OK, all you good Americans, what business does the U.S.

government have in supporting one side in a democratic election in another country? The answer is NONE. Democratic elections are for the participation of the people of the country whose leaders are being elected. The United States would not allow any other country, or even citizens of another country, to make contributions in its elections, not even $1. So how is it that the United States makes massive contribitions to influence the elections in other countries? Does the United States think that it is so exceptional, it alone is free to corrupt the political process in other countries? The United States has assumed this freedom by its brute, and ugly, power

and force. The United States made massive contributions (millions of dollars) in the Nicaragua elections of 1990, contributing to the defeat of Daniel Ortega. (It also conducted an extensive terrorist campaign in Nicaragua at that time, killing a reported 9 thousand people.) Now the U.S. is making massive money infusions to defeat democratically elected and very popular Hugo Chavez in Venezuela in 2012 (reported--5 to 20 million dollars.) Oh, the U.S. is such a wonderful supporter of freedom and democracy--the freedom of rich people to get grossly rich, the freedom of poor people to have to struggle to survive--and to get killed if they try to politically organize for decent pay and

working conditions. The U.S. doesnt really mean we support democracy; it means we support themocracy--the rich people are them. Do you not believe my assertions? Please, do check them out before you dismiss them. So much media is largely propaganda--full of distortions, terrible reasoning, lies--and having a point of view that is based on mythical, fabricated, selfserving drivel.