Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 45

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA

NATION RELIGION KING


r r[s s

REPORT ON
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CHECK
OF STEEL ROOF FRAME AND CONNECTION
(CALCULATION NOTE IN PART-B)

PROJECT: GUAG HUA G.H GARMENT CO., LTD.


INSPECTOR: E.T.C ENGINEERING CONSULTANT CO., LTD.

Location: PHNOM PENH, CAMBODIA.

Phnom Penh, June, 2016

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

View - 3D
View - 3D-01
View - 2D Frame_Edge
View - 2D Frame_Interior
View - MY, Cases: 5 (ULS_RAFTER)
View - FZ, Cases: 5 (ULS_RAFTER)
View:2 - MY, Cases: 6 (ULS_PURLIN)
View:2 - FZ, Cases: 6 (ULS_PURLIN)
Loads - Cases
Loads - Values
Combinations
PURLIN_RESULT SUMMARY
Detail Result of Purlin Capacity Check
RAFTER_RESULT SUMMARY
Detail Result of Rafter Capacity Check
Top Roof Frame_Result Summary
Detail Result of Top Roof Frame Capacity Check
Connection (1)
Connection (1.1)
Connection (1.2)
Connection (2)
Connection (2.1)
Connection (2.2)

Report on Calculation Note

2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
6
8
10
13
15
18
20
23
23
24
37
38
39

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 1

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

View - 3D

17/06/16 11:21

View - 3D-01

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 2

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

17/06/16 11:21

View - 2D Frame_Edge

17/06/16 11:21

View - 2D Frame_Interior

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 3

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

17/06/16 11:21

View - MY, Cases: 5 (ULS_RAFTER)

17/06/16 11:21

View - FZ, Cases: 5 (ULS_RAFTER)

17/06/16 11:21

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 4

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

View:2 - MY, Cases: 6 (ULS_PURLIN)

17/06/16 11:21

View:2 - FZ, Cases: 6 (ULS_PURLIN)

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 5

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

17/06/16 11:21

Loads - Cases

Case

Label

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

SW
SDL
Lr_Rafter
Lr_Purlin

Case

Case name

Nature

SW
SDL
Lr_Rafter
Lr_Purlin
ULS_RAFTER
ULS_PURLIN
ULS
ULS+
ULSSLS
SLS+
SLS-

dead
dead
Roof live
live
dead
dead

Analysis type

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Static - Linear
Static - Linear
Static - Linear
Static - Linear
Linear Combination
Linear Combination
Linear Combination
Linear Combination
Linear Combination
Linear Combination
Linear Combination
Linear Combination

Loads - Values

Case
1
2
3
4

Load type
self-weight
uniform load
uniform load
uniform load

List

Load values

1to1237 1240 PZ Negative Factor=1.00


371to1237 12 PZ=-0.09(kN/m)
371to1237 12 PZ=-0.26(kN/m)
371to1237 12 PZ=-0.43(kN/m)

Combinations
- Cases: 5 6

Combinations
5 (C)
6 (C)

Report on Calculation Note

Combi
Analysis type nation Case nature
type
ULS_RAFTER Linear Combinati
ULS
dead
ULS_PURLIN Linear Combinati
ULS
dead
Name

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 6

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE
Combinations
5 (C)
6 (C)

Report on Calculation Note

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Definition
(1+2)*1.20+3*1.00
(1+2)*1.20+4*1.00

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 7

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

PURLIN_RESULT SUMMARY

STEEL DESIGN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CODE: ANSI/AISC 360-10 An American National Standard, June 22, 2010
ANALYSIS TYPE: Member Verification
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CODE GROUP:
MEMBER: 1284 Beam_1284POINT: 1
COORDINATE: x = 0.00 L = 0.00 m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOADS:
Governing Load Case: 6 ULS_PURLIN (1+2)*1.20+4*1.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MATERIAL:
STEEL 235MPa
Fy = 235.00 MPa
Fu = 360.00 MPa
E = 200000.00 MPa
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SECTION PARAMETERS: Tube:125x50x1.5
d=125.0 mm
Ay=1.36 cm2
Az=3.62 cm2
Ax=5.16 cm2
bf=50.0 mm
Iy=102.59 cm4
Iz=24.65 cm4
J=62.58 cm4
tw=1.5 mm
Sy=16.42 cm3
Sz=9.86 cm3
tf=1.5 mm
Zy=20.43 cm3
Zz=10.75 cm3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MEMBER PARAMETERS:

Ly = 6.00 m
Lz = 6.00 m
Ky = 1.00
Kz = 1.00
Lb = 6.00 m
KLy/ry = 134.56
KLz/rz = 274.49
Cb = 2.15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------INTERNAL FORCES:
DESIGN STRENGTHS
Mry = -3.75 kN*m
Fib*Mny = 4.22 kN*m
Vrz = 2.55 kN
Fiv*Vnz = 40.47 kN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SAFETY FACTORS
Fib = 0.90
Fiv = 0.90
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SECTION ELEMENTS:
Flange = Compact
Web = Non-compact
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------VERIFICATION FORMULAS:
Mry/(Fib*Mny) = 0.89 < 1.00 LRFD (H1-1b) Verified
Vrz/(Fiv*Vnz) = 0.06 < 1.00 LRFD (G2-1) Verified
Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 8

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Section OK !!!

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 9

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Detail Result of Purlin Capacity Check

Detail Result of Purlin Capacity Check


Symbol

Values

Unit

Symbol description

Cross-section area
Shear area - Y-axis
Shear area - Z-axis
Torsional constant
Moment of inertia of a section about the Yaxis
Moment of inertia of a section about the Zaxis
Plastic section modulus about the Y (major)
axis
Elastic section modulus about the Y-axis
Plastic section modulus about the Z (minor)
axis
Elastic section modulus about the Z-axis
Height of cross-section
Width of cross-section
Flange thickness
Web thickness
Radius of gyration - Y-axis
Radius of gyration - Z-axis

Section

MEMBER:
1284
Beam_1284
; COORDIN
ATE: x =
0.00 L =
0.00 m
Crosssection
properties:
Tube:125x5
0x1.5
Ax
Ay
Az
J
Iy

5.16
1.36
3.62
62.58
102.59

cm2
cm2
cm2
cm4
cm4

Iz

24.65

cm4

Zy

20.43

cm3

Sy
Zz

16.42
10.75

cm3
cm3

Sz
d
bf
tf
tw
ry
rz
Material:

9.86
125.0
50.0
1.5
1.5
44.6
21.9

cm3
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

Name
Fy
Fu
E

235.00

MPa

360.00
200000.0
0

MPa
MPa

STEEL 235MPa
Specified minimum yield strength of
material
Specified minimum tensile strength
Longitudinal elasticity coefficient

Partial
factor
method
LRFD
Fib
Fiv

Report on Calculation Note

0.90
0.90

Resistance factor for flexure


Resistance factor for shear

Date : 17/06/16

[F1.(1)]
[G1]

Page : 10

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Local
buckling
Lamf

31.33

Width-To-Thickness ratio for a flange

Lamw

81.33

Width-To-Thickness ratio for a web

Section
class for
simple
bending
(My
moment)
Lamf_p_My

32.67

Limiting slenderness for compact flange

Lamf_r_My

40.84

Limiting slenderness for noncompact flange

ClassF_My

Compact

Flange class

70.60

Limiting slenderness for compact web

Lamw_p_My
166.29
Lamw_r_My
ClassW_My

Limiting slenderness for noncompact web

Noncompact

Web class

[Table
B4.1a,b]
[Table
B4.1a,b]

[Table
B4.1b]
[Table
B4.1b]
[Table
B4.1b]
[Table
B4.1b]
[Table
B4.1b]
[Table
B4.1b]

Limiting
slendernes
s for shear
71.76
Lamw_p_Vz
Lamw_r_Vz

89.37

Limiting shear slenderness for compact


web
Limiting shear slenderness for noncompact
web

[G2.1.(b)]

[Comm.F
1]
[F1.(3)]

[G2.1.(b)]

Parameters
of lateral
buckling
analysis:
Rm

1.00

Cross-section monosymmetry parameter

Cb

2.15

Lb

6.00

Lpy

2.13

Lry

78.95

Lateral-torsional buckling modification


factor
Laterally unbraced length of a member
(lateral-torsional buckling)
Limiting laterally unbraced length for the
limit state of yielding
Limiting laterally unbraced length for the
limit state of inelastic lateral-torsional
buckling

[F]
[F]
[F]

Other:
Cw
kvz
Cvz
Internal
forces

73331655
.5
5.00
0.88

mm6

-3.75

kN*m

Mry

Report on Calculation Note

Warping constant

[E,F]

Shear buckling coefficient


Ratio for critical web stress calculations

[G2.1]
[G2.1]

Required flexural strength

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 11

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

Vrz
Nominal
strengths:
About the
Y axis of
crosssection
Mpy
Mny[YD]
Mny[WLB]
Mny
Vnz
Design
strengths:
About the
Y axis of
crosssection
Fib*Mpy
Fib*Mny
[YD]
Fib*Mny
[WLB]
Fib*Mny
Fiv*Vnz

2.55

kN

4.80
4.80

kN*m
kN*m

4.69
4.69
44.97

kN*m
kN*m
kN

4.32
4.32

kN*m
kN*m

4.22
4.22
40.47

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Required shear strength

Nominal plastic bending moment


Nominal flexural strength in the limit state
of yielding
Nominal strength for web local buckling
Nominal flexural strength
Nominal shear strength

[F]
[F7.1]
[F7.3]
[F7]
[G2.1]

[F]
[F7.1]

kN*m

Design plastic bending moment


Design flexural strength in the limit state of
yielding
Design strength for web local buckling

kN*m
kN

Design flexural strength


Design shear strength

[F7]
[G2.1]

[F7.3]

Verification
formulas:
UF(H1_1b)
UF(G2_1)
Ratio:

0.89
0.06

Mry/(Fib*Mny)
Vrz/(Fiv*Vnz)

Verified
Verified

RAT

0.89

Efficiency ratio

Section
OK

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 12

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

RAFTER_RESULT SUMMARY

STEEL DESIGN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CODE: ANSI/AISC 360-10 An American National Standard, June 22, 2010
ANALYSIS TYPE: Member Verification
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CODE GROUP:
MEMBER: 343 Beam_343POINT: 3
COORDINATE: x = 0.63 L = 7.65 m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOADS:
Governing Load Case: 5 ULS_RAFTER (1+2)*1.20+3*1.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MATERIAL:
STEEL 235MPa
Fy = 235.00 MPa
Fu = 360.00 MPa
E = 200000.00 MPa
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SECTION PARAMETERS: I-350x75x7x10
d=350.0 mm
Ay=15.00 cm2
Az=24.50 cm2
Ax=38.10 cm2
bf=75.0 mm
Iy=6432.58 cm4
Iz=71.26 cm4
J=8.80 cm4
tw=7.0 mm
Sy=367.58 cm3
Sz=19.00 cm3
tf=10.0 mm
Zy=445.57 cm3
Zz=32.17 cm3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MEMBER PARAMETERS:
Ly = 12.13 m
Lz = 12.13 m
Ky = 1.00
Kz = 1.00
Lb = 0.85 m
KLy/ry = 83.96
KLz/rz = 892.43
Cb = 1.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------INTERNAL FORCES:
DESIGN STRENGTHS
Mry = 83.58 kN*m
Fib*Mny = 91.04 kN*m
Vrz = 0.30 kN
Fiv*Vnz = 310.90 kN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SAFETY FACTORS
Fib = 0.90
Fiv = 0.90
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SECTION ELEMENTS:
Flange = Compact
Web = Compact
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 13

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

-------------------VERIFICATION FORMULAS:
Mry/(Fib*Mny) = 0.92 < 1.00 LRFD (H1-1b) Verified
Vrz/(Fiv*Vnz) = 0.00 < 1.00 LRFD (G2-1) Verified
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Section OK !!!

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 14

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Detail Result of Rafter Capacity Check

Detail Result of Rafter Capacity Check


Values

Unit

Symbol description

38.10
15.00
24.50
8.80
6432.58

cm2
cm2
cm2
cm4
cm4

Iz

71.26

cm4

Zy

445.57

cm3

Sy
Zz

367.58
32.17

cm3
cm3

19.00
350.0
75.0
10.0
7.0
129.9
13.7

cm3
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

Cross-section area
Shear area - Y-axis
Shear area - Z-axis
Torsional constant
Moment of inertia of a section about the Yaxis
Moment of inertia of a section about the Zaxis
Plastic section modulus about the Y (major)
axis
Elastic section modulus about the Y-axis
Plastic section modulus about the Z (minor)
axis
Elastic section modulus about the Z-axis
Height of cross-section
Width of cross-section
Flange thickness
Web thickness
Radius of gyration - Y-axis
Radius of gyration - Z-axis

Symbol

Section

MEMBER:
343 Beam_
343 ;
COORDINA
TE: x = 0.63
L = 7.65 m
Crosssection
properties:
I350x75x7x1
0
Ax
Ay
Az
J
Iy

Sz
d
bf
tf
tw
ry
rz
Material:
Name
Fy
Fu
E

235.00

MPa

360.00
200000.0
0

MPa
MPa

STEEL 235MPa
Specified minimum yield strength of
material
Specified minimum tensile strength
Longitudinal elasticity coefficient

Partial
factor
method
LRFD
Fib
Fiv

Report on Calculation Note

0.90
0.90

Resistance factor for flexure


Resistance factor for shear

Date : 17/06/16

[F1.(1)]
[G1]

Page : 15

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Local
buckling
Lamf

3.75

Width-To-Thickness ratio for a flange

Lamw

47.14

Width-To-Thickness ratio for a web

Section
class for
simple
bending
(My
moment)
Lamf_p_My

11.09

Limiting slenderness for compact flange

Lamf_r_My

25.28

Limiting slenderness for noncompact flange

ClassF_My

Compact

Flange class

109.69

Limiting slenderness for compact web

166.29

Limiting slenderness for noncompact web

Lamw_p_My
Lamw_r_My
ClassW_My

Compact

Web class

[Table
B4.1a,b]
[Table
B4.1a,b]

[Table
B4.1b]
[Table
B4.1b]
[Table
B4.1b]
[Table
B4.1b]
[Table
B4.1b]
[Table
B4.1b]

Limiting
slendernes
s for shear
71.76
Lamw_p_Vz
Lamw_r_Vz

89.37

Limiting shear slenderness for compact


web
Limiting shear slenderness for noncompact
web

[G2.1.(b)]

[Comm.F
1]
[F1.(3)]

[G2.1.(b)]

Parameters
of lateral
buckling
analysis:
Rm

1.00

Cross-section monosymmetry parameter

Cb

1.00

Lb

0.85

Lpy

0.70

Lry

2.47

Lateral-torsional buckling modification


factor
Laterally unbraced length of a member
(lateral-torsional buckling)
Limiting laterally unbraced length for the
limit state of yielding
Limiting laterally unbraced length for the
limit state of inelastic lateral-torsional
buckling

[F2.2]
[F2.2]
[F2.2]

Other:
Cw
kvz
Cvz
Internal
forces

24926389
173.4
5.00
1.00

mm6

83.58

kN*m

Mry

Report on Calculation Note

Warping constant

[E,F]

Shear buckling coefficient


Ratio for critical web stress calculations

[G2.1]
[G2.1]

Required flexural strength

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 16

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

Vrz
Nominal
strengths:

0.30

kN

About the
Y axis of
crosssection
Mpy
Mny[YD]

104.71
104.71

kN*m
kN*m

Mny[LTB]
Mny1[LTB]

101.16
101.00

kN*m
kN*m

Mny
Vnz
Design
strengths:

101.16
345.45

kN*m
kN

94.24
94.24

kN*m
kN*m

91.04

About the
Y axis of
crosssection
Fib*Mpy
Fib*Mny
[YD]
Fib*Mny
[LTB]
Fib*Mny1
[LTD]
Fib*Mny
Fiv*Vnz

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Required shear strength

Nominal plastic bending moment


Nominal flexural strength in the limit state
of yielding
Nominal lateral-torsional buckling strength
Nominal lateral-torsional buckling strength
(Cb = 1.0)
Nominal flexural strength
Nominal shear strength

[F]
[F2.1]
[F2.2]
[F2.2]
[F2]
[G2.1]

kN*m

Design plastic bending moment


Design flexural strength in the limit state of
yielding
Design lateral-torsional buckling strength

[F]
[F2.1]
[F2.2]

90.90

kN*m

Design lateral-torsional buckling strength

[F2.2]

91.04
310.90

kN*m
kN

Design flexural strength


Design shear strength

[F2]
[G2.1]

Verification
formulas:
UF(H1_1b)
UF(G2_1)
Ratio:

0.92
0.00

Mry/(Fib*Mny)
Vrz/(Fiv*Vnz)

Verified
Verified

RAT

0.92

Efficiency ratio

Section
OK

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 17

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Top Roof Frame_Result Summary

STEEL DESIGN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CODE: ANSI/AISC 360-10 An American National Standard, June 22, 2010
ANALYSIS TYPE: Member Verification
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CODE GROUP:
MEMBER: 1607 Beam_1607
POINT: 3
COORDINATE: x =
1.00 L = 2.43 m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOADS:
Governing Load Case: 6 ULS_PURLIN (1+2)*1.20+4*1.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MATERIAL:
STEEL 235MPa
Fy = 235.00 MPa
Fu = 360.00 MPa
E = 200000.00 MPa
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SECTION PARAMETERS: Tube:150x65x1.5
d=150.0 mm
Ay=1.81 cm2
Az=4.37 cm2
Ax=6.36 cm2
bf=65.0 mm
Iy=186.92 cm4
Iz=51.33 cm4
J=125.83 cm4
tw=1.5 mm
Sy=24.92 cm3
Sz=15.79 cm3
tf=1.5 mm
Zy=30.69 cm3
Zz=17.17 cm3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MEMBER PARAMETERS:
Ly = 2.43 m
Lz = 2.43 m
Ky = 1.00
Kz = 1.00
Lb = 2.43 m
KLy/ry = 44.74
KLz/rz = 85.37
Cb = 1.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------INTERNAL FORCES:
DESIGN STRENGTHS
Mry = -4.39 kN*m
Fib*Mny = 5.27 kN*m
Vrz = -6.51 kN
Fiv*Vnz = 37.06 kN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SAFETY FACTORS
Fib = 0.90
Fiv = 0.90
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SECTION ELEMENTS:
Flange = Slender
Web = Non-compact
Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 18

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------VERIFICATION FORMULAS:
Mry/(Fib*Mny) = 0.83 < 1.00 LRFD (H1-1b) Verified
Vrz/(Fiv*Vnz) = 0.18 < 1.00 LRFD (G2-1) Verified
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Section OK !!!

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 19

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Detail Result of Top Roof Frame Capacity Check

Detail Result of Top Roof Frame Capacity Check


Symbol

Values

Unit

Symbol description

Cross-section area
Shear area - Y-axis
Shear area - Z-axis
Torsional constant
Moment of inertia of a section about the Yaxis
Moment of inertia of a section about the Zaxis
Plastic section modulus about the Y (major)
axis
Elastic section modulus about the Y-axis
Plastic section modulus about the Z (minor)
axis
Elastic section modulus about the Z-axis
Height of cross-section
Width of cross-section
Flange thickness
Web thickness
Radius of gyration - Y-axis
Radius of gyration - Z-axis

Section

MEMBER:
1607
Beam_
1607 ;
COORDIN
ATE: x =
1.00 L =
2.43 m
Crosssection
properties
: Tube:15
0x65x1.5
Ax
Ay
Az
J
Iy

6.36
1.81
4.37
125.83
186.92

cm2
cm2
cm2
cm4
cm4

Iz

51.33

cm4

Zy

30.69

cm3

Sy
Zz

24.92
17.17

cm3
cm3

Sz
d
bf
tf
tw
ry
rz
Material:

15.79
150.0
65.0
1.5
1.5
54.2
28.4

cm3
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm

235.00

MPa

360.00
200000.0
0

MPa
MPa

Name
Fy
Fu
E

STEEL 235MPa
Specified minimum yield strength of
material
Specified minimum tensile strength
Longitudinal elasticity coefficient

Partial
factor
method
LRFD
Fib
Fiv
Report on Calculation Note

0.90
0.90

Resistance factor for flexure


Resistance factor for shear
Date : 17/06/16

[F1.(1)]
[G1]
Page : 20

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Local
buckling
Lamf

41.33

Width-To-Thickness ratio for a flange

[Table
B4.1a,b]
[Table
B4.1a,b]

Lamw

98.00

Width-To-Thickness ratio for a web

32.67

Limiting slenderness for compact flange

[Table
B4.1b]

40.84

Limiting slenderness for noncompact flange

[Table
B4.1b]

Flange class

[Table
B4.1b]

Limiting slenderness for compact web

[Table
B4.1b]

Limiting slenderness for noncompact web

[Table
B4.1b]

Web class

[Table
B4.1b]

71.76

Limiting shear slenderness for compact


web

[G2.1.(b)]

89.37

Limiting shear slenderness for noncompact


web

[G2.1.(b)]

[Comm.F
1]
[F1.(3)]

Section
class for
simple
bending
(My
moment)
Lamf_p_M
y
Lamf_r_M
y
Slender
ClassF_M
y
70.60
Lamw_p_
My
166.29
Lamw_r_M
y
ClassW_M
y
Limiting
slenderne
ss for
shear

Noncompact

Lamw_p_
Vz
Lamw_r_V
z
Parameter
s of
lateral
buckling
analysis:
Rm

1.00

Cross-section monosymmetry parameter

Cb

1.00

Lb

2.43

Lpy

2.90

Lry

106.39

Lateral-torsional buckling modification


factor
Laterally unbraced length of a member
(lateral-torsional buckling)
Limiting laterally unbraced length for the
limit state of yielding
Limiting laterally unbraced length for the
limit state of inelastic lateral-torsional
buckling

[F]
[F]
[F]

Other:
Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 21

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

18940104
2.8
5.00
0.67

mm6

-4.39
-6.51

kN*m
kN

Required flexural strength


Required shear strength

About
the Y axis
of crosssection
Mpy
Mny[YD]

7.21
7.21

kN*m
kN*m

[F]
[F7.1]

Mny[FLB]

5.85

kN*m

Mny
[WLB]
Mny
Vnz
Design
strengths:

6.82

kN*m

Nominal plastic bending moment


Nominal flexural strength in the limit state
of yielding
Nominal strength for local buckling of a
compression flange
Nominal strength for web local buckling

5.85
41.18

kN*m
kN

Nominal flexural strength


Nominal shear strength

[F7]
[G2.1]

6.49
6.49

kN*m
kN*m

[F]
[F7.1]

5.27

kN*m

6.14

kN*m

Design plastic bending moment


Design flexural strength in the limit state of
yielding
Design strength for local buckling of a
compression flange
Design strength for web local buckling

5.27
37.06

kN*m
kN

Design flexural strength


Design shear strength

[F7]
[G2.1]

0.83

Mry/(Fib*Mny)

Verified

0.18

Vrz/(Fiv*Vnz)

Verified

0.83

Efficiency ratio

Section
OK

Cw
kvz
Cvz
Internal
forces
Mry
Vrz
Nominal
strengths:

About
the Y axis
of crosssection
Fib*Mpy
Fib*Mny
[YD]
Fib*Mny
[FLB]
Fib*Mny
[WLB]
Fib*Mny
Fiv*Vnz

Warping constant

[E,F]

Shear buckling coefficient


Ratio for critical web stress calculations

[G2.1]
[G2.1]

[F7.2]
[F7.3]

[F7.2]
[F7.3]

Verificatio
n formula
s:
UF(H1_
1b)
UF(G2_1)
Ratio:
RAT

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 22

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Connection (1)

Connection (1.1)

100 100100100100 180 100 100


80
1011

75
40

x75x
I-350

7x10

I-350
x75x
7

00
0 - 12
75x1

Report on Calculation Note

1200

1200

1213

x10

10

75x1
0-

1200

1213

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 23

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Connection (1.2)

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017

Design of fixed beam-to-beam connection


Ratio
0.32

EN 1993-1-8:2005/AC:2009

GENERAL
Connection no.:
Connection nam e:
Structure node:
Structure bars:

1
Beam-Beam
211
141, 142

GEOMETRY
LEFT SIDE
BEAM
Section: I-350x75x7x10
Bar no.: 141
=
-165.7 [Deg]
h bl =
350
[mm]

Height of beam section

b fbl =

75

[mm]

Width of beam section

twbl =

[mm]

Thickness of the web of beam section

tfbl =

10

[mm]

Thickness of the flange of beam section

Abl =

38.10

[cm 2 ]

Cross-sectional area of a beam

Ixbl =

6432.58

[cm 4 ]

Mom ent of inertia of the beam section

Material: STEEL 235MPa


fyb =
235.00 [MPa]

Report on Calculation Note

Inclination angle

Resistance

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 24

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

RIGHT SIDE
BEAM
Section: I-350x75x7x10
Bar no.: 142
=
-14.3 [Deg]
h br =
350
[mm]

Height of beam section

b fbr =

75

[mm]

Width of beam section

twbr =

[mm]

Thickness of the web of beam section

10

[mm]

Thickness of the flange of beam section

tfbr =
Abr =
Ixbr =

38.10
6432.58

Inclination angle

Cross-sectional area of a beam

Mom ent of inertia of the beam section

[cm ]
[cm ]

Material: STEEL 235MPa


fyb =
235.00 [MPa]

Resistance

BOLTS
The shear plane passes through the UNTHREADED portion of the bolt.
d=
13 [mm ] Bolt diam eter
Class = A307
Bolt class
FtRd = 37.66 [kN] Tensile resistance of a bolt
nh =

Num ber of bolt columns

nv =

Num ber of bolt rows

h1 =

80 [mm ] Distance between first bolt and upper edge of front plate

Horizontal spacing e i = 40 [mm]


Vertical spacing p i =

100;100;180;100;100;100;100;100 [mm]

PLATE
h pr =

1011

[m m]

Plate height

b pr =

75

[m m]

Plate width

tpr =

10

[m m]

Plate thickness

Material: STEEL 235MPa


fypr =
235.00 [MPa]

Resistance

LOWER STIFFENER
w rd =

75

[m m]

Plate width

tfrd =

10

[m m]

Flange thickness

h rd =

540

[m m]

Plate height

twrd =

[m m]

Web thickness

l rd =

1213

[m m]

Plate length

d =

11.5

[Deg]

Inclination angle

Material: STEEL 235MPa


fybu =
235.00 [MPa]

Report on Calculation Note

Resistance

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 25

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

FILLET WELDS
aw =

[m m]

Web weld

af =

[m m]

Flange weld

a fd =

[m m]

Horizontal weld

MATERIAL FACTORS
M0 =

1.00

Partial safety factor

[2.2]

M1 =

1.00

Partial safety factor

[2.2]

M2 =

1.25

Partial safety factor

[2.2]

M3 =

1.25

Partial safety factor

[2.2]

L OADS
Ultimate limit state
Case: 5: ULS_RAFTER (1+2)*1.20+3*1.00
Mb1,Ed = -35.01
Vb1,Ed =

[kN*m]

Bending m oment in the right beam

-0.08

[kN]

Shear force in the right beam

N b1,Ed = -69.48

[kN]

Axial force in the right beam

RESULTS
BEAM RESISTANCES
COMPRESSION
Ab =
38.10

[cm 2 ]

Area

EN1993-1-1:[6.2.4]

N cb,Rd = Ab fyb / M0
N cb,Rd = 895.35

[kN]

SHEAR
Avb =

[cm 2 ]

60.90

Design com pressive resistance of the section

EN1993-1-1:[6.2.4]

Shear area

EN1993-1-1:[6.2.6.(3)]

Design sectional resistance for shear

EN1993-1-1:[6.2.6.(2)]

Vcb,Rd = Avb (fyb / 3) / M0


Vcb,Rd = 826.27

[kN]

Vb1,Ed / Vcb,Rd 1,0

0.00 < 1.00

verified

BENDING - PLASTIC MOMENT (WITHOUT BRACKETS)


Wpl b =
484.38 [cm 3 ] Plastic section modulus

(0.00)

EN1993-1-1:[6.2.5.(2)]

Mb,pl ,Rd = Wpl b fyb / M0


Mb,pl ,Rd = 113.83 [kN*m] Plastic resistance of the section for bending (without stiffeners) EN1993-1-1:[6.2.5.(2)]
BENDING ON THE CONTACT SURFACE WITH PLATE OR CONNECTED ELEMENT
Wpl =
1554.54 [cm 3 ] Plastic section modulus

EN1993-1-1:[6.2.5]

Mcb,Rd = Wpl fyb / M0

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 26

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE
Mcb,Rd = 365.32

Design resistance of the section for bending

EN1993-1-1:[6.2.5]

FLANGE AND WEB - COMPRESSION


Mcb,Rd = 365.32 [kN*m] Design resistance of the section for bending

EN1993-1-1:[6.2.5]

hf =

891

[kN*m]

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

[m m]

Distance between the centroids of flanges

[6.2.6.7.(1)]

Fc,fb,Rd = Mcb,Rd / h f
Fc,fb,Rd = 410.02

[kN]

Resistance of the com pressed flange and web

[6.2.6.7.(1)]

WEB OR BRACKET FLANGE - COMPRESSION - LEVEL OF THE BEAM BOTTOM FLANGE

Bearing:
=
14.3 [Deg] Angle between the front plate and the beam
=
11.5 [Deg] Inclination angle of the bracket plate
b eff,c,wb = 116 [mm ] Effective width of the web for com pression
Avb =

23.10 [cm 2 ] Shear area

[6.2.6.2.(1)]
EN1993-1-1:[6.2.6.(3)]

=
0.93
Reduction factor for interaction with shear
com,Ed = 0.00 [MPa] Maxim um compressive stress in web

[6.2.6.2.(1)]

kwc =

[6.2.6.2.(2)]

1.00

Reduction factor conditioned by compressive stresses

[6.2.6.2.(2)]

Fc,wb,Rd1 = [ kwc b eff,c,wb twb fyb / M0 ] cos() / sin( - )


Fc,wb,Rd1 = 398.05
Buckling:
d wb =
p =

316

[kN]

[m m]

0.87

Beam web resistance

[6.2.6.2.(1)]

Height of com pressed web

[6.2.6.2.(1)]

Plate slenderness of an element

[6.2.6.2.(1)]

=
0.88
Reduction factor for element buckling
Fc,wb,Rd2 = [ kwc b eff,c,wb twb fyb / M1 ] cos() / sin( - )
Fc,wb,Rd2 = 351.15
[kN]
Beam web resistance

[6.2.6.2.(1)]

[6.2.6.2.(1)]

Resistance of the bracket flange


Fc,wb,Rd3 = b b tb fyb / (0.8*M0 )
Fc,wb,Rd3 = 220.31

[kN]

Resistance of the bracket flange

Final resistance:
Fc,wb,Rd,low = Min (Fc,wb,Rd1 , Fc,wb,Rd2 , Fc,wb,Rd3 )
Fc,wb,Rd,low = 220.31 [kN]
Beam web resistance

[6.2.6.7.(1)]

[6.2.6.2.(1)]

GEOMETRICAL PARAMETERS OF A CONNECTION


EFFECTIVE LENGTHS AND PARAMETERS - FRONT PLATE

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 27

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE
Nr

mx

ex

leff,cp

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

leff,nc

leff,1

leff,2

leff,cp,g leff,nc,g leff,1,g

leff,2,g

1 13

45

18

51

108

178

38

38

38

2 13

18

100

82

76

76

76

141

89

89

89

3 13

18

100

82

74

74

74

200

100

100

100

4 13

18

100

82

74

74

74

200

100

100

100

5 13

18

100

82

74

74

74

200

100

100

100

6 13

18

140

82

74

74

74

280

140

140

140

7 13

18

140

82

74

74

74

280

140

140

140

8 13

18

100

82

74

74

74

200

100

100

100

9 13

18

100

82

74

74

74

141

87

87

87

m
mx

Bolt distance from the web


Bolt distance from the beam flange

e
ex

Bolt distance from the outer edge

p
l eff,cp

Distance between bolts

l eff,nc

Effective length for a single bolt in the non-circular failure m ode

l eff,1

Effective length for a single bolt for mode 1

l eff,2

Effective length for a single bolt for mode 2

Bolt distance from the horizontal outer edge


Effective length for a single bolt in the circular failure mode

l eff,cp,g Effective length for a group of bolts in the circular failure m ode
l eff,nc,g Effective length for a group of bolts in the non-circular failure m ode
l eff,1,g

Effective length for a group of bolts for m ode 1

l eff,2,g

Effective length for a group of bolts for m ode 2

CONNECTION RESISTANCE FOR COMPRESSION


N j ,Rd = Min ( N cb,Rd2 Fc,wb,Rd,low )
N j ,Rd =

440.63

[kN]

Connection resistance for compression

N b1,Ed / N j,Rd 1,0

[6.2]
verified

0.16 < 1.00

(0.16)

CONNECTION RESISTANCE FOR BENDING


Ft,Rd =

37.66

[kN]

Bolt resistance for tension

[Table 3.4]

Bp,Rd =

103.42

[kN]

Punching shear resistance of a bolt

[Table 3.4]

Ft,fc,Rd

colum n flange resistance due to bending

Ft,wc,Rd

colum n web resistance due to tension

Ft,ep,Rd

resistance of the front plate due to bending

Ft,wb,Rd resistance of the web in tension

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 28

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Ft,fc,Rd = Min (FT,1,fc,Rd , FT,2,fc,Rd , FT,3,fc,Rd )

[6.2.6.4] , [Tab.6.2]

Ft,wc,Rd = b eff,t,wc twc fyc / M0

[6.2.6.3.(1)]

Ft,ep,Rd = Min (FT,1,ep,Rd , FT,2,ep,Rd , FT,3,ep,Rd )

[6.2.6.5] , [Tab.6.2]

Ft,wb,Rd = b eff,t,wb twb fyb / M 0

[6.2.6.8.(1)]

RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 1


Ft1,Rd,comp - Formula

Ft1,Rd,comp

Component

Ft,ep,Rd(1) = 19.42

19.42

Front plate - tension

Bp,Rd = 206.83

206.83

Bolts due to shear punching

Fc,fb,Rd = 410.02

410.02

Beam flange - compression

Ft1,Rd = Min (Ft1,Rd,comp )

19.42

Bolt row resistance

Ft2,Rd,comp - Formula

Ft2,Rd,comp

Component

Ft,ep,Rd(2) = 72.13

72.13

Front plate - tension

Ft,wb,Rd(2) = 125.01

125.01

Beam web - tension

Bp,Rd = 206.83

206.83

Bolts due to shear punching

Fc,fb,Rd - 1 Ftj,Rd = 410.02 - 19.42

390.60

Beam flange - compression

Ft2,Rd = Min (Ft2,Rd,comp )

72.13

Bolt row resistance

Ft3,Rd,comp - Formula

Ft3,Rd,comp

Component

Ft,ep,Rd(3) = 71.45

71.45

Front plate - tension

Ft,wb,Rd(3) = 122.22

122.22

Beam web - tension

Bp,Rd = 206.83

206.83

Bolts due to shear punching

Fc,fb,Rd - 1 Ftj,Rd = 410.02 - 91.55

318.47

Beam flange - compression

Ft,ep,Rd(3 + 2) - 22 Ftj,Rd = 150.66 - 72.13

78.53

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(3 + 2) - 22 Ftj,Rd = 310.65 - 72.13

238.52

Beam web - tension - group

78.53

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(3 + 2) - 2 Ftj,Rd = 310.65 - 72.13

238.52

Beam web - tension - group

Ft3,Rd = Min (Ft3,Rd,comp )

71.45

Bolt row resistance

RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 2

RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 3

Ft,ep,Rd(3 + 2) - 2 Ftj,Rd = 150.66 - 72.13


2

Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance


Ft3,Rd = Ft2,Rd h 3 /h 2
Ft3,Rd =
63.59
[kN]

Reduced bolt row resistance

[6.2.7.2.(9)]

RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 4

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 29

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Ft4,Rd,comp - Formula

Ft4,Rd,comp

Component

Ft,ep,Rd(4) = 71.45

71.45

Front plate - tension

Ft,wb,Rd(4) = 122.22

122.22

Beam web - tension

Bp,Rd = 206.83

206.83

Bolts due to shear punching

Fc,fb,Rd - 1 Ftj,Rd = 410.02 - 155.14

254.88

Beam flange - compression

Ft,ep,Rd(4 + 3) - 33 Ftj,Rd = 150.66 - 63.59

87.06

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(4 + 3) - 33 Ftj,Rd = 329.00 - 63.59

265.41

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(4 + 3 + 2) - 3 2 Ftj,Rd = 225.98 - 135.72

90.26

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(4 + 3 + 2) - 3 2 Ftj,Rd = 475.15 - 135.72

339.43

Beam web - tension - group

90.26

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(4 + 3 + 2) - 3 Ftj,Rd = 475.15 - 135.72

339.43

Beam web - tension - group

Ft4,Rd = Min (Ft4,Rd,comp )

71.45

Bolt row resistance

Ft,ep,Rd(4 + 3 + 2) - 3 Ftj,Rd = 225.98 - 135.72


2

Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance


Ft4,Rd = Ft2,Rd h 4 /h 2
Ft4,Rd =
55.05
[kN]

Reduced bolt row resistance

[6.2.7.2.(9)]

RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 5


Ft5,Rd,comp - Formula

Ft5,Rd,comp

Component

Ft,ep,Rd(5) = 71.45

71.45

Front plate - tension

Ft,wb,Rd(5) = 122.22

122.22

Beam web - tension

Bp,Rd = 206.83

206.83

Bolts due to shear punching

Fc,fb,Rd - 14 Ftj,Rd = 410.02 - 210.20

199.83

Beam flange - compression

Ft,ep,Rd(5 + 4) - 44 Ftj,Rd = 150.66 - 55.05

95.60

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(5 + 4) - 44 Ftj,Rd = 329.00 - 55.05

273.95

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(5 + 4 + 3) - 4 3 Ftj,Rd = 225.98 - 118.65

107.34

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(5 + 4 + 3) - 4 3 Ftj,Rd = 493.50 - 118.65

374.85

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 4 2 Ftj,Rd = 301.31 - 190.78

110.54

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 4 2 Ftj ,Rd = 639.65 - 190.78

448.87

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 4 2 Ftj,Rd = 301.31 - 190.78

110.54

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 4 2 Ftj ,Rd = 639.65 - 190.78

448.87

Beam web - tension - group

Ft5,Rd = Min (Ft5,Rd,comp )

71.45

Bolt row resistance

Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance


Ft5,Rd = Ft2,Rd h 5 /h 2
Ft5,Rd =
46.52
[kN]

Report on Calculation Note

Reduced bolt row resistance

[6.2.7.2.(9)]

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 30

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 6


Ft6,Rd,comp - Formula

Ft6,Rd,comp

Component

Ft,ep,Rd(6) = 71.45

71.45

Front plate - tension

Ft,wb,Rd(6) = 122.22

122.22

Beam web - tension

Bp,Rd = 206.83

206.83

Bolts due to shear punching

153.31

Beam flange - compression

104.14

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(6 + 5) - 5 Ftj,Rd = 394.80 - 46.52

348.28

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(6 + 5 + 4) - 5 4 Ftj,Rd = 225.98 - 101.57

124.41

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(6 + 5 + 4) - 5 4 Ftj,Rd = 559.30 - 101.57

457.73

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(6 + 5 + 4 + 3) - 5 3 Ftj,Rd = 301.31 - 165.16

136.15

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(6 + 5 + 4 + 3) - 5 3 Ftj ,Rd = 723.80 - 165.16

558.64

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 5 2 Ftj ,Rd = 376.64 - 237.29

139.35

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 5 2 Ftj ,Rd = 869.95 - 237.29

632.66

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 5 2 Ftj ,Rd = 376.64 - 237.29

139.35

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 5 2 Ftj ,Rd = 869.95 - 237.29

632.66

Beam web - tension - group

Ft6,Rd = Min (Ft6,Rd,comp )

71.45

Bolt row resistance

Fc,fb,Rd - 1 Ftj,Rd = 410.02 - 256.71


5

Ft,ep,Rd(6 + 5) - 5 Ftj,Rd = 150.66 - 46.52


5

Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance


Ft6,Rd = Ft2,Rd h 6 /h 2
Ft6,Rd =
37.98
[kN]

Reduced bolt row resistance

[6.2.7.2.(9)]

RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 7

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 31

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Ft7,Rd,comp - Formula

Ft7,Rd,comp

Component

Ft,ep,Rd(7) = 71.45

71.45

Front plate - tension

Ft,wb,Rd(7) = 122.22

122.22

Beam web - tension

Bp,Rd = 206.83

206.83

Bolts due to shear punching

Fc,fb,Rd - 1 Ftj,Rd = 410.02 - 294.69

115.33

Beam flange - compression

Ft,ep,Rd(7 + 6) - 66 Ftj,Rd = 150.66 - 37.98

112.68

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(7 + 6) - 66 Ftj,Rd = 460.60 - 37.98

422.62

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(7 + 6 + 5) - 6 5 Ftj,Rd = 225.98 - 84.50

141.49

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(7 + 6 + 5) - 6 5 Ftj,Rd = 625.10 - 84.50

540.60

Beam web - tension - group

161.76

Front plate - tension - group

650.05

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3) - 6 Ftj ,Rd = 376.64 - 203.14

173.50

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3) - 6 3 Ftj ,Rd = 954.10 - 203.14

750.96

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 62 Ftj,Rd = 451.97 - 275.27

176.70

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 62 Ftj,Rd = 1100.25 - 275.27 824.98

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 62 Ftj,Rd = 451.97 - 275.27

176.70

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 62 Ftj,Rd = 1100.25 - 275.27 824.98

Beam web - tension - group

Ft7,Rd = Min (Ft7,Rd,comp )

Bolt row resistance

Ft,ep,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4) - 6 Ftj,Rd = 301.31 - 139.55


4

Ft,wb,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4) - 6 Ftj ,Rd = 789.60 - 139.55


3

71.45

Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance


Ft7,Rd = Ft2,Rd h 7 /h 2
Ft7,Rd =
22.61
[kN]

Reduced bolt row resistance

[6.2.7.2.(9)]

RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 8

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 32

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Ft8,Rd,comp - Formula

Ft8,Rd,comp

Component

Ft,ep,Rd(8) = 71.45

71.45

Front plate - tension

Ft,wb,Rd(8) = 122.22

122.22

Beam web - tension

Bp,Rd = 206.83

206.83

Bolts due to shear punching

Fc,fb,Rd - 1 Ftj,Rd = 410.02 - 317.30

92.72

Beam flange - compression

Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7) - 77 Ftj,Rd = 150.66 - 22.61

128.04

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7) - 77 Ftj,Rd = 394.80 - 22.61

372.19

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7 + 6) - 7 6 Ftj,Rd = 225.98 - 60.59

165.39

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7 + 6) - 7 6 Ftj,Rd = 625.10 - 60.59

564.51

Beam web - tension - group

194.20

Front plate - tension - group

682.49

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4) - 7 Ftj ,Rd = 376.64 - 162.16

214.48

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4) - 7 4 Ftj ,Rd = 954.10 - 162.16

791.94

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3) - 73 Ftj,Rd = 451.97 - 225.75

226.21

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3) - 73 Ftj,Rd = 1118.60 - 225.75

892.85

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 7 2 Ftj,Rd = 527.30 - 297.88 229.41

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 7 2 Ftj,Rd = 1264.75 - 297.88 966.87

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 7 2 Ftj,Rd = 527.30 - 297.88 229.41

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 7 2 Ftj,Rd = 1264.75 - 297.88 966.87

Beam web - tension - group

Ft8,Rd = Min (Ft8,Rd,comp )

Bolt row resistance

Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5) - 7 Ftj,Rd = 301.31 - 107.11


5

Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5) - 7 Ftj ,Rd = 789.60 - 107.11


4

71.45

Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance


Ft8,Rd = Ft2,Rd h 8 /h 2
Ft8,Rd =
14.07
[kN]

Reduced bolt row resistance

[6.2.7.2.(9)]

RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 9

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 33

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Ft9,Rd,comp - Formula

Ft9,Rd,comp

Component

Ft,ep,Rd(9) = 71.45

71.45

Front plate - tension

Ft,wb,Rd(9) = 122.22

122.22

Beam web - tension

Bp,Rd = 206.83

206.83

Bolts due to shear punching

Fc,fb,Rd - 1 Ftj,Rd = 410.02 - 331.38

78.65

Beam flange - compression

Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8) - 88 Ftj,Rd = 150.66 - 14.07

136.58

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8) - 88 Ftj,Rd = 307.86 - 14.07

293.79

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8 + 7) - 8 7 Ftj,Rd = 225.98 - 36.68

189.30

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8 + 7) - 8 7 Ftj,Rd = 538.16 - 36.68

501.48

Beam web - tension - group

226.65

Front plate - tension - group

693.80

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5) - 8 Ftj ,Rd = 376.64 - 121.18

255.46

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5) - 8 5 Ftj ,Rd = 932.96 - 121.18

811.78

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4) - 84 Ftj,Rd = 451.97 - 176.23

275.73

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4) - 84 Ftj,Rd = 1097.46 - 176.23

921.23

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3) - 8 3 Ftj,Rd = 527.30 - 239.83

287.47

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3) - 8 3 Ftj,Rd = 1261.96 - 239.83

1022.13

Beam web - tension - group

Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6) - 8 Ftj,Rd = 301.31 - 74.66


6

Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6) - 8 Ftj ,Rd = 768.46 - 74.66


5

Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 8 2 Ftj,Rd = 602.62 - 311.96 290.67

Front plate - tension - group

Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) - 8 2 Ftj ,Rd = 1408.11 - 311.96 1096.15

Beam web - tension - group

Ft9,Rd = Min (Ft9,Rd,comp )

Bolt row resistance

71.45

Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance


Ft9,Rd = Ft2,Rd h 9 /h 2
Ft9,Rd =
5.54
[kN]

Reduced bolt row resistance

[6.2.7.2.(9)]

SUMMARY TABLE OF FORCES


Nr

hj

Ftj ,Rd

Ft,fc,Rd

Ft,w c,Rd

Ft,ep,Rd

Ft,w b,Rd

Ft,Rd

Bp,Rd

1 945

19.42

19.42

75.33

206.83

2 845

72.13

72.13

125.01

75.33

206.83

3 745

63.59

71.45

122.22

75.33

206.83

4 645

55.05

71.45

122.22

75.33

206.83

5 545

46.52

71.45

122.22

75.33

206.83

6 445

37.98

71.45

122.22

75.33

206.83

7 265

22.61

71.45

122.22

75.33

206.83

8 165

14.07

71.45

122.22

75.33

206.83

9 65

5.54

71.45

122.22

75.33

206.83

CONNECTION RESISTANCE FOR BENDING Mj ,Rd


Mj ,Rd = h j Ftj,Rd

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 34

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE
Mj ,Rd =

213.06

[kN*m]

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Connection resistance for bending

Mb1,Ed / Mj,Rd 1,0

[6.2]
verified

0.16 < 1.00

(0.16)

VERIFICATION OF M+N INTERACTION


Mb1,Ed / Mj,Rd + N b1,Ed / N j,Rd 1
Mb1,Ed / Mj,Rd + N b1,Ed / N j,Rd

[6.2.5.1.(3)]
verified

0.32 < 1.00

(0.32)

CONNECTION RESISTANCE FOR SHEAR


v =

0.60

Coefficient for calculation of Fv,Rd

Lf =

0.75

Reduction factor for long connections

[Table 3.4]
[3.8]

Fv,Rd =

18.87

[kN]

Shear resistance of a single bolt

[Table 3.4]

Ft,Rd,max =

37.66

[kN]

Tensile resistance of a single bolt

[Table 3.4]

Fb,Rd,i nt =

87.33

[kN]

Bearing resistance of an interm ediate bolt

[Table 3.4]

Fb,Rd,ext =

68.64

[kN]

Bearing resistance of an outermost bolt

[Table 3.4]

Ftj ,Rd,N

Nr

Ftj ,Ed,N

Ftj ,Rd,M

Ftj ,Ed,M

Ftj ,Ed

Fv j ,Rd

75.33

-7.72

19.42

3.19

-4.53

37.73

75.33

-7.72

72.13

11.85

4.13

36.25

75.33

-7.72

63.59

10.45

2.73

36.75

75.33

-7.72

55.05

9.05

1.33

37.26

75.33

-7.72

46.52

7.64

-0.08

37.73

75.33

-7.72

37.98

6.24

-1.48

37.73

75.33

-7.72

22.61

3.72

-4.00

37.73

75.33

-7.72

14.07

2.31

-5.41

37.73

75.33

-7.72

5.54

0.91

-6.81

37.73

Ftj ,Rd,N

Bolt row resistance for sim ple tension

Ftj ,Ed,N

Force due to axial force in a bolt row

Ftj ,Rd,M

Bolt row resistance for sim ple bending

Ftj ,Ed,M

Force due to m oment in a bolt row

Ftj ,Ed

Maxim um tensile force in a bolt row

Fvj,Rd

Reduced bolt row resistance

Ftj ,Ed,N = N j,Ed Ftj,Rd,N / N j,Rd


Ftj ,Ed,M = Mj,Ed Ftj,Rd,M / Mj ,Rd
Ftj ,Ed = Ftj,Ed,N + Ftj ,Ed,M
Fvj,Rd = Min (n h Fv,Ed (1 - Ftj,Ed / (1.4 n h Ft,Rd,m ax), n h Fv,Rd , n h Fb,Rd))
Vj,Rd = n h 1 n Fvj,Rd
Vj,Rd =

336.65

[Table 3.4]
[kN]

Report on Calculation Note

Connection resistance for shear

[Table 3.4]

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 35

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Vb1,Ed / Vj,Rd 1,0

verified

0.00 < 1.00

(0.00)

W ELD RESISTANCE
Aw =

64.52 [cm 2 ] Area of all welds

[4.5.3.2(2)]

Awy =

12.30 [cm 2 ] Area of horizontal welds

[4.5.3.2(2)]

Awz =

52.22 [cm 2 ] Area of vertical welds

[4.5.3.2(2)]

Iwy =

51138.36 [cm 4 ] Mom ent of inertia of the weld arrangem ent with respect to the hor. axis [4.5.3.2(5)]

max=max =

-21.05 [MPa] Normal stress in a weld

[4.5.3.2(5)]

= =

-20.78 [MPa] Stress in a vertical weld

[4.5.3.2(5)]

II =

-0.01 [MPa] Tangent stress

w =

[4.5.3.2(5)]

Correlation coefficient

0.80

[4.5.3.2(7)]

[max2 + 3*(max2 )] fu /( w*M2 )

42.10 < 360.00

verified

(0.12)

[ 2 + 3*( 2 +II 2 )] fu /( w*M2 )

41.55 < 360.00

verified

(0.12)

0.9*fu/M2

21.05 < 259.20

verified

(0.08)

CONNECTION STIFFNESS
twash =

[m m]

Washer thickness

[6.2.6.3.(2)]

h head =

[m m]

Bolt head height

[6.2.6.3.(2)]

h nut =

13

[m m]

Bolt nut height

[6.2.6.3.(2)]

Lb =

37

[m m]

Bolt length

[6.2.6.3.(2)]

k10 =

[m m]

Stiffness coefficient of bolts

[6.3.2.(1)]

STIFFNESSES OF BOLT ROWS

Nr

k3

hj

k4

k5

k eff,j

k eff,j hj

k eff,j
hj 2

945

1.65

156.09

845

30

34.07

2878.47

745

30

29.86

2223.90

645

30

25.85

1666.84

545

30

21.84

1189.95

445

30

17.83

793.23

265

30

10.62

281.16

165

30

6.61

108.92

65

30

2.60

16.85

Sum

150.92

9315.41

keff,j = 1 / ( 3 5 (1 / ki,j ))
zeq = j keff,j h j 2 / j keff,j hj
zeq =
617 [m m]

Report on Calculation Note

[6.3.3.1.(2)]

Equivalent force arm

[6.3.3.1.(3)]

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 36

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

keq = j keff,j h j / zeq


keq =
24 [mm ]

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Equivalent stiffness coefficient of a bolt arrangem ent

[6.3.3.1.(1)]

Sj ,ini = E zeq 2 keq

[6.3.1.(4)]

Sj ,ini = 1863082.84 [kN*m] Initial rotational stiffness

[6.3.1.(4)]

=
1.00
Sj = Sj ,ini /

[6.3.1.(6)]

Sj =

Stiffness coefficient of a connection

[6.3.1.(4)]

1863082.84 [kN*m] Final rotational stiffness

[6.3.1.(4)]

Connection classification due to stiffness.


Sj ,ri g = 8486.99 [kN*m ] Stiffness of a rigid connection

[5.2.2.5]

Sj ,pin =

[5.2.2.5]

530.44

[kN*m ]

Stiffness of a pinned connection

Sj ,ini Sj ,ri g RIGID

W EAKEST COMPONENT:
FRONT PLATE - TENSION

REMARKS
Bolts vertical spacing is too large. 180 [mm] > 140 [mm]

Connection conforms to the code

Ratio 0.32

Connection (2)

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 37

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Connection (2.1)

400
200
20

900

33

65

300

20

10

65

I-350x75x7x10
D 16 A307

250

450
125

70

200

Report on Calculation Note

20

Y
Z

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 38

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Connection (2.2)

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017

Fixed column base design


Eurocode 3: EN 1993-1-8:2005/AC:2009 + CEB Design Guide:
Design of fastenings in concrete

Ratio
0.32

GENERAL
Connection no.:
Connection nam e:
Structure node:
Structure bars:

2
Fixed column base
92
141

GEOMETRY
COLUMN
Section: I-350x75x7x10
Bar no.: 141
Lc =
12.13
[m]
=
hc =

Colum n length

14.3

[Deg]

Inclination angle

350

[mm]

Height of column section

b fc =

75

[mm]

Width of column section

twc =

[mm]

Thickness of the web of column section

tfc =

10

[mm]

Thickness of the flange of column section

rc =

[mm]

Radius of column section fillet

Ac =

38.10

[cm 2 ]

Cross-sectional area of a column

Iyc =

6432.58

[cm 4 ]

Mom ent of inertia of the colum n section

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 39

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE
Material: STEEL 235MPa
fyc =
235.00 [MPa]

Resistance

fuc =

[MPa]

Yield strength of a material

360.00

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

COLUMN BASE
l pd =

400

[m m]

Length

b pd =

200

[m m]

Width

tpd =

10

[m m]

Thickness

Material: STEEL 235MPa


fypd =
235.00 [MPa]

Resistance

fupd =

Yield strength of a material

360.00

[MPa]

ANCHORAGE
The shear plane passes through the UNTHREADED portion of the bolt.
Class =
A307
Anchor class
fyb =
248.21 [MPa] Yield strength of the anchor m aterial
fub =

413.69

[MPa]

Tensile strength of the anchor material

16

[m m]

Bolt diam eter

1.98

[cm 2 ]

Effective section area of a bolt

Av =

1.98

[cm 2 ]

Area of bolt section

nH =

Num ber of bolt columns

nV =

Num ber of bolt rows

d=
As =

Horizontal spacing e Hi = 100 [mm]


Vertical spacing e Vi =

70 [mm]

Anchor dimensions
L1 =
65
[m m]
L2 =

300

[m m]

L3 =

65

[m m]

L4 =

65

[m m]

Washer
l wd =

20

[m m]

Length

b wd =

20

[m m]

Width

twd =

[m m]

Thickness

MATERIAL FACTORS
M0 =

1.00

Partial safety factor

M2 =

1.25

Partial safety factor

C =

1.50

Partial safety factor

SPREAD FOOTING

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 40

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE
L=
B=
H=

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

450
250
900

[m m]
[m m]
[m m]

Spread footing length


Spread footing width
Spread footing height

Concrete
Class C25
fck =
25.00

[MPa]

Characteristic resistance for com pression

Grout layer
tg =
20

[m m]

Thickness of leveling layer (grout)

fck,g = 12.00 [MPa] Characteristic resistance for com pression


C f,d =

Coeff. of friction between the base plate and concrete

0.30

W ELDS
ap =

[m m]

Footing plate of the colum n base

L OADS
Case: 5: ULS_RAFTER (1+2)*1.20+3*1.00
N j ,Ed =

-85.19

[kN]

Axial force

Vj,Ed,y =

-0.25

[kN]

Shear force

Vj,Ed,z =

22.38

[kN]

Shear force

RESULTS
COMPRESSION ZONE
COMPRESSION OF CONCRETE
fcd =
16.67 [MPa] Design com pressive resistance
fj =

13.18

[MPa]

EN 1992-1:[3.1.6.(1)]

Design bearing resistance under the base plate

[6.2.5.(7)]

c = tp (fyp /(3*fj *M 0))


c=
b eff =

24 [mm ] Additional width of the bearing pressure zone

[6.2.5.(4)]

59 [mm ] Effective width of the bearing pressure zone under the flange

[6.2.5.(3)]

l eff =

124 [mm ] Effective length of the bearing pressure zone under the flange

[6.2.5.(3)]

Ac0 =

72.73 [cm ] Area of the joint between the base plate and the foundation

Ac1 = 275.00 [cm 2 ] Maxim um design area of load distribution

EN 1992-1:[6.7.(3)]
EN 1992-1:[6.7.(3)]

Frdu = Ac0 *fcd *(Ac1/Ac0 ) 3*Ac0 *fcd


Frdu =
j =

235.71

[kN]

0.67

Bearing resistance of concrete

EN 1992-1:[6.7.(3)]

Reduction factor for com pression

[6.2.5.(7)]

Design bearing resistance

[6.2.5.(7)]

fjd = j *Frdu /(b eff*leff )


fjd =

21.61

[MPa]

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 41

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE
Ac,n =

[cm 2 ]

302.29

Fc,Rd,i = AC,i *fjd


Fc,Rd,n = 653.12

[kN]

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Bearing area for com pression

[6.2.8.2.(1)]

Bearing resistance of concrete for com pression

[6.2.8.2.(1)]

RESISTANCES OF SPREAD FOOTING IN THE COMPRESSION ZONE


N j ,Rd = Fc,Rd,n
N j ,Rd = 653.12

[kN]

Resistance of a spread footing for axial compression

[6.2.8.2.(1)]

CONNECTION CAPACITY CHECK


N j ,Ed / N j,Rd 1,0 (6.24)

verified

0.13 < 1.00

(0.13)

SHEAR
BEARING PRESSURE OF AN ANCHOR BOLT ONTO THE BASE PLATE
Shear force Vj ,Ed,y
d,y = 1.21

Coeff. taking account of the bolt position - in the direction of shear

[Table 3.4]

b,y = 1.00

Coeff. for resistance calculation F1,vb,Rd

[Table 3.4]

k1,y = 2.50

Coeff. taking account of the bolt position - perpendicularly to the direction of shear

[Table 3.4]

F1,vb,Rd,y = k1,y* b,y*fup *d*tp / M2


F1,vb,Rd,y = 114.30

[kN]

Resistance of an anchor bolt for bearing pressure onto the base plate

[6.2.2.(7)]

Shear force Vj ,Ed,z


d,z = 1.86

Coeff. taking account of the bolt position - in the direction of shear

[Table 3.4]

b,z = 1.00

Coeff. for resistance calculation F1,vb,Rd

[Table 3.4]

k1,z = 2.50

Coeff. taking account of the bolt position - perpendicularly to the direction of shear

[Table 3.4]

F1,vb,Rd,z = k1,z* b,z*fup *d*tp / M2


F1,vb,Rd,z = 114.30

[kN]

Resistance of an anchor bolt for bearing pressure onto the base plate

[6.2.2.(7)]

SHEAR OF AN ANCHOR BOLT


b =
Coeff. for resistance calculation F2,vb,Rd
0.37

[6.2.2.(7)]

Avb =

1.98

[cm 2 ]

Area of bolt section

[6.2.2.(7)]

fub =

413.69

[MPa]

Tensile strength of the anchor material

[6.2.2.(7)]

Partial safety factor

[6.2.2.(7)]

Shear resistance of a bolt - without lever arm

[6.2.2.(7)]

M2 =

1.25

F2,vb,Rd = b *fub*Avb/M2
F2,vb,Rd =
M =

23.94

2.00

[kN]

Factor related to the fastening of an anchor in the foundation

CEB [9.3.2.2]

MRk,s = 0.15 [kN*m ] Characteristic bending resistance of an anchor

CEB [9.3.2.2]

l sm =

CEB [9.3.2.2]

Ms =

33 [mm ] Lever arm length


1.20

Partial safety factor

CEB [3.2.3.2]

Fv,Rd,sm = M *MRk,s/(l sm *Ms)

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 42

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE
Fv,Rd,sm =

[kN]

7.40

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Shear resistance of a bolt - with lever arm

CEB [9.3.1]

CONCRETE PRY-OUT FAILURE


N Rk,c =
20.41
[kN]
Design uplift capacity

CEB [9.2.4]

k3 =

2.00

Factor related to the anchor length

CEB [9.3.3]

Mc =

2.16

Partial safety factor

CEB [3.2.3.1]

Fv,Rd,cp = k3 *N Rk,c/Mc
Fv,Rd,cp =

[kN]

18.90

Concrete resistance for pry-out failure

CEB [9.3.1]

CONCRETE EDGE FAILURE


Shear force Vj ,Ed,y
VRk,c,y0 = 55.52 [kN] Characteristic resistance of an anchor
A,V,y =

0.93

Factor related to anchor spacing and edge distance

h,V,y =

1.00

Factor related to the foundation thickness

s,V,y =

0.98

Factor related to the influence of edges parallel to the shear load direction

ec,V,y =

1.00

Factor taking account a group effect when different shear loads are acting on the individual anch

,V,y =

1.00

Factor related to the angle at which the shear load is applied

ucr,V,y = 1.00
Mc =

Factor related to the type of edge reinforcement used


Partial safety factor

2.16
0

Fv,Rd,c,y = VRk,c,y * A,V,y* h,V,y* s,V,y* ec,V,y* ,V,y* ucr,V,y/Mc


Fv,Rd,c,y = 23.27
[kN]
Concrete resistance for edge failure

CEB [9.3.1]

Shear force Vj ,Ed,z


VRk,c,z0 = 90.88 [kN] Characteristic resistance of an anchor
A,V,z =

0.48

Factor related to anchor spacing and edge distance

h,V,z =

1.00

Factor related to the foundation thickness

s,V,z =

0.84

Factor related to the influence of edges parallel to the shear load direction

ec,V,z =

1.00

Factor taking account a group effect when different shear loads are acting on the individual anch

,V,z =

1.00

Factor related to the angle at which the shear load is applied

ucr,V,z = 1.00
Mc =

Factor related to the type of edge reinforcement used


Partial safety factor

2.16
0

Fv,Rd,c,z = VRk,c,z * A,V,z* h,V,z* s,V,z* ec,V,z* ,V,z* ucr,V,z/Mc


Fv,Rd,c,z = 17.05
[kN]
Concrete resistance for edge failure

CEB [9.3.1]

SPLITTING RESISTANCE
C f,d =
0.30
Coeff. of friction between the base plate and concrete

[6.2.2.(6)]

N c,Ed = 85.19

[6.2.2.(6)]

[kN]

Com pressive force

Ff,Rd = C f,d *N c,Ed


Ff,Rd =

25.56

[kN]

Slip resistance

[6.2.2.(6)]

SHEAR CHECK
Vj,Rd,y = n b *m in(F1,vb,Rd,y, F2,vb,Rd , Fv,Rd,sm , Fv,Rd,cp , Fv,Rd,c,y) + Ff,Rd

Report on Calculation Note

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 43

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017


Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd.
Designer: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE
Vj,Rd,y =

[kN]

69.95

File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtd


Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

Connection resistance for shear

Vj,Ed,y / Vj ,Rd,y 1,0

CEB [9.3.1]
verified

0.00 < 1.00

(0.00)

Vj,Rd,z = n b *m in(F1,vb,Rd,z, F2,vb,Rd , Fv,Rd,sm , Fv,Rd,cp , Fv,Rd,c,z) + Ff,Rd


Vj,Rd,z =

[kN]

69.95

Connection resistance for shear

CEB [9.3.1]

Vj,Ed,z / Vj ,Rd,z 1,0

0.32 < 1.00

verified

(0.32)

Vj,Ed,y / Vj ,Rd,y + Vj ,Ed,z / Vj,Rd,z 1,0

0.32 < 1.00

verified

(0.32)

W ELDS BETWEEN THE COLUMN AND THE BASE PLATE


=

15.92

[MPa]

15.92

Normal stress in a weld

[4.5.3.(7)]

[MPa]

Perpendicular tangent stress

[4.5.3.(7)]
[4.5.3.(7)]

yII =

-0.29

[MPa]

Tangent stress parallel to Vj,Ed,y

zII =

11.30

[MPa]

Tangent stress parallel to Vj,Ed,z

[4.5.3.(7)]

W =

0.80

Resistance-dependent coefficient

[4.5.3.(7)]

/ (0.9*fu/M2 )) 1.0 (4.1)

0.06 < 1.00

verified

(0.06)

( + 3.0 (yII + )) / (fu /( W*M2 ))) 1.0 (4.1) 0.09 < 1.00

verified

(0.09)

( 2 + 3.0 (zII2 + 2 )) / (fu /( W*M2 ))) 1.0 (4.1) 0.10 < 1.00

verified

(0.10)

W EAKEST COMPONENT:
FOUNDATION - BEARING PRESSURE ONTO CONCRETE

REMARKS
Anchor curvature radius is too small.
33 [mm] < 48 [mm]
Segment L4 of the hook anchor is too short. 65 [mm] < 79 [mm]

Connection conforms to the code

Report on Calculation Note

Ratio 0.32

Date : 17/06/16

Page : 44

Вам также может понравиться