Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

Case dismissed--Buckley did not appear for his own deposition a SECOND time after Court warning that

if he did not appear the case could be dismissed. There was NO default judgment. Buckley vacation pay claim NOT a part of case dismissal. Buckley's accusations, conduct, and history included--PLEASE READ ADDED NOTES.

EFILED Document District Court 2009CV991 CO Weld County District Court 19th JD Filing Date: Jul 22 2010 5:44PM MDT Filing ID: 32287891

Buckley sues DS for over $2 million.

Buckley claims vacation pay as part of his lawsuit in his amended complaint.

Colo. Div. of Labor dismissed Buckley claim on 3/16/2010 because he had not been employed for a full year.

Buckley warned that if he did not attend his second deposition, DS would move to dismiss the case.

Buckley did not appear for his 2nd deposition.

Buckley's CDLE claim discussed.

These two paragraphs (Court findings) sum up Buckley's conduct overall and the Court comments about his making, serious, unsubstantiated allegations. The case is dismissed because Buckley did not appear for his deposition a second time after being warned--his vacation pay claim had NOTHING to do with the dismissal of this case.

Вам также может понравиться