Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
produce the zero load amplitude d,, which yields the de~ : eee: ViBRATION=PREDUCT Fy = ¢ VIBRATION-PRODUCT Fy od PRELOAD Fy [Fro] UI Tae ¢ fll gti eH g | lil | ; Lt fat ti 4 d | IL i ‘ i 1 | ee ; 2 Number of Cycles Fig, 19 ~ Vibration product and preload versus number of cycles (VN and Fy Number of Cycles IN curves) for specimens C,, C,380 GRRHARD H, JUNKER oy) ” wo 1000 0 1 1000 eD Fig. 20 Preload curves versus the number of cycles for varlous maximum enesgy level E-F-N curves for specimens By Ay By By€ ‘SELF-LOOSENING OF FASTENERS seed energy level acoordag w the equation (4) @ a) % As presented in Fig. 16, results gained from different E ‘max ‘machines must be comparable, even if the spring constants of the load transmitting parts are in the ratio of 1:2. Fig. 16 (4) shows that transverse vibratfon tests, run at equal energy levels nae) * Ea max)’ 44408 Machines wth spring constants in the ratio of 1:2 resulted {n comparable force / deflection (displacement processes. If, as reference for the text levels, the transverse force or the zero load amplitude (eccentric adjustment) were used in the Case of two ma~ cchines with 1:2 spring constants, the results would be very different force deflection displacement processes; see Figs, 16(0) and (6). a2) — 331 ‘The procedure to generate E-F-N curves is as follows: 1, Adjust the zero load amplitude with the eccentric of the vibration machine to obtain the first desired energy level: F max M 2, Proload the specimen to 15% of proof loads read pre~ oad off bridge amplifier. 3 During vibration process, read numbers of eycles cor responding to 80, 50, and 20% of preload F,, as indicated on bridge amplifier. 4, Repeat process at lower energy level until the preload does not drop below 80% after @ predetermined number of cycles. Run several tests at each energy level, similar to fatigue testing, so that a statistical evaluation of the results 4s possible. as) C1 soft washer C1 hard washer , (emia) C2 soft washer Fer Tanke) C2 hard washer Fig. 21 ~ Preload curves versus the number of cycles for various maximum energy level E-f-N curves for specimens ,, C, om hard and soft washers392 SUREACE INTEGRITY - The value of self-locking ele~ ments with serrated head bearing surface is often diminished by the damage they cause to the surface of the clamped parts, despite their excellent locking performance. They ‘itt nothes in the surface of the clamped parts, which reduce the fatigue strength of sheet metal designs as well as of other ‘machine components. ‘The new vibration machine can be adapted to evaluate this influence, t00, as is shown inFig. 9 Fig. 22 shows the teat seuup for 2 shicet metal spectmen. "The specimens used for the tests desorbed here were ‘made from 1 mm (0.04 in.) cold rolled body sheet, bent nto a U-shaped channel. The sheet metal specimens were ‘ested with two types of screws with serrated beating surface (G, and C.). For comparion, txt with nonlocking serews ‘were run. ‘The fasteners were tightened twice to 100% pre~ i z T | | r g rei eae umber of cyelan Fig. 29 - Transverse force versus number of cycles, F..-N curves for clamped sheet metal specimens GERHARD H, JUNKER: Joad, unscrewed, cleaned, and seated for a third time to 1106 preload prior to vibration testing. After taking out the flat stipe of needle bearings, the tests could be run like standard pushpull fatigue tests. ‘The results are shown in Fig. 28. Some typical fatigue failures caused by sorew C, are shoven in Fig. 24, and those caused by screw C, in Fig. 25. These tess make clear the difference in the shape of the serration of the two screws. , cus an annular notch, angular in cros sections, a5 ‘can be seen in the washer left over from other tests (Fig, 24). ‘The fatigue failure ocours along that snnular notch; as = result, a washerlilee piece {s cut out by the serew. The screw has long radial teeth, the edges of which run out con~ tinuously into a smooth outer bearing surface. The damage done to the seating surface is minute, and therefore fatigue failures oceur away from the fastened area, as is shown in Fig. 25. For this reason, the F.,-N curve of serew C,, is close to the S-N curve of the undamaged sheet specimen. Fig. 24 - Fatigue fatiure of sheet metal specimens clamped ‘with free spinning self-locking serews C, 7 shape of teeth and removed washer after vibration Fig. 25 ~ Fatigue failure of sheet metal specimens clamped ‘with free spinning self-locking screws C+ shape of teeth and removed washer after vibration 9‘SELE-LOOSENING OF FASTENERS CONCLUSION AND FUTURE ‘TEST PROGRAM Self-loosening characteristic of fasteners can be achieved with a new vibration machine that generates relative motion in the clamped parts perpendicular to the axis of the fastener. Several values characteristic of the process can be measured during the test. These {nclude preload, transverse force, displacement, and angle of rotation, The described ma~ chine is suited for further research wotk to study the mech ism of self-loosening. It must therefore be equipped with a series of electronfe recording instruments. “The machine is also suited for large scale testing and inspection testing. For this kind of work, only one bridge amplifier {s needed to record the preload. Whea so equipped, E-FsN curves can be recorded for large scale and inspection tests, Thereby a quantitative testing of locking performance of all Kinds of locking elements becomes possible. The fasteners are tested in 8 preloaded condition. Test results of different locking types of fasteners such as thove having prevailing torque, and free splaning torque, and adhesive type screws can be compared. ‘The spring constant of the machine must be known. Results obtained from machines ‘with different spring constants must be comparable. ‘The following details must be resolved preparatory 10 the specification of a standard test method: 1, Influence of serew length, 2, Performance of nuts tested on special externally threaded thserts or suuds. 3° Vibration endurance Umit; that fs, after how many cycles has the self-rotation of a fastener or the loss of pre= oad eojite to rest. 4, Tnfence of hardness of clamped parts; specification, of standard test washers. 5. Influence of thread tolerance. 6. Influence of thread pitch. 1. Reusabilit Of spectal interest fs the determination of dhat number of cycles after which no more self-loosening occurs. ‘The ‘exact shape, particularly the horizontal part, of all F,-N, oN. -N, and F.,-N curves presented in this paper is not yot known because only a Iimfted number of tests have Deen run so far. Tecan only be estimated that the "vibration endurance limit” is smaller than the fatigue stength of ma~ terials and structures. Furthermore, tests should be run to establish the influence of superimposed forces other than transverse forces. First screening tests using angles of 15, 30, 45, and 60 degshowed that under an equal external force, serews loosened faster when tested under smaller angles. Itean be assumed that the pure transverse force applied at an angle of 180 deg represents the most severe conditions. The influence of Inbrication, tolerances, and surface finish should be investi~ gated. The question is whether there is a correlation bo ‘reen static tests (ixcaktaway torque and s0 on) and vibration 333 tests. ‘The answer to this will probably be found by statistical methods. When enough tests have been run to make it possible to give statistically evaluated data concerning the locking performance of locking elements (@-F-N curves, endurance limits for F, = 86, 50M, 20%), then a truc analysis of the value of locking elements will be possible. In addition to the then measurable value of locking performance the following factors must be taken int consideration; reusability (a), surface integrity and fatigue strength of clamped parts (6), fatigue strength of clamping parts (c), compatibility with clamped material and hardness (é), installation cost (e), ‘and price (f). Factors (a) and (6) can also be evaluated with the desertbed vibration machine and the proposed meth~ ods. When a catalogue with E-P-N curves is established by 4 large number of tests, short term tests with specific energy Jovels canbestandardized as inspection tests, the minimum number of cycles for F,, = 80%, SOF, or 20 have to be specified. It was not intended to give at this stage of study an ‘evaluation of the locking performance of the tested speci- ‘mens. The results, therefore, shall only be considered as 2 ‘means for the demonstration of the operation of the vibra~ ‘tion machine and for the discussion of several possible test methods. A value analysis covering sIl the above mentioned factors will show which locking element is the optimum one for the actual application. SUMMARY Proloaded screws (or nuts) rotate loose, a5 soon af a rela~ tive motion in the thread takes place. This motfon cancels ‘the frfetion grip and originates an inner off-torque propor~ ‘ional to the thread pitch and to the preload. The inner off= ‘torque rotates the screw loose if the friction under nut or bolt head bearing surface is canceled by relative motions. ‘A dynamicatly loaded joint fails in most cases either by fatigue or by rotation loosening of the fastener. Even the fatigue fatlure is often initisted by partial loosening. If tt {s impossible to avoid relative movements by design, self- locking screws must be used, This means either that relative ‘movements in threads must be diminished or avoided so that the formation of the inner off-torque will be thereby pre~ vented, or that the formation of inner off-torque must be blocked up in the head or nut bearing surface. Dynamic transverse forces are more dangerous than dy~ namic axial forces. Axial forces cause relative movements through expansion of the nut threads transverse forces cause relative movements through rocking action of the sorew in ‘the internal thread (or rockng motions of the nut on the extemal thread). The relative motions caused by transverse forces are larger. No existing dynamic test method measures the locking performance of locking elements. A new vibratfon machine fs desoribed which generates transverse forces and displace ments in preloaded joints as well as combinations of tans~334 ‘verse and axial forces. Displacement, transverse forces, protoad, and angle of rotation can be measured. Additfon~ ally, the fatigue swength of bolted sheet metal joints can be evaluated, which 1s a means of rating the damage that flocking element causes to the surface of the clamped parts. ‘Various test methods using different recording instruments axe described and discussed in relation to nonlocking and self-locking screws of sizes M10 and 8/8 in. NC. The in= fluence of thread fit on the loosening resistance of noalock- ing screws, the influence of the shape of the serration of free spinning serewe on locking performance, the fnfluence fof frequency on the self-loosening process, and fatigue strength of clamped sheet specimen were studied. Finally, a simplified method for large soale testing and inspection testing {s proposed for which only one bridge. amplifier is needed with the vibrationmachine. Thismethod produces energy/aumber of eycles curves (similar to S-N curves) with 20, 50, and 80h preloads as parameter @-F-N curves). This test method could be developed into a stan~ dard test method after solving some detail questions. Tt ‘would yield measurable values for the Locking performance of nuts and bolts under dynamic loading. It could become the basis of a real value analysis for the use of locking ele~ ments. ACKNOWLEDGMENT G. Meyer, Labs Manager of SPS-UNBRAKO's European RE Dept., has contributed to this paper by arranging the ‘electronic test setup, supervising the voluminous test series, ‘and assisting in preparing che English version of this papers which originally was written in German. ‘SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS Displacement of elamped components under twansverse force, mm or in. Displacement of U-shaped top part of vibra~ tion machine in unloaded condition (ze20 oad amplitude), mm ot in, a, = Major diameter of thread, mm or in. a, = Pitch diameter of thread, mm or In, 5 = Dilation of aut under axial load, mm z = Amount of embedding @rineling, "Setzen,” plastic deformations) during dynamic dy name loading of a joint, mm or in. a = Tightening or trque factor, which considers the preload deviations caused by differ~ ences of filetion coefficients and applied torque in the design equation for bolted connections 4 = Spring constant of load transmitting parts ‘of vibration machine, Fig. 16 (ai hef/ am or Ib/in. GERHARD HI, JUNKER = Spring constant of clamped plates or com= ponents, kgf/mm or 1b/in. = Spring constant of sorew, kgf/mm or tb /in. = Friction diameter of a bolt head or aut, mm or in. = Energy for elastic deflection of bolt in a transversely loaded joint during 1/4 eyele, mm kgf or fn.-Ib = Energy absorbed by friction in a sliding foint during 1/4 cyclé, mm kgf or in.-Ib = Maximum output of vibration machine for ‘acettaineccentric adjustment, mm kgf or in-lb sxial force in a fastener, kgf or Ib ‘Maximum axial force in a prestressed fas~ tener under working load, kgf or Tb Rg = Residusl clamping force necessary for main~ taining grip friction of clamped compo- nents, kgf oc Tb ‘Transverse force in a bolied joint as well as in the vibration machine, kgf ot 1b F = Transverse force in vibration machine with 0 toventric adjustment dy kgf orb Fy = Preload in fastener, kgf oc 1b Fy = Working oad in a bolted joint, tgfor 1b ary Los of preload in a bolted joint by em- bedalng, laf or 1b L = Weight, gf oF 1b ° 1 Tranavowe fore for moving loads resting on 2 horizontal plane and sope, ligt or Ib Toee = off-nrque for a tneaded fastenee under static conditions, m kf or in.-Ib v = vibration product equals displacement “8” times transverse foree Fn a wansversly vibrated joint, significant factor for the locking performance of «self-locking fastens, mm igf 0: in.-tb « = Angle of loed deflection curve of 1oad trans~ rltting machine pars, dog ’ = Slope angle and hetlx angle, deg # Goefficlentof inictionintnreads, = tan p My CGoefficfent of fiction in tsads, under ‘head or nut E*E-N curves = Curves of constant preload for certain vi~ bration energy levels versus number of cycles EgeN euves = Transverse force versus nusaber of oyeles significant for surface integrity of clamped ‘components g, jy-N ourves = Decreasing preload under transverse vibra~ tion versus number of cycles V-N curves = Vibration product versus number of cycles c 4 WZSELE-LOOSENING OF FASTENERS REFERENCES 1. J.N. Goodier and R. J. Sweeney, “Loosening by Vi~ bration of Threaded Fastenings,” Mechanical Engineering (December 1945), 798-802. 2. J. A. Sauer, D. G. Lemmon, and E. K. Lynn, "Bolts How to Prevent Their Loosening," Machine Design (August 1950), 188-199. 3. E.G. Paland, "Untersuchunged ther die Sicherungsei- sgenschaften von Schraubenverbindungen bei dynamischer Belastung” (Iavestigation of the Locking Features of Dy~ namfcally Loaded Bolted Connections), Dissertation TH, Hannover, 1986, 4, G, Junker and D. Strelow, "Untersuchungen iiber die ‘Mechanfk des selbstttigen Lésens und die aveckmBige Sicherung von Schraubenverbindungen” (Investigation of the Mechanism of Self-Loosening and Optimal Looking of Bolted Connections}, DRAHT-Welt, Fachbeilage Schrauben ‘Mattern Formteile, Teil Iz $2 (1966), Ne. 2, 108-114; Teil tz 52 (1966) Ne. 9, 175-182; Teil Il: 52 (1966) Nr. 6, 617-885. 5. G. Junker, "Betrachtungen tiber das selbstitige LSsen. und die zweckmiBige Sicherung von Schraubenverbindungen” (Aspects of Self-Loosening and Optimal Locking of Bolted Connections), Maschinenmarkt, 72 (2966), Nr. 76. 6. G. Junker, “Warum ldsen sich Schraubenverbindungen ~ wie Kann man ¢s verhindern? (Why Fasteners Come Loose = 336 and How to Prevent it), industrie-Anizetger, 61 (1867), 19-22. 1. G. Junker and G. Meyer, "Neuere Betrachnungen liber ie Haltbarkoit von dynamtsch belasteten Scheaubeaverdin~ dungen” (New Aspects on the Fatigue Behavior of Dynar~ {cally Loaded Bolted Joints), Draht-Welt, Fachbeilage Sch rauben Mattern Formtefle, 54 (1968), Nr. 7, 487-499. 8. G. Junker and D. Blume. "Neue Wege einer system= atischen Schraubenberechnung” (Moder Rules for Calcula~ ton of Bolzed Connections), Disseldorft Triltch, 1965. 9. G. Junker, “Neue Prinzipfen der Schraubenberechnung, (New Principles of Caleulation for Bolted Connections), Mas~ hinenmarkt, 71 (1965), Nr. 74, 16-29. 10, AN-N-L0a, "Nuts; self-locking, 650° E." 11, AN-N-5b, "Nuts; self-locking, 250° 12, MIL-N-167817, "Nut self-locking, 1200°F." 12. MS 26531 (ASG). "Vibration Test RIG." 14. NAS 9356, "Nuts: self-locking 450°F, High Quality." 15. MIL-N-25027C, “Nut; self-locking, 250°F, 450°F, and 800°, 125 KSLFTU, 60 KSIFTU, and 30 KSEFTU," 16. MIL-F+18240, “Self-locking element for faetener ‘externally threaded 250° F." 17. TET-100, "Prevailing-Torque Type Steel Hexagon Lookauts." 16. IEI-101, "Torque~Tension Requirements for Pro- vailing Torque Type Steel Hexagon Lockauts.” 19, MUL-STD-1812, "Fasteners, Test Methods.”