Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Murray, Fabre` L.
Professor Smiley
Mark Apollo?´ While this is the central and core ethical issue, more ethical issues can be found through out this
case study. One such ethical issue stems form one simple statement in the case study, ³New clients, higher fees,
and increased prestige have placed OSMA«.´ Phe ethical issue of ³Should OSMA charge higher fees to new
clients, just because they have become more reputable?´ Another ethical issue stems from how OSMA won the
bid to become the official medical providers for the Lumberjacks. Instead of gaining the bid by the skills they
possess, experience, and track record that the physicians collectively possess, the Lumberjacks awarded OSMA
the bid because they donated $150,000 worth of equipment and treatment at a reduced rate. Phis brings up the
ethical issue of ³Should OSMA have been awarded the bid for the official medical providers of the
Lumberjacks, simply because of what they donated and offered?´One final ethical issue I could find had to do
with how instead of focusing on Mark Apollo¶s full recovery and well being, the Owner, General Manager,
Head Coach, and Mark himself were only concerned about having home field advantage during the play-offs.
Phey instead of following Dr. Jacob recommendations for treatment and prognosis that warranted surgery and
physical therapy to prevent any further injury, they prefer to just give Mark Apollo injections that will only
mask the symptoms of his injury. Phis brings arise to the ethical issue of ³Should the health, safety and over all
well being of an athlete be sacrificed for the sake of a team and/or community?´ Also the ethical issue of
³Should an athlete be given injections/drugs that will only elevate the symptoms of an injury just so an athlete
can continue to play during the games?´ Phese are just a few ethical issues that I have been able to Identify, but
there could possibly be many more hidden in this compelling case study.
c å
aa esearch
injuries are dreaded to athletes, they still happen very frequently due to weariness, bad eating habits, poor
form, or constant repeating of exercises. (How to Recover) Most injuries are the result of over-use. (4) Rest
is one way to help naturally heal an injury, by cutting back on running mileage, or not running at all, not
putting weight on your injured area.(6) Icing the injured area with anything cold and that will conform to the
body part, also naturally helps reduce inflammation and pain.(7) Compression with a latex or non latex Ace
bandage will help reduce blood flow to the injured area helping to slowly reduce swelling.(8) Lastly,
Elevation above the heart will help inhibit over flow of blood to the injured area, helping blood flow
naturally and normally.(9) In the article, whether with surgery or medication, the only true way that Apollo
would be able to fully heal would be to take the natural rout. All these things plus time is the only way to
Phis article helps point out how one can treat sport injuries with the help of drugs. While many minor
sport injuries can be self-treated, some more prominent injuries may require the help of over the counter
drugs. (A Harvard) One might use Acetaminophen (Pylenol), which helps reduce pain but not
inflammation or one might want to switch to NSAIDs like ibuprofen (Advil) or naproxen (Aleve) to help
fight inflammation and pain. One can also choose topical anti-inflammatory instead of oral anti-
inflammatory. (23) Overall, liniments are not cure-alls. Phey reduce pain, but they do not heal tissue. (26)
Phis article directly relates to Dr. Jacob¶s ethical issue, because it shows you how the use of drugs can
mask and hide the symptoms caused by the injury, but definitively cannot heal the injury itself.
c o
Link: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?hid=11&sid=9aa41164-5dff-447b-aeed-
c1ccb0b2ab51%40sessionmgr111&vid=50&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db
=a9h&AN=48637836
Phis final article helps inform you of some of the side effects to serious sport ligament injuries if left
untreated. Knee ligament injuries, such as ACL injuries, may act up months or years down the line. Phey
could cause one¶s knee to give out when one twists or pivots. (Moore) It also informs me that certain
ligaments, such as the ACL and PCL, cannot be repaired. Once they are completely torn or stretched
beyond their limit that¶s it. (18) If one chooses not to opt for reconstructive surgery, and can live with pain,
they will have to except the risk of some permanent weakness and instability in their leg, or other area of
the body. (19) Apollo is taking a major risk by not opting for the surgery and healing time off. While he
may be able to enjoy one more game, the risk he is taking could possibly permanently damage his injured
area to the point he may end his football career abruptly, as well as forever suffer with the inflictions.
Loss of potential profits from Increased profits from having May gain home field advantage Faced with the same dilemmas
All Venors having home games home games which could increase profits just with a new physician
about Mark Apollo?´ Act Utilitarianism is a consequential ethical theory that was thought up by
Jeremy Bentham during the 1800¶s A.D. It is a theory that focuses on the main principle of producing
the greatest possible good for the greatest number of people. Phis is done by finding the net utility, the
sum or total of the happiness and unhappiness caused by a specific action. (Goree Ch.5) In order to
apply Act Utilitarianism you have to follow five steps. Phose steps are:
M Identify the ethical problem ant the decision that has to be made
M Phen finally choose and follow the option that produces the highest net utility
(Goree Ch.5)
In the next portion of this section I will put these steps to use and show how Act Utilitarianism is
applied.
c
Unhappiness Jappiness
-10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
c
Part 2a
I¶ve chosen to apply the non-consequential theory Natural Law to Dr. Jacob¶s ethical issue. Natural Law
was the product of the philosopher Phomas Aquinas during the 1200s A.D. Natural Law looks to natural
features and characteristics of humans as the basis for ethical reasoning. Phese features or characteristics are
ones that we are born with, ones that are natural to the human nature. (Goree Ch.6) Natural Law believes that
there are natural human inclinations that are inherently morally good, providing that they are reasonably
pursued, and that if these if these inclinations are values shared by all humans then they must be apart of our
basic human nature. Phis idea of natural inclinations are referred to as $% &!'().
M Human life
M Health
M Procreation
M Welfare of Children
M Knowledge
(Goree Ch.6)
Pherefore actions that promote these shared universal values are ethically ³good´, because they help fulfill our
human nature and purpose. On the other hand if an action violates or interferes with a universal value it
becomes ethically ³wrong´, because it interferes with the fulfillment of our human nature and purpose. (pg.169)
Now that you have a clear understanding as to what Natural Law is, I will apply it to Dr. Jacob¶s ethical issue in
Part 2b
Option C: Suggest a more rigorous practice routine for the backup QB to improve his skills for Play-offs.
Step 2: Evaluate each option to see if it violates or interferes with any of the Universal Juman Goos
Option A: Phe values of health and knowledge play a role in this option. Phe value of health is promoted
because Dr, Jacob wants to heal Apollo¶s injury correctly and prevent ant further or permanent
damage. Knowledge is promoted because Mark Apollo is made aware of the extent of is injury
and what treatment is needed in order for him to resume normal activity.
Option B: Phe values of health and knowledge once again come into play. Phe value of health is violated
because it puts Apollo at risk of causing further and possible permanent damage. Knowledge is
promoted because once again Apollo is made aware of what could happen if he continues to
play on his untreated injury, and what exactly the injections will do for him.
Option C: Phe value of Human relationships and the consideration of other people¶s interests apply to Dr.
Jacob¶s ethical issue in this option. Phis Value is violated because it may possibly interfere
with Pommy Lee¶s relationship with Mark Apollo, his other team members, and the City of
c p
Athens. Phis option interferes with the consideration of the other stakeholders¶ interests of
gaining home field advantage and possibly bringing the championship to Athens.
Option D: Phe values of knowledge and human relationships come into play in this option. Knowledge is
violated because the new physician may not know the complete extent of Apollo¶s injury like
Dr. Jacob may. So because of this the new physician may not be able to make sound logical
decision. Phe value of human relationships is violated because this option interferes with the
relationship between Dr. Jacob and his colleagues, precisely the physician he hands Apollo¶s
Step 3: Eliminate all actions that clearly violate one or more Universal Juman Goos
Options B, C, D clearly violate one or more of the Universal Human Goods so ther are all morally and
Option A is morally permissible because it does not violate any Universal Human Good. Pherefore
according to Natural Law Dr. Jacob should keep Mark Apollo out of the games to prevent further injury.
c pp
V Decision aking
I¶ve come to the conclusion that Dr. Jacob should keep Apollo out of the games in order to reduce the
chance of further and possible injury. My research has shown me how even though medications can alleviate
the symptoms of an injury, only Dr. Jacob¶s recommendations will help him heal correctly and more quickly
with out further damage. According to the theory Natural Law the ethical and morally correct option would also
be to keep Apollo out of the games. Phis option, doesn¶t violate, but instead promotes some of the Universal
Human Goods (or Values). Although according to Act Utilitarianism this is the worst possible option because it
fails do the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people. Phis is because it is only for the
immediate present time, the period of the playoffs and the championship, not the length of Apollo¶s career. Also
the welfare of Mark Apollo was lost in the overall good of the group. So even though just giving Mark Apollo
the injections may benefit the other stakeholders, it would prove detrimental to Apollo. And as Apollo¶s
physician Dr. Jacob is obligated to do what¶s in the best interests of his patient, not the other stakeholders¶. So
according to my research and Natural Law the more sound, reasonable, and ethical option would be the one that
I chose.
Va Evaluation
Argument 1: Phe first possible argument against the resolution I chose is that it doesn¶t do the greatest
amount of good for the greatest amount of people. While this is true, it only proves to be true for the
immediate situation at hand. If Dr. Jacob were to give Mark Apollo the injections and allow him to continue
to play during the playoffs, there would be a strong negative effect on Apollo in the long run. It increases
the chance of Apollo further and possibly permanently damaging in injury. Who is to say that Apollo will
even make it though the play offs and actually to the championship, he may further damage is injury in the
first game he tries to play in. Phat¶s a huge risk to ask an athlete to take. Paking the risk of receiving
injections and playing on a injury could not only lessen the chance of the Lumberjacks chance of a
c pë
championship win now, it could also possibly prevent them from even making the playoffs with Apollo as
Argument 2: Phe second possible argument against the option I chose is ³Who¶s to say that the
recommendations for treatment, the prognosis for surgery and intense physical therapy that Dr. Jacob will
actually work for or improve Apollo¶s injury?´ According to the case study Dr. Jacob provided MRI reports,
X-rays, and addition evidence in order to make a decision on how to heal Apollo¶s injury. According to my
research, Dr. Jacob¶s recommendations are the best course or action for Apollo. Although there are no
definites in any medical procedures and there is always a slight risk that a procedure may fail, there is a
greater risk of further or worse permanently damaging his injury if he does receive any form treatment. Plus
according to my research the faster an injury is treated and the less strain put on it, the greater chance of the
injury healing quickly and correctly. Phis rings true for all athletes including Apollo.
Argument 3: Phe last argument against the resolution I chose is ³Who is to say that Apollo may further and
or permanently injure himself if he receives the injections?´ Phis is something that no one can know for
certain, but one truth that was shown in my research is that the only thing that the injections would do is
³mask´ the symptoms of Apollo¶s injury. Phis is the exact same thing that Dr. Jacob let Apollo know in the
case study. Phis means that the injury is still present. So when Apollo is playing during the playoffs, he is
placing a much greater strain on his still present injury. Phis is doing the exact opposite of what is needed in
order for an injury to heal. So even though he may not feel the injury, he is increasing the chance of further
and possibly causing permanently damage to his injury with every step that he takes.
c på
Vaa efection
Phis assignment proved to be a great challenge to me. Phis was mainly because I procrastinated slightly, but
also because it challenged my thought process. Returning from spring break and trying to jump right back into
school was little more difficult then expected. Between work, a child, other family and friends, and additional
school work, I always had an excuse as to why I couldn¶t start this paper yet. Plus to make matters worse I
thought I understood all the theories and how to apply them, which proved to be false once I started this
assignment. I found myself having to do further research to grasp and clarify my understanding of them in order
to better apply them to the ethical dilemma of this paper. I learned a few things from the research I performed
and it helped me to better make a sound, logical and informed decision, which I seldom make. I was able to put
myself in the stakeholders¶ shoes and speculate as to how they might feel because of a decision that was made.
I stick by my original decision, because I feel that Dr. Jacob, as a physician, has the duty to his patient Mark
Apollo, not to all the other stakeholders. Due to this Dr. Jacob is responsible for Apollo¶s overall health and
safety. So really would you want a physician who holds your career in his hands to base a decision off of any
and everything other then your over all wellbeing? I know that I wouldn¶t.
c po
0orks Cite
"A Harvard Health Guide to Preating Sports Injuries." ü*+, - 28.1 (2010): 16-19. .!
/g0 . EBSCO. Web. 16 Mar. 2011.
Goree, Keith, Nicholas Manias, and Jane E. Pill. ³ Chapter 5 Consequential Ethical Pheories.´ 1 g.!
6th Ed. Pearson Custom Publishing. Print
Goree, Keith, Nicholas Manias, and Jane E. Pill. ³ Chapter 6 Non-Consequential Ethical Pheories.´ 1 g
.! 6th Ed. Pearson Custom Publishing. Print
Moore, Dr. David R. ³Sports Injuries.´ g Sept. 20th 2010. Web. 16 Mar. 2011.
http://www.newschannel5.com/story/13186322/sports-injuries-september-20-2010-dr?redirected=true