Kinematics discussion solutions Linear motion |. No. Since velodty is constant, average velocity is equal to the instantaneous velod Note: Imagine a v-t graph. average velocity over time interval At = vxat =v = mstantanens v At velocity 2@) Yes. Example : when a ball is Hirown upwards at its moximnum height, velocity is zero but acelerakon is 9 C4.81mS*) downwards (bo) Yes. Example: an object undegoing uniform circular motion will have wonstant speed but rts velouty is varying due 4o the continuous change in the direction of motion (c) No. Veloity is the vector counterpart of the scalar, speed. velocity has both magnitude (which is equakto.the speed) as well as direction. If either of the magnihde ov direction changes, velocity will change. Therehore varying speed will result in varying velocity uo 3 . upivards . downwards motion : : motion cia 8 upwards downwards we acceleration — = WeR 7 Consider tne magnitude of acceleration ale we ' WR 5 Wek | Qupmacas | wae Sine WHE > wet | douwarde| Ww and the distance $ covered is the same, m upwards motion takes a shorter time.Note: 4) divection of acceleration does nok matter, If you cavmot see why rotate the diagram ‘shown 10° andl look at it this way : aw Figetwarde motion uso ° . leftwiards mokon <= lefewards erotion Ss? The deceleration rate (whichis 4) in the vightwards motion Cwhich is WEP) to rest is larger than the acceleration rate in the leFtwards motion. I+ does not matter what fram rest speed the ball ends up with at & (note tat Vdv—? because the distance 3 coverecl in both directions is the same, heme time. taten rightwards is shorter than that Jeftwards. Reaction time 2 0-55 max deceleration of car = Sms™* * We necd to find distance s For distance s,, ny acceleration . ue $= For distance ss, acteleration > -5 ms Sime we knew VY and U too, use v* sur das, 2D 0 = (0% #2(-5)S. > 3,5 loom Hence stopping olism s = S +105 1S m \f ue 20ms", ut: 200-5 Hence $ *5,+52 =lom = lorHo. 750m s,0 view. Q-208 Ba” 3¢-5) © 40mAvthough the initial speed u foy the second case is twice that for she firstcase, the stopping distance is not twice the first stopping distance because. when we take deceleration into account Cacceleration is not een), the distance is not Proporkonal to the mikal speect. When we catculated $3, v* = u*t das 2 Oz uUPtaas (the car comes to vest hence v=Oms", > -2as Sinz the decelevahion of the car is the same in both cases , it is clear that $ is not proportional to wu 5) ces (a) veusat — (Vertical motion) ty to 30225 4-4 Yo >t: on Sdrone Vg Awe asi 2 255s +2-65 (asf) V7) : (b) ¢ sub + Lat? (vertical motion) S (a6) + hC-4. by = Bem y ~ TTT TT (ce) gsub+dat? — (verkcal motion) > 255 3e +448 2 Yl yr ~ ast + 2570 > £2 25% /25*-4 (1H) 0s) 48 2 3-738 or 13ts Hene,|t, = 1-348 27 3.738 « (refer +0 diagram) tH wilh take the stone 1-378 to first teach a weight of 25m > (a) yrs urs aas (vertical motion) > v*s 35*+2(-4.41) (-20) av 3)-E mg" (upwards dakente be positive) 4 Velocié of the stone as it hits the water surface is 31-8ms downwards.