0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
5 просмотров1 страница
A psychosis is traditionally defined as a subtotal disorganization of personality. Psychoses may also be seen as an attempt to adapt, says dr. Sanjay gupta. Psychosis can be treated in a number of ways, he says.
A psychosis is traditionally defined as a subtotal disorganization of personality. Psychoses may also be seen as an attempt to adapt, says dr. Sanjay gupta. Psychosis can be treated in a number of ways, he says.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате DOC, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
A psychosis is traditionally defined as a subtotal disorganization of personality. Psychoses may also be seen as an attempt to adapt, says dr. Sanjay gupta. Psychosis can be treated in a number of ways, he says.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате DOC, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
“Reality, for the individual. Is the world as that person perceives it, not necessarily as it exists.”
Mary Almore (Almoire, 1976)
With the possible exception of the sociopathic personality, the
psychoses constitute the most serious psychiatric disorders with which the nurse has to deal.
A psychosis is traditionally defined as a subtotal disorganization of
personality, in which the individual loses contact with reality. However, the latter part of this definition frequently leads to misinterpretations and sets off spectres in the layman’s perception of psychosis, which are themselves unrealistic. Perhaps it would be most accurate to say that in a psychosis, the individual moves in and out of reality for, characteristically, the “loss” of reality does not involve the totality of the individual’s life, at least not for protracted periods. In fact, sometimes the psychotic is sufficiently in contact, that he can maintain himself in society without hospitalization or even without treatment. In such cases, of course, the effectiveness of that person’s overall adjustment is minimal. His personality is disorganized, and his behaviour tends to be psychologically, if not physically, damaging to those close to him. In any event, no matter how bizarre the behaviour of the psychotic may be at times, psychoses may also be seen as an attempt to adapt. What one calls the psychotic’s ‘loss” of contact with reality may be seen as a restructuring of that reality on his own terms, as it were. In effect, these are the best, or only, terms he sees as available and reinforcing to him at the time.
An example of the latter would be the schizophrenic who cuts himself
for the reassurance that he is still real because he bleeds and, possibly, hurts. This should not be interpreted as an indication that he is attempting to structure a less “crazy” world.
Professional treatment, then, ideally becomes a matter of permitting
and encouraging the person’s redefining of his terms in a more realistic and effective way. In another way, one opens up new options, enabling and reinforcing the person’s behaving in a more normal way. This is not a simple process, however, and tool often the helping profession settles for no treatment at all beyond custodial care or for removal of symptomatology classified as “sick”-with-out going on to deal with behaviour and without really attempting to encourage growth orientation.