Lets consider this statement.

"This statement is False" The statement cant be true because it is self-referentially stating that its false which causes contradiction. It also cant be false because that would also be self contradictory. Hence this simple statement has become a Paradox. It cant be both true and false. Lets move on to the solution. My friend says that this happen because of the inadequacy of our language when dealing with transcendental concept. There are no frames of references of which we can take when discussing about concepts. Can u define what is true and what is false? I sure do think that I cant. He also further states that we can create a new word for almost every new concept that need explanations although we as a human being cant even comprehend the true nature of the concept. I on the other hand, are quite sceptical about the fact that language is so limited and that there is no real frame of reference that we should anchored our thought in a discussion. But I do agree that in some circumstances, what he says hold as truth. In my opinion, we should see language as only a symbolic manifestation of the hidden nature of logic and concept (relationship between one facts to the others).Just like mathematics, language can also be reduce to its basics form.

Lets just say for an example 1+1=2(1)....It tells that when u add a concept of singular with a another singular it will give double singularity.Which symbolically we present as 2.How do we get this?Well EXPERIENCE ofcourse.This number doesnt exist in real physical sense but its useful to show the relationship between idea.So lets work backward with the statement "This statement is false".This statement is subject,IS is the copula,and false is object.We sure know from experience what true and false is. right?Just like in 1+1=2