Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

Summary: .

Troy, New York; General Obligation



Primary Credit Analyst:

Lindsay Wilhelm, New York 212-438-2301; lindsay_wilhelm@standardandpoors.com

Secondary Contact:

Kate Hackett, New York (1) 212-438-7535; kate_hackett@standardandpoors.com

Table Of Contents

Rationale

Outlook

Troy Municipal Assistance Corp. Related Criteria And Research

www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect

1

Summary:

Troy, New York; General Obligation

Rationale

Standard & Poor's Ratings Services raised its issuer credit rating (ICR) on Troy, N.Y. one notch to 'A-' from "BBB+' based on its opinion of the city's financial stability over .the past five fiscal years. The outlook is stable.

The rating further reflects our view of the city's:

• Adequate income levels and property values;

• Strong total general fund balance but adequate unreserved general fund balance;

• Limited revenue-raising flexibility; and

• Outstanding operational debt and high fixed costs, including pension and other postemployment benefits (OPEB).

Troy is in Rensselaer County (AA-/Stable), just eight miles northeast of Albany, N.Y. (AA-/Stable). It is home to multiple higher education facilities, including Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Hudson Valley Community College; and Russell Sage College, as well as the Samaritan Hospital Nursing School. Several redevelopment projects are in progress, including warehouse rehabilitations; a new Dinosaur Bar-B-Que restaurant; student housing projects; and

.. publicly financed roadway, riverfront access, and underground parking projects. Property values, though somewhat misleading due to the large number of tax-exempt properties, have remained steady: They are, in our view, an adequate $40,729 per capita. While the city has not experienced a significant number of appeals, it is now in the process of a full property revaluation, which it expects to complete over the next three years. Income levels are, in our opinion, an adequate 70% of the D.ational average. Unemployment, which averaged 8.9 %in 2010, has trended slightly above the state's rate but below the nation's rate.

Thecity's financial position has remained, in our opinion, stable over the past five fiscal years. The city finished fiscal 2009 with a deficit of$2.0 million on expenditures of $62.7 million; management attributes the deficit to capital spending. Total general fund balance, as of fiscal year-end 2009, was $14.9 million, or, in our view, avery strong 24% of expenditures. Unreserved fund balance was $1.3 million, or, in our opinion, an adequate 2.1 % of expenditures. The city's $13.6 million of reserved general fund balance consists primarily of an $8.4 million debt reserve, which the city is required to maintain under the amended Financial Control Act of1994. The remaining $4.4 million is a capital reserve.

Standard & Poor's I RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal I March 31,2011

2

For fiscal year-end Dec. 31,2010, management reports that sales and mortgage recording taxes came in under budget but that positive health care cost variances arid a $2.4 million property sale should at least offset the difference. The city collects and remits property taxes on behalf of the county and the school district, and it is

. working on those adjustments before closing its books for fiscal 2010. The city must make the school district, along

" with its own water and sewer special revenue funds, whole for uncollected taxes and rents. It is not required to do so for the county.

Summary: T1'OY, New York; General Obligation

Leading revenue sources include property taxes (32%); state aid (26%); and nonproperty taxes, including the city's share of the county sales tax (23%). The New York State Constitution limits the city's property taxing power to 2 % of its five-year average full valuation. As of December 2010, the city was at 87% of its constitutional tax margin, limiting its continued revenue flexibility. In addition, while the state provides aid to the city in an amount equal to at least 1.5x debt service coverage, the aid is subject to appropriation; the state's budgetary needs could pressure the aid.

www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect

3

The city has balanced its fiscal 2011 budget with the use of $505,000 of general fund balance, While it has not had to implement any layoffs or furloughs, the city has realized some cost savings through debt refinancing, pension cost amortization, and attrition.

Standard & Poor's considers Troy's financial management practices" good" under its Financial Management Assessment (FMA) methodology, indicating financial practices exist in most areas but that governance officials might not formalize or regularly monitor all of them.

The city'S overall net debt burden is, in our view, a low-to-moderate $1,293 per capita, or 3.2 % of market value. A majority of the city's debt outstanding is operational debt issued in 1996 and 1997. Debt service carrying charges are, in our opinion, a low 7.6% of governmental expenditures. Amortization is, what we consider, above average with officials planning to retire 84% of debt outstanding over the next 10 years and 98% over the next 20 years.

The city has elected to amortize a portion of pension cost increases for a period of up to 10 years; otherwise, the city contributes its full annual required contribution (ARC). Pension costs in 2009 represented 5.5% of total governmental expenditures. The city also provides OPEB; which it funds through pay-as-you-go financing. As of fiscal year-end 2009, the city's OPEB ARC was $12.5 million, or 14.4% of governmental expenditures, of which it contributed $4.9 million. Combined debt service; pension; .and OPEB fixed costs, assuming the full ARC, totaled 27.8% of expenditures in fiscal 2009, putting additional limits on the city's budgetary flexibility.

Outlook

The stable outlook reflects Standard & Poor's opinion that the city will likely be able to manage its budgetary challenges and maintain sufficient reserves. Ongoing revenue pressures and fixed costs could limit the city's budgetary flexibility. A failure to maintain structural balance or a significant drop in reserves could likely lead to our lowering the rating.

Troy Municipal Assistance Corp.

The New York State Legislature established the Troy Municipal Assistance Corp. (MAC) (AiStable) in 1995 to provide market access for Troy. The city was in severe fiscal crisis with an accumulated operating deficit of $20.0 million, or 52% of budget, at Dec. 31, 1995, despite funding a $10.5 million operating deficit in fiscal 1992 with certificate of participation proceeds. Legislation specifically prohibits the city from filing for bankruptcy while any MAC bonds are outstanding.

The MAC board consists of five members: three appointed by the governor, one appointed by the senate majority leader, and one appointed by the speaker of the assembly. The overall MAC structure is similar to legislation drafted for New York City in the 1970s, reflecting the state's relatively long history of aiding localities in fiscal distress. The

Summary: Troy, New York; General Obligation

MAC has financial oversight powers; and it uses New York City's MAC staff to oversee Troy -- including a review of the city's audits, budgets, and financial plans -- and report its findings to appropriate state officials. The board terminated Troy's emergency period on June 22, 1999; this limits the supervisory board's role in approving the financial plan, city contracts, and proposed borrowings. The board is obligated to review and monitor the city's financial operations and plans, and the board can reinstate the emergency period pursuant to statute.

• USPF Criteria: GO Debt, Oct. 12, 2006

• USPF Criteria: Key General Obligation Ratio Credit Ranges - Analysis Vs. Reality, April 2, 2008

Related Criteria And Research

Complete ratings information is' available to subscribers of RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal at www.globalcreditportal.corn. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column.

Standard & Poor's I RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal I- March 31,2011

4

B5H173! 3G1379Bl1

Copyright © 2011 by Standard & Poors Financial Services LLC (S&P), a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hili Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model. software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P, its affiliates, and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders; employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use olthe Coritent, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided.on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THATTHE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THATTHE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental. exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content. even if advised of the 'possibility of such damaqes.

Credit-related analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold,or sell any securities orto make any investment decisions. S&P .assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any forin or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions.S&p's opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or

. an.investment advisor. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or

independent verification of any information it receives. ..

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information. that is not available to other S&P business units, S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain'the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standsrdandpoors.cem (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com(subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect

5