Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 39
The Effect of Caffeine Ingestion on Exercise Performance Table of Contents Key Points 4 Introduction 5 1. Caffeine: Cellular Mechanisms of Action 9 1.1. Muscle Caleium 9 1.2. Cellular cAMP Levels 10 1.3. Adenosine Receptor Antagonism 10 1.4. Caffeine and Cellular Actions: Conclusions 12 2. Other Effects of Caffeine: Catecholamines and Acetylcholine 13 3. Effect of Caffeine on Muscle 4 3.1. Direct Effects of Caffeine on Muscle 4 3.2. Effects of Caffeine on Muscle Metabolism 4 4. Caffeine and Exercise Performance: Studies Review 7 4.1. Methodological Considerations 7 4.2. Short Term, High Intensity Exercise 18 4.3. Graded Incremental Exercise 20 4.4, Prolonged Endurance Exercise 23 5. Caffeine’s Ergogenic Mechanisms of Action 30 5.1. Short Term, High Intensity Exercise 30 5.2. Graded Incremental Exercise 32 5.3. Prolonged Endurance Exercise 32 5.4, Caffeine’s Mechanisms of Action: Conclusions 35 6. Summary 36 7. References ee KEY POINTS 1. Recent, well-controlled studies have established that moderate doses of caffeine ingested 1 hour prior to exercise, enhance the performance of certain types of endurance exercise in the laboratory. Moderate caffeine doses produce urinary caffeine levels well below the allowable limit, as determined by the International Olympic Committee (I2ug/ml). The results are specific to well-trained elite or recreational athletes. It is not known if these findings will improve performance in competitions because controlled field studies of the effects of caffeine are lacking. 2. The mechanisms responsible for improved exercise endurance in prolonged exercise remain elusive. A metabolic mechanism appears to contribute early in exercise, when caffeine ingestion increases plasma free-fatty acid concentratipns and muscle triglycerides use and spares muscle glycogen. However, it is not clear if increased fat oxidation causes the glycogen sparing in muscle. Increases in plasma epinephrine concentrations usually occur following caffeine ingestion, but are npt essential for the accompanying metabolic changes. When studying caffeine effects in the human it is difficult to identify the primary source of the "stimulus" because caffeine usually increases epinephrine secretion and is also rapidly metabolized in the liver to three dimethylxanthines (paraxanthine, theophylline andtheobromine). The dimethylxanthines can remain in the circulation longer than cafffine and may be metabolic signals in their own right. 3. Caffeine appears to enhance performance during short-term, intense cycling lasting ~5 min in the laboratory and in simulated 1500 m race time. However, positive ergogenic effects of caffeine are much less frequent during sprint exercise lasting less than 90 seconds and in graded incremental exercise tests lasting 8-20 min. 4, Potential mechanisms for improving performance during intense qxercise lasting 5- 20 min include direct effects of caffeine on the central nervoys system and/or excitation-contraction coupling and increased anaerobic energy pravision in skeletal muscle. Introduction Caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine, see figure 1 - The structure of caffeine), one of the most widely consumed drugs in the world and the most commonly used drug in North America (8, 46), is found in coffee, tea, cocoa, soft drinks, and various other foods (8, 51, 61). Coffee consumption is increasing mainly in the middle-aged and older population whereas soft drink consumption has increased by 14% in the younger population (43). Caffeine is also common in several over-the-counter medications, often even in simple aspirin compounds, The caffeine contents of some common produets arg listed in table 1. Much of the popularity of beverages containing caffeine is because of the general belief that caffeine improves both mental and physical performance. The notion that caffeine is an ergogenic aid has led to widespread use of the drug by ajhletes engaged in many sports, The possibility that caffeine or methylxanthines could improve performance during sports events and prolonged effort aroused great interest and was the basis for numerous studies. However, this hypothesis remains extremely controversial, undoubtedly because of lack of standardization among the varius experimental procedures (31, 43, 58). Furthermore, this type of study is complicates] by the fact that caffeine effects vary with corpulence of the individual, the type, intensity and duration of the given exercise, the dose of caffeine used, habituation to methylxpnthines and with environmental conditions during exercise (31, 58). While it is common to equate caffeine with coffee, it should be noted that rarely is coffee the vehicle of administration in research studies. Therefore, it may be misleading to equate the two because cofice contains hundreds of additional chemicals (34) Tn 1990, Wileox (58) concluded that few well-controlled studies had examined the effects of caffeine on endurance performance and that the results were inconsistent. Since 1990, the research examining calleine and exercise performance increased and demonstrated the ergogenic effect of caffeine during prolonged endurance exercise (35, 44), In addition, investigations (11, 39, 42) examining the effects of caffeine on exercise performance during sprinting (<90 s) intense exercise of short (~5 min) and long uration (~20 min) have appeared. There has been general improvement in the quality of the investigations because researchers have attempted to control several factors that may confound the caffeine results. Three factors relate to the nature of the experimental design, ic., the exercise modality, the power output, and the caffeine dose, whereas four others relate to the status of the subjects prior to the experiment, ie., nutritional status, training status, previous caffeine use, and individual variability. An additional factor is the ability to reliably measure exercise performance. This reliability ig greater in highly trained subjects than itis in the less well trained (58). Caffeine is a central nervous system stimulant, and its effects are similar to those noted previously for amphetamines, tough weaker (43, 51). The short-term consumption of caffeine may result in increased urination (34, 46), gastrointestinal distress, (Igemors, decreased sleep, and anxiety symptoms in certain individuals (46). The long term Consumption of caffeine at less than 5 cupsiday does not appear to increase the risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease, peptic ulcer disease or cardiac arrhythmia’s (46). Caffeine also has profound effects on metabolic processes. Caffeine stimulates heart function (15), blood circulation, and release of epinephrine (adrenaline) from the adrenal gland (1, 3). Epinephrine, also a stimulant, augments these effects and also, in conjunction with caffeine, stimulates a wide variety of tissues. Together they potentiate muscle contraction, raise the level of muscle and glycogen breakdown, increase release of FEA from adipose tissue (1, 15), and increase use of muscle triglycerides (TMTG). These varied physiological responses are mediated by the action of caffeine, or epinephrine, to enhance appropriate intracellular funetions in specific cells. This review provides findings relative to the cellular actions of caffeine and the effect of caffeine ingestion on various types of work performance (i.e, short term, high intensity exercise; graded incremental exercise; and prolonged endurance exercise). In addition, after reviewing findings of work performance studies using caffeine, we try to define the main ergogenic mechanism/s of action by which caffeine gnhances exercise performance. Table 1 Caffeine Contents Of Some Common Products __Caffeine (mg) _ Substance Standard dose Prolamine Standard dose Dexatrim, Dietac Standard dose No Doz, Vivarin 6 oz automatic drip coffee 6 oz automatic perk coffee 6 07 hot tea (strong) 6 oz iced tea 6 oz instant coffee 12. oz cola beverages 12 oz Mountain Dew 12.02 Mello Yellow 8 07 chocolate milk 2 oz chocolate candy 1 oz baking chocolate 280 Sie 200 tie 100-200 181 125 65-107 70-75, 54.75 32-65, 45 “Recommended caffeine intake is less then 250 mg per day. “The doping limit of the International Olympic Committee is 12.g/ml Cyetic AMP. Figure 1 - The structure of caffeine, Caffeine and the other xanthines and purine- based compounds consist of two heterocyclic rings containing various numbers of methyl groups. Note the similarity in the structure of caffeine to adenosine and cyclic AMP. 1. Caffeine: Cellular Mechanisms of Action The understanding of the potential ergogenic effects of caffeine requires the knowledge of its mechanisms of action at the cellular level. Three principal cellular mechanisms (see figure 2) have been proposed to explain its possible ergogenic effect during exercise: (1) elevated affinity of the myofilaments for calcium (Ca™) and/or increased Ca"* release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in skeletal myscle; (2) cellular actions caused by accumulation of cyclie-3?5"-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in various tissues including skeletal muscle and adipocytes; and (3} cellular actions mediated by competitive inhibition of adenosine receptors in the central nervous system and in somatic cells. A brief summary of each of these potential mechaypisms follows. 1.1.Muscle Calcium While the debate continues on the effects of caffeine on in vivo muscular strength, it is well established that large doses of caffeine increase the force of muscular contractions in isolated (in vitro) skeletal muscle (16, 43, 51). There are 3 mechanisms that may account for this observation. First, caffeine could result in a greater Ca” release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in skeletal muscle (16, 43. 51). Secondly, caffeine might increase the sensitivity of the myofilaments for Ca‘, Thirdly, caffeine ingestion may result in both an increases in the release of Ca’! from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and increase myofilaments Ca’' sensitivity. Indeed, evidence exits that caffeine can influence both sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca‘* release and the sensitivity of the myofibrils for Ca'*, For example, exposure to caffeine has been shown to increase sarcoplasmic reticulum release of Ca‘ in both skinned fibers and in in vitro muscle preparations exposed to caffeine at 500 mol/L concentrations. Further, caffeine promotes a grater twitch tension development at a given submaximal Ca™ concentration. This finding as been interpreted as a grpater myofibrillar sensitivity to Ca’" in the presence of caffeine. Therefor, given the above findings, it seems likely that the increased tension development in muscle expgsed to high doses of caffeine is because of both an increase in the release of Ca‘ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and an increase in myofibrillar Ca“ sensitivity. ‘A minimal concentration of 250 iM of caffeine seems necessary to produce detectable effects on calcium shifts. The circulating plasma concentrations of caffeine afler ingestion of cofiee is usually less then 100 y M/L. toxie effects are observed with concentration of this methylxanthine above 200 iM/L, and lethal intoxication’s are ‘observed with blood concentrations higher then 500 ,M/L. Thus, the mechanism responsible for the pharmacological effects of caffeine are probably activated by concentrations lower then 100 4M. given this conditions, it is unlikely that mobilization of intracellular calcium represents an essential mechanism of caffeine action in vivo. 1.2.Cellular cAMP Levels Caffeine as been shown to increase cellular levels of cAMP, thus promoting lipolysis by activation of hormone sensitive lipases. Increased lipolysis results in an increased availability of free fatty acids as substrate for contrapting muscle. An increased dependence on five fatty acids during exercise and a sparing of muscle glycogen could theoretically improve performance during prolonged events. By what physiological mechanism does caffeine increase cAMP levels in cells? ‘Theoretically, calleine could increase cAMP by increasing blood levels of catecholamines or by an inhibition of the enzyme phosphodiesterase. Consumption of caffeine by caffeine-naive subjects (ie. subject who have not developed a tolerance to caffeine) results in increased levels of plasma catecholamine, Catecholamines increase cellular cAMP levels by binding to B-receptors on cell merpbranes activating the enzyme adenylate cyclase; active adenylate cyclase then catalyses the formation ‘of cAMP from adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Phosphodiesterpse enzymatically degrades cAMP into the nonnative compound 3°, 5° AMP; therefor, inhibition of phosphodiesterase increases the biological half-life of cAMP. It js well established that high concentrations of caffeine (ie. >1000 mol/L) greatly reduce phosphodiesterase activity 1.3.Adenosine Receptor Antagonism ‘There is growing evidence that many of the physiological effects of caffeine are because of antagonism of adenosine receptors in both brain tissue and peripheral cells (16, 43, 46, 51). Caffeine and other methylxanthines derivatives competitively inhibit the binding of adenosine receptor ligands. In brain tissue, metabolically stable adenosine analogues binding to adenosine receptors results in behavioral depression. Conversely, caffeine antagonizes the behavioral depressant effects of adenosine analogues, shifting their dose-response curve to the right in a manner consistent with a competitive interaction at the receptor level. Indeed, it is generally agreed that caffeine-mediated behavioral stimulation is because of inhibition of brain adenosine receptors, In addition to central nervous system effects, caffeine can also act on peripheral adenosine receptors (A;) on adipocytes suppresses lipolysis by inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity. Recent evidence demonstrates a reduction in triglycerides content in adipocytes of caffeine treated rats. This observation can be interpreted as in vivo evidence that caffeine ingestion promotes an increase in free fatty acids by antagonizing adenosine-mediated inhibition of lipolysis. db ———aeryiare yaiase : ar oe Figure 2 — Three models for the caffeine mechanis1 (a) methylxanthines (MX) cause increased mobilization of caleium (Ca™ ) from endoplas reticulum (ER) and other vesicles. The Ca” triggers various cellular events. (b) MX inhibits phosphodiesterase, causing an elevation in cAMP and greater cellular actions of t second messenger. (c) MX binds to adenosine receptors (AI and A2) to inhibit adenosine’s effect on GI and Gs proteins. 1.1.Caffeine and cellular Actions: conclusions From the above discussion, it is clear that caffeine could influence physical performance by 1 of 3 mechanisms. Which of these 3 mechanisms is the most important in producing a biological effect during exercise? At present, a definitive answer is not possible. However, there is growing evidence that adenosine receptor inhibition is one of the most important, if not the most important, mechanisms to explain the physiological effects of caffeine at nontoxic plasma concentrations of the drug. This conclusion is based on critical examination of the dose-response relationship of caffeine for producing the desired biochemical effect. For example, consumption of 200 to 350 mg of caffeine in adults generally results in plasma concentrations of ess then 50 ymoV/L. Toxic effects are observed at plasma concentration of 200 tM/L, and plasma concentration of 500 uM/L Are considered to be fatal. Caffeine is a potent adenosine receptor antagonist in plasmg concentration as Jow as 40 MIL as this dose as been shown to inhibit 50% of the ayailable adenosine receptors in adipocytes in vitro. In contrast, 50% inhibition of phosphodiesterase activity (in vitro) requires caffeine concentrations of = 1000 wM/L. further, most investigations demonstrating a caffeine-induced increase in sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca‘ release have used in vitro caffeine concentrations in the 500 ta 750 4M/L range. Therefore, on the basis of the above data, many of the biological effects of low to moderate plasma concentrations of caffeine must be mediated by inhibition of adenosine receptors. Research continues on this fascinating topic. R 2. Other Effects of Caffeine: Catecholamines and Acetylcholine Caffeine, which is a well-known stimulant of the central nervous system, increases motoneurons recruitment as well as the frequency of potentials of the motor end plate through release of acetylcholine. Caffeine at doses of 7 to 35 mg/kg also facilitates the effect of acetylcholine and of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, but only transiently. Cafléine increases production of plasma catecholamines during and at the end of exereise. Action of catecholamines is essential because it allows the body to adapt to the stress created by physical exercise. In fact, catecholamines participate in a number of critical process, including glycogenolysis, uptake of ghicose, gluconeogenesis, lipolysis of muscle and adipose tissue, muscle contractility, intropic and chronotropic responses of the heart, and circulatory adjustments. However, results of studies on plasma catecholamine changes are somewhat contradictory. Only one study reports an increase in plasma concentration of dopamine and noradrenaline after 60 min of exercise (43). At 90 tin after effort, other authors found no change in plasma levels of adrenaline and noradrenaline, whereas in two other studies, plasma adrenaline is selectively increased during non-intense and prolonged exercise without warm-up and after high doses of caffeine (9 mg/kg) with no change in noradrenaline levels (35). 3. Effect of Caffeine on Muscle 3.1.Direct Effects of Caffe Caffeine potentiates the tension of isolated muscle contraction by direct stimulation and of nerve-muscle preparations by indirect stimulation, both at rest and after fatigue. Sensitivity to caffeine is not the same for all muscles. Muscles, which contain a majority of type I fibers, are much more sensitive to the effect of caffeine then muscles which contain a majority of type II fibers (Figure 3 describes the possible role of caffeine in the regulation of muscle action). e on Muscle 3.2.Effects of Caffeine on Muscle Metabolism Metabolic modifications of muscle vary with the type of exercise. Thus, during brief and intense effort, mainly anaerobic metabolism is involved. During prolonged effort, anaerobic glycolysis is involved first since it is needed for cardiovascular adaptation. After about 2 minutes of exercise, aerobic glycolysis takes place in the muscle, During intense and relatively long exercise, both metabolisms, aerobic and anaerobic, are associated. Intense muscle exercise induces an increase in glycolytic ‘lux which results in an increase in lactic acid production and a decrease in pH, which has been postulated to partly account for the onset of musele fatigue. Fatty acids are used actively by the muscle during exercise, which results in sparing of glycogen, Improvement in performance after absorption of caffeine, observed in prolonged exercise involving aerobic metabolism has been attributed to stimulation of lipolysis. Hydrolysis of triglycerides of adipose tissue increases blood concentrations of free fatty acids (18, 25). However, some studies do not demonstrate an increase in plasma concentration of free fatty acids after ingestion of caffeine (48). The effect of caffeine on potential storing of muscle glycogen has been the focus of many studies. Caffeine, fructose and glucose, either alone or combined, have a marked effect on storing of muscle glycogen during cycling exercise (24). Similarly, caffeine and suctose stimulate endurance to comparable degrees but have no synergistic effect on performance. According to recent studies, ingestion of caffeine ‘one hour before exercise decreases muscle glycogen utilization about 55% during the first 15 minutes of effort compared to subjects receiving placebo. The glycogen thus saved becomes available for the following phases of exercise, delaying onset of exhaustion. This mechanism is important, because depletion of muscle glycogen could be to a great extent responsible for the fatigue observed during tests of ‘endurance (25). Furthermore, increased utilization of intra muscular triglycerides and/or extramuscular fatty acids after ingestion of caffeine could inhibit glycogen breakdown, especially by modifying muscle contractions of acetyl-coenzyme A and citrate. However, increased plasma concentration of free fatty acids induced by caffeine is not always accompanied by a modification of substrate utilization by the muscle. Circulating concentration of free fatty acids is the product of both hepatic release and amount taken up by all other tissues that can vary widely with ‘experimental conditions. Lastly, at high altitude, caffeine increases endurance by a “4 mechanism other then that of mobilization of fatty acids, since it does not induce an increase in plasma concentration of camitine; the mechanism involved is still unknown. During anaerobic exercise, caffeine seems to increase the production of lactate by the muscle, regardless of the degree of training of the subjects (2, 11). This phenomenon could reflect caffeine-induced potentiation of muscle glycogenolysis and/or increase in release of lactate that does not necessarily reflect a stimulation of lactate formation (12). Depletion of muscle glycogen during exercise is greater in type 1 then in type If fibers, the later acting only intermittently in continues contraction. The sparing of glycogen due to caffeine could apply more to type I fibers by increasing their energy reserves. Thus, it is possible that the effects of caffeine ‘vary as a funetion of the type of fibers contained in the muscles that are called upon ina given sport activity. ‘Some authors suggest that only well-trained athletes can draw benefit from use of caffeine (11, 12). Highly trained athletes already posses, becquse of intensive training, a stimulated lipolytic activity and an increase in the size and density of their mitochondria (25). Also, in rats trained with endurance exercise, caffeine does not modify plasma concentration of free fatty acids nor utilization of glycogen from muscle or liver. Recently, caffeine has been shown (o increase the levels of excess post-exercise oxygen consumption in untrained female subjects both during ang after 90 min of exercise (18). Therfore, the caffeine-induced increase in metabglic rate of these ‘women may have a beneficial effect for obese subjects or those whp are on a weight Joss program, since caffeine intake enhances oxygen and energy gonsumption for a Jong time afler exercise, However, there seems to be no signifigant advantage in ingesting large (10 mg/kg) rather then small (5 mg/kg) doses of caffeine (18). 15 CAFFEINE emp greonae nen wonton 12 wemsincor 9 ire 3 — Possible role of caffeine in the regulation of muscle action. These include both direct and indirect mechanisms (clockwise from the left): alternations of neuron threshold (1), stimulation of neurotransmitter release (2), alteration of sarcolemma threshold (3), alteration of membrane activity related to calcium storage (4), inhibition of adenosine binding (5), and phosphodiesterase activity (6), ulation of catecholamine release (7), that, in turn, increases cAMP activity. The ivates protein kinases that turn on glycogenolysis (10), lipolysis (11), and , caffeine may inhibit glycogenolysis (8), increase blood glucose levels (9), and induce FFA mobilization from adipose tissue (12). 4. Caffeine and Exercise Performance: Studies Review 1. Methodological Considerations There are a number of factors that need to be considered in determining the validity and reliability of studies of the effect of caffeine on performance. It makes little sense to explore the results of studies using animals to examine the ergogenic potential of caffeine for the question of dose equivalents and biological species differences are always present. Several other factors to consider in the evaluation of the ergogenic effect of caffeine include exercise type and intensity, training status of the study participants and pre-exercise feedings. From a critical evaluation standpoint, a number of factors are necessary requisites for generalisability to an athletic population and to establish validity and reliability due to individual variation amongst study participants. First, it is necessary that the study population be athletic and the extrapolation from study to ‘the field” should best be made under sport specific conditions (ic. cycling Vs running). In addition, the testing variable upon which ergogenic potential is determined should either be a true measure of performance (i.e. open-ended test to exhaustion (35), test for a given time but with maximal power output measured (38), or a field test (4). The general rules for a research study to minimize bias in an investigation of the effects of fa drug upon a variable (performance) are as follows: sample size large enough to avoid a type II error (at Ieast 5 study participants in a controlled rescarch study), randomized, counterbalanced design and double-blinded administration (placebo controlled). A factor that has been overlooked is that of gender, which is important due to findings of a facilitated free fatty acid utilization by female’s vs. males during endurance exercise (46). The impact of gender upon ergogenic potential of caffeine has not yet been explored, but should be considered in future research. ‘A final factor to consider is the caffeine intake status of the study participants, for it has been demonstrated that tolerance develops to several of the effects of caffeine with habitual consumption (3). Development of tolerance to caffeine induced increases in heart rate and blood pressure has been demonstrated to occur within 4 days of regular caffeine consumption. However, from limited studies data (3, 15, 35, 37, 40, 52, 53), it does not appear that habitual consumption of caffeine has Significant effect upon variables that may be ergogenic to endurance exercise performance (3). It also does not appear to alter the ergogenic effect of high doses of caffeine (9 mg/kg) upon endurance running or cycling performance (35). A study with a large group of individuals who are reselected based upon a wide range caffeine intake status would be required to definitely determine whether a habitual caffeine intake alters its ergogenic potential. ” 4.2.Short Term, High Intensity Exercise Discrepancies exist between the findings of studies that have examined the in vivo effects of caffeine on short term, high intensity work and those examining isolated (in vivo or in situ) muscle performance. Studies utilizing isolated muscle have consistently shown caffeine to enhance muscle force production, while the majority of human studies have shown caffeine to have no effect on short term, high intensity exercise performance. Recent studies (2, 12, 17, 59) do not support previous reports that caffeine does not increase in vivo strength and power (11, 60). Collomp and associates have performed a series of studies showing that caffeine ingestion can increase maximal anaerobic power in a protocol in which brief cycle sprints (6 s) are performed against increasing resistance (2) and also can increase the swimming velocity in trained athletes during 100-m freestyle repeats (12). Simpilarly, Wiles and associates (59) report that caffeine ingestion results in decreased timpe to run 1,500 m and increases the speed of the “finishing burst”. Table 2 summarjzes those studies that have examined short-term exercise. Table 2 - Summary Of Key Results From Studies Of Caffeine And Short Term Intense Exercise Study Collomp et al. 1990 Collomp et al. 1991 Anselme et al. 1992 Collomp et al. 1992 Wiles et al. 1992 Test conditions + + . 100% VOzmax 250 mg caffeine Cycle ergometer 30-s Wingate test 5 mg/kg caffeine an hour before testing Cycle ergometer maximal anaerobic power ‘A6-s cycle sprint 250 mg caffeine 30 min before testing 2X 100-m freestyle swim 20 min rest 250mg caffeine Simulated 1,500-m runs on treadmill 3 g coffee (=150-200 mg caffeine) an hour before testing Subjects 7 3 Males and 3 females active in sports 2-3 hours/week #10 Males and 4 females active in sports for an average of 3.5 hours/week * 7 trained swimmers (4 females&3 males) * 7untrained swimmers (5 females&2 males) ¢ 18 Trained males ae Endurance T 9% (nonsignificant) No improvement in maximal anaerobic capacity, power and power decrease @ Increase in catecholamine and blood lactate levels # 7% Increase in power 4 Increase in blood lactate levels * Trained-2% and 4% respectively, greater velocity in first and second 100-m + Untrained-no change 4 4.2: faster run + 0.6 km/hr faster in final min (finishing burst’) 19 4.3.Graded Incremental Exercise Studies, examining the effects of caffeine on short term incremental exercise performance, are limited. A number of studies suggest that caffeine has no effect on short term incremental exercise performance (5, 15, 16, 30). On the other hand, one study suggests that 10 mg/kg dose of caffeine, three hours prior to an incremental work test will allow caffeine naive, recreational subjects to work for a longer period of time and, therefore, to produce more work (28). Two studies have examined the effects of caffeine tolerance during graded incremental exercise (15, 30). First, Dodd and associates (1991) found that 5 mg/kg dose of caffeine increased resting values for heart rate, VO2 and ventilation while Gastin and associates (1990) found no difference in these variables. It may be that the fitness level of the subjects caused these disparate findings since Dodd et al. (1991) used subjects of average fitness levels while Gastin et al. (1990) used highly trained subjects. Although Dodd et al. (1991) administered caffeine to subjects 1 hour before the exercise and Gastin et al. (1990) administered caffeine to subjects 3.5 hours before the exercise, both studies concluded that caffeine had no effect on time to exhaustion, VO2 wax or the lactate threshold. Thus, the direct findings of these studies indicate that the caffeine tolerance of the subjects does not effect pgrformance during exercise to moderate intensity and duration. In addition, a comparison of findings between the 2 studies suggests that the timing of dosage in relation to the exercise bout does not effect performance. However, one study suggests that caffeine improves performance during graded incremental exercise (28). A high dose of caffeine (10 mg/kg) was administered to moderately fit, caffeine-naive subjects at 1 and 3 hours before eyercise testing. In addition to an increase in time to exhaustion, the study reported q right shift in the lactate threshold. Table 3 summarizes those studies that have pxamined graded incremental exercise. 20 Table 3 - Summary Of Key Results From Studies Of Caffeine And Graded Incremental Exercise Study Test conditions Flinnetal. 1990 # + + Gastin et al. 1990 . Berry et al. (1991) Dodd et al. 1991 ¢ . Incremental VO2max cycle ergometer Anaerobic threshold 1omg/kg of caffeine 3 hours before testing Incremental VOzmax treadmill running Anaerobic threshold 5 mg/kg of caffeine 3.5 hours before testing Incremental VOzmax treadmill running Anaerobic threshold ‘Tme/kg of caffeine citrate 45 min before testing Incremental VOzmax cycle ergometer Anaerobic threshold 3 mg/kg or S mg/kg of caffeine an hour before testing Subjects + . . 9 Male recreational cyclist caffeine consumption less then 2543 mg/day 8 Moderately ‘rained male runners Non-users of caffeine 10 Males engaged in regular aerobic exercise Non-users of caffeine 17 Moderately trained males 8 subjects with caffeine consumption above 300 mg/day 9 subjects with caffeine consumption 25 mg/day or less Findings + . + Increased time to exhaustion Right shift in the lactate threshold Lowered RER between 250 and 450 watts workload No effect on VOzmax No effect on anaerobic threshold Lower RPE ratings in caffeine trial No effect on VOzmax No effect on anaerobic threshold No effect on VOsmax No effect on anaerobic threshold 2 Btime to Exhaustion Work completed (kilojoutes) Work competed) acebo Caffeine Control Figure 4 — Effect Of Caffeine On Time To Exhaustion And Total Work (mean values). Data from Flinn et al. (1990), * Significantly different from either the control or placebo measures (P<0.01). ; i 3 ear wanes aoe 1 i | ae . Tike Figure 5 — Effect Of Caffeine On Lactate Threshold (mean values). Data from Flinn et al. (1990). * Significantly different from either the control or placebo measures (P<0.01). 2 3.1.Prolonged Endurance Exercise Unlike short term, high intensity exercise, in prolonged endurance exercise aerobic metabolism is the main metabolic pathway. During prolonged effort, anaerobic glycolysis is involved first since it is needed for cardiovascular adaptation. ‘After about 2 minutes of exercise, aerobic glycolysis takes place in the muscle. During intense and relatively long exercise, both metabolisms, aerobic and anaerobic, are associated. Intense muscle exercise induces an increase in glycolytic flux which results in an increase in lactic acid production and a decrease in pH, which has been postulated to partly account for the onset of muscle fatigue During endurance exercise, fat is a major substrate, and muscle glycogen depletion could be a limiting factor of performance. Therefore, if caffeine ingestion can alter substrate turnover, itis likely to have a major effect on endurance exercise performance. Fatty acids are used actively by the muscle during exercise, which results in sparing of glycogen. Improvement in performance after absorption of caffeine, observed in prolonged exercise involving aerobic metabolism has been attributed to stimulation of lipolysis (10, 13, 15, 24, 25, 38, 45). A now classic study in the late 1970s provoked much research activity in the area of the ergogenic potential of caffeine by reporting a 20% prolongation in the time to fatigue following 330 mg of caffeine (approximately 5 mg/kg) vs. decaffeinated caffeine during cycling at 80% VOz mx (13). A well controlled study in 1982 examined the effects of caffeine (6 mg/kg) vs. placebo (double blind) administered to elite Nordic skiers during races at low (300m above sea level /20 km/n=14) and high (2900m above sea level /23 knv/n=13) altitude. The pre-exercise diet and caffeine intake were controlled, and the data was carefully normalized to account for differences in snow conditions, revealing a significant improvement in performance time for the low (p<0.05) and high (p<0.001) altitude tests of 1.7% and 3.2% respectively (about 1 and 2 minutes respectively) (4). One of the best designed and controlled study reported to date investigating the effects of caffeine on performance was by Graham and Spriet (35). These investigators used a randomized/double-blind protocol to examine the effects of a fairly high caffeine dose (9 mg/kg) upon the performance of 7 elite athletes (mean VOz max = 73 mV/kg/min) during both cycling and running to exhaustion at approximately 85% VO? mx. They found improvements in running and cycling time that averaged 44% and 51%, respectively, to exhaustion in all study participants. This study demonstrated quite dramatically the ergogenic potential of caffeine 9 mg/kg on endurance exercise performance, and provided evidence that the mode of exercise (ie. cycling vs. running) was not important in determining the ergogenic potential of caffeine. In all of the above studies, the first dose of caffeine was administered 60 minutes prior 10 exercise, Table 4 summarizes those studies that have examined graded incremental exercise prolonged endurance exercise, 2B BLOOD LACTATE ME i i [ya ]mrieete] atop auvetnon aE fas msica = te 08 moka aan rm ie 4 in Figure 6 — Effect Of Caffeine On Blood Concentration Of Lactate, Glucose, FFA, ‘And Glycerol. (Mean values). Data From Graham And Spriet. (1995). 4 Table 4, - Summary Of Key Results From Studies Of Caffeine And Prolonged Endurance Exercise Study Test conditions Costill et al. 1978 Cycle ergometer at 80% VO2 mx tO exhaustion: Iyetal, 1979 Essig et al. 1980 330 mg of caffeine 60 min before testing Cycle ergometer at 75% VO2 max/120 min Treadmill running at 80% VO2 max to exhaustion 250 mg of caffeine 60 min before testing ‘An additional 250 mg of caffeine fed at 15 min intervals over the first 90 min of exercise 30 min on a cycle ergometer at 65%- 75% VO2 max 5 mg/kg of caffeine 1 hour before testing Subjects 4 Unknown % Trained cyclists 7 males and 2 females # 7 Active males Findings . . 20% prolongation in the time to fatigue (96 min vs. 75 min wieatteine) TIFFAI Increased work production by TA% RPE unchanged 31% elevation in fat oxidation during last 70 min of caffeine trial No change in ‘CHO utilization 42% Decrease in muscle glycogen utilization IMTG use was 150% greater in caffeine trial RER shifted from CHO towards fat metabolism as Table 4 - Summary Of Key Results From Studies Of Caffeine And Prolonged Endurance Exercise Study Ericson et al. 1989 French et al. 1991 Graham & Spriet 1991 Test conditions + 90min of eycle ergometer at 65%- 70% VO mx +S mgikg of caffeine 1 hour before testing 4 45 Min of treadmill running at 75% VO2 max # After the first 45 rin speed was increased by 2 mph till exhaustion #10 mg/kg of caffeine immediately prior to testing Cycle ergometer and treadmill run at 85% VO2 mx tO exhaustion + 9 mg/kg of caffeine 60 min before testing * Subjects 4 4 Male and one female highly trained competitive cyclist 6 Male trained munners (participated in at least 2 marathon races) Non habitual users of caffeine (caffeine ingestion <20 mg/day) well-trained distance runners 6 males and 1 female + Users and non users of caffeine: © 2 Habitual users of caffeine (450- 720 mg/day) © 2 Habitual users of caffeine (120- 150 mg/day) = 3 non-users (<29 mg/day) Findings © 30% Decrease in muscle glycogen utilization @ Lower RER for caffeine trial during final 60 min 4 No significant differences in VOz, and in RPE © ‘Significant increase in the distance run during the period to exhaustion (post 45 min) in the caffeine trial Running time to exhaustion increased 69% Cycling time to exhaustion increased 66% + All subjects increased their running & cycling time to exhaustion 6 Table 4c - Summary Of Key Results From Studies Of Caffeine And Prolonged Endurance Exercise Study Test conditions Titlow et al. 1991 ¢ 60 min of treadmill running at 60% VO2 mx 200 mg of caffeine 60 min before. testing Spriet et al. 1992 © Cycle ergometer 80% VO2 mx to exhaustion + 9 mg/kg of caffeine 60 min before testing Van Soeren et al. 1993 ¢ Cycle ergometer 50% VO2 mn/60 min + 250 mg of caffeine 60 min before testing + Smg/kg of caffeine ‘60 min before testing Wemple et al. (1994). Cycle ergometer 60% VOr mad 180 min + 25 mg/dl of caffeine ina solution with a mi/kg 60 min before testing Subjects * 5 Males involved in moderate exercise programs Recreational cyclists 7 males and one female * 14 Males, not engaged in regular physical activity: * 7 Habitual users of caffeine (400- 750 mg/day) © TNon-users (0-20 mg/day) +6 Findings . 20% prolongation in the time to fatigue 55% Decrease in muscle glycogen utilization in first 15 min 27% prolongation in ‘the time to fatigue (96 min vs. 75 min) No effect on metabolism In non-users caffeine increased plasma epinephrine concentrations during exercise Cycling performance was unaffected by caffeine ‘No significant difference in plasma catecholamine concentration 7 4800 4800 4100 Distance (meters) Distance Run To Exaustion 14,920m 44,222 Control Placebo Caffeine Figure 7 ~ Effect Of Caffeine On Distance Run During The Period To Exhaustion (mean values). Data from French et al. (1991). * Significantly different from either the contro! or placebo measures (P<0.05). 28 RUNING se teem 133% é : g | i eS CAFFEINE é g z 2 a 2 CYCLING Figure 8 - Individual performance times (in minutes) of subjects running and cycling to exhaustion after placebo or caffeine ingestion (mean values). Subjects 4 and 6 were caffeine users (450-720 mg/day), subjects 1, 2, and 7 were light users (120-150 mg/day), and subjects 3 and 5 were nonusers (<20 mg/day). Data from Graham and Spriet. (1991). 2» ms of Action 4. Caffeine’s Ergogenic Mecha §.1.Short Term, High Intensity Exercise Short term, high intensity activities last only seconds or a few minutes. During brief and intense effort, mainly anaerobic metabolism is involved, fat metabolism is, very minor fuel and muscle glycogen is not a limiting factor of performance. Therefore, the metabolic explanation cannot pertain to short-term exercise. Metabolic shifts may occur, but obviously additional actions must take place, which may act in concert with the metabolic shifts Caffeine is a drug that can enter every tissue of the body and thus can have multiple effects. Under this circumstances it appears that caffeine must be acting either directly on the muscle to enhance eross-bridge formation or acting on the central nervous system, In the latter regard, the drug could influence motor recruitment and/or the perception of fatigue ‘One needs to bear in mind that normally excitation/contraction coupling drives metabolism, not vice versa, Thus we need to consider whether or not caffeine could alter some aspect of the contraction process. It has been repeatedly demonstrated in isolated sarcoplasmic reticulum, cardiac muscle, and skeletal muscle that caffeine causes translocation of Ca” through plasma and sarcoplasmic reticular membranes (Figure 2). This lowers the threshold potential for excitation and extends the active period of contraction, The sensitivity of muscle to caffeine depends on the sarcomere length (43). Thus, the increased force of contraction in muscle triggered by high ‘concentration of caffeine is probably related to both the increase in the release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and the increase in myofibrils sensitivity to calcium. Ca" sensitivity is also greater in slow vs. fast twitch muscle fibers, which may help to explain the force potentiation of caffeine. An increase in cross-bridge formation would increase ATP demands and stimulate metabolism including glycolysis, and an increase in intracellular Ca" should stimulate glycogenolysis (6, 31). This could account for the increased power ‘output and high blood lactate results with intense exercise (2, 11, 12). Caffeine and/or epinephrine may stimulate the Na‘/K” ATPase (41), resulting in a more stable intracellular environment that would be more optimal for tension development. These possible influences, together with the finding that performance is enhanced when glycogen is not limiting (Table 2), means we must consider alternatives to the common theory of altered carbohydrate metabolism following caffeine ingestion (31), 30 ‘A. second theory focuses on caffeine inhibiting cAMP yhosphodiesterase, elevating cAMP (Figure 2b). At physiological concentrations, methylxanthines are very weak inhibitors of phosphodiesterase and do not elevate tissue cAMP, As a result, this mechanism is not likely to enhance short-term, high intensity exercise performance (31) thas also been demonstrated that caffeine facilitates neuromuscular transmission and increases neuronal excitability by reducing the threshold of motor neuron firing and/or by reducing the adenosine inhibition of firing (60). This could result in increased motor unit recruitment and altered pattems of substrate utilization in the active muscle fibers (51). Caffeine may also play an ergogenic role in exercise performance by alt neural perception of effort and/or fatigue (ie. by lowering the perception of effort and/or fatigue) (10, 13, 26). The perception of fatigue is a multifactorial process that is influenced by numerous variables. Given the ‘black box’ of the central nervous system it has been very difficult to objectively quantitate variables such as the perception of fatigue. A reduced perception of fatigue at a given exercise intensity may either arise from a reduction in inputs into the system, or an increased threshold of detection, Semiquantitation of this may be obtained using a scale such as the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) Scale, Reduced input could arise from a reduction in afferent information to the CNS from the periphery if caffeine potentate force at a submaximal frequency (46). Imespective of the mechanism involved, caffeine as been shown to decrease the RPE in some (10, 13, 26) put not all studies (48) of endurance exercise, In one study there was no difference in RPE for caffeine ys. placebo in spite of significant increases in power output for the caffeine trial (38), suggesting an ergogenic benefit. In summary, there are very few studies upon which to conclude what is the ergogenic mechanism of action that enhances short-term, high intensity exercise, following caffeine ingestion. Furthermore, there is a great controversy regarding caffeine, whether it is a true ergogenic aid. There is even greater confusion regarding the ergogenic effect of caffeine on short-term, high intensity exercise. Many studies have not demonstrated a performance enhancement following caffeine ingestion. Indeed, data from studies are available to defend or refute its enhancement of short- term, high intensity exercise. Based on the data above, it seems that caffeine has multiple effects on muscle action and muscle metabolism. It is likely that the increased power output in muscle exposed to high doses of caffeine is because of both an increase in the release of Ca” from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and an increase in myofibrils Ca” sensitivity, In addition, through the stimulation of the Na'/K” ATPase activity, and the increased neuronal excitability, there is increased motor unit recruitment, leading to a more optimal tension development, resulting in a greater force production. Caffeine may also lower the neural perception of effort and/or fatigue at a given exercise intensity, but there are very few studies upon which to conclude whether or not caffeine alters the perception of fatigue. Clearly, further study is necessary to determine which of the above mechanisms has the greatest effect on short-term, high intensity exercise. 31 §5.2.Graded Incremental Exercise Findings, from the studies of Dodd and associates (1991) and Gastin and associates (1990), indicate that the caffeine tolerance of the subjects does not effect performance during exercise to moderate intensity and duration. In addition, a comparison of findings between the 2 studies suggests that the timing of dosage in relation to the exercise bout does not effect performance. It would seem, therefore, that the most likely explanation of the findings of Flinn and associates (1990), is that the high dosage of caffeine may have resulted in improved exercise performance. One possible explanation for the findings of Flinn et al, (1990) could be the timing of caffeine ingestion prior to exercise, which could effects substrate turnover. Based on their findings, one can suggest that caffeine needs to be taken between three to four hours pre-exercise, (at least for incremental exercise) in order to allow FFA levels to reach their peak, rather then one hour pre-exercise which only allows caffeine levels to reach their peak (28). Furthermore, small doses of caffeine (

Вам также может понравиться