DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Office of Inspector General Washington, DC 20528 David R. Amos 153 Alvin Avenue Milton, MA 02186 OIG Complaint Number: C04-01448 Dear Mr. Amos: We received your letter on November 21, 2003. We will review the information carefully to determine the appropriate action; however, our office will not be able to provide you with any information as to the action taken. In general, privacy and law enforcement concems prohibit the Office of Inspector General (OIG) from disclosing information from its system of records to third parties, including the individual who made the original allegation. Often, this is a source of some frustration to those who contact us, but it is unavoidable in light of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. §552a) and the regulations promulgated thereunder. For this and other reasons, it is the policy of the OIG that once we receive an allegation of fraud or other misconduct, no information concerning the allegation may be released to any third party, except to other law enforcement agencies. Individuals named in allegations received by this office are entitled to the same privacy rights that you or any other citizen might expect from us. ‘Thank you for bringing this matter to the attention of the OIG, Sincerely, ew le fe in G. Sullivan, Jr Deputy Assistant Inspector General for InvestigationsClark Kent Ervin November 12, 2003 Acting Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, D.C. 20528 Sir, Need I remind you of Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics hereto attached. May I strongly suggest that you waltz around the various departments of the DHS, drop my name and ask a few questions. W. Ralph Basham , Director, United States Secret Service, would be a good place to start. After all it was he who sent the Secret Service to see me to investigate false allegations but I bet that it was Mr. Webster who had an influence on their not investigating Bank Fraud. The recent developments in Boston with regards to the SEC and Putnam Investments must be great concern to the FEDS. Why else would they be calling me now after ignoring me for so long? Perhaps you should go talk to Eduardo Aguirre, Jr. about his fellas investigating me. I would like to know why the. General Counsel of the DHS has not responded to my letter. Is he waiting the full six months like H. Marshall Jarrett did? November the 20" is the last day for your boss Attorney General Ashcroft to respond to me. After that date I can complain of him as an individual. Trust that I shall. T also suggest that you read the enclosed documents ond listen to the tape, then apply your ethics while you ask yourself what you would do if you were me. Please surprise me and become the first Inspector General and in fact the first civil servant that acted within the scope of his employment. Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on September 29". I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as to whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil. ‘The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. See) Fike Cyatt in Court @ LAS t \ee David R. Amos 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. 02186US. Postal Service Delivery Confirmation’ Receipt { Pastage sn Dlr Contato es stb etd bel reg i fe teem IRV Keer Bey, DIE pot mice T2€ Heat bed FeecusS WAS hingtav Dlaogige POSTAL CUSTOMER: oe Kee seca For Iquies: Pie ‘Acces eet web teat oreat ha-222-1811 (POSTAL USE OMEN) (Serta er [olritst-class tai? porcat ‘CPackage Services parce! (eovfers i