Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai

IN-PLANT TRAINING REPORT

Subimitte in partial fulfillment of Master of Chemical engineering.

2011
IPCA Laboratories Limited, Ratlam

Under the guidance of Mr. M K Mittal Mr. Lokesh Khandelwal and Mr. Promod Trivedi, Departmant of Environmental Health and Safety, IPCA, Ratlam INDERDIP P. SHERE Final Year, Master in Chemical engineering, ITC, Mumbai

ACKNOWLE
Wi

E ENT

n o gr i u n r i S r m v ry nk ul o my gui orm r m n o Environm n l H l n S y R l m r i l r Lok K n lw l n r Promo riv i or ir v lu l gui n ugg ion n im ly n our g m n roug ou our o i in- l n r ining An rovi ing m n r or on roj o i nil ; o or uni y o r n A m n o om li n o on n on i ion i ul ion o nvironm n l l r n n on i ion o u oriz ion un r HS D rul 2008 or l or ori limi R l m om l ion o roj woul no o i l wi ou gr ul l rom ll m m r o EHS r m n in v r l i u ion r Piyu R j Puro i r R j Kum r r R vi K lk r r n ir n in ir l orm ll o l working in in u ry woul l o lik o nk my ll oll gu w o v l m o un r n u j r wi ou w om i work oul no v n r li y D :15 Jun 2011
Inderdi P. Shere
Final year, M. Chem. Engg. Department of chemical engineering ICT, Mumbai

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 2

INTRODUCTION

IPCA LABORATORIES LIMITED, RATLAM

In-pl nt t ining, IPC , Ratlam

Page | 3

Intr

ucti n

Ipca is a fully integrated, rapidly growing Indian pharmaceutical company with a strong thrust on exports. Ipca's APIs and Formulations produced at world class manufacturing facilities are approved by leading drug regulatory authorities including the US-Food and Drug Administration (FDA), UK-Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), South Africa-Medicines Control Council (MCC), BrazilBrazilian National Health Vigilance Agency (ANVISA) and Australia-Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). With operations in over 100 countries, exports account for over 52% of the company's income. Forbes, a leading US business magazine, selected Ipca in 2003 among its top 200 successful, rising companies outside USA, with sales under USD 1 Billion. Over 19,000 companies were considered by Forbes, and of the 18 companies from India that figured in this list, only four were from the 'Indian Pharmaceutical Sector'. Ipca happens to be one of them. Subsequently, Ipca was selected by FORB S in this prestigious list for two

consecutive years; 2004 and 2005. From a modest income of Rs. 0.54 crores in 1975 -76, the net income has soared to Rs. 753.30 crores in 2005-06 with exports accounting for Rs. 401.83 crores. The net profit for the year ending 31st March, 2006 stood at Rs. 63.98 crores. Formulations constitute 67 percent of the total income for 2005 -06. Today, Ipca is one of the biggest manufacturers in the world of APIs Atenolol (Antihypertensive), Chloroquine Phosphate (Antimalarial), Furosemide (Diuretic) and Pyrantel Salts (Anthelmintic) right from the basic stage. Ipca is also one of the largest suppliers of these APIs and the ir intermediates world over. M/s. Ipca Laboratories Ltd. is a reputed name in the Indian pharmaceutical & Health care industry. It is a public limited organization engaged in manufacturing pharmaceutical products since 1975 in various plants located in India. The products made by the company have been well received both by the national & foreign users, thereby leading to further

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 4

expansions & developments M/s. Ipca Laboratories Ltd. had contemplated a major expansion of its products & production capacity of the plant at Ratlam. The company has been pioneers in development & market headers in most of the products made by them. Th e plant at present manufactures 62 Bulk Drugs & is having formulation. The Existing Production capacity of Bulk Drug is 2551.5 MT/year this consists of,
T let : : 800 Milli n nos. /year 20 Million nos. /year : 2500 KL/year Table 1: Plant over view

Injection Liq id orals

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 5

Company Back Ground

One of the first modern Pharma factories of yesteryears was commissioned by IPCA at Mumbai in 1969. The company was originally promoted by a group of medical professionals and businessmen and was incorporated as The Indian Pharmaceutical Combine Association Limited in October 1949. The present man agement took over in November 1975 when the total turnover of the company was just Rs. 0.54 corers. Currently, this premise where IPCA started its operations, houses the registered office of the company, key departments like international marketing, R&D (f ormulations) and analytical development lab are located here. IPCA is a fully integrated, rapidly growing Indian pharmaceutical company with a strong thrust on exports. IPCAs APIs and formulations produced at world class manufacturing facilities are approved by leading drug regulatory authorities including the US- food and drug administration (FDA), UK- medicines and healthcare products regulatory agency (MHRA), south Africa medicines control council (MCC) , brazil Brazilian national health vigilance a gency (ANVISA) and Australia- therapeutic goods administration (TGA). With operations in over 100 countries, exports account for over 52% of the companys incomes. Forbes, a leading us business magazine selected IPCA in 2003 amount its top 200 successful, rising companies outside USA, with sales under USD 1 Billion. Over 19,000 companies were considered by Forbes, and of the 18 companies form India that figured in this list, only four were form the Indian pharmaceutical sector. IPCA happens to be one of them. Subsequently, IPCA was selected by Forbes in this prestigious list for two consecutive years. 2004 and 2005. Form a modest income of Rupees 0.54 cores in 1975-76, the net income has soared to Rupees 753.30 cores in 2005 -06 with exports accounting for Rupees 401.83 cores. The net profit for the year ending 31 st march 2006 stood at Rupees 63.98 cores. Formulations constitute 67 % of the total income for 2005 -06. Today, IPCA is one of the biggest manufacturers in the world of APIs atenolol (anti hypertensive), chloroquine phosphate (anti malarial), furosemide (diuretic) and pyrantel salts (anthelmintic) right form the basic stage. IPCA is also one of the largest suppliers of these APIs and their intermediates world over.

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 6

M/s IPCA laboratories ltd, Ratlam a public limited company with share capital of Rupees 1100 cores was established in 1984 Indias first APIs plant commissioned at Ratlam and IPCAs second formulations plant commissioned at Ratlam. M/s IPCA laboratories ltd. having its registered office in Mumbai, came into existence originally in the 1975, with a pharmaceutical manufacturing activity in Mumbai, and gradually grown up as a large pharmaceutical corporation in coming years. All the manufacturing operations are conducted strictly adhering to GMP norms. The production is licensed by FDA. Batch to batch production quality control is maintained as per he FDA rules which are the most stringent and strict amongst all the government regulations concerning the industrial manufacturing activities.

Mission

1. Enhance continuously the total quality of life of its employees and help them realize their potentials by Providing opportunity to grow and realize full potential.
y Improving their quality of life y Improving their skills and character y Giving joy in work / camaraderie

2. Become a key player world wide in chosen areas of business. 3. Customer satisfaction of a high level and standards higher than that of competitors by providing :
y Quality, transparency, reliability, flexibility, cost competitiveness and e njoyable

relationship
y Provide good returns to its share holders by giving y Good profitability, above average return on net worth. y Regular dividend market appreciation. y Courteous and reliable service.

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 7

Vision

Emerge as world class player in all its chosen business areas in 5-7 years. Achieve global standards in quality, cost, service and the scale of its operations. Become world class in the way we thing, manage and do things using principles, methods, systems and tools of total quality management (TQM). The Ipca Laboratories Ltd. plant is situated in North -East direction of village Sejavta which is approximately 7 km away from Ratlam district headquarter on the Madhya Pradesh National Highway No. 79 connecting Mhow & Neemuch. The city of Ratlam is situated on the main broad gauge rail route of western railway connecting Mumbai & Delhi. It is also connected to state capital Bhopal and Rajasthan by rail. Mumbai & Kandla are the nearest sea ports. Both are connected with rail route from Ratlam. Indore is the nearest airport & domestic flights for Ahmedabad, Mumbai & Delhi are available from here.

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 8

Plant Layout

Fi

re 1: Site Layout Plant

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 9

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 10

Energy Consumption

With the implementation of Energy conservation measures, Ipca could still maintain the consumption pattern, even after its expansion of production facility almost at the same level. The energy cost as percentage of manufacturing cost has shown the decline, for year 2006-07 it was 23.69%. Which depicts the continual reduction in energy consumption due to sustain efforts to conserve it by implementation of various energy measure and ideas to increase efficiency of equipments. The Table below gives the comparative figure of energy consumption of last three years. Ipca has Energy conservational cell headed by D.G.M. assisted by Asst. Manager & supported by 2 engineers. This team identifies various energy saving potential in different working areas. This team makes the proposal after a brain storming session and after evaluating its feasibility, a report is made and submitted to management for approval.
Table 2: Energy consumption

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 11

Manufacturing pr c ss
Introduction

To assess the possible impact of the pollutants on the environmental component, it is essential to understand the manufacturing process of the products, raw material used and nature and quantum of pollutants released during the curse of manufacturing. One may co relate the volume and concentration of the pollutants, which is suppose to be given the treatment at pollution control facilities available at premises.
Project data

Most of the project data are process and operation related data. Project data are distinguished into project description, resources requirement (water, power, etc), technology and chemicals used, land required, and resource recovery (water, solid waste, energy, etc)
Project description

General M/s IPCA laboratories lid, located at Sejavta industrial area, Ratlam made a change in their product mix and discontinued / reduced production of certain bulk drugs and intermediates and added / increased production of certain bulk drugs and intermediates, tablets, injections and liquid orals. Total production capacit y of plant is 1202 MT / year of bulk drugs, 800 millions no per year of tablets, 20 millions no/ year of injections and 2500 KL/year of liquid orals.name of product and product capacity given in Table no
Existing Capacity Additional Capacity

S. No

Products

Total

Bul Drugs 1. Synthetic Drug API (MTPA) 2551.5 59 2610.5

Formulations 2. Tablets (Million Nos./Year) 800 1300 2100

3. 4.

Injections (Million Nos./Year) Orals (KL/Year)

20 2500

Nil 800

20 3300

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 12

5. 6.

Dry Syrup (Million nos./year) Ointment (MTPA)

Nil Nil

1.5 150

1.5 150

R&D Products 7. R & D Products (MTPA) Nil 05 MT 05

Steroids & Hormones 8. Steroid (MTPA) & Hormonal products Nil 41.391 41.391

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 13

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Located at Mumbai, Ipcas research center is focused on generics in regulated markets, specifically in Europe and USA. The center has expertise in Active Drug Intermediates and Formulation Development which

Pharmaceutical Ingredients,

includes NDDS and ANDA. Ipcas Research and Development comprises of two sections: 1 Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient and Drug Intermediates 2. Formulation Development Both the departments are supported by the Analytical Development cells which are fully equipped with all modern instruments (like NMR, LC -MSMS, GCMS etc) required to carry out research on day -to-day basis. Units are geared to continuously innovate and remain competitive by developing/acquiring abilities to find simple and effective solutions to practical problems, solutions which are free from Patent Infringement issues. 1. Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients/Drug Intermediates The Active Pharmaceutical Ing redients/Drug Intermediates Research and

Development department at Mumbai is supported by two more units located at Ratlam and Indore. All the R&D units are recognized by the Department of Science and Industrial Research, Government of India. Research & Development units at Ratlam and Indore are also supported by facilities required for scale up of the processes from grams to kilo as well as to Pilot level. Strengths: Innovative chemistry-driven process research leading to the generation of non infringing routes for APIs/Drug Intermediates and Intellectual Property. Ipca has highly qualified and experienced groups of people capable of handling patent -related issues, which includes various aspects of patenting and patent evaluations. Impurity Profiling of APIs:

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 14

This includes identification and characterization as well as structural elucidation of unknown impurities (present in APIs), followed by their synthesis. Analytical developments:
y New method developments. y Method validations for getting products registered in Regulated Markets.

Process Research: Process development/improvements to make products competitive and profitable in the long run by giving major emphasis on:
y Non-infringing processes y Alternative cost effective routes y Increasing plant friendliness. y Improving selectivity/reducing impurity levels by sensitive chemistry inputs. y Reducing effluent generation.

2. Formulation Development Our Formulation Development Laboratory located at Mumbai has been gearing up for a state-of-the-art R&D facility (in line with the US-FDA requirements). The current R&D activities are also approved by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India. The laboratory is well equipped with various ultramodern equipments and technologies required for conducting high quality research activities. Some of the equipments available in the R&D are:
y High Sheer Mixer (GMP model) y Fluid Bed Drier y Fluid Bed Processor y Ganscoata y Walk-in Stability Chambers y Dissolution Apparatus with intrinsic dissolution

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 15

y Assembly y Bilayer Tablet Compression Machine y Equipments for liquid orals and semi-solid y Hard gel capsule facility y Blister packing machine with Alu-Alu facility y Press-cota y Roll compactor y Pelletisation facility y Facility for Effervescent tablets (low RH area) y Reverse laminar flow

The key activities of R&D-Formulations are:

y Novel Drug Delivery System (NDDS):

R&D in this area attempts to improve the efficiency with which the medicine is absorbed in the body. Novel Drug Delivery Systems (NDDS) efforts are directed towards: 1. Controlled Release: Ipcas Research concentrates on sustained, delayed and pulsatile release. The company introduced a novel bilayer tablet for an antidiabetic combination. 2. Novel Dosage Formulations: In the novel dosage form, the company concentrates on the following therapeutic segments.
y Cardiac Care y Anti-infective y Anti diabetics

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 16

Ipcas R & D laboratory has filed patents across the world for products based on the NDDS. Ipcas strength in this segment of R&D puts the company in an excellent position to compete in the growing markets for generic drugs in Europe and USA. Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA): The filing of ANDAs received a major boost after Ipca opened its wholly owned subsidiary in New Jersey, USA. The company will now be working on ANDAs to address the growing opportunity in USA. Ipcas research endeavors are well supported by world class infrastructure comprising:
y Analytical Research y Clinical Research y International Regulatory Affairs y Corporate Quality Assurance y Intellectual Property Cell

Manufacturing of generic products for registration in UK/EU/South Africa/Brazil and many other countries

At present, pollution and its abatement are a concern at every level. It is essential to understand the magnitude of the task confronting the developing world to maintain the cleanliness of its environment while keeping up the pace of industrialization. While the industrial revolution brought comforts to the making in abundance, it also brought with in miseries and discomforts, the degradation of environment, due to industrialization, has been at an alarming pace, the increasing urban and sub urban population, which needed the goods in large quantities, brought with it industries in large numbers, the Ganges of yesteryears is not the Ganges of today. The country has to cleanse

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 17

the Ganges which was supposed to be purest in the world. As a matter of fact, not only the Ganges, but most of the available water in the country is polluted, in addition to the pollution of water the pollution of the air is also on rise. Keeping the above facts in view, manufactures and entrepreneurs have no longer the freedom to disregard to environment and they have to take every precaution to see that the environment s not exploited in any manner. The enlightened management of the industries has every reason to put all its might to keep the environment as pure as possible. Communities all over the world, including India, have introduced legislations. In India, the water (prevention and control of pollution) act was promulgated in 1974. The other act, namely, air (prevention and control of pollution) act followed in 1981. These tow acts aim at controlling pollution at source. The central government also promulgated a comprehensive umbrella act, namely, environment (protection) act in 1986.

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 18

Tr at nt an anag nt
Introduction

valuati n f th wast wat r

Prediction of impacts is the process of determining the nature and extent of the environmental changes that may result form proposed activity. The predicted value for environmental variables from the objective basis for the assessment of the environmental feasibility of the proposed activity and for evolution of the effectiveness of mitigating measures. The management of M/s IPCA laboratories Ltd., Ratlam has decided to carry out an evaluation and performance study of exiting ETP. The study was conducted by setting up field stations for measurement of ambient air quality, meteorology, analysis of water and soil, collection demographical and other relevant data.
Table 3: pollutant sources and characteristics

S Activity no Construction phase 1 Ground working and leveling

Pollutant

Pollutants characteristics

Frequency

Air emissions SPM, PM10, CO,NOx,SO2

Earth/ solid waste Noise

Labor camps

Sewage

Dust form construction activities and excavation. Particulates, NOx and Co form vehicles exhaust Solid waste form construction activity and excavation Noise generated form construction equipment and machinery Sewage generated form temporary labor camps on site

Temporary during construction phase onlybulk of the emissions are expected from ground working and leveling activities Periodic

Temporary during initial construction phase Temporary- during the initial construction phase

1 2

Operation phase Vehicular movement Diesel power generators

Air emissions Vehicle exhaust and noise emissions Air emissions SO2,NOx, SPM , CO form fuel burning

Continuous / periodic If power cut from MPSEB

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 19

7 8

Noise due to running of equipment Sewage Solid waste Settled and stabilized treatment plant sludge Treated water Treated sewage used for horticulture Diesel storage Solid waste Settled sludge during tank cleaning Oil Oil spillage- accidental large spills due to pipe rupture oil spillage small quantities due to small pipe leaks Hydrogen Thermal / Accidental explosion bullets blast effect due to hydrogen leaks and fire Maintenance Waste water Floor washing housekeeping Solid waste Used equipment parts and garden waste Air Air emission Ozone depleting conditioners substance release Vehicle Oil spills Minor oil leaks in parking area parking lot

Noise

Continuous Continuous Continuous Occasional Accidental / only due to poor housekeeping

Accidental

Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous- small quantities

Water environment

As stated, during operation phase, the total quantity of water is required per day for exiting project is about 622 m3/day (622KLPD) which includes 150 KLPD of water for utility, 250 KLPD for cooling purposes, 100 KLPD for domestic and 122 KLPD for process purpose. Therefore total fresh water needs to be pumped is about 622 KLPD for consumption of domestic and industrial purpose. Discharge of domestic/industrial waste water is 350 m3/day form the exiting project, form which domestic/industrial waste waster shall be treated in well designed effluent treatment plant. The entire volume of treated water shall be recycled again for different uses. Part of the treated water will cover the requirement of the cooling tower and fan coil units, which is basically the HVAC requirement and balance water will be used for green belt development. Thus there will be

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 20

no adverse impact over the water environment. Detail of water balance is given below in table
Table: details of water consumption per day

1 2

Domestic Industrial a. Process b. Cooling c. Utility

Total

100 m3/day 122 m3/day 250 m3/day 150 m3/day 622 m3/day

Table: details of waste water generation per day

1 Domestic 2 Industrial a. Process b. Cooling c. Utility

Total

95 m3/day 122 m3/day 58 m3/day 75 m3/day 350 m3/day

Exiting effluent treatment plant

The facility has a full fledged effluent treatment plant designed for a hydraulic flow of 500 m3/day. (Flow diagram attached) All the effluent generated form the process plants and utilities are led to ETP through impervious drainage system/ the waste water form various units and streams of the plant are finally mixed together in the equalization chamber and then the composite effluent is collected into a holding tank no 1 The present effluent generation quantity is around 280m 3/day Therefore the present effluent treatment plant is adequate enough to trea t the hydraulic load of waste water as per given below in table.

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 21

Methodology of treatment

The existing treatment process comprises of the three stages;  Primary treatment  Secondary treatment  Tertiary treatment The effluent treatment is carried out in three stages 1. Primary treatment to reduce the suspended solids and BOD/COD 2. Secondary treatment which is a two stage biological treatment to reduce BOD/COD 3. Tertiary treatments consisting of pressure sand filter and activated carbon filter to polish the effluent

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 22

Primary treatment The composite effluent form the plant is passed through oil and grease trap to separate the oily matter. The oil layer is periodically removed form the oil and grease trap / chamber The oil collected in drums and incinerated in the i ncinerator. The effluent is then collected in tow nos. of holding tanks operating in series. The first tank is of 300 m3 holding capacity with 3 nos. of 5 HP floating aerators, followed by another tank of 150 m3 capacity with 2 nos. of 5 HP floating aerators. The total retention time is about 22 hours. On average flow. These tanks serve the purpose of a. Equalization of effluent feed stream. b. Stripping of volatile organics c. Mixing of neutralizing chemicals

The neutralized effluent is then pumped to the che mical treatment tank where a coagulant dose, alum or PAC or ferric chloride is added. It is then passed into a primary clarifier to facilitate settlement of flocculated mass for better flocculation polyelectrolyte is also added. The primary sludge settled at the bottom of clarifier is taken into sludge drying beds for drying, while the clarified effluent is further subjected to biological treatment.
Secondary treatment The biological treatment provided is a tow stage extended aeration activated sludge process. The residence period in the total system is 3 days and oxygen supplied is 2400 kg/day by means of 98 HP surface aerators. The clarified effluent form the 1at stage clarifier is taken to an intermediated sump for pumping to the 2 nd stage aeration tank. In the secondary aeration tank BOD and COD is further reduced. The secondary sludge form both the secondary clarifiers is recycled in their respective aeration tanks or taken to the sludge drying beds for drying. Tertiary treatment Tertiary treatment facility at the plant comprises of following units I. Pressure sand filter II. Activated carbon filter. The clarified effluent form second stage secondary clarifier passes through pressure sand filter. In the sand filter fine suspended matters and colloidal matters are removed. The quality of the biological oxidized effluent is slightly higher the standards prescribed. Hence it is further taken for tertiary treatment by passing through

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 23

activated carbon to remove traces of organics. This will act as a polishing treatm ent to the biologically oxidized effluent. Further carbon adsorption helps in removal of the refractory organic compounds in the waste water. Effluent the tertiary treatment, the effluent passes through a holding sump provided with V- notch. It is then pumped to the holding lagoon located at the dairy farm through a closed pope line for final disposal. Ultimately the treated effluent is disposed off either by solar evaporation or use for irrigation purposes. Form quality of treated waste water it is observed that it is meeting the discharge norms of MPPXB for treated effluent. Even the yield of the various crops like maze, wheat and sugarcane etc. taken form this water is quite good.
Table 4: details of units of effluent treatment plant

S no 1 2 3.

Unit Oil separator (2 no) Holding point (2no0 with floating aerators / mixers Chemical treatment tank with slow mixer Primary clarifier Bio reactor no 1 with surface aerators Bio reactor no 2 with surface aerators Secondary clarifiers 1 and 2 Intermediate effluent Sludge drying beds v-notch chamber Lagoon

4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11

12 13

Sand filter Activated carbon filter

Size (m) 5 *1.2*1(SWD) 12.5(D)*2.5 (SWD) *3 2.5 *2.5M*2.0M SWD *3 nos. 7 (diameter) *2.6 (SWD) 9.25 *18.5 *3(SWD) +1.0 18.5 *18.5*3(SWD) +1.0 7 (diameter) *2.6 (SWD) 2.6(diameter) *2 (SWD) 10 *10*3 1.55 *0.8*0.8 Bottom (71.5*49.2) Top (85*62.5*4.3) 0.3 *1.5*3nos

Volume (m3) 6 300/150 12.5

Hydraulic retention time 1 hours on average flow 22hours 0.5hours

100 1000 500

4hours 1.5 days 1.5 days

100(each) 10 300 0.96 -

4 hours 6 days -

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 24

Table 5: details of the mechanical equipments

S no 1

Equipment Intermediate effluent pump

Hp Make 5 KIRLOSKAR

Purpose Pumping effluent form intake well to oil separator

2 3 4 5 6 7

Return sludge pump 5 Floating aerator Mixer Surface aerator (4 no) Primary clarifier Secondary clarifier 5 3 15 2 2

CROMPTOM GREAVES/RADICON CROMPTOM GREAVES/RADICON KIRLOSKAR KIRLOSKAR CROMPTOM GREAVES/RADICON CROMPTOM GREAVES/RADICON

Attaching to holding tank Chemical treatment tank Bioreactor tank

Sewage treatment plant All the sanitary discharges are diverged to STP via drains and sewage discharges are collected into a septic tank. Septic tank overfl ow is transferred to the bio reactors where it acts as a nutrient for bio mass development. There is no direct discharge of sanitary and sewage waste water on surface water bodies of possibility ground water contamination.

Waste water characterization

To carry out a systematic performance analysis of the existing effluent treatment plant, it was decided to collect the samples from all the units of the plant. All the results are complied in enclosed table and are as follow.
Sampling date Following are the average analysis data of the samples.

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 25

Table 6: average analysis data of the samples

Parameter Outlet of equalization tank (holding tank) pH BOD COD TS TDS TSS MLSS 7.5 1660 5110 4931 4678 253 Outlet of chemical treatment tank Outlet Secondary Final of clarifier 1 tank primary clarifier 1 8.53 1660 5110 4931 4678 253 7.44 3057 7.405 1318 8.52 8.42 32.385 0 0 0 3375 3626.77 Bioreactor

56.2

Design basis and details of the exist ion ETP 1. Raw waste waster characteristic:- the average characteristics of the raw waste water has been found as below:

Flow pH BOD COD TS TDS TSS O&G

500 m3/day 6.5-10.5 800-2000 2300-5000 1200-9800 1000-9000 200-800 20-40

2. The effluent treatment plant consists of the following units

Oil and grease trap No of traps 2 nos Dimensions 5M*1.2M*1M SWD *2nos Material of RCC tank with construction polyurethane coating Retention time 1 hour on average flow Volume 6m3(each)

Holding pond

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 26

Holding ponds Material of construction Volume Dimensions Retention time

2 nos it is RCC tank provided with polyurethane coating 150 m3/300 m3 12.5 m diameter *2.5 MSWD*3Nos 22hours on average flow

These tanks are be provided with floating aerators / mixers for mixing and equalization of effluent

Chemical treatment tank Volume 12.5m3 Material of RCC tank with construction polyurethane coating Retention time 0.5 hour on average flow Dimensions 2.5M*2.5M*2.0M SWD *3nos The tank provided with slow speed mixer. These mixers are also help in effective neutralization of effluent during addition of neutralizing chemicals.

Primary clarifier

Volume Dimensions Retention time Material of construction

100 m3 7M diameter *2.6M SWD 4 hour on average flow (20 hours) RCC tank

Sludge drying beds Chemical sludge 200 kg/day Drying period 6 days Produce per day % 2.0% consistency Material of brick masonry construction construction provided with 600 mm height filter

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 27

Volume Drying bed area Dimensions

media 12.5m3 200 m2 10 M*10*2 nos

Bio reactor Total BOD load 1500 kg/day BOD load after primary treatment BOD loading (F/M) I stage 0.3 II stage 0.15 MLSS concentration 4000-4500 PPM Oxygen requirement 2.0 kg of O2 / Kg of BOD applied Volume of bio reactor I stage 1000m3 II stage 500 m3 Retention time (overall) 3.0 days (approx) Dimensions Bio reactor no I 9.25 M*18.5 M*3.0M SWD +1.0 M Bio reactor no II 18.5 M*18.5 M*3.0M SWD +1.0 M HP required for oxygenation 90 HP Material of construction these are RCC tank, provided with RCC Bridge for installation of surface aerators. Secondary clarifiers No of tanks 2 nos 3 Volume 100 m (each) Retention time 4 hours on average flow Dimensions 7M diameter *2.6 M SWD Material of construction RCC tank

Intermediate effluent sump Function to pump the 1 st stage clarified effluent to 2 nd stage aeration tank Volume 10 m3 Dimensions 2.6 M diameter *2.0 M SWD Material of construction RCC tank

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 28

Sludge drying beds % consistency 1.0% Drying period 6 days Drying bed area 300 m2 Dimensions 10 M*10*3 nos Material of construction brick masonry construction provided with 600 mm height filter media V-notch chamber This chamber is provided with a V- notch to measure the out going flow Dimensions 1.5 M*0.8 M * 0.8 M Material of construction brick masonry /RCC Lagoon The effluent water is being stored in the lagoon is given appropriate physical and chemical treatment Dimensions bottom diameter 71.5 M* 49.2 M Top diameter 85 M* 62.5 M *4.3 M Material of construction brick masonry /PCC lining

Sand filter No 1 Size 0.3 M * 1.5 M * 3 Capacity for 80 m3/day is sufficient for sand filter and activated carbon filter Activated carbon filter No 1 Size 0.3 M * 1.5 M * 3 Capacity for 80 m3/day is sufficient for sand filter and activated carbon filter Analysis and observation of the existing ETP Design basis Supplier has taken the values at hi gher side considering the changes that may occur with the time span Flow 350 m3/day pH 6.5-10.5 BOD 1500

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 29

COD TS TDS TSS O&G

5000 5000 4500 500 50

Considering is to be continuous process has been applied 1. Oil separator Design flow taken as 6.0 m3/day Retention time then 1 hour (remark) (OK) 2. Holding pond Design flow taken as Retention time then 150 m3/day 22 hours (remark) (ok)

3. Chemical treatment tank Design flow taken as 12.5 m3/day Retention time then 0.5 hours (remark) (OK) 4. Primary clarifier Design flow taken as 100 m3/day Retention time then 4 hours (remark) (OK) 5. Bio reactor BOD load 1500kg/day BOD loading (F/M) I stage 0.3 II stage 0.15 MLSS concentration 4000-4500 PPM Oxygen requirement 2.0 kg of O2 / kg of BOD applied (remark) (OK) For tank volume of 1000/500 m3 the MLSS and F/M ratio is within design parameter 6. Secondary clarifier Design flow with 100% re-circulation 100 m3/day Over flow rate 16m3/m2/day Retention time 4 hours The oil and greases content has reduced form 130 150 mg/l to 16 -20 mg/l at primary oil separators The effluent equalizes over the organic load due to proper mixing and the volatile matter is also removed by stripping of solvent traces giving substantial reduction

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 30

in COD levels reveals proper functioning of aeration grid and sprinkler nozzles in equalization tank Introduction of more effective coagulants like FeSo4 and poly electrolyte in neutralization tank The reduction in the COD concentration in the primary stage has been observed as 35- 40 % Better bacterial grow this observed and the DO levels have increased There is no accumulation of the activated biomass and the entire bio mass is available for recirculation in secondary settling tank Pressure sand filter and activated carbon filter has helped in the tertiary treatment in maintaining the outlet norms
Suggestion and recommendation on performance of existing ETP The existing ETP at EPCA, Ratlam has been over designed. The parameters as analyzed before treatment is of very high concentration but after treatment at the ETP all the parameters falls within the prescribed limits of MPPCB. For better functioning of the ETP, the following suggestions are advisable 1. Dosing at neutralization tank can be minimized, if proper dosing calcula tion can be done. 2. Oil removal system can be made more effective if proper skimming of the floating oil is made from time to time 3. Quantity of lime dosing to be properly calibrated to reduce lime sludge 4. Design MLSS to be maintained at the aeration tank 5. DO level to be monitored at the aeration tank \sludge level to be monitored at the secondary settling tank 6. Proper backwashing of the PSF and ACF to be done to obtain maximum efficiency. 7. RO treatment can be used for reduction of TDS of the final treatment effl uent for further use.

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 31

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INCINERATOR

INTRODUCTION Prediction of impacts is the process of determining the nature and extent of the environmental changes that may result from proposed activity. The predicted values for environmental variables from the objective basis for the assessment of the environmental feasibility of the proposed activity and for evaluation of the effectiveness of mitigating measures.

DESIGN BASIS AND DETAILS OF INCINERATORS

1.

Waste Data Composition Chlorides Phosphorous Carbon Hydrogen Sulphur Oxygen Nitrogen Ash Calorific value ( Kcal/kg) Solid ( % by weight) 1.6 1.7 32.1 5.06 0.23 35.88 Traces 26.73 1817 Liquid ( % by weight) 6.3 6.9 33.03 5.16 0.40 60.2 Traces 1.21 9664

2.

Area Classification Duration for operation:

Non Hazardous

20 hrs per day

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 32

3.

Utility Specification

Fuel Instrument air Process Water Alkali Solution Power Motor Instrumentation & Control

LDO 6-7 kg/cm3 9g) dry, oil and dust free 2 kg/cm2 (g) at ambient 5% NaOH

440 V, 3 phase, 50 Hz 230V, 3 phase, 50 Hz

4.

System Parameters

A. Solid waste Incinerator Type Pyrolytic with primary and secondary chambers Thermal Capacity Operating Temperature Primary Secondary Operating Pressure Auxiliary Fuel Firing Rates (Kg/Hr) Mixing Firing 750-850 oC 950-1150 o C -5 to -15 mm WG LDO 100 (Kg/Hr) solid waste 50 (Kg/Hr) liquid waste 710000 Kcal/Hr

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 33

Duration B. Quench Type MCC Flue gas inlet temp Flue gas outlet temp. Quench Field C. Absorption Tower ( Packed Coloum) Type MCC Type of Packings Scrubbing Media D. Stacks Type Diameter Height MOC E. Combustion cum Dilution Air Fan Type MOC Capacity Head Motor

10 hrs/day

Open Spray type Acid resistant refractory 500 oC 50oC Water

Vertical Cylindrical randomly packed MSRL PP Intallox sadddie 5% Alkali Solution

Self Supported 400 mm at top 30 mtrs MSRL

Centrifugal MS 6000 M3/hr 150 mm WG 7.5 HP

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 34

F. I/D Fan Type MOC Capacity Head Motor G. Fuel Oil Tank Type MOC Capacity H. Recirculation Pumps Type MOC Capacity Head Motor I. Plate Heat Exchanger Type MOC Thermal capacity Cooling Water Plate type Titanium 5,30,000 Kcal/hr Inlet temp 32 0C Outlet temp 38 0C Centrifugal UHMW 25 M3/hr 3 kg/cm2 (g) 10 HP Horizontal Cylindrical MS 1 M3 Centrifugal MS 7500 M3/hr 400 mm WG 25 HP

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 35

PERFORMANCE EVLUATION FOR INCINERATOR

1. Burner installed on the unit is of pre jet type with following specification: Capacity Fuel Comment : : (A) (B) (C) 3.00 LKcal/Hr X 2 nos. LDO Both the burners are found in working condition with satisfactory performance. Combustion Was Colourless Sensor working properly

2. Stack Temperature found to be in range of 60-80OC, which is as per recommended practice. 3. 4. 5. 6. Refractory lining checked and found to be OK Fuel filter and pressure gauge were working properly. ID fan and FD fan is working properly. Safeties & Control of the unit (A) Bypass Damper opening in case of power failure (B) Combustion parameters at the outlet of the unit were checked & found OK Client has installed and Heat recovery unit at the flue gas outlet of the incinerator, which shows the concern of the user to prevent the losses & save the environment. Performance of Incinerator is 99%.

7.

8.

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 36

SUGGESTION & RECOMMENDATION

1. 2. 3. Timely overhauling and replacement of burner is needed attention. Regular maintenance is to be scheduled for refractory lining. Confirmation required with the design parameters towards the pressure drop across the heat exchanger is in line with the safety limits of the fans. 4. Further safety devices like flame failure, auto ignition, fuel pump for low and high pressure, charging door open interlocking are recommended of better performance of the incinerator.

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 37

Environment health and Safety

EHS Management system

Environment, Health, Safety (EHS) program is managed according to the framework that sets out consistent standards of employee health and safety, environmental protection and sustainability. This framework acts as an internal regulatory system that reflects our understanding of risks to ensure our operations comply with laws and regulations. Our integrated EHS management system is further evaluated on a regular basis to identify areas for continual improvement. By thoroughly tracking our performance, we are able to spotlight our successes in eliminating or reducing our EHS impacts, quickly and responsibly handle any EHS issues, and identify key areas where we need to focus on improving our performance. During the past few years, Ipca has improved energy efficiency and reduced the emissions in various operations. Our strategy is to focus on continuous improvement by striving to learn from our experience and those of others, and to apply scientific, economic and technical analysis to adopt best practices.

Environment management system

To achieve sound environmental performa nce, organizational commitment towards a systematic approach and continual improvement of its all aspects arising out of all its activities is a pre- requisite. They have made an inventory of all activities, which are interfacing with environment and have positive of negative impact. To mitigate the adverse effect of all such activities documented procedures are implemented by trained persons. Wherever required environment management procedures are made to mollify the adverse effects of the industrial activities. Management review is done periodically of EMS and preventive measures are decided and implemented Experience of last few months after implementation of EMS cam be narrated in the following few words.

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 38

Environment policy

IPCA laboratories Ltd .Ratlam is committed to create and maintain clean, safe and pleasant working environment. They used to do continual improvement for pollution control over and above abiding all environmental legislation and regulations. They have taken initiation for energy and water conservation, waste reduction and other objectives, keeping in view the interest of employs and associates. They give averseness training to employs, contractors and the concerned vendors.
What is pollution?

The air, water, soil, plants and animals all constitute the environment. These constituents keep on interaction with each other to maintain a mutual balance, called ecological balance. Man, using nature in the process of development does cause certain changes in environment. It these changes are not fully orchestrated to preserve the harmony of nature and the ecological balance, he runs the risk not only of increasing the costs of development but also of imbalances which may be so serous as to reduce his living conditions instead of enriching them. It is this imbalance which creates pollution.
Industrialization and pollution

Industries have often been called the big polluter. The impact on human environment is not restricted to highly industrialized countries only. India also has severed pollution problems of its own. Improper location of industries, the use of polluting technologies, and inadequate waste treatment facilities are mainly responsible for deterioration of air and water quality in industrialized cities of our country . There is a growing need for industrialization and more important is to preserve and world for improvement of environment and ecology. IPCA laboratories ltd. Ratlam has given equal importance to both Following steps have been taking to preserve and enrich the environment and ecology at IPCA laboratories lid, Ratlam 1. Technology selected which is less pollution. 2. Training people and creating full awareness in this direction. 3. pollution controls considered a social need in place of legal requirement 4. Integrated facility for effluent treatment and incinerator and its monitoring 5. Extensive tress plantation.

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 39

Formulation of check list as per concerning environmental acts

Hazardous Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1989 Order Rules Rules citation
1
1.1 1.2 1.3

Checked

Responsibilities of the occupier for handling of Hazardous wastes Is Hazardous wastes generated is sent or sold to a recycler of reprocessor or re-user registered or authorized? Is hazardous wastes transported in accordance with the provisions of these rules Is facility to the treater provided as per state pollution control board? Grant of authorization for handling hazardous wastes Is it authorization from the State pollution control board? Is application in Form 1 made to state pollution control board for authorization? Is authorization in Form 2 obtained from State pollution control board? Whether authorized person who is handling Hazardous wastes maintaining record in Form 3? Is prepared record is submitted to State pollution control board as specified in Form 4, before 30th of June? Is application for renewal of an authorization in made in Form 1? Storage of hazardous waste Is record of sale, transfer, storage, recycling and reprocessing of Hazardous waste is maintained? Procedure for grant of registration Is application in Form 5 for recycling or reprocessing of hazardous waste is made? Is consent to establish granted by the State pollution control board attached? Is certificate of registration issued by the district industries center or any other government authorized agency, attached? Proof of installed capacity of plant and machinery is attached? Is certificate for compliance of effluent, emissions standards and treatment and disposal of hazardous wastes, is attached for renewal? Is records of hazardous wastes purchased and processed is maintained? Is the records is filed in annual return of its activities to state pollution control board on 30th June of every year? Do we sell hazardous wastes to the occupier having valid registration from central pollution control board for recycling or recovery? Is utilization of hazardous wastes is processes is approved by central pollution control board?

4
Sub rule 2 Sub rule 3 Sub rule4

Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No

2 2.1 2.2
2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6

5 Sub rule 1 Sub rule 3

Sub rule 4 Sub rule6 Sub rule6 Sub rule7

3 3.1 4 4.1
4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 5 6

7 Sub rule1 8 Sub rule1

Sub rule1 (a) Sub rule 1 (b) Sub rule 1 (c) Sub rule 1 (d) Sub rule 2 Sub rule 7 9 11

Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 40

7 7.1

7.2 7.3

Treatment, storage and disposal facility for hazardous wastes Is the design and setup of treatment storage and disposal facility as per technical guidelines issued by the central pollution control board? Is the storage and disposal facility is operated as per the guidelines issued by the central pollution control board? Is record for treatment, storage and disposal facility of hazardous wastes is maintained? Packaging and labeling Is packaging and labeling for safer handling, storage and transport is as per the guidelines issued by the central pollution control board? Is labeling and packaging is easily visible and could sustain physical conditions and climatic factors? Transportation of hazardous waste Is transportation of hazardous wastes as per rules of motor vehicles act, 1988? Is in formation regarding hazardous wastes and an emergency measure is provided to the transporter in Form 11? Is hazardous waste containers are marked as per Form 12? Whether the No objection certificate from State Pollution Control Board of both the states (from and to) is obtained? Manifest system (movement of document to be used within the country only) Is 6 copies of manifest in Form 13 prepared as per the rule Is copy 1 (white) is forwarded to state pollution control board? Is copy (blue) is received from operator on completion of treatment?

18 Sub rule 2

Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No

Sub rule 4 Sub rule 5

8 8.1
8.2

19 Sub rule 1
Sub rule2

Yes/ No Yes/ No

9 9.1
9.2 9.3 9.4

20 Sub rule1
Sub rule2 Sub rule2 Sub rule3

Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No

10
10.1 10.2 10.3

21
Sub rule 1 Sub rule 2 Sub rule 5

Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No

11 11.1
11.2

Records and returns 22 Is a record of operations of facility for disposal of hazardous waste is Sub rule 1 maintained in Form 3? Is annual returns is sent to state pollution con troll board in Form 4? Sub rule 2 Accident reporting and follow up Is report of accident dealing with hazardous wastes, if any, is submitted to state pollution control board in Form 14? 24 24

12 12.1

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 41

The manufacture, storage and import of Hazardous chemical rules, 1989

Order Rules Rules citation Checked

1 1.1
1.2

Approval and notification of sites Is it approved for undertaking of industrial activity?

If any changes are made in the activity, has it been reported to concerned authority?

7 Sub rule 1
Sub rule 2

Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No

2 2.1
2.2 2.3 2.4

Safety reports and safety and reports Has safety report on the industrial activity in concern of authority is submitted to concerned authority?
Has safety audit with the help of an expert is performed? Is auditors report is been forwarded with comments to concerned authority, with in 30 days after completion of audit? Is the safety audit is updated every year and same is submitted with comments to concerned authority?

10 Sub rule 3
Sub rule 4 Sub rule5 Sub rule 6

3 3.1

3.2

Updating of reports under rule 10 Whether the modification to the industrial activity is made to which safety report is applicable, if so, modification in the report is sent to concerned authority, before 90 days of modification? If industrial activities are unchanged with respect to the safety report, then, has further report is being send within 3 years? Preparation to on-site emergency plan by the occupier Is up-to date emergency plan is made to deal with major on site accidents as per schedule II?
Whether plan includes the name of the persons who are responsible for safety? Whether changes in plans are being informed to relevant provisions? Whether mock drill on the on-site emergency plan is conducted every 6 months? Is detailed report of the mock drill conducted is made available to the concerned authority?

11 Sub rule1

Sub rule 2

4 4.1
4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5

13 Sub rule1
Sub rule1 Sub rule 2 Sub rule4 Sub rule5

5
5.1

Information to be given to persons liable to be affected by a 15 major accident Whether appropriate steps are taken to inform persons who are likely Sub rule1 to be affecting by the major accident? Collection, development and dissemination of in formation Whether safety data sheet is developed as specified in schedule 9 and could be accessible upon request? 17 Sub rule 2

Yes/ No Yes/

6 6.1

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 42

6.2

6.2

Whether safety a data sheet includes accurate information related to hazardous wastes and added to material safety data sheet as specified in schedule 9? Whether every container of a hazardous chemical is labeled or marked as per the rule?

Sub rule 3

No Yes/ No Yes/ No

Sub rule 4

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 43

The Hazardous wastes (management, handling and Trans boundary movement) rules, 2008
Order Rules Rules citation Checked

1
1.1 1.2 1.3

Responsibilities of the occupier for handling of hazardous 4 wastes Whether the hazardous wastes are sent to an authorized re- processor? Sub rule 2
Whether the waste sent for reprocessing or recycle thing is being transported accordance with the provisions of the rules? Sub rule3

Whether all adequate steps are taken while handling hazardous wastes Sub rule as per the rule?

Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/

2 2.1
2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5

Grant of authorization for handling hazardous waste Do we have obtained an authorization from the state pollution control board for handling hazardous wastes?
Are the handling of hazardous wastes is done in the facilities, which are authorized by the state pollution control board?

5 Sub rule1
Sub rule 2

Whether the application in Form 1 to the state pollution control board Sub rule3 is made for the authorization? Whether the record of waste handled by each authorized personal made in Form 3? Whether the annual return is submitted to state pollution control board containing the details specified in Form 4 on or before 30th of June? For renewal of authorization whether application is made in Form 1? Whether all the possible steps take to reduce and prevent waste generation with condition specified in the authorization? Sub rule4 Sub rule4

2.6 2.7

Sub rule7 Sub rule8

3 3.1
3.2

Storage of hazardous waste Whether the record is maintained for storage of hazardous waste as per the rules?
Whether the storage time is as per rules

7 Sub rule1
Sub rule1

4 4.1
4.2 4.3 4.4

Procedure for grant registration Whether the application in Form 5 made for recycling or reprocessing the hazardous waste as per Schedule IV?
Whether the application is accompanied by the copies of documents listed in the rules for grant or renewal of registration? Whether the record of re-processed is maintain in Form 6? Whether annual return of the activities of previous year is made to

8 Sub rule1
Sub rule1 Sub rule7 Sub rule7

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 44

state pollution control boards or pollution control committees? Whether hazardous wastes are sold to recycler having a valid registration from the central pollution control board for recycling or recovery? Whether the recycling, if any, is as per guidelines issued by the central government and central pollution control board?

No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No

10

7 7.1
7.2

Treatment, storage and disposal facility for hazardous waste Whether the treatment storage and disposal facility is as per technical guidelines issued by the central pollution control board?
Whether storage and disposal facility and its closure and post closure phase are as per guidelines issued by the central pollution control board? Whether the records of hazardous wastes handled is maintained in Form 3?

18 Sub rule2
Sub rule4

7.3

Sub rule5

8 8.1
8.2

Packaging and labeling Whether the package and labeling is as per the guidelines issued by the Central pollution control board?
Is labeling and packaging is easily visible and would be able to withstand physical condition and climatic factors?

19 Sub rule1
Sub rule2

9 9.1
9.2 9.3 9.4

Transportation of hazardous waste Is transportation of wastes is as per the provisions of the rules made by the central government under the motor vehicles act, 1988?
Whether the relevant information in Form 11 is provided to the transporter? Whether the container is marked the hazardous wastes as per Form 12 Whether No Objection Certificate is obtained from the state pollution control board?

20 Sub rule1
Sub rule2 Sub rule2 Sub rule3

10
10.1 10.2 10.3

Manifest system (movement of document to be used within the country only) Is 6 copies of manifest in Form 13 prepared as per the rule
Is copy 1 (white) is forwarded to state pollution control board? Is copy (blue) is received from operator on completion of treatment?

21
Sub rule 1 Sub rule 2 Sub rule 5

Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No

11 11.1
11.2

Records and returns Is a record of operations of facility for disposal of hazardous waste is maintained in Form 3?
Is annual returns is sent to state pollution con troll board in Form 4?

22 Sub rule 1
Sub rule 2

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 45

12 12.1

Accident reporting and follow up Is report of accident dealing with hazardous wastes, is any, is submitted to state pollution control board in Form 14?

24 24

Yes/ No

The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000

Order Rules Rules citation Checked

1
1.1

Ambient air quality standards in respect of noise fro different areas/ zones Whether the ambient air quality with respect to noise is as per schedule?

3
Sub rule 1 Yes/ No

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 46

The Bio Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998

Order Rules Rules citation Checked

1 1.1

Duty of occupier Whether all steps are taken to ensure that such waste is handled without any adverse effect to human health and the environment? Treatment and disposal Whether the treatment and disposal of the waste is as per schedule I and with compliance with the standards prescribed in schedule V?
Whether a waste treatment facility is set up in accordance with the Schedule VI?

4 4

Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No

2 2.1
2.2

5 Sub rule1
Sub rule2

3 3.1
3.2 3.3 3.4

Segregation, packing, transportation and storage Whether the bio medical waster is collected separately?
Whether the bio medical waste is segregated into the containers/ bags in accordance with Schedule II? Are the container labeled according to Schedule III?

6 Sub rule1
Sub rule2 Sub rule2

Is all of the bio medical waste is treated before the period of 48 hours, Sub rule 5 or permission is taken from the authorized person, subjected it does not affect the human health and environment?

4 4.1
4.2

Authorization Is application in Form 1 for grant of authorization is made?

Whether the application is accompanied by a fee as prescribed by the government of the state?

8 Sub rule 2
Sub rule3

Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No

5 5.1

Annual report Whether the annual report is submitted to the authority in Form 2 by 31st of Jan? Maintenance of records Whether the records related to the generation, collection, reception, storage, transportations, treatment, disposal or handling is maintained? Are records are ready for inspection and verification by the authority at any time? Accident reporting Whether the report in Form 3 for accident is submitted to the concerned authority?

10 10

6 6.1

11 Sub rule 1

6.2

Sub rule2

7 7.1

12 12

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 47

The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 (Act No. 14 Of 1981)
Order Acts Acts citation Checked

1 1.1
1.2

Restrictions on use of certain industrial plants Whether the establishment of operation of an industrial plant is with the consent of the state government, in an air pollution area?
Whether the application for consent of the state board is accompanied by fees?

21 Sub act 1
Sub act 2

Yes/ No Yes/ No

The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Rules, 1982 The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) (Union Territories) Rules, 1982

Order Rules

Rules citation Checked

1
1.1 1.2

Form of application for consent and fees

Whether the application for consent is made in Form 1? Whether the prescribed application fee is paid as per the rule?

9 (chapter IV) Sub rule 1

Sub rule 1

2
2.1

Manner of taking samples

Whether the required facilities are provided for taking samples of air or emission as may required by the board or empowered officer?

12
Sub rule 1

3
3.1 3.2

Form of appeal and manner of preference

Is appeal under section 31 against an order passed by the board, if any, is filled in the Form 7? Is appeal is as per the rule?

17
Sub rule 1 Sub rule 3

Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 48

The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 Act No 6 Of 1974 The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Rules, 1975
Order Rules Rules citation Checked

1 1.1

Application for consent Is application of consent in Form 13 made to central board? Directions Whether all direction issued in writing, if any, have been followed in time span of 15 days?

32 32

Yes/ No Yes/ No

2 2.1

34 Sub rule 3

The Waste (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977 (Act No. 36 Of 1977)
Order Acts Acts citation Checked

1 1.1
1.2

Levy and collection of Cess Is levy and collection of Cess is as per Schedule II?
Is levy and collection of Cess applicable to us?

3 Sub Act2
Sub Act 2

Yes/ No Yes/ No

2 3 3.1

Whether the meters are affixed as per the act? Furnishing of returns Whether returns are being furnished?

4 5 Sub Act 1

Yes/ No Yes/ No

4 4.1

Rebate Whether we are entitle for the rebate of Cess as per Act?

7 7

The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Rules, 1978

Order Rules Rules citation Checked

1
1.1 1.2

Standards of the meters and places where they are to be affixed Are Vee notches are permitted from authority?
Is separate meter is affixed to measure the purpose as per Schedule II

3
Sub rule 2 Sub rule 3

Yes/ No Yes/ No

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 49

1.3

Are meters approved by the assessing authority and is as per the rule?

Sub rule 4

Yes/ No Yes/ No

2 2.1

Furnishing of returns Is the return is furnish in Form I on or before 5th of every month? Manner of payment of the Cess to the central government and the time within which it shall be paid Is Cess amount remitted in bank draft as per mentioned rules?

4 Sub rule 1

3
3.1

5
Sub rule 2

Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No

4 4.1
4.2 4.3

Appeal 9 Whether aggrieved by an order of assessment under section 6 or order Sub rule1 imposing penalty under section 11?
Whether the appeal in Form II made, as per the rules? Is appeal accompanied by the fee of 50 Rs? Sub rule 1 Sub rule 4

In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 50

Conclusion


In-plant training, IPCA, Ratlam

Page | 51

 

rm

u i l in u ry

 

o m ny

ll m in in i

n r in u ur

n on

n i n norm u glo l norm



y mu

volv

ing glo l

 

 

nvironm n i wor

r i ing

ygi n

yi

n r no only

 

 

o gui lin

ow o on rn or on

nvironm n w l rn ov r

n ging

r ining o

r m n l m loy

l o ug

m o

on i l ow r on

nvironm n rul ook

 

ov r

r w wor

ining ny vo

ion l r ining

i our l o

kl

m wi

in r

ion wi

 

yr l

v g

ri in orm ion

ou m nu

uring ro

 



   

 

involv

in

lu n r

mn

l n

v nri

my knowl g r g r ing nvironm n l

L rning

  

 

 



or i l n

i l knowl g

i gol n o or uni y o

lo vi w o ro

Vi i o P A l or ori

R l m

n l

n n knowl g

l x ri n in rm o

z r ou