Court File No. 07-CV-342052PD3 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: TORONTO AIRPORT CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP JOHN ARNOTT and STEPHEN LONG Plaintiffs and WALTER KAMBULOW Defendant AFFIDAVIT OF DOCUMENTS OF TORONTO AIRPORT CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP |, STEPHEN LONG, of the City of Mississauga, in the Regional Municipality of Peel, in the Province of Ontario, MAKE OATH AND SAY: 1. 1am the Vice President of the Plaintiff, Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship, which is a not-for-profit corporation. 2. I have conducted a diligent search of the records of the corporation and have made appropriate enquiries of others to inform myself in order to make this Affidavit. This Affidavit discloses, to the full extent of my knowledge, information and belief, all documents relating to any matter in issue in this action that are or have been in the possession, control or power of the corporation. 3. Ihave listed in Schedule A those documents that are in the possession, control or power of the corporation and that it does not object to producing for inspection. 4. Ihave listed in Schedule B those documents that are or were in the possession, control ‘or power of the corporation and that it objects to producing because it claims they are privileged, and | have stated in Schedule B the grounds for such claim. 5. | have listed in Schedule C those documents that were formerly in the possession, control or power of the corporation but are no longer in its possession, control or power and |Affidavit of Documents of TACF Page 2 have stated in Schedule C when and how it lost possession or control of or power over them and their present location 6. The corporation has never had in it possession, control or power any documents relating to any matter ssue in this action other than those listed in Schedules A, B and C. SWORN BEFORE ME, at the City of Toronto, in the Province of Ontario, this 14” day of August, 2008 David Frank Siachy, a Commissioner, et, STEPHEN LONG Zo Province of Ontario, while a Studental Law. ee TO. CERTIFICATE OF SOLICITOR | CERTIFY that | have explained to the deponent, the necessity of making full disclosure of all documents relating to any matter in issue in the action; (a) what kinds of documents are likely to be relevant to the allegations made in the pleadings; and (b) if the action is brought under the simplified procedure, the necessity of providing the list required under rule 76.03. Date: Ave 20? RAW Howard W. WinklerAffidavit of Documents of TACF Page 3 SCHEDULE A Documents in the possession, control or power of the corporation that it does not object to producing for inspection: See attached Schedule “A”.