica) remedy is to
reduce or minimise standing waves.
Peak flows from the side channel may not occur
simultaneously with peak flows in the main channel.
Laboratory tests by Behlke, 1966 indicate that the
occurrence of design flow in one of the channels with zero
flow in the other can result in a very high wave pileup on
the junction walls.
Supercritical flow may unavoidably occur in certain
confluences. The designer should try to correct the
geometry and channel sections to avoid the situation. If
the condition remains, a more detailed hydraulic study or
model study must be initiated to address the problem.

29.8 SIDE-OVERFLOW WEIRS


Side-overflow weirs facilitate overflow and diversion of
stormwater by directing the discharge away from the
original channel. Such structures are commonly used to
direct channel discharges aboye predetermined levels into
off-line stormwater detention facilities. Flow diversions
occur only during storms (Figure 29.17).

discharge over the weir and geometric parameters at the


weir, including the length of the weir and head (Hager,
1987). Figure 29.18 (Metcalf and Eddy, 1972) shows three
head or water surface profile conditions that can prevail
at a side-overflow weir:
(a) Condition 1:

producing supercritical flow. Under this condition, the weir


has no effect upstream and along the weir there is a
gradual reduction in depth. Downstream of the weir, the
flow depth in the original channel increases, tending
asymptotically to the normal depth corresponding to the
remaining discharge.
(b) Condition 2: The channel bed slopes mildly. Under
this condition, subcritical flow prevails and the weir
impact is noticed upstream of the weir only. The water
surface profile downstream of the weir corresponda to the
normal depth of the remaining discharge. Along the weir
there is a gradual increase in depth and, upstream of the
weir the flow depth tends asymptotically to the normal
depth for the initial discharge.
(c) Condition 3: The channel bed slopes mildly, but the
weir crest is below the critical depth corresponding to the
initial flow, and the flow at the weir is supercritical. Recent
studies (Frazer 1957) indicate that conditions 1 and 3 may
result in the development of a hydraulic jump at the weir.
The most common condition that a designer will
encounter is Condition 3, where the weir elevation is below
the critical depth. When only a relatively small amount of
the flow is diverted, a rising water surface profile occurs.
According to Metcalf and Eddy Inc. (1972), the falling
profile results if the ratio of the height of the weir, c, to
the channel specific energy, E, referenced to the top
of the weir, is less than 0.6.
29.8.2 Design Practices

(a) Fallfrig Water Surface


The equations and procedures for computing weir length
for the falling water surface profile were developed by
Ackers (Chow 1959). These equations combine Bernoulli's
theorem with a weir discharge formula. Metcalf and Eddy
Inc. (1972) suggests using:

L = 2.035 5.28 2.63

The design of side-overflow weirs is based on empirical

(29.14)

where,
L = length of weir (m) B =
channel width (m) c = height
of

29.8.1 Design Considerations

The channel bed slopes steeply,

weir

(m)

Ew = channel

specific energy (m)


and,

equations which quantify the relationship between the

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

29-17

Hydraulic Structures

V,
.1.

b
1A1

e\.

120 7

(a) Plan - Constant Width

b3

b1= b3

b3

vi

V3

b1# b3

(b) Plan - Unequal Width

Figure 29.15 Channel Junction Definition Sketches


Main Channel
go

vi
Y1 y
Possible
Wave Fronts
/5 1/

rei
q..)/

2
3

/
Reflected
Waves

/5 z

Area of
Maximum
Wave Height

/,

Area of Maximum
Wave Height When B 2

>19

NOTE:
Should Not be
Greater than 12

Figure 29.16 Open Channel Confluence, Standing Waves Supercritical Flow

29-18

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Hydraulic Structures
2

Ew=a

2g

+ a' (y, c)

(29.15)

= channel width (m)

= constant (0.35 for a free nappe)

0 y= varied flow function (Figure 3, Collinge 1957)


E

where,
a = velocity coefficient

3/2

V= normal velocity in the approach channel (m/s)

g= acceleration due to gravity(9.81 m/s2)


a'

= depth in channel (m)


= specific energy (m)

Equation 29.16 is recommended for use only in the case


of a rising water surface profile. Metcalf and Eddy Inc.
(1972) indicates that this equation works best when the
Froude number is between 0.3 - 0.92.

pressure-head correction

;in = normal depth of flow in approach channel (m)


c = height of the weir aboye the channel bottom (m)
Values for a and a' of 1.2 and 1.0 respectively can be

29.9 FLOW SPLITTER

used in the approach channel, while at the lower end of


the weir values of 1.4 and 0.95 can be used for a and a'
respectively.

A flow splitter is a special structure designed to divide a


single flow and divert the parts into two or more
downstream channels. A flow splitter can serve three
functions.

(b) Rising Water Surface


The analysis for estimating the weir length for the rising
water surface profile is based on the theoretical equations
developed by DeMarchi (Collinge 1957):

(a) Reduction in water surface elevation By dividing the


flow from a large pipe into multiple conduits, the
height of flow (measured from the flow line to the
water surface (or for pipes flowing full, the inside
diameter) can be reduced. This may be necessary to
route flows under immovable obstructions.

L= CL[Y2

(29.16)

where,
LONGITUDINAL SECTION

cc

Vn

= length of weir (m)

Eal

2g

Energy Grade Line

Water profile

Evv=cc V2 + cc d

h1= r

2g
n

1 Weir

vn>.

Channel Invert

OWWWWWWWWWWW r - v - Z - 1y

h_

"IKX

n2

SECTION A A
-

Figure 29.17 Typical Cross-sections at a Side-Overflow Weir


B

(Metcalf & Eddy, 1972)

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

y
n

29-19

Hydraulic Structures
29.9.1 Design Consideration

Ql

Q___
Two major considerations exist for the design of flowQ2
splitting devices:

(a)

Condition 1

Q2

C > dcrit

dl P
(b)

Condition 2

d2

(a) Head Loss Hydraulic disturbances at the point of


flow division result in unavoidable head losses. These
losses, however, may be reduced by the inclusion of
proper flow deflectors in the design of the structure.
Deflectors minimise flow separation by providing a
gradual transition for the flow, rather than by forcing
abrupt changes inflow direction.

(b) Debris In all transitions from large to smaller pipes, debris


accumulation is a potential problem. Tree limbs
and other debris that flow freely in the larger pipe
5

Q'e
may not fit in the smaller pipe(s) and may restrict flow.
Q
2 d2
Q1 d1= dcrit
In addition, flow splitters cause major flow
P
disturbances resulting in the regions of decreased
C > dcrt and L
velocity. This reduction causes material suspended in
(c) Condition 3
the stormwater flow to settle in the splitter box.
Although the deflector design should minimise velocity
reduction as much as possible, total elimination of the
Figure 29.18 Possible Types of Water Surface Profiles
problem is unlikely. Therefore, positive maintenance
access must be provided. Because flow splitting
at a Side-overflow Weir
devices are maintenance-intensive, their use should
be judiciously controlled by the engineer.
(Metcalf & Eddy, 1972).

29.9.2 Design Criteria


(b) Dividing flows wherever necessary Examples of this
include division of existing large special-design
conduits, such as arches or horseshoes, into less
expensive multiple-pipe continuations and division of
flow between low and high-flow conduits at the
intake of an inverted siphon.

The flow splitter shall be designed to cater for 6


month ARI storm.

The top of the weir shall be located at the water


surface for the 3-month ARI water quality design
storm.

(c) To restrict flows to water quality treatment facilities


and bypass the remaining higher flows around the
facilities (off-line).
This can be accomplished by

The maximum head over the weir shall be


minimised

splitting flows in excess of the water quality design


flow upstream of the facility and diverting higher
flows to a bypass pipe or channel. The bypass
typically enters a detention pond or the downstream
receiving drainage system.
A crucial factor in
designing flow splitters is to ensure that low flows are
delivered to the treatment facility up to the water
quality design flow rate. Aboye this rate, additional
flows are diverted to the bypass system with minimal
increase in head at the flow splitting structure to
avoid surcharging the water quality facility under high
flow conditions.
Figure 29.19 shows a typical flow splitter made of
manholes with concrete baffles. Figure 29.20 shows a
typical diversion/isolation structure.

for flow in excess of the water quality design flows.

29.10 FLOW SPREADER


Flow spreaders are used to uniformly spread flows across
the inflow portion of water quality facility (e.g. sand filter,
biofiltration swale, or filter strip). Options A through C
(see Section 29.10.2) can be used for spreading flows that
have already concentrated. Option D is only for flows
that are already unconcentrated and enter a filter strip
or biofiltration swale.
29.10.1 General Design Criteria

Where flow enters the spreader through a pipe, it is


recommended that the pipe be submerged to
practically dissipate energy.

Rock protection is required at outfalls.

29-20

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Hydraulic Structures
29.10.2 Design Criteria for Flow Spreading
Options

The following presents the design criteria for each of the


following spreading options:

Anchored plate (Option A)

Concrete sump box (Option B)

Flat-topped notched curb spreader (Option C)

Through-curb ports (Option D) (a)

Option A Anchored Plate Figure 29.21


shows the details of the spreader.

The spreader shall be preceded by a sump having a


minimum depth of 200 mm and minimum width of 600
mm. The sump area shall be lined with steps to
reduce erosion and to provide energy dissipation.

The top of the flow spreader plate shall be level,


projecting a minimum of 50 mm aboye the final
grade of the invert of the water quality facility.

The plate shall extend horizontally beyond the bottom


width of the facility to prevent water from eroding the
side slope.

The plate shall be securely fixed in place.

The level spreader plate may be either wood, metal,


fibreglass reinforced plastic, or other durable material.

To Bypass Conveyance

PLAN
Type 2 M.H No Base
Channel Required

rw~

4W.
-11*

SystemorDetentionPond

Round Solid Lid

1220 mm or Provide Separate


Access to Either Side of Baffle Wall
100 mm Thick Reinforced Concrete
Baffle Wall or Other Suitable Material

Water Quality Design


Water Surface Elevation

Bypass Pipe

Hands Holds (typ.)

To Water Quality Facility

Inflow

Sump (Optional)

Reinforced Baffle Wall Grouted to M.H Structure (both ends) A


To Water Quality Facility
SECTION A-A
NOTE:
The water quality discharge Pipe may require an orifice plate
be installed on the Outlet to control the height of the design water
Urban Stormwater Management Manual

29-21

surface (weir height). The design water surface should be set to


provide a minimum headwater/diameter ratio of 2.0 on the outlet Pipe.
Figure 29.19 Typical Flow Splitter Device

Hydraulic Structures
Diversion Weir

PLAN

4 A

Open Channel
HIGH FLOW
FLOW

D + 200

A
SECTION A A
-

Diversion Pipe Diameter, D


Diversion Weir

Open Channel
to Filtration Basin

___ HIGH FLOW

Figure 29.20 Typical Isolation/Diversion Structure

(b) Option B Concrete Sump Box


This alternative uses a rectangular concrete sump (see
Figure 29.22 for details)

The wall of the downstream side of the concrete sump


shall extend a minimum 50 mm aboye the invert of
the treatment bed.

The downstream wall of the box shall have "returns"


at both ends. Side walls and returns shall be slightly
higher than the weir so that erosion of the side
slope is minimised.

(c)

Option C Flat-Topped Notched Curb Spreader

Flat-topped notched curb spreader is shown in


Figure 29.23. The spreader sections are made of extruded
concrete laid side by side and level. Typically four "teeth"

29-22

per 1.25 m section provide good spacing. The space


between adjacent "teeth" forms a v-notch.
(d)Option D Through Curb
Details of the spreader are shown in Figure 29.24.
Unconcentrated flows from paved areas entering filter
strips or continuous flow biofiltration swales can use curb
ports to allow flows to enter the strip or swale. Curb ports
use prefabricated openings that allow concrete curbing
to be poured or extruded continuously while still providing
an opening through the curb to admit water to the
water quality facility.
Openings in the curbing shall be at regular intervals but at
least every 3.6 (minimum). The width of each curb port
opening shall be 275 mm minimum. Approximately 15
percent or more of the curb section length shall be in open
ports, and no port should discharge more than about 10
percent of flow.

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Hydraulic Structures
PLAN
Example of anchored plate used with a sand filter*
(May also be used with other water quality facilities)
SECTION A-A
Extended into slope to protect from the
100 year flow or the highest flow
entering water quality facility

A
V-Notched
or
Level Plate Spreader

Inlet Pipe

Anchor posts
spaced 1.8 m 0.0
or at each end
if width 1.8 m

Edge of Sand
Pond Side Slope
(Sand Bed)

*Sand filter may use other


spreading options

__ Sand Layer
Gravel Layer

600 mm

Existing Grade
Level Spreader Plate
bolted to anchor Post

Alternative Design
Example of Catch Basin recommended for higher flow situations
(Generally 140 L/S or greater for 100 year storm)

600 mm Embedded
into exisitng ground

Figure 29.21 Level Spreader (Option A)

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

29-23

Hydraulic Structures
PLAN
Example of a Concrete Sump Flow Spreader
used with a biofiltration swale
(May be used with other W.Q. Facilities)
SECTION A-A

Side with Returns.


(See Note)

Concrete Sump

Swale Bottom
Outfall Rip Rap Pad
Inlet Pipe
A

NOTE:

Inlet Pipe
Wing Wall Outline
50 mm Clearance

Concrete Sump
(100 mm wall thickness)
:600 mm

Extend sides into slope. Height of side wall and


returns must be sufficient to handle the 100 year flow
or the highest flow entering the Facility

Figure 29.22 Level Spreader (Option B)

29.11 SIPHONS
Any conduit that drops under an obstruction such as
railroad tracks, depressed roadways or utilities, and regains
elevation at the downstream side of the obstruction is
referred to as an inverted siphon.

29-24

Because of the inverted bottom, the siphon stands full


storm water even when there is no flow. Some drainage
districts discourage the use of siphons on the basis that
the siphon requires more frequent maintenance including
removal of debris that may clog the conduit. Nevertheless,
siphons have certain advantages in particular settings,
usually in urban areas where other solutions such as flow

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Hydraulic Structures
re-routing may result in disruptions to traffic and higher
costs.
Siphons are normally single-or multi-barrel and consist
of an entrance section, drop, depressed reach, rise,
and outlet structure. Siphons require hydraulic head to
operate properly and the adequacy of available head
should be assessed early in the design process.
Siphons can be simpler or sophisticated, and the related
design effort can be nominal or complex. The following
examples apply to large, sophisticated siphons with
multiple appurtenances some or which may not always
be necessary.
29.11.1 Single-Barrel Siphons
Single-barrel siphons can be used for conveying
stormwater flows where there are periods of no flow
during which maintenance can be provided.
Even though some agencies limit the slope of the rising
leg of the siphon to 15%, steeper slopes and even
vertical drops and risers are acceptable, if maintenance
chambers with debris collection sumps at the bottom are
provided at the drop and riser of the siphon, as shown in
Figure 29.25.
Sloping legs of siphons (Figure 29.26) have been designed
without maintenance chambers; however, the chambers
provide maintenance flexibility with direct access to service
the siphon. The steeper the legs of the siphon, the more
difficult it is to clean the siphon from shallow manholes
located near the ground surface, and Jeep maintenance
chambers reaching to barrel inverts may be required.
Where a vertical drop and riser are provided, they should
serve as maintenance chambers and include access
down to the barreis and sumps. Sunnps located at the
bottom of the maintenance chambers trap the
debris that accumulates in the siphon.
29.11.2 Multi-Barrel Siphons
In channels or sewers that convey a continuous flow,
where one barrel does not have sufficient capacity and the
flow has to be divided, or where redundancy is required by
local agencies, the multi-barrel siphon is applicable. Plan
and profiles of such siphons are shown in Figure 29.26.
Where redundancy is required for maintenance purposes,
one additional equal capacity barrel is sufficient. To fulfil
its functions, the multi-barrel siphon requires equipment
and structure , including gates that close the barrel to be
nnaintained while the other barrel is open.

Special structure may also include a flow distribution


chamber and a flow adapter chamber. These chambers
are used to contract and expand the flows. The
distribution chamber serves to direct the flow from one
sewer to the two barreis of the siphon alternatively used,
while the flow adapter chamber serves to direct the flow
from the two barreis of the siphon to one conduit.
29.11.3 Design Criteria and Practices
One of the critica) criteria for the design of siphons is the
maintenance of self-cleansing velocities under widely
varying flow conditions (ASCE 1969). Siphons used for
conveying storm water are usually designed for a
velocity of 0.9 m/s for a 5-year return interval design
flow. Siphons with water containing abrasive
suspended materials should be designed for a flow
velocity less than 3 m/s.
The head losses through each of the siphon components
must be estimated for the purpose of plotting the hydraulic
grade line. Upstream surcharging should be avoided, and
therefore one of the main design objectives should be to
minimise the head losses through the siphon. The friction
losses can be estimated by using the combined DarcyWeisbach - Manning equation is useful in the following
form (in metric units):
hr =

19.5 n2 LV2
r4/3

1,
.c

(29.17)

where,
hf = lead loss (m)
n = Manning's frictions
factor L = length of conduit
(m)
r = hydraulic radius (m)
V = velocity (m/s)
g = acceleration of gravity (m/s2)
Minor losses (such as at bend, contraction and expansion,
and entrance and exit losses) can be estimated as
discussed in Chapter 25. It should be noted that head
losses in siphons can be significant, particularly in fat
coastal areas, where the low terrain does not allow for
surcharge and the available project corridor is narrow.
The size of the barrel or conduit can be determined initially
based on the minimum required flow velocity. However,
the barrel can be sized accurately only alter he hydraulic
losses are estimated. If the head loss under the design
flow condition is excessive, increases in the size of the
conduit should be considered.

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

29-25

Hydraulic Structures

PLAN

1.2m

300 mm

1501

300 mm

SECTION B-B
Inlet Pipe

200mm

30

1111IIIIIIIIM1111
111111
2 R10 Rebar or Reinforce
-

as Necessary

Figure 29.23 V-notch Level Spreader

Concrete Curb

Opening 280 mm

lidbidbidbidII
FRONT

Grass Filter Strip


Figure 29.24 Through-Curb Port

29-26

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

Hydraulic Structures

al

7
PLAN

Outlet Chamber

Inlet Chamber

Manhole Frame and Cover


Removable Precast Concrete Slabs
PROFILE
Outlet Chamber

Inlet Chamber
Water Level

Concrete Encasement

Figure 29.25 Profile and Plan of Double-Barrel Siphon Vertical Legs (Engineering News, 1916)

1.5 m Circular Reinforced Concrete


)
400 mm CI Bypass
(StormPipes
1.4 m x 1.2 m Reinforced Concrete Overflow
Old 1.6 m x 1.2 m Sewer

Dam Oulet Chamber

wg, --------I
E
1

Cleanout Chamber

Dam Intake Chamber

400 mm CI (Dry Weather) Pipe

Cleanout Chamber

(a) Sectional Plan

Old 1.6 m x 1.2 m Sewer

Cleanout Manhole

Cleanout Manhole
B
1.4 m x 1.2 m Reinfor ced Concrete Overflow
i

Old 1.6 m x 1.2 m Sewer

Su bway Structure
400 mm CI
1.5 m Circular
Storm Pipes

New 600 mm Sewer

Two Circular Reinforced Concrete

w~~A.
EaN

400 mm CI (Dry Weather) Pipe

400 mm CI

Section A-A

Section B-B
(b) Longitudinal Section

Figure 29.26 Profile and Plan of a Double-Barrel Siphon Sloping Legs (Engineering News, 1916)

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

29-27

Urban Stormwater Management Manual

33