Comms 239 Group Presentation & Peer Review

Dimensions Emerging Developing Mastering Points

Presentation The presentation provided superficial The presentation contained substantial The presentation provided in-depth
content information about the assigned topic, information regarding the assigned topic and information regarding the assigned topic and
stimulated little substantive discussion, stimulated some substantive discussion. generated substantial and meaningful
and/or was not suitable for a class at BYU. discussion.

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Presentation Visual information was meager or did not Substantial visual information was provided to The presentation included visual evidence
visuals significantly contribute to the classʼs aid the classʼs understanding of the that both contributed to the classʼs
understanding of the presentation presentation. understanding and were of a professional
standard.
0 2 4
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Overall The presentation may have lacked a strong
presentation organization, coherence, or professional
orientation; and/or presentation started late
due to disorganization or foreseeable
technical problems
The presentation was well organized and The presentations was well organized,
easily understood, though it may have lacked started on time, was easily understood, was
substance or professional polish of substance, and was of a professional
quality

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Handouts and files The group provided little to no supporting
materials—either handouts for students in
the classroom or documents for linking to
the course website
The group provided some supporting
materials, such as a ppt file, but either did not
provide links to other learning materials, or
provided materials late, or did not provide a
group self-evaluation.
Students were provided useful handouts, the
group provided ppt files, links, or other
materials to share with students on the
course website, and provided a group self-
evaluation.

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Peer review The group did not review and grade The group provided grades for peers, but little The group provided strong review comments
classmates material as assigned, or did so or no comment or less constructive comment. and grades for all students as assigned.
late.

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Total

Notes: