Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The procedures of the World court are highly structured and bureaucratic. The cases are made up
of grievances among countries. Each claim is brought before the World Court by a plaintiff that
makes an argument or assertion. It is presented in the form of a petition. At least one statement of
fact must exist for the claim to be valid. The statement of fact must be supported by a statement
of relevance.
The statement of fact is the claim that the plaintiff makes against the defendant based on
something that happened between the two parties in a certain time and place. The statement of
Statement of relevance is the supporting evidence for a statement of fact that justifies its validity
or truth. After the plaintiff presents its claim, the defendant has the opportunity to dispute or
acknowledge the plaintiff’s claim. This process is repeated until all claims have been resolved
and brought before the court. The World Court then makes a judgment based on the evidence and
facts presented. The first judgment is a draft which the parties can object to. In the case of no
Basically the way facts are presented is much like in the US Court system. The plaintiff states
their case and then presents their facts and evidence, followed by the defendant. The U.S. Court
system have attorneys that represents the plaintiff and defendant where the World Court does not.
The advisory opinion is decision or judgment of the World Court. This judgment by the World
Court is considered advise or an authorized decision and is not enforced by the Court (World
Justice.org, 2001).
References
WorldJustice .org. (2001). The World court of justice. Retrieved April 16, 2010 from
http://www.worldjustice.org/rules.html