0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
17 просмотров1 страница
This document summarizes proposed energy projects in Michigan and their expected economic benefits. It lists 9 coal and 1 nuclear plant project. It then provides economic data for Michigan like its population and income. It estimates the upfront investment and annual economic output and jobs that would result from the projects. It gives an example of the proposed Fermi 3 nuclear reactor project which faces opposition over environmental and need concerns and has fallen behind in permitting.
This document summarizes proposed energy projects in Michigan and their expected economic benefits. It lists 9 coal and 1 nuclear plant project. It then provides economic data for Michigan like its population and income. It estimates the upfront investment and annual economic output and jobs that would result from the projects. It gives an example of the proposed Fermi 3 nuclear reactor project which faces opposition over environmental and need concerns and has fallen behind in permitting.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
This document summarizes proposed energy projects in Michigan and their expected economic benefits. It lists 9 coal and 1 nuclear plant project. It then provides economic data for Michigan like its population and income. It estimates the upfront investment and annual economic output and jobs that would result from the projects. It gives an example of the proposed Fermi 3 nuclear reactor project which faces opposition over environmental and need concerns and has fallen behind in permitting.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Consumers Energy Coal Plant, Essexville Coal Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station Nuclear Great Lakes Energy and Research Park Coal Lansing Coal/Biomass Hybrid Plant Coal/Biomass LS Power/Dynegy Midland Power Plant Coal Northern Michigan University Ripley Addition Coal The Board of Holland Public Works Coal Tondu/MSWDC Northern Lights Coal Plant Coal Wisconsin Public Power Inc., Escanaba Plant Coal Wolverine Coal Plant Coal
Economic Overview Benefits from Proposed
Energy Projects Population (2009 in thousands) 9,970 Personal Income per Capita (2009) $34,025 Upfront Investment (total of all projects) Employment (Aug 2010 in thousands) 4,196.3 Total Economic Output (in PDV) $39,400,000,000 Unemployment Rate (Aug 2010) 13.1% Employment Earnings (in PDV) $13,100,000,000 Change in Jobs (Jan. 2008 – Aug. 2010) -417,700 Average Annual Jobs 56,700 All State Government Expenditures $56.9 bn First Year of Operations (total of all projects) Total Economic Output (in PDV) $4,700,000,000 Electricity Costs Employment Earnings (in PDV) $1,200,000,000 (cents/kilowatt hour) Average Jobs Created in Year 1 26,000
Residential (June 2010) 12.87
Commercial (June 2010) 10.70 Example Project Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station 14 DTE Energy submitted an application in September 2008 to construct a new reactor at 12 its Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station in Monroe County, Michigan. The project, called 10 Fermi 3, would add a 1500-megawatt Economic 8 Simplified Boiling Water Reactor, designed Residential by General Electric. Environmental groups 6 Commercial immediately lined up to oppose the project, citing 4 radioactive, thermal and toxic impacts, as well as concerns to Lake Erie from onsite storage of 2 spent fuel. Sierra Club argued that the electricity 0 from the project would not even be needed. The United Michigan opposition groups were granted intervenor status States in the licensing process before the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The permitting process is already more than a year behind schedule. U.S. vs. Michigan Electricity Costs (cents/kilowatt hours)