HOT MIX DESIGN BY MARHSALL METHOD

MENU
1. DATA
2. TEST REPORT
3. FIGURE
4. AGGREGATE
5. MARSHALL
DESIGN CRITERIA

L METHOD

Created by: kamardin@kuittho.edu.my

Please insert the Data

Date of sampling 2/8/2003
Date of testing 2/8/2003

Gsb

Pen
Gmm

2.454

Test by

Deen

Gb

1.03

Providing Ring Factor

2.758

Max. Temp
Testing Temp.

135
60

o
o

2.62

C
C
Go to Result

Spec. No.

Asphalt
Content
%

Weight of Specimen
In Air
In Air
In Water
(SSD)
(SSD) (Dry) gm
gm
gm
1169.0
1167.8
650.7
1164.2
1164.9
647.0
1167.0
1165.1
651.0

Stability
Meas.
Correct
lb
lb

5.0

2400
2630
2560

2400
2630
2560

11
11
12

5.5

1167.5
1180.6
1171.0

1167.5
1180.6
1171.0

652.4
661.4
650.9

2520
2690
2650

2520
2690
2650

11
12
13

6.0

1170.4
1181.1
1187.3

1171.0
1181.9
1189.0

656.7
664.7
670.9

2620
2710
2980

2620
2710
2980

13
13
12

6.5

1174.2
1185.3
1182.3

1174.7
1186.0
1182.9

661.6
667.7
667.7

2800
2730
2900

2800
2730
2900

12
13
14

7.0

1177.5
1183.4
1192.8

1177.9
1183.6
1193.3

663.0
665.4
675.7

2820
2730
2790

2820
2730
2790

14
14
15

7.5

1181.9
1173.0
1182.2

1182.3
1173.5
1182.7

663.3
660.2
666.1

2690
2340
2590

2690
2340
2590

16
16
14

2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3

Flow
inch

Go to Result

40/50
60/70
80/100
120/150
200/300
3
3
Go to Result

Go to Result

6
2
6
4
5

MARSHALL TEST RESULTS

Date of sampling 2/8/2003

Pen

Date of testing 2/8/2003

Gmm

2.454

Gb

1.03

Test by
Providing Ring Factor

Deen
2.758

Back to MENU

Max. Temp

135

Test Temp.

60

o
o

Gsb =

2.62

Gse =

2.647

ee
80/100
FALSE
FALSE

C
C

Back to DATA
Spec.
No.

Asphalt
Content
%

b
5.0

Weight of Specimen

Bulk
Vol
In Water
cc
(SSD)
kkkkk
gm
kkk
e
f

Density (gm/cc)

Voids %

In Air
(Dry)
gm

1169.0

1167.8

650.7

517.1

2.253

2400

2400

11

1164.2

1164.9

647.0

517.9

2.252

2630

2630

11

1167.0

1165.1

651.0

514.1

2.258

2560

2560

12

AVE :

2.254

2530

11

5.5

2.454

i ccc

8.13

VMA

VFA

18.25

Meas.
lb

55.46

Correct
lb

Flow
inch

In Air
(SSD)
gm

Bulk
kkkkk
kkkkk

Max
AV/ VTM
(Theory)

Stability

1167.5

1167.5

652.4

515.1

2.267

2520

2520

11

1180.6

1180.6

661.4

519.2

2.274

2690

2690

12

1171.0

1171.0

650.9

6.0

520.1

2.251

AVE :

2.264

2650
2.436

7.07

18.34

61.44

2650

13

2620.0

12

1170.4

1171.0

656.7

514.3

2.280

2620

2620

13

1181.1

1181.9

664.7

517.2

2.289

2710

2710

13

1187.3

1189.0

670.9

518.1

2.302

2980

2980

12

AVE :

2.290

2770.0

13

6.5

2.419

5.31

17.83

70.19

1174.2

1174.7

661.6

513.1

2.292

2800

2800

12

1185.3

1186.0

667.7

518.3

2.291

2730

2730

13

1182.3

1182.9

667.7

515.2

2.299

2900

2900

14

AVE :

2.294

2810.0

13

7.0

2.252

5.16

18.14

71.53

1177.5

1177.9

663.0

514.9

2.289

2820

2820

14

1183.4

1183.6

665.4

518.2

2.285

2730

2730

14

1192.8

1193.3

675.7

517.6

2.308

2790

2790

15

AVE :

2.294

2780.0

14

7.5

2.385

3.80

18.57

79.55

1181.9

1182.3

663.3

519.0

2.280

2690

2690

16

1173.0

1173.5

660.2

513.3

2.288

2340

2340

16

1182.2

1182.7

666.1

516.6

2.292

2590

2590

14

2.368

7.5

AVE :

2.287

2.368

Summary of Result

19.27

82.19

2540.0

(Go to Figure )

AV

VMA

VFA

lb

in

mm

140.4

11282

2530

8.13

18.25

55.46

1.1

2.88

2.264

141.0

11683

2620

7.07

18.34

61.44

1.2

3.05

2.290

142.7

12352

2770

5.31

17.83

70.19

1.3

3.22

6.5

2.294

142.9

12530

2810

5.16

18.14

71.53

1.3

3.30

7.0

2.294

142.9

12396

2780

3.80

18.57

79.55

1.4

3.64

7.5

2.287

142.4

11326

2540

3.43

19.27

82.19

1.5

3.89

AC
%

Bulk Density
g/cm3
lb/ft3

5.0

2.254

5.5
6.0

Stability

3.43

f = c-e , Bulk volume in gm

g = d/(c-e) , Bulk Density in g/cm3
h = 1/(1-b/Gse + b/Gb), Theorical maximum density (Gmm)
i = (1-g/h)x 100 , Void in total mix (AV)
j = 100(1-(g(1-b))/Gsb), Void in mineral aggregate (VMA)
k =( j - i/ j)100 , Void filled asphalt (VFA)

Flow

15

2850

Stability (lb)

Bulk Density (lb/ft3)

Bulk Density Vs AC
143.5
143.0

2800

2750

142.5
142.0

2700

141.5

2650

141.0

2600

140.5

2550

140.0
4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

2500

% AC

Flow Vs AC
Air Void

Flow (in.)

Back to MENU

1.6

1.5

9.00
8.00
7.00

1.4

6.00

1.3

5.00
4.00

1.2

3.00
1.1

2.00

% AC

1.0
4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

1.00

% VMA

VMA Vs AC
19.40
19.20
19.00

% VFA

4.0

90.00

19.00
18.80
80.00

18.60
18.40
18.20

70.00

18.00
17.80
60.00

17.60
4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

% AC

4.0

Marshall Stability Vs AC
2850
2800

2750
2700
2650
2600
2550
2500
4.0

6.0

8.0

% AC

Back to Test Report

Air Void Vs AC

% AC
4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

VFA Vs AC

% AC
Bulk Density
Stability

6.7
6.6

Air Void
Void Filled
Average

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

% AC

7.0
7.2
6.9

AGGREGATE GRADATION BY SIZE SPECIFICATION

SIEVE ANALYSIS SIZE :

SINGLE TYPE
BLENDING TYPE

Back to MENU

Back to MENU

Single Type
BS Sieve
(mm)
28.0
20.0
14.0
10.0
5.0
2.36
1.18
0.600
0.300
0.150
0.075
pan

Back to Aggregate

Weight
Retained
0
105.9
83.8
157.3
80
20
150
210.3
132.3
114.7
25.4
60.3

%
Retained
0.00
9.29
7.35
13.80
7.02
1.75
13.16
18.45
11.61
10.06
2.23
5.29

%
Passing
100.00
90.71
83.36
69.56
62.54
60.79
47.63
29.18
17.58
7.52
5.29
0.00

%
Job Standard Tolerence
100
100
100
80
100
72
93
58
82
50
75
36
58
30
52
18
38
11
25
5
14
3
8
4.22
0
4.82

1140

SIEVE ANALYSIS TEST

110.00
100.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.0

0.1

Seive Size

1.0

10.0

0.00
100.0

Percentage Passing (%)

90.00

Blending Aggregates
BS Sieve
(mm)
12.5
9.5
4.75
2.36
1.18
0.600
0.300
0.150
0.075

Type 1

Type 2

Type 3

Type 4

100
89
3
1
1
1
1
1
0.1

100.00
100.00
58.00
10.00
8.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.20

100.00
100.00
99.00
81.00
71.00
46.00
26.00
15.00
10.00

100
100
100.00
99.00
94.00
86.00
68.00
18.00
2.50

Percentage Trial :

Type 1
Type 2
Type 3
Type 4

25
15
35
25

%
Job Standard Tolerence
100
100
95
100
47
77
52
70
46
63
37
57
24
39
8
25
2
8

%
%
%
%

Blending Result
BS Sieve
(mm)
12.5
9.5
4.75
2.36
1.18
0.600
0.300
0.150
0.075

Back to Aggregate

Type 1

Type 2

Type 3

Type 4

25.00
22.25
0.75
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.025

15.00
15.00
8.70
1.50
1.20
0.75
0.60
0.45
0.33

35.00
35.00
34.65
28.35
24.85
16.10
9.10
5.25
3.50

25
25
25
24.75
23.5
21.5
17
4.5
0.625

Combined Mid. Spec

100.00
97.25
69.10
54.85
49.80
38.60
26.95
10.45
4.48

100.00
97.50
62.00
61.00
54.50
47.00
31.50
16.50
5.00

0.0

0.1

Sieve Size

1.0

10.0

110.00
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
100.0

Percentage Passing (%)

SIEVE ANALYSIS RESULT

Sample
Lower Limit
Upper Limit

Back to MENU

Lower Limit
Upper Limit

MARSHALL MIXTURE DESIGN CRITERIA

Back to MENU
Marshall
Method Mix
Criteria

Traffic
Medium (104 < ESAL < 104)

Light (ESAL < 104)

Minimum

Maximum

Compaction No.
of blow/side

Minimum

Maximum

35

750 (3333)

Flow 0.01
inches
(0.025mm)

8
203.2

18
457.2

Air Voids %

1800 (8000)

203.2

16
406.4

8
203.2

14
355.6

By Graphically

JKR : MARSHALL DESIGN CRITERIA

LAYER
Binder Course
Maximum

Wearing Course
Minimum

Maximum

Compaction No.
of blow/side

50

75

Stability, lb(N)

500

500

Flow (0.01cm)

20

40

20

40

Air Voids %

Voids in mineral
Aggregate

Back to MENU

75

75

Maximum

75

1200 (5333)

Voids in mineral
Aggregate

Minimum

Minimum

50

Stability, lb(N)

Marshall
Method Mix
Criteria

Light (ESAL > 104)