You are on page 1of 3

Why did the nationalist revolutions of the 1820s and 1830s fail?

By Samuel Ahmed 12U

Between 1820 and 1830 there was a rise in nationalistic views amongst Italians. Many of them started revolutions hoping that it would lead to the unification of Italy. However the revolutions of the 1820s and 1830s failed to reach that objective. In this essay I will be looking at how and why they were unsuccessful. One of the most important factors was the fact that there was very little communication between revolutionaries in different states. Italy didn¶t exist at that time; it was a mere geographic expression. Many Italians regarded them selves as being from their state. For example people from Sicily were known as Sicilians and people from Tuscany were known as Tuscans, they weren¶t recognised as Italians. This was not good for unification as there was very little interaction between the states since they were culturally different. For instance, the revolutionary government in Bologna refused to send help to Modena, as they didn¶t want to use up their own resources. Nationalist revolutions were uncoordinated and they relied heavily on the network of secret, minor groups such as the Carbonari who had different aims in different states. Some may argue that groups like the Carbonari had a huge membership in states like Naples (60,000) however since they were a sworn to secrecy it was difficult for them to organise a national revolution or spread nationalistic ideas across regions. Most of the states were fixed on regional issues such as Sicily. Sicilians were against the unification with Naples as they felt the ruler King Ferdinand I was oppressive and was solely focusing on Naples. Therefore one can argue that these revolutions were not in fact ³national´ but were mainly local and regional uprisings against old rulers. The idea of National unification did not spread to everyone in Italy. Since many revolutionaries were educated middle class men it meant that the majority of the population, which were peasants, were not even involved in the uprisings. Some say the work of Mazzini helped to spread the ideas of nationalism and unification across Italy. However the efforts of revolutionaries like Mazzini only appealed to a few middle class families who got a taste of liberalism and freedom during the French occupation. Peasants didn¶t feel there was a great change during or after the French occupation because they still had to work very hard to earn a living. Poor peasants couldn¶t read and write let alone afford to buy the books. Peasants were more interested in getting more land, which revolutionaries could not promise to provide. Also as mentioned before many revolutionary groups were secret societies which meant that the message was not spread to the masses. Without the support of the peasant population it was impossible to have a unified and national Italian revolution.

However Albert was not a legitimate ruler. Russia and Prussia. Soon Charles Felix (first in line to the throne) returned to Piedmont and denounced Albert as a rebel. Metternich could leave his army in Italian states to intimidate revolutionaries.Another reason for the failures of the 1820 and 1820 revolutions was the fact that the revolutionary groups were ill equipped and foreign and internal support. Essentially this meant that the Italy failed to stand up to a well-oiled Austrian army due to a lack of military resources. A very good example of this was the revolution that took place in Piedmont in 1820-1. Another factor that made the Austria¶s work effortless was the . Charles Albert was appointed as the leader for the liberals after the King Victor Emmanuel I abdicated his throne due to the revolutionary forces. Felix didn¶t accept the new government appointed by Albert. King Ferdinand of Naples went to seek help from Austria when revolutionaries effectively took over the Neapolitan government. Since most Italians were poor they couldn¶t afford to buy military resources that the Austrians had at their disposal. Metternich sent in the Austrian armed forces that dealt with the problem with ease and King Ferdinand was reappointed. Britain and France were present at the negotiations and remained as neutrals. Italy was not an industrial country they relied a lot on their agricultural sector. It practically allowed Austria to have free control over everything that happened in Italy. which meant it wasn¶t the responsibility of France to get involved with what was going on in Italy. Albert and his fellow revolutionaries didn¶t have many military resources and were certainly no match for the ruthless Austrian army. foreign support and a united Italian armed force. So he got help from the Austrian Military to scare of Albert and the Liberals. The Austrian chancellor Klemens Von Metternich was not in favour of liberal. The Italian revolutionaries were outnumbered and nowhere near as organised as the brutal Austrian armed forces. Revolutionaries in the Papal States used scythes as one of their sophisticated means of weaponry. Austria also had a significant influence on the Kings and leaders of the Italian Peninsula. national or radical ideas and was strongly against a unification of Italy. he was second in line to the throne. five out of six of the main Italian rulers had called upon Austrian troops to help them. Another important factor was the Troppau agreement (1820). therefore they didn¶t have enough money to supply the same weapons as the Austrian military were provided with. His thought of great powers taking action to suppress disturbances in Italy was drawn up in the Trappau Agreement. Also developed nations like France weren¶t willing to help as they had a policy of non-interference. By 1831. as they were also very ill equipped. The influence of Austria played a major role in the failures of the revolutions in 1820s and 1830s. This protocol was signed by Austria. a declaration of intention to take collective action against revolution. However since they were not against the Austrian¶s it meant that Italy had no genuine foreign support. Also he didn¶t have much support from the other regions of Italy who were mainly afraid to get involved. For example the Austrian army had promised to protect the Pope as long as he wasn¶t spreading or accepting any radical ideas. Effectively this allowed Austria to do whatever they wanted to do to Italy if there were any revolutionary uprisings.

fact that the Italian states were separated. The power and authority that the Austrians imposed over the Italians meant that revolutions were effortlessly crushed. The Italian states were too weak individually to face a massive and well-trained Austrian army. Since Italy was a poor country it didn¶t have the means to provide resources to fight the Austrians. . The revolutions of 1820 and 1830 were failures. The message of national unification didn¶t spread to the masses and therefore revolutionary movements lacked substantial support and only appealed to a minority middle class. Without a national identity or purpose people wouldn¶t know what they were fighting for. It was easier for them to fight one group at a time rather than a larger unified Italian army. If unification was to be successful. revolutionaries should have magnetized every single Italian to the idea of national identity. Italy itself was divided. people fought for different reasons but there was no call for unification against the common enemy.