Grading Checklist - PSP 0

Estudiante Maricarmen Nicacio Morales Programa 1B

Instructor Fernando Osiel Peñaloza Avila Revisó Fernando José Martínez López

1a. Revisión 2a. Revisión 3a. Revisión Captura Datos

Fecha 14/02/11
Notación Hora Inicio 12:32
√ - O.K. Hora Fin 12:49
X – Corregir y volver a entregar Interrupción 7
Tiempo Total 10

Assignment Package Comments

√ PSP0 Project Planning Summary
√ Time Recording Log Considera colocar un título para la sección
√ Defect Recording Log Considera colocar un título para la sección
√ Source Program Listing Considera colocar el contenido en orden
puesto que primero presentas los
resultados de las pruebas y luego el
código.
√ Test Results

Program and Test Results Comments

- The program appears to be workable.
- All required tests have been run.
- The actual output is correct for each test.

Time Log Comments

- Time data are entered for all process steps.
- Process steps are sequenced appropriately.
- Time data are entered against the appropriate process
step.
- Interrupt time is tracked appropriately.
- Time data are complete and reasonable.
- Times were recorded as the work was done.

Defect Log Comments

- Every defect has all required data.
- Defects were injected before removed.
- Every defect has a fix time.
- Defects injected in compile and test have fix numbers.
- Defects are adequately described.
- Defect types are consistent with description.
- Defect types are consistent with phase injected.
- Defect types are assigned consistently.

PSP0 GC January 2006 1 © 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University

 Grading Checklist - PSP 0

Planning Summary Comments

- Planned total time has been entered correctly.

Consistency Checks Comments

- Defects removed are consistent with compile and test
phase time and program size.
- Total compile defect fix times are less than compile
time.
- Total test defect fix times are less than test time.
- Defect dates & phases are consistent with the time log.
- Planning summary is consistent with the time log.
- Planning summary is consistent with the defect log.

General Comments
- Followed the defined process.
- Complete, consistent and accurate process data
collected.
X The student did his or her own work. El código fuente es una copia de Beatriz
Eugenia Romero García, quien entregó
primero.

PSP0 GC January 2006 2 © 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University