Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
REPORTER'S DAILY TRANSCRIPT OF PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2011
Fr
ie
nd s
of T
) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) ) ) No. SACV 11-0485-AG(AJWx) vs. ) ) ) ) ORLY TAITZ, ET AL, ) ) ) ) Defendant(s). ) ) ___________________________________)
DENISE PADDOCK CSR 10199, CMRS, RMR, CRR transcripts@ocrecord.com U.S. DISTRICT COURT REPORTER
he F
og bo w
.c
om
CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT
---
A P P E A R A N C E S
091211 DCCD GUILFORD 10D TAITZ SACV 11-0485-AG(AJWx)
Fr
ie
nd s
of T
he F
og bo w
Daryl M Crone Crone Hawxhurst LLP 10880 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1150 Los Angeles, CA 90024 310-893-5150 Fax: 310-893-5195 Email: daryl@cronehawxhurst.com
.c
Philip J Berg Law Offices of Philip J Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 610-825-3134 Fax: 610-834-7659 Email: philjberg@gmail.com PRO HAC VICE
om
1 1 2 3 4
11:02
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA; MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 THE CLERK: Item 13, SACV 11-0485-AG(AJWx):
5 6 7 8 9
Philip Berg for the plaintiff. MR. CRONE: Good morning, Your Honor.
Daryl Crone on behalf of defendant Oracle Corporation. THE COURT: All right.
11:02
10 11 12 13 14 tentative?
THE COURT:
11:02
15 16 17 18 19
THE COURT:
21 22 23 24
11:03
Fr
11:02
20
findings and ruling. THE COURT: MR. BERG: All right. What clarifications?
ie
nd s
MR. BERG:
Paragraph 3, the court states Defendant Orly Taitz who had a long and convoluted history with plaintiffs. Your Honor, to
25
set the record straight, Plaintiff Lisa Ostella did work with
of T
he F
MR. BERG:
og bo w
.c
om
2 1 2 3 4
11:03
Orly Taitz for a few short months. However, Plaintiff Lisa Liberi and myself never worked together with Orly or had any dealings with Defendant Orly Taitz. As a matter of fact, Ms. Liberi met Orly Taitz only one time in federal court in Philadelphia, December the 20th of 2010.
5 6 7 8 9
Orly Taitz made the threat to get rid of me and to do so she was going to destroy my very able paralegal Lisa Liberi and get rid of her.
11:03
10 11 12 13 14
Ms. Liberi emotional damage and stress. THE COURT: Next. Understood.
11:03
15 16 17 18 19
MR. BERG:
21 22 23 24
11:04
Fr
11:04
20
Professional Code Section 17200, et cetera. This is not accurate. Plaintiffs addressed -THE COURT: MR. BERG: THE COURT: All right. You're looking at --
ie
nd s
25
of T
he F
og bo w
.c
om
3 1 2 3 4
11:04
Page 10, Your Honor. And Section 10 as well? Let me take a look.
(Pause in the proceedings.) MR. BERG: THE COURT: Yes, Your Honor. All right. And so you're -- go ahead
5 6 7 8 9
Plaintiffs address that cause of action 18 in our opposition to Oracle's motion to dismiss, at
11:04
10 11 12 13 14
11:05
15 16 17 18 19
21 22 23 24
11:06
Fr
11:06
20
This is incorrect, Your Honor. Orly Taitz had her followers, readers and
supporters, threatening, harassing and filing false reports against plaintiffs. THE COURT: Hold on.
25
ie
nd s
of T
he F
THE COURT:
Just a moment.
og bo w
Go ahead.
.c
om
4 1 2 3 4
11:06
deny that you claim that Taitz gave this information to his wife? Do you deny that? MR. BERG: THE COURT: No, no. Okay.
5 6 7 8 9
her to carry out threats against plaintiffs? MR. BERG: THE COURT: No, there's some --
11:06
10 11 12 13 14
thereby causing Defendants severe emotional distress. should be plaintiffs. THE COURT: moment.
he F
11:06
15 16 17 18 19
of T
Hold on.
nd s
It should be plaintiffs' severe emotional distress? MR. BERG: Yes, Your Honor. Okay. I think there's another one.
21 22 23 24
11:06
Fr
11:06
20
ie
(Pause in the proceedings.) MR. BERG: And the earlier where you say (reading)
encouraging defendants -THE COURT: MR. BERG: Wait, what page? Same page, same paragraph,
25
og bo w
Just a moment.
.c
Just a
om
5 1 2 3 4
11:07
a little earlier. THE COURT: MR. BERG: Okay. (Reading) Plaintiffs claim Defendant --
to his wife -- encouraging Defendants' neighbors to threaten Plaintiffs. Actually, Orly Taitz had her followers, readers
5 6 7 8 9
and supporters threatening, harassing, filing false reports against plaintiffs. people. THE COURT: I'm not understanding.
11:07
10 11 12 13 14
I don't understand what you just said. MR. BERG: THE COURT: think is wrong. MR. BERG: Okay.
11:07
15 16 17 18 19
encouraging Taitz -- Taitz encouraged Defendants' neighbors to threaten Plaintiffs, and Orly Taitz instead of Defendants'
nd s
neighbors, she encouraged followers, readers and supporters. THE COURT: All right. So you're saying that
21 22 23 24
11:07
Fr
11:07
20
encouraged her followers, readers and supporters. THE COURT: All right. Have you reread the First
25
ie
of T
he F
og bo w
.c
om
6 1 2 3 4
11:08
it's not going to talk about neighbors? I'm going to look at it and if it talks about neighbors I'm going to be a little upset that we went through this trouble. By the way, notice I just said Paragraphs 408 through 411. Emphasize.
5 6 7 8 9
And you're telling me if I read those paragraphs it's not going to talk about Defendants' neighbors threatening Plaintiff?
11:08
10 11 12 13 14
11:08
15 16 17 18 19
nd s
21 22 23 24
11:09
Fr
11:08
20
ie
(Pause in the proceedings.) MR. BERG: As a matter of fact that's where I was
going to direct you to go to, from 408, to 411. In part, in 408 it actually states (reading) Orly Taitz then began inciting violence against plaintiffs Liberi and Ostella -THE COURT: Hold on just a moment.
25
of T
he F
og bo w
.c
om
7 1 2 3 4
11:09
Ms. Taitz, I'm sure you disagree with everything that Mr. Berg says and you don't need to be shaking your head while he's talking. MR. BERG: THE COURT: my job here. Go ahead. MR. BERG: Yes, Your Honor. Thank you, Your Honor. You don't need to thank me. I'm doing
5 6 7 8 9
Just repeating what I said, Orly Taitz in Paragraph 408, Orly Taitz then began inciting violence against plaintiffs Liberi and Ostella calling for people who
11:09
10 11 12 13 14
But you are correct, Your Honor, these are Paragraphs 408 to 411.
11:09
15 16 17 18 19
With the above clarification, Your Honor, and corrections, Plaintiffs submit to this court's tentative.
nd s
of T
All right.
21 22 23 24
11:10
Fr
11:09
20
that counsel mentions affect the tentative ruling. The one thing I would like to address is counsel's
statement regarding Section 10 of the court's tentative order, which is on Page 10. The issue was not that Plaintiffs failed to respond to the arguments with respect to the unfair competition claim
25
ie
he F
og bo w
.c
om
8 1 2 3 4
11:10
at all, but the issue was instead whether or not Plaintiffs have identified anything that was supposedly fraudulent or unfair about Oracle's claimed conduct, whether or not they have standing and whether or not there is a -- a remedy that they can claim against Oracle. The only other question I have for the court is
5 6 7 8 9
whether or not the court intends to enter a separate judgment in favor of Oracle. And the reason why I ask that, I
11:10
10 11 12 13 14
my client, although I have not -- although I have not discussed the issue with my client yet, my client may wish to seek its costs and attorneys' fees in connection with this matter.
11:11
15 16 17 18 19
nd s
Thank you.
THE COURT:
of T
All right.
21 22 23 24
11:11
Fr
11:11
20
ie
judgment, you're right, the tentative does not address the It's something that I wanted to discuss
If you were here just one matter ago, there was an issue of all defendants submitting one judgment or multiple judgments. The issue of the one-judgment rule is an
25
he F
og bo w
.c
om
9 1 2 3 4
11:11
California there is something called the one-judgment rule. It comes rather ambiguously from a CCP section that cites variations when there needs to be more than one judgment and by implication thereby creating a one-judgment rule.
5 6 7 8 9
The one-judgment rule in federal court is even less clear, but I will take into account your statement that there should be a judgment. Go ahead. MR. CRONE:
11:11
10 11 12 13 14
Rule 54(d) -- and I may have that wrong -- but it states that the court is entitled to enter a separate judgment if there is either good cause or the circumstances warrant it. THE COURT: All right. I'll keep that in mind.
11:12
15 16 17 18 19
nd s
MR. CRONE:
THE COURT:
21 22 23 24
11:12
Fr
11:12
20
you -- and this is directed both to you, Mr. Berg, and to the other parties -- are the parties aware of rules governing publicity and statements publically and to the press on pending cases? Are you aware of those rules? There are ethical rules about how much -- and this
25
ie
Mr. Berg and to the other parties in this case, I'll just ask
of T
Thank you, Your Honor. Now, one other thing, I'd say to
he F
og bo w
.c
om
10 1 2 3 4
11:12
is directed both at you, Mr. Berg, and at the opposition, who I think at least some of which is in the courtroom, are you aware of the ethical rules -MR. BERG: THE COURT: comment on a case? You're aware of that? MR. BERG: Yes. -- on when a party may publically
5 6 7 8 9
made any comments at all on this case. THE COURT: All right.
11:12
10 11 12 13 14 rules.
I'm well aware of the First Amendment considerations. In fact, I've been -- I was an attorney on some
11:13
15 16 17 18 19
cases with a lot of public exposure and I'm well aware of those rules.
21 22 23 24
11:13
Fr
11:13
20
the public.
aware of the ethical rules constraining people's comments about pending litigation. And with that I am going to take the tentative under submission briefly to review the points that
25
ie
nd s
of T
he F
og bo w
.c
om
11 1 2 3 4
11:13
Mr. Berg has made. MR. BERG: THE COURT: MR. BERG: Your Honor, one last thing? Yes. Your Honor, does the court -- I've just
5 6 7 8 9
broke my glasses -- does the court allow telephonic appearances to certain motion hearings, especially if we're in agreement -THE COURT: Hold on. Hold on.
Hold on.
You've sat here this morning. MR. BERG: THE COURT: MR. BERG: THE COURT: Yes.
11:14
10 11 12 13 14
11:14
15 16 17 18 19
THE COURT:
nd s
MR. BERG:
21 22 23 24
11:14
Fr
11:14
20
ie
Thank you, Your Honor. But I'm seeing the various doctors. Thank you very much. THE COURT: All right. Telephonic appearances are
permissible, particularly from folks on the east coast, particularly folks on the east coast facing health problems.
25
of T
Yes, Your Honor. And by the way, how's your health? I'm still having problems.
he F
Yes.
og bo w
.c
om
12 1 2 3 4
11:14
You're -- the -- the efficacy of your advocacy might be diminished if the connection isn't good. It would be good to assure a good connection and speak directly into the phone, but in the future if you wish to appear telephonically I will grant you the same rights I grant everyone in this court. MR. BERG:
5 6 7 8 9
get in touch with your staff to -THE COURT: THE CLERK: MR. BERG: THE CLERK: Ms. Bredahl?
11:14
10 11 12 13 14
and we'll call you from the courtroom. MR. BERG: THE COURT: Thank you.
11:15
15 16 17 18 19
21 22 23 24
11:15
Fr
11:15
20
25
ie
to resolve the issue without your presence. But if you try and get ahold of us we're likely to
nd s
of T
he F
og bo w
.c
om
13 1 2 3 4
11:15
THE COURT:
Yes, sir.
Anything further? MR. CRONE: Thank you. THE COURT: MR. BERG: Thank you, Counsel. Thank you, Your Honor. No.
5 6 7 8 9
May I be excused? THE COURT: MS. TAITZ: What's that? Orly Taitz.
11:15
10 11 12 13 14
MS. TAITZ:
since the case is on the docket, I have just one small procedural issue.
11:15
15 16 17 18 19
21 22 23 24
11:16
Fr
11:16
20
ie
corrected an error.
nd s
dental office.
They made an error in two entries -THE COURT: Is this a matter -- does this have to
do with Oracle's motion? MS. TAITZ: THE COURT: No. Then it's not before me.
25
of T
he F
og bo w
.c
om
14 1 2 3 4
11:16
And by the way, I think you filed some papers with some inaccuracy. On the issue of who are the parties in front of the Ninth Circuit, you need to look at your own papers and your own papers -MS. TAITZ: THE COURT: No.
5 6 7 8 9
And if you have any matters on that you'll have to file another motion or file another letter, but I urge you to look at your own papers before you accuse this court of
11:16
10 11 12 13 14
he F
11:16
15 16 17 18 19
by Mr. Cook on behalf of Orly Taitz. THE COURT: I consider papers filed by Mr. Cook on
nd s
behalf of Orly Taitz to be your papers, ma'am. MS. TAITZ: I can check with him, but at any rate
21 22 23 24
11:17
Fr
11:16
20
court to file 12(b)(6) on behalf of my dental office, Orly Taitz, Incorporated. And since this matter was -THE COURT: I'll have to look at that, because
frankly you have confused the record, and in confusing the record you've accused this court of making errors when it has
25
ie
of T
og bo w
.c
It was filed
om
15 1 2 3 4
11:17
only been following papers you have filed. So I don't appreciate getting letters where you're accusing this court of improperly denying you relief when it is your own papers which has set forth who are the parties on appeal. So be very careful about accusing this court of
5 6 7 8 9
error when it's been the error maybe not of you but of your attorney which I consider to be your error. Understand? MS. TAITZ: Your Honor.
11:17
10 11 12 13 14
All right.
11:17
15 16 17 18 19
something for further clarification we will deal with it. MS. TAITZ: It it's a mistake, I apologize. I'm
21 22 23 24
11:18
Fr
11:17
20
other parties already got such leave of court, it would serve judicial economy to file on behalf of both of these entities and have one motion hearing. It will be easier for Mr. Berg as well. THE COURT: All right. If you have filed papers
25
ie
nd s
of T
he F
og bo w
.c
om
16 1 2 3 4
11:18
jurisdiction to consider anything from that party. Not because I'm picking on you, Ms. Taitz, it's because your own papers remove me of jurisdiction. So if you have those issues, present them in papers and we'll look at them. I'd be particularly interested if you can cite a Ninth Circuit ruling that has returned jurisdiction to me. I'll have to look at that. File the papers. MS. TAITZ: THE COURT: MR. BERG: THE COURT: Okay. Okay.
5 6 7 8 9
11:18
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
All right.
(End of proceedings.)
of T
Fr
fee reduction and/or deposit, are in conformance with the regulations of the judicial conference of the United States.
/S/ Denise Paddock DENISE PADDOCK, CMRS, RMR, CRR, CSR 10199
ie
proceedings in the above matter. Fees charged for this transcript, less any circuit
nd s
he F
*** Certificate
Denise Paddock
Digitally signed by Denise Paddock DN: cn=Denise Paddock, o=Official Court Record, LLC, ou=RMR, RSA, CMRS, CRR, CSR 10199, email=transcripts@ocrecord.com, c=US Date: 2011.10.25 15:50:57 -07'00'
og bo w
10/25/2011 DATE
.c
om