Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Concurrent Engineering
Objectives
N. C. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
With the latest development due to globalization, business unit may have the
capacity to deal with the increasing competition. This is possible only by drastic
organizational productivity improvement. One of the tools to achieve the
organizational productivity improvement is called Concurrent Engineering. If there is a
delay of three months in bringing a product to the market, it would cause an
enormous loss to the organization by way of reduced market share.
A systematic approach to the integrated, concurrent design of products and to
their related implementation, including operational aspects, whereby designers/
developers process simultaneously and since go ahead, all requirements of the product
life cycle, from concept through delivery, includingquality, cost, schedule and user
requirements.
Concurrent Engineering, also called parallel or simultaneous engineering, is a
new philosophy, viewed by most corporations as a means to competitive, world class
manufacturing. It strives to do the right job the first time. It results from the
synthesizing the two fundamental observations which are given below:
1. The changes become more costly , and these changes are incorporated in
the project later.
2. Performing different steps of a project in parallel, would complete the
project more quickly than executing the steps sequentially, one after the
another.
Therefore concurrent engineering can be defined as:
N. C. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
3
TRADITIONAL ENGINEERING VS. CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
Example of design changes as a function of time for an American and Japanese automobile.
Source: Engineering Modeling and Design, Chapman, Bahill & Wymore (see reference 1.A).
This is the relatively recent term which is applied to the engineering design
philosophy of cross-functional cooperation in order to create products which are
better, cheaper, and more quickly brought to market. This new trend reunites
technical and non technical disciplines such as engineering, marketing and
accounting. Always focusing on satisfying the customer, these representatives work
together in defining the product to be manufactured.
Various organizations follow a plethora of product and process development
cycle. Characterizing the phases of the product development cycle helps to put in
perspective some of the organizational issues involved. The phases are:
N. C. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
4
1. Mission statement: it is also known as design brief or charter. I should
contain a general description of the product, target market segments,
and the customer categories and specify business goals so as to
market share, profit margins and the product’s projected life cycle.
2. Market and concept definition: Consumers demands are identified
by various market survey techniques; benchmark studies are
conducted, the functional technical design requirement are identified,
design and manufacturing feasibility is determined and cost estimates
are projected.
3. System level concept generation and selection: various design
concepts that satisfy the functional design requirements are generated.
Design satisfying these requirements in terms of quality, cost and
delivery is selected and the product architecture is determined.
Mission statement
Production
Ramp-up
Development time
N. C. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
5
5. Prototype testing and refinement: prototypes of the selected design
are tested for functionality, manufacturing and assembly feasibility,
reliability & cost.
6. Process planning , Production planning and Control: Actual
production processes of the final deign are planned. Production
control and quality assurance plans are drawn up.
7. Production Ramp-up and Refinement: in this final phase a pilot
production is run is carried out with the purpose of familiarizing and the
training the workforce, discovering the correcting production problems
before full production level s are reached. Subsequently, the product is
launched.
N. C. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
6
parts consolidation and the material/manufacturing costs. The benefits of
design for manufacturing for design are listed below:
4) Design for Environment (DFE) - The designer must develop the habit of
constantly evaluating the design for safety, considering not only the
design itself but the personnel involved in fabricating the product, using the
procedure, and in maintaining and repairing the product or system as well
as the end user or purchaser. This evaluates:
N. C. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
• Key Elements
The Concurrent Engineering approach is based on the following key elements:
• The system engineering process
• A multidisciplinary, product oriented team
• An information distribution and control environment
• Supporting tools and facilities
The approach may be evolved into an Integrated Product Development (IPD) based
on cross functional Product/Process Teams for all products and services, plus a
System Engineering and Integration (SE&I) Team to cover the system issues, balance
requirements between Product Teams and integrate the Teams.
A collaborative approach is implemented between the SE&I Team, PDTs and the
Supporting functions (Configuration Control, Data Management System, Cost
Engineering and Cost and Schedule Control).
Since engineering represents the balance point between the customer needs and
the program costs, the PDTs shall be given the means to make cost-effective
decisions.
N. C. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
8
Need for Integrating Design with other Functions
Product designs have existed for as long as mass production has existed.
Early on, there arose a division of intellectual labor whereby the designer was
responsible for producing the design and the manufacturer was responsible for
making the actual product. A design which is thrown over the proverbial wall is
generally difficult and costly to produce, and does not necessarily conform to the
desires of the market. This functional separation and its resulting adverse effect on
the resulting product design may be repeated with other functions (such as marketing,
maintenance, or others). The remedy for this situation is to have the designer become
more aware of other's concerns within and the need to reduce development lead
time. All of these justifications for pushing concurrent engineering ideas have deep
historical antecedents. These justifications are discussed below.
6) Increased Competition
1) One justification given for the need for increased cooperation in the product
development process is an increased level of competition. There have been
claims that the level of competition has increase 'recently' at times which we
no longer consider recent.
2) For example in the claim is made that the level of competition has increased
since the beginning of the nineteenth century, and modern firms can not afford
to ignore design-manufacturing interaction issues. Similarly, in the claim is
made that the high level of competition in the 1950's requires that design and
manufacturing personnel cooperate on new product development. Economic
competition is now, and has always been, fierce. This is not a new effect.
N. C. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
9
available to the product designer. This knowledge is often resident in the
production engineer.
1) The situation where new production processes are used will often be an
important area for ensuring that design engineers work closely with
production engineers. Among new manufacturing processes, the
development of automatic assembly techniques has been frequently cited
as requiring a higher level of integration between design and
manufacturing
8) Lead Time
1) One of the prime motivations for a concurrent engineering approach
to product development is a desire to shorten the total time that it
takes to bring a product to the marketplace. The notion that the
length of the development cycle is an important competitive
advantage and that addressing all aspects of the design problem
simultaneously might lead to a shortened development cycle is a
long-standing precept. In summary, the claimed reasons for the need
of integration of economic competition, new production processes,
and a shortening lead time are not new.
N. C. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
ENTREPRENEURSHIP