Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

The History of Articulators: A Perspective on

the Early Years, Part I1


Edgar N. Starcke, DDS

I T MAY NEVER be known when, where, or from


whose imagination the first mechanical hinge
articulator emerged. The early dcntists in America,
was quite evident in the literature for years, but with
the passnge oT time, “articulation” and “artic~lator”
have become the accepted tcrms. In the Glossary of
especially thosc in the territories and on the fron- Yrosthodontic Terms (seventh edition): “articula-
tier, often found it diricult to obtain equipment tion” is defined as, “in dentistry, the static and
and supplies to pmctice their profession. It is likely dynamic contact relationship between the occlusal
that early hinge articulators were handmade surfaces of the teeth during function.” The tcrm
contrivances, constructed from materials at hand. “articulator” is defined as “a mechanical instrument
Even though well into thc 20th century plaster was that represents the temporomandibular joints and
commonly used to relate casts, some time before jaws, to which maxillary and mandibular casts may
I840 mechanical hinge articulators seem to have be attached to simulate some or all mandibular
become the preferred typc. According to the litera- movements.” In contrast, the Glossary describes-
ture, there were three primary reasons expressed for “occluding frame” as an obsolcte term, while omit-
their use and popularity; these mechanical hinge ar- ting the terms, “antagonizing frame” and “antagoni-
ticulators were more convenient and casicr to use, zors” altogether.
allowed modifications of the cast position when inac-
curacies were suspected, and saved plaster of Paris.’
From the beginning, the term “articulator” was
Early References to Mechanical Hinge
not popularly ascribed to the hinge-type devices.
Articulators
Among the more common terms were “antagonizing The first published reference to the earliest mechani-
frames,”:! “occluding frames,” “occlusion frames,” cal hinge articulators is probably Fairhurst’s6discus-
and “antagonizors.””,~ In 1914, Wilson3emphatically sion of Hovarth‘s articulator and Ladmore’s articula-
expressed his opposition to thc widely uscd dcsigna- tor of the 1830s. Fairhurst describcd these and other
tion, “articulator,” artping that it was a misnomer early examplcs as instruments consisting of two
because, in the anatomic sense, the term means “a wooden or metal blocks or slabs hinged together with
joint.” Similarly, he considered “articulation of the a simple hinge. These articulators and others of the
teeth” incorrect because teeth can only articulate day must certainly have resembled what is now
upon their proximal surfaccs and not upon their commonly referred to as the ”barn door hinge”
occlusal surfaces. Wilson stated that such instru- (Fig l).*
ments were intended to occlude and antagonize the
teeth, not articulate them. Wilson suggested the
instruments are used to arrange artificial teeth in
occlusion and “they should be in ‘a~itagoIiiZalion.”’
In his textbook, Wilson referred to a simple hinge
articulator as an “Occlusion Frame” and to all othcrs
as “Antagonizors.”This controversyconcerning terms

Correspondence to: Edgar AVStarcke, DDS, Clinical P r n j r . , Deport-


ment uf Pmsthodontics, The Lrniimity of Te,zas Houston Health S c i e n r -
Center Dental Branch, 6516 John Freeman Arienue, P.O. Box 20068,
Houston, TX 77225,E-mail: ~starcke~mail.~.uth.tmc.~di~
Copjri@t 8 1999 ly TheAmerican Collepe ofPrmthodontists
I0jY-Y4IX/99/0804-0011$5.00/0

Journal qjProsthodontics, Vobl8,No 4 [December), 1999:bp 277-280 277


ARTICULATORS.

INVENTED BY W. H.SMITE, NEWPORT, R. I.


Thia article is made of brass, and possesses the advantage over those fn general
use in having n screw m d hinge, whereby it can he adjusted to any angle. There
is slso a set ecreew, allowing the top to slide either backward mforaard. It ha8 met
with general favor by tlrose who have used it. Price $1.00.
SAMUEL 8.WHITE.

Figure 2. This is an S. S. Whitr ad for an articulator


attributed to W. H. Smith. This articulator likely first
appeared in the 18f2 Samuel S. White catalogue, the first
Figure 1. A “Barn Door Hinge” Articulator in the collec- catalogue produced by White after the dissolution of the
tion of the University of Texas-Houston Dental Branch. partnership ofJones and White in 1861. The S. S. White
Dental Manufacturing Co, incorporated in 1881, has col-
Illustrations of mechanical hinge articulators found laborated with several inventors associated with articula-
tors, notably W. G. A. Bonwd and Rupert Hall. (Reprinted
most commonly in the early literature wcre thosc from McQuillan JH, Zieglar GJ (eds): Dental Cosmos,
that were commercially manufactured and pro- Philadelphia, PA, Samuel S. White, August 1865, vol7.)
moted. Because scientific articles on articulators
were rare at that time, dentists were highly depen-
tant feature was that vertical dimension could be
dent an advertisements that provided illustrations
preserved or altered as required.’
(Fig 2). Harris was initially introduccd to this devicc in
About 40 hinge-type articulators were patented
1849 when Evans sent a sample of one to the edtors
between 1860 and 1910. However, numerous commer-
cially successfularticulators were not patented (Fig 3).
THE WILMINGTON DEXTAL MANUFACTURING CO
One of the earliest mechanical hinge articulators
illustrated and discussed in some detail in the litera- STANDARD ARTICULATO R.
ture is attributed to Thomas W. Evans.? In his
textbook, Chapin A. Harris (fourth edition, 1X50)7 The capacity of this
Articulator is all that
described the T. Mi. Evans articulator as a “very is necessary. It will
simple instrument by means of which the extension take single or double
of the plaster back of the plates and wax is rendcrcd models, and admit of
unnecessary.” He ernphasizcd that the most impor- any change in articula-
tion. Entirely of brass,
nicely fitted,finely pol-
ished, nickel-plated.

PRICES.
As above. ........ $1.25
Pla,in Brass...... .85

Figure 3. A v e n popular articulator or common basic


design. Note the uncommon feature: a vertical rod at-
tached to thr wing-nut to support thc fully opened upper
member. (Reprinted from the 1890 Wilmingon Dental
Manufacturing Co catalogue, Philadclphia, PA, p 293.)
patcnts were issued between 1840 and 1870. It is
logical to assume that because of the number of‘
patents issued during the subsequcnt three decades
(about 45),some records werc lost.

The First US Articulator Patent


The first US patent for ari articulator was issued to
James Cameron on April 30, 1840 (Fig 6A and B).
Cameron’s articulator was unique in its departure in
design from othcr hinge-type devices, and it is not
clcar why he chosc such a design. However, the
Figure 4. Thomas W. Evans hrticulator. Woodcut snbmit- inclusion ofthe anterior-posterior and vertical adjust-
ted by J. r). Chevalirr to the American Juurnal Ilenlal ment features does show his concern for the pcrva-
Science. Vertical rod D and wing-nut E control vertical sive problems related to the wax impression and
dimension. This is artually the second appearance of the “mush-bite” techniques of the day and the necessity
‘tertical stop” feature. Daniel T. Fxens recorded the first to makc corrections using articulators. Cameron’s
in his patent application (1840). (Reprinted from Cheva-
lier?) articulator also displayed a mistaken concept that
has been, with some persistence, repeated in articula-
tor design-that is, the idea that the ma.ndibular
of TheAmericanJournal ofDeenta1Scietice for eva1uaLion.t member of the articulator must move. The second
As a co-editor, Harris reported receiving Evans’
“antagonizing instrument for artificial tccth” and
noted that, “With the exception of a plaster antago-
nizing model, it is superior to any we have seen.”HIn
April 1850, John D. Chevalier of New York submit-
ted, with a letter to the editor, a woodcut of the Evans
instrument and a description of its use. Chevalier
intended to manufacture it and commissioned the
woodcut for his circularsg (Fig 4).
It is not known if Thomas Evans patented his
articulator, and this illustrates one of the obstacles
encountered by investigators seeking early patent
data: according to the records of the US
patcnt office before 1870 may be incomplctc. In that
year, the Commissioner of Patents completely reorga-
nized the system of kecping records and issuing
patcnt letters. Furthermore, sometimc between 1840,
when the first patents were issued, and 1870, a fire
destroyed many of the original patent records. Accord-
ing to the existing records, only four articulator

Figure 5. Thomas W. Evans (1823-1897). (Reprinted


from Rainey.! I )
Figure 6 . 64) From Patent #1,574, April 1840. This was essentially a plasterless hingc-type device. Kod E allows an
anterior-posterior adjustment of upper plate A. Assembly K incorporates a vertical adjustment and the hinge mechanism
for the lowcr plate B. Rods M and 0 are supports for the lowcr platc B. (B) This is an actual model of the Cameron
articulator. (Reprinted from House.'")

articulator to be patented, that of Daniel T. Evens, 5. The glossary of prosthodontic terms (ed 7). J Prosthet Dcnt
exemplifies this problem, but also represents an 1999;81:48
advancement in the understanding of mandibiilar 6. Fairhurst R: The Wadsworth Articulator. Dent Rec 1929;49:
58-66
movement (more of the history of articulators in thc
7. Harris CA (ed):The Principles and Prarticc of Dental Surgery
next issue of t h eJournal ofProsthodontiw). (cd 4). Philadelphia, PA, Lindsay & Blakiston, 1850, pp
699-700
References 8. Harris CA: Editor's note: &I antagonizing instrument for
artificial teeth. Am J Dent Sci 1819;1054
1. Harris CA (ed): The Principles and Practice of Dental Surgery 9. Chevalier JD: Evans'htagonizing Instrument.AmJDent Sci
(ed 8). Philadelphia, P& Lindsay & Blakiston, 1863, p 685
1850;10206-208
2. kchardson J (ed): A Practical Treatise on Mechanical Drn-
10. House JE:The d e s i p and use of dental articulators in the
tistry (ed 1). Philadelphia, PA, Lindsay & Blakiston, 1860, p
United States from 1840-1970. Masters thesis, IndiamUniver-
2 75
3. Wilson GH (ed): A Manual of Dcntal Prosthetics (ed 2). sity School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, 1970
Philadelphia,PA, Lea &E'ebiger, 1914, pp 159-160 11. Rainey H (ed): Dr. Thomas W'. Evans, America's Dentist to
4. Waugh Lhl: The laws of antagoniaation of the teeth in European Royalty. Philadelphia, PA, Thc Evons Co, 1916, pp
orthodontia. Dent Items oflnterest 1910;32:192-213 9-19

Вам также может понравиться