Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Proudly Presents...
6/22/2011
Matt Day
8 years experience in transportation planning and policy Expertise includes: Multi-modal, long-range transportation plans
Development of Transit and Rail Plans Bicycle and Pedestrian Studies Project Feasibility Studies Air Quality Analysis Travel Demand Modeling Participation in the development of several National Guide Books on Congestion Management Process and Context Sensitive Solutions
6/22/2011 2
Questions and Answers from MCTC Members. The Real Charrette Issues
What Does NCDOT Need to Know? What Does Moore County Need to Know?
Review of Charrette Maps. MCTC Member Questions and Comments Availability for General CTP updates and presentations Public Comment
6/22/2011
11/04/2010 7/15/2010
Fact and Resource Findings Project Development and Environmental Analysis (PDEA). Rail Division and Cheryl Hannah NCDOT Feasibility Unit (West End and Cameron) Researching Impacts of Proposed TIP Projects Building Fort Bragg and BRAC Relationships Meeting with Local Planners (on going) Development of Materials Engaged Roadway Design Unit to Create US 1 Visualization New Approach to Charrette mapping Collection of local data and planning elements Responding to Public Comment Letter to and from Secretary Conti Emails to and from citizens Concerned citizen visited the office Feedback from planning level staff Rethinking Process, Materials, and Schedules
5
6/22/2011
http://www.ncdot.org/doh/preconstruct/tpb/PLANNING/mooreco.html
6/22/2011
MCTC May 25th Information Relay Subcommittee 1 Subcommittee 2 Subcommittee 3 Subcommittee 4 Subcommittee Cameron MCTC End of July Subcommittee Report Final Comments and Role Rehearsal First Week in August MCTC Technical Committee Final Review of Maps 6/22/2011
Charrette 1 Charrette 2 Charrette 3 Charrette 4 Charrette 5 Cameron MCTC Charrette Review And Breakout Sessions For Charrettes 1 and 2 MCTC Charrette Review And Breakout Sessions For Charrettes 3, 4 and 5
6/22/2011
What is a CTP?
6/22/2011
6/22/2011
10
SOMETHING TO REMEMBER.
Typical Stages of NCDOT Project Development
PLANNING
PROGRAMMING
DESIGN
DATA COLLECTION ALIGNMENT SELECTION TRANSPORTATION FACILITY DESIGN ESTIMATES & QUANITIES
RIGHT-OF-WAY
CONSTRUCTION
CTP STUDY RPO PROJECT PRIORITIZATION PROJECTS PRESENTED TO NCDOT BOARD FOR STIP CONSIDERATION
BIDDING PROCESS NCDOT BOARD AWARDS CONTRACT CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION COMPLETED PROJECT
CTP is here.
2-3 YEARS UP TO 7 YEARS 1-2 YEARS 1-2 YEARS 1-2 YEARS
6/22/2011
11
6/22/2011
12
The CTP is now a portal for funding transportation projects through the Prioritization Process.
Who determines what projects are eligible for consideration in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)?
NCDOT Division offices in response to safety, mobility, and local needs. Metropolitan and Rural Planning Organizations in response to local needs and visions. BUT THESE PROJECTS ARE CHOSEN PRIMARILY FROM CTPs or OTHER EXISTING PLANS. Without a CTP, competing against statewide priorities will diminish the opportunity for Moore County to receive transportation funding because criteria is data driven.
6/22/2011 14
What Are The Benefits of having an Adopted CTP? The CTP can be used as a tool for local land use planning by: 1) Protecting of RIGHT OF WAY for future facilities. 2) Reducing the number of social and environmental impacts to the community.
6/22/2011
15
Corridor Protection
Benjamin Parkway (Greensboro) protected corridor in 1981
6/22/2011
16
6/22/2011
18
US 1 in Sanford
6/22/2011
19
6/22/2011
20
3. 4.
5. 6.
7.
6/22/2011
Listening to Feedback
General Comments from December 6, 2010:
In totality, the meeting had mixed reviews Facility too small Needed leadership to facilitate Mapping was not detailed enough Hard to focus with four or five focus areas working so closely. We had a long way to go to be ready for a large crowd and for the general public. Process was a successful learning experience.
6/22/2011
Comments about specific projects are grouped with the focus area.
22
6/22/2011
23
Cameron
Examine feasibility and existing geometric constraints of projects on line. Strategic Highway Corridor Plan calls for NC 24/27 to be an Expressway. R-2529 is a widening project NC 24/27, NC 87 Cameron
6/22/2011
25
Cameron
From NCDOT Feasibility Unit. For Communities like Cameron, West End, and Carthage two scenarios exist to reduce impacts: 1. Reduce cross section to a 4-lane, divided narrow median curb and gutter section on 130-150 Right-of-Way. 2. Choose a bypass scenario with 300 of Right-of-Way. With the additional restrictions of NC 24/27s designation as a SHC, the option of reducing the cross section may not be a possibility.
In addition, future consideration of the existing single quadrant interchange with between US 1 and NC 24/27 is substandard and probably insufficient for long term growth.
6/22/2011 26
NC 24/27
6/22/2011
27
Objective:
Examine West Ends land use development and area connectivity given the completion of four significant transportation facilities: R-2807 (Re-alignment of NC 73 intersection at NC 211), R-2812 (NC 211 widening), R-2591 (Western Connector) and locally requested project widening NC 73. R-2807 is listed in the STIP; R-2812 is scheduled in the STIP with construction slated for 2012; R-2591 is not in the STIP; and a local request has been submitted for a feasibility study widening NC 73. NC 73 and NC 211 West End
Current Status:
6/22/2011
28
West End
R-2807 (Re-alignment of NC 73 intersection at NC 211) R-2812 (NC 211 widening) R-2591 (Western Connector) Locally requested project widening NC 73
What is the Community Vision? Assuming NC 73 is re-aligned and widened, NC 211 improvements end south of West End at the existing eastbound approach of NC 73 at NC 211; Where will the Western Connector tie in? Is Land Use Planning and Revitalization the goal? Can the CTP help support development of a vibrant town center?
6/22/2011 29
6/22/2011
30
We have the same questions to ask in R-2528 -- CARTHAGE R-2529 Carthage What is your Vision?
6/22/2011
31
6/22/2011
32
We would like a scaled-up map of Carthage with buildings and more roads shown. Community concerns include:
Needmore North Dowd Street Community Southwest Jeffers Sunset Drive
Worried about economic impact of bypass around Carthage. 5% of traffic goes though Carthage for reasons other than going to court. Would like guidelines on specific projects included in the handouts.
6/22/2011
33
Three Towns Similar Concerns One CTP Can Offer the Comprehensive Answer
What is the difference between having one project in the vicinity and developing a CTP?
STIP projects usually address one primary deficiency. A CTP addresses a communitys quality of life, economic growth and development, and its connectivity to neighbors, nearby communities and beyond the boundaries of the county. STIP projects usually target connectivity of a few specific facilities and their through traffic. A CTP, in addition, also addresses the cohesion of a community and the needs of local residents to reach their destinations.
6/22/2011
34
6/22/2011
Health and Wellness Parks and Recreation Chambers of Commerce Business Community Environmental Community Elected Officials Non-Profits Hospitals and Insurance Companies
35
The CTP Provides the CONNECTIVITY Between These Initiatives AND within our Communities
Bottom Line: It takes the ability to provide a Better Quality of Life to compete in todays market for growth and development opportunities! INTEGRATING THE CTP AND EFFECTIVE LAND USE PLANNING IS THE FIRST STEP.
6/22/2011 36
6/22/2011
37
Monita McLaurin
Has been a planner with the NC Department of Commerce since 2006 and is now the Chief Planner for the Division of Community Planning. Ms. McLaurin manages and administers planning services to a 16 county area in the Southeastern Region of our state. Prior to coming home to Fayetteville, Ms. McLaurin worked in the DC Metro area as a consultant as well as with the federal government with the Library of Congress, the State of Virginia, and the Washington Area Metropolitan Planning Authority.
6/22/2011
38
6/22/2011
39
6/22/2011
40
BRAC RTF Sub-Area Model: Development and Findings Moore County Needs
41
MCTC Questions?
MCTC Comments?
6/22/2011
42
- Rules and Regulations NCDOT and all those in the Construction Industry Work Under. - Importance of the CTP in early planning process. - What Happens When Corridor is not Preserved? - What Do Ideas Look Like on Paper?
6/22/2011
44
National Environmental Policy Act Basic structure for decision-making on projects. It is a required process for all federally-funded projects or projects that require a federal permit regardless of the funding source. Is the umbrella that helps us make sure we consider and address all applicable environmental laws and regulations.
6/22/2011
Requires us to look at enough solutions to a problem to make a sound, fact-based decision. Involves input from many agencies, businesses and local citizens. Final decision balances transportation needs with human and natural environment needs. Requires us to document and disclose all information concerning our decision.
45
Resources to Consider
Rivers, streams & wetlands Rare and protected plant & animal species Historic properties Archaeological resources Farmland Communities, homes, & businesses Minority and low-income populations Parks and other recreational facilities Wildlife refuges Economy Land use Noise levels Air quality Land with hazardous materials present Community facilities such as churches, schools, hospitals, post offices and fire stations And others as needed..
6/22/2011 46
6/22/2011
47
So, there are many environmental safety nets built in to the Transportation Design Process
6/22/2011 Note: Environmental covers people and the places they live 48
0-7 years
NEPA/SEPA
What do NEPA and SEPA have to do with the Moore County CTP Process?
6/22/2011 49
NEPA and SEPA Studies produce maps that look like this..
6/22/2011
50
6/22/2011
51
6/22/2011
52
6/22/2011
53
Objective:
Current Status: Associated Facilities: Communities:
Locate an Expressway facility along NC 24/27 to provide continuity and connectivity between R-2528 and R-2529. The project is not currently included in the STIP. NC 24/27, NC 22, US 15-501, and US 1 Carthage
6/22/2011
54
From Roadway Design Engineer NC 24/27 compliance with Strategic Highway Corridor #25 (Charlotte to Fayetteville)
R-2528, R-2212, R-2529 are the three STIP projects that define Strategic Highway Corridor #25 in Moore County. R-2212 has been deferred, but R-2528 and R-2529 are still viable projects. Neither are funded for construction. Both have made it to Right-of-Way. R-2528 and R-2529 are scheduled as Expressways. Both projects are proposed as 4 lane divided highways with a 46 median. The Department will likely recommend the use of the superstreet design concept. Expected speed limit 60 MPH with approximately 200-250 proposed Right-of-Way.
6/22/2011
55
We have a long walk a head of us and we want to make sure we are all together arm-n-arm when we start talking about the tough questions.
6/22/2011
56
2.
3.
4. 5.
6/22/2011
6/22/2011
6/22/2011
60
Where we were.
6/22/2011
61
2011 Western Connector Study plus new development proposed and permitted. 6/22/2011 62
What will happen if you dont take the steps necessary to preserve a Western Corridor?
6/22/2011
63
US 1 Freeway
Locate Freeway corridor through Moore County. The project is not currently included in the STIP. NC 24/27, US-15-501, NC 2, and US 1. Cameron, Vass, Southern Pines, Aberdeen, and Pinebluff.
6/22/2011
64
US 1 FREEWAY CONVERSION
US 1- Eastern Constraints
Objective:
Avoid Horse Country and specifically Walthour-Moss Foundation. Involve BRAC/Bragg Representatives, Explore Eastern and Western Alternatives.
6/22/2011
65
6/22/2011
66
US 15-501/NC 211
With minimum median width of 23 and a concrete island.
6/22/2011
67
Does this scenario fit Moore Countys Vision? Do we need to find a plan B?
6/22/2011
68
Your Role:
Requires due diligence through sound engineering and planning practices and design standards.
Information included on the maps. Special elements labeled. Area Development Areas for special consideration Design tools provided and charrette process Test Drive #2.
6/22/2011
Many thanks to Jeremy Rust for his hard work and dedication to Moore County and its residents! Great Job!
72
West End
6/22/2011 73
6/22/2011
PROJECT HAZARD
74
NOT IMPACT THE FOLLOWING: Historical districts and/or interests Federal land preservation sites Public parks Inequitable impacts to disadvantaged communities
NOTE: THESE ARE NOT NEGOTIABLE
6/22/2011
HAULT PROJECT
75
POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENTS
TOOLS IN YOUR TOOL BOX AS ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS, YOU CAN
WIDEN AN EXISTING ROAD TO ADD LANES OR ENCOURAGE MULTI-MODAL USAGE. EXTEND EXISTING ROAD ON NEW LOCATION. PROVIDE CONNECTION BETWEEN A SERIES OF EXISTING ROADS TO CREATE A CONTINUOUS CROSS SECTION AND ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS. CREATE A BYPASS THAT WILL SERVE GENERAL COMMUNITY GROWTH TRENDS. UPGRADE FACILTY CLASSIFICATION AND MANAGE ACCESS.
76
We have allotted about 30 minutes for this exercise. I will prompt you at the end of 20 minutes. And call everyone back to their seats for questions and comments at the end of 30 minutes.
Dont forget to think about what it would take to make the process better.
6/22/2011 77
Parting Thoughts:
There have been several requests for evening meetings. Would it be helpful to schedule the sub-committee meetings between 6:00 - 8:00 PM? There are on going efforts to visit communities and meet with staff. Please come see me if you are interested and I have not yet made it to your community. We will also be glad to come for presentations on the CTP if there is a group of stakeholders in your area that would welcome the opportunity.
6/22/2011
79
6/22/2011
80
CONTACTS
Frances Bisby Triangle Planning Group NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch 919.733.4705 fdbisby@ncdot.gov
http://www.ncdot.org/doh/preconstruct/tpb/planning/mooreco.html
6/22/2011 81