You are on page 1of 5

# Hydrostatic Pressure (Center Of Pressure)

Objective:

## The purpose of this experiment is to experimentally locate the center of

pressure of a vertical, submerged, plane surface. The experimental
measurement is compared with a theoretical prediction.

Apparatus:

## Hydraulic bench, Hydrostatic pressure apparatus, set of weights, metric

ruler, graduated cylinders

Theory:

## The center of pressure of an immersed body is defined by the vertical

distance below the liquid surface. In this experiment we aimed to find out
the center of pressure both theoretically and practically and to compare
them after all. Theoretically, calculations of center of pressure " Hcp" by
using the

## Hydrostatic force of the fluid pressure acting on the rectangular plane

surface.

F = ρ x g x A x Hcg Where;

## g: the gravitational acceleration (m/s2)

A: the cross sectional area of the surface at which the load is acting.

Hcg: the center of gravity of the cross section By taking ΣM about the pivot
point.

The application of this formula may differ according to whether the body is
partially or totally immersed.

## Practically, the center of pressure will be calculated using the principle of

moment equilibrium of the used apparatus about a pivot, only two forces
create a moment about this pivot as the apparatus is designed to have a
curved surface with the pivot as the center, so that forces exerted on this
surface all pass through the pivot and create no moment about it.

Partial Immersion:

F = ρ x g x A x Hcg = ρ x g x y^2/2 x b

## m.g.L= F x Hcp = ρ x g x y^2/2 x b [a + d – 1/3 x y]

Total Immersion:

F= ρ x g x (y-d/2) x (b x d)

## m.g.L= F x Hcp = ρ x g x (y – d/2) x (b x d) x [a + d/2 + d^2/12 x (y –

d/2)]

Several values of Hcp is talking by mass increments of 50g each trial, and
increasing the water level until the hydrostatic force is sufficient to make the
apparatus in equilibrium.

Procedures:

1. The instruments used was adjusted as the tank was filled with water till it
touched the bottom surface of the surface and that point was considered to
be the zero of the vernier caliper.

2. Masses were added to the balance pan in increments of about 50g, and
the water surface was raised in the tank until the balance arm is horizontal
again.

3. The vernier reading was taken to measure the depth of immersion, which
restores the balance arm to its balanced position.

## 4. A series of readings with increasing values of "m" are then taken.

Analysis and Calculation:

Data:

## result Mass depth m.g.L F.ycp

error
# (kg) (m) (M1) (M2)
-
0.13488 0.15595
1 0.05 0.048 0.0210
8 5
7
0.26977 0.26921 0.0005
2 0.1 0.064
5 8 57
-
0.40466 0.42710
3 0.15 0.082 0.0224
3 7
4
-
0.56957
4 0.2 0.096 0.53955 0.0300
6
3
0.67443 0.64030 0.0341
5 0.25 0.108
8 9 29
0.80932 0.77283 0.0364
6 0.3 0.12
5 8 87
0.94421 0.92747 0.0167
7 0.35 0.134
3 8 35
1.07109 0.0080
8 0.4 0.147 1.0791
3 07
1.21398 0.0103
9 0.45 0.159 1.20368
8 08
Sample of calculations:

## m.g.L = 0.048*9.81*0.275 = 0.134888

F.Hcp = 9810*(0.134888^2/2)*0.075*(0.1+(0.1-(1/3*0.134888))) =
0.155955

## Discussion and Conclusion:

The obtained results showed large discrepancies between the theoretical and
experimental values of the center of pressure, where the experimental ones
were larger than the theoretical ones.

The difference between the two values were smaller in the total immersion
region (y >= 10cm) than in the partial immersion region.

## These discrepancies might be a result of errors occurred in the experimental

procedures or apparatus.

some of the possible errors that might have caused the large discrepancies:

## 1. Neglecting the weights of the balance and the pan.

2. Errors in determining the depth "y", either due to errors in taking the
reading from the vernier or from parallax errors in determining the touching
point between the water surface and the pin of the measuring device.

Reference:

B.R. Munson, D.F. Young, and T.H. Okiishi, Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics,
4th ed., 2002, Wiley and Sons, New York.