Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • Decision-Making - Specifications

    Загружено:

    bertrood
    33 просмотров1 страница
    The second element of the decision process is to establish clear specifications or boundary conditions to define the minimum goals needed to resolve the problem. Clearly stating the objectives and conditions increases the likelihood that the decision will be effective. Failing to properly define the boundary conditions makes the decision ineffective regardless of how brilliant it may seem. Asking "what is the minimum needed to resolve this problem?" helps probe the boundary conditions.

    Исходное описание:

    What criteria needs to be met in order to resolve this problems?

    Авторское право

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Доступные форматы

    PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    The second element of the decision process is to establish clear specifications or boundary conditions to define the minimum goals needed to resolve the problem. Clearly stating the objectives and conditions increases the likelihood that the decision will be effective. Failing to properly define the boundary conditions makes the decision ineffective regardless of how brilliant it may seem. Asking "what is the minimum needed to resolve this problem?" helps probe the boundary conditions.

    Авторское право:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    33 просмотров1 страница

    Decision-Making - Specifications

    Загружено:

    bertrood
    The second element of the decision process is to establish clear specifications or boundary conditions to define the minimum goals needed to resolve the problem. Clearly stating the objectives and conditions increases the likelihood that the decision will be effective. Failing to properly define the boundary conditions makes the decision ineffective regardless of how brilliant it may seem. Asking "what is the minimum needed to resolve this problem?" helps probe the boundary conditions.

    Авторское право:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 1

    The Elements of the Decision Process

    2) Establish the specications: What is the minimum needed to resolve this problem?

    The second major element in the decision process is clear specications as to what the decision has to accomplish. what are the
    objectives the decision has to reach? What are the minimum goals it has to attain? What are the conditions it has to satisfy? In science these are known boundary conditions. A decision, to be effective, needs to satisfy the boundary conditions. It needs to be adequate to its purpose.

    The more concisely and clearly boundary conditions are stated, the greater the likelihood that the decision will indeed be an effective one
    and will accomplish what it set out to do. Conversely, any serious shortfall in dening these boundary conditions is almost certain to make a decision ineffectual, no matter how brilliant it may seem.

    What is the minimum needed to resolve this problem? is


    the form in which the boundary conditions are usually probed. Can our needs be satised, Alfred P. Sloan presumably asked himself when he took command of General Motors in 1922.

    One cannot get in anything but trouble from the decision that is
    inadequate to its specications. In fact, clear thinking about the boundary conditions is needed so that one knows when a decision has to be abandoned.

    Вам также может понравиться