md
. (37322) 409 006 (37322) 220 591
4, 2010
,
,
.
,
.
.
,
CHIBID
,
CHIBOR
EUR
MDL
NEER
OPEC
REER
REPO
RUB
USD
.................................................................................................................................4
I. ..............................................................................................6
..................................................................................................6
.........................................................................................................................................10
..........................................................................................................13
.....................................................................................................................................18
..........................................................................................................20
.....................................................................................................................24
II. .......................................................................................24
................................................................................................23
.................................................................................................26
...................................31
III. ...............................................................32
......................................................................................................32
...................................................................................................33
.................................................................................................................33
.............................................................................................................34
2010. .
(), I II ,
4.7 4.9% .
, , 2010. 4.8%.
, .
, ,
, .
, 2.7%
7.1%.
, , -
, ,
II 2010.
, ,
. ,
.
,
. 1.4% 2010.,
- 6.2 %.
III 2010. , 7.6%
8.0% ,
( 5.1% 4.8% 2010.).
.
2010.
, , ,
. , ,
.
. , ,
, ,
.
, 2009.,
. , 2010.
5.6% .
II
2010.
. II 2010.
,
, .
4
,
, .
,
, ,
III
2010.
II 2010. ,
0.9
, .
, , 2009.,
, . ,
,
.
3, 2010.,
1.6 0.1 . ,
2010. 5.0% 3.4% 2011. , ,
.
2010. 7.8%, 0.4
. 2010.
, .
2011. 2010.
(2012.)
- 5.0%. 4.0%.
2011. 2.1%, 4.0% 2012.
, ,
.
. , ,
.
,
28 2010. 7.0%.
II III 2010.
I.
,
(), II ,
4.9%, .. ,
:
2.9%, - 8.1%. ,
2010, 4.6% ( 2010.)1 4.8%
( 2010.)2 .
2010. 2.7%,
7.1%.
,
- .., ,
, , 2010.
-
,
.
, ,
.
, ,
,
.
,
, .
, :
, ,
( ,
, , ).
, ,
:
.
, .
: ,
, . ,
,
. ,
, .
,
. .
,
, ,
.
1
2
,
.
,
,
. ,
, .
2010., 2011.
1.4% 2010., 6.2%.
,
.
, ,
, 2009. II 2010.,
,
2.0 1.9%, .
, -
, ( ) ,
.
II 2010. .
, 2010. 2011. 1.7 1.5%, .
-. , , , II
2010. 3.7% 2009. ,
.
, ,
.
, .
,
.
, ,
, 1.6% 2010. 1.8% 2010.
, 2010.,
.
, ,
II 2010.
3.0% , .
II , ,
,
1.7% . ,
, 2010.
,
,
, .
7
, . ,
2010. 2.6%. ,
.
, ,
.
, 0.1% 2010. 1.1%
2010. , , -
. , ,
.
2009.
. - ..
. II 2010.
1.5% ,
2010. , ,
,
1.9% ,
( ).
, ,
, ( 12.0%)
2010., 2009. ,
5.1%
2011.,
.
,
. ,
2010. -
5.0 .
. , 2009.
, . II
2010. 5.2% ,
- 3.1%. ,
, 2010.
. , .. (
) 0.4% .
, ,
, ,
4.0% 2010. (
). , .
:
.
.
,
2.1% 2008. 15.1% 2009.
, , ,
. , 2009. ,
. , II 2010.
5.9% .
, (
14.7%), .
III 2010.,
, futures .
, ,
,
. ,
,
, ,
.
, , ,
, 75.6
3, 14.2% .
III 2010. - 75.7
, 11.4%
.
80.0 4.
2010-2011. 80.0 - 86.0 .
1.1.
( /1000 m3) ( )1
350
330
310
290
270
250
230
210
190
170
150
95
85
75
65
( )
2009 .
2010 .
2011 .
3
4
5
45
35
55
, ,
2010.
,
, , ,
,
2010., ,
0.3%
2010., 86.9
. 5.
http://www.opec.org/opec_web/static_files_project/media/downloads/publications/MOMR_October_2010.pdf
http://omrpublic.iea.org/currentissues/high.pdf
IV 2010. 270.0 1000
, 2.0% III 2010.
, 2011. ,
.
III 2010. , , ,
7.6% 8.0% . ,
( 2010.). II
2010.,
III 2010.
. ,
5.1% 4.8% .
(3.2
1.2.
, 2010.)
%
20.0
.
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-5.0
2008.
:
2009.
2010.
,
6,
, .
,
2010. : (2.5
) (, ,
) . , (2.4 )
,
.
,
1.1 .
2.1 .
, 2010. 2009.
( 11.1%) , ( 7.1%),
6.8%. ,
4.5%, 0.6%,
4.6% 9.4%.
6
.
: (1) ; (2) ; (3) (4) .
10
7
III 2010. ,
, 5.1% 4.8% 2010. ( 1.2.).
2010. ,
8.1% 2009. III
5.1% ,
,
.
,
,
, , , .
,
.
1.3.
30.0 %
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
-15.0
-20.0
-25.0
,
,
12.0
10.9% ,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2008.
2009.
III 2010.
.
,
2010. 7.1%
5.3% ..
2010.
:
5.6, 22.9, 45.8 8.7%.
,
,
. ( 112.9 50.3% )
.
, .
IV 2009. I 2010.
,
II III 2010.
20.3 2.0% ,
.
( , , ),
, .
11
,
,
2010. 6.4% .
III 2010.,
.
, 16.3% .
,
.
20.4% 2009., .
21.6
25.3 % , .
24.3%
11.4%.
III 2010.
, ( 1.3.). ,
2010. 17.5%
.
Platts
,
. ,
. , 80.0
, (77.1 )
13.0% . ,
, 7.2%
, .
, 28.2%
. 19.7%,
10.4% 2009.
1.4.
18.0
15.0
12.0
9.0
6.0
3.0
0.0
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-3.0
-6.0
2008.
2009.
2010.
III 2010.
7.7% 8.5%
, 7.2%.
,
- 0.5%
,
5.2 18.2% ,
2009.
12
2010., 0.3%.
0.4%.
,
.
1.5.
( % )
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
-15.0
I . II . III . IV . I . II . III . IV . I . II . III .
II III 2010.
,
. ,
,
- III
2010. 0.4%
2009.
, III
2010.
:
III 2009.
( 1.4%),
- ( 2.6%), ( 2.5%)
( 12.8%).
2008 .
2009 .
2010 .
2009., . ,
I 2010.
1.6.
5.6%
( )
.
40
30
20
10
II 2010., ,
0
6.4%
4.7%
-10
I 2010.
-20
2009.
-30
-40
2009. 7.8%,
2007 .
2008 .
2009 . I . 2010 . II . 2010 .
13
, ,
.
( 1.6.),
II 2010.
, ,
. 6.1%,
, ,
. ,
,
- . ,
,
13.7% II 2010.
. ,
3.4%
.
, 3.4%
, , .
18.9% II 2010.,
,
,
.
, ,
.
( 1.7.),
15
.
10
5
- 13.5%.
0
,
,
-5
,
5.1%
-10
2007 .
2008 .
2009 .
I . 2010 . II . 2010 .
. II 2010.
-
.
, I
2010., , ,
II
:
2010., 5.2%
.
, , ,
4.1, 9.7 4.5% . ,
,
5.4% II 2010.
. 8.0% ,
,
1.7.
( )
14
7.8 8.2% .
, II
2010. 10.0% II 2009.
1.8.
( )
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
3.6
6.1
5.8
2.5
2007 .
2008 .
-7.9
2009 .
I . 2010 .
II . 2010 .
2009. (7.9%),
, II,
2010.
,
I 2010.,
6.1%
,
5.8% II
2010.
:
10.1%, 66.5%. ,
4.5%.
, 17.9% II 2010.
.
18.4%.
8, II 2010. 7.0% 9
2009.
-
11.8 168.3% .
, , ,
. 4.3%
. , 2.7%,
.
II 2010. 71.3%
.
,
.
II 2010.
13.7% II 2009.
8
, ,
9
2000.
15
13.7%, 80.8% .
,
- 18.4 15.5% .
25.3 13.4% .
II 2010.
16.9 .
II 2010. ,
54.4 .
- 2010., ,
6.3%
,
1.9.
,
( %,
2009.,
)
13.9%.
16
12
8
4
0
-4
-8
-12
-16
-20
-24
-28
-32
,
- 2009.,
-
7.5%,
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2008 .
2009 .
2010 .
:
:
, ,
,
, ,
, 2.9, 1.0, 0.8, 0.5
0.5 , .
, , 2009.,
:
,
, ,
,
0.5, 0.4, 0.4 0.3%,
.
-
2010. 8.7% .
- 15.5%
4.4%.
16
2010.,
. ,
58.0% 25.0%
, , . ,
- 2010., 12.4%
,
, 14.3 9.6% .
2.6%
2.9%,
7.2 %.
,
.
(80.0% )
, ,
, . ,
1.10. ( %
)
,
.
25
, ,
20
, ,
.
,
15
10
.
5
-10
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-5
2008 .
2009 .
2010 .
1.11. ( %,
)
80
60
40
20
0
-20
-60
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-40
2008 .
2009 .
2010 .
,
,
2009.,
,
,
, .
2010.
8.2%
2009..
10.1%
3.5%. , III
2010.,
8.9, 9.7 8.1%,
,
.
17
, 9.0%, ,
. II
2010. ( 11.6 0.2 ), III
, 1.3%. ,
,
5.0% - 2009.,
.
,
III 2010. ,
( 25.3%
2009.), .
2010., 9.2% - 2009.,
- :
, ,
, 38.6, 20.0 18.2% .
, , ,
30.1 4.5% , 2010. .
, III 2010. , ,
2009. , 2010., 28.9%
, ,
. , 14.8%
- 2009.,
, , ,
24.4, 22.8, 18.5 16.8%
.
III 2010. ,
2.9% 21.4% ,
,
1.12 (
,
)
40
1.8%
-
2009.,
20
.
0
-20
-40
II 2010.
,
,
II 2009. ,
0.6%
-60
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-80
2008 .
:
2009 .
2010 .
18
%
.
10
9
1.6% II 2009.
8
,
7
93.9
6
93.0%.
5
7.0%, 0.9
4
,
3
.
2
( )
1
,
0
8.2%
7.2% I 2010. 3.5% II
2007.
2008.
2009.
2010.
2008. ( )
( 1.13).
: ,
, 2010.
.
II .
I .
IV .
III .
II .
I .
IV .
III .
II .
I .
IV .
III .
II .
I .
1.13.
1.14. Beveridge
Beveridge
( , .)
40
II
I/2 0 0 7
I/2 0 0 8
2010., I
I/2 0 0 9
I/2 0 1 0
30
2010. 8.3 . ,
II/2 0 1 0
2.5 . .
20
I/2 0 0 5
10
I/2 0 0 6
,
0
40
60
80
100
120
140
.
: ,
- .
,
. 32.8% II
2010., .
, ,
19.7% II 2010, .
5.9 , , 4.3%
II 2009., 17.6 , ,
11.7%. , II
2010. 5.2%. ,
.
19
, II 2010.
10.8% 2009.
, 42.2%
, 2.4 II 2009.
18.7% ( 0.4
2009.)
- ,
15.8% 1.4 II 2009.
II 2010.
10.6% 2009.
, 40.6% 0.6
II 2009.
18.7% , 1.4.
. ,
10.0% ,
, 6.5% .
- 2010., 7.4%
. , -
2010. 8.3% 7.1%
.
,
, , (15.6%)
(9.3%). 6.1 5.8%,
(0.2%)
.
( 1.2%), .
, ,
- .
2010.
,
1.15.
( %, )
.
40.0
20.0
,
,
0.0
-16.3
-15.3
-8.6
-11.6
.
-20.0
-12.6
-40.0
-60.0
2007 .
2008 .
2009 .
I . 2010 .
II . 2010 .
2009.
,
,
. ,
20
5 0 .0
1.16. ( %,
)
4 5 .4
4 1 .0
4 0 .0
3 7 .0
3 3 .7
3 2 .7
3 0 .0
2 0 .0
1 0 .0
8.6% 2009. 2
, 12.1%
( 1.15.)10
.
,
0 .0
,
II 2010. 32.7%,
:
12.7
1.17. ( %,
2007.
)
100.0
83.8
80.9
80.0
,
60.7
57.2
59.7
60.0
( 1.16.).
40.0
, 2010.
20.0
0.0
58.5%,
2007 .
2008 .
2009 .
I . 2010 . II . 2010
2009.,
.
60.7% ( 1.17.).
, ,
,
.
2 0 0 7 .
2 0 0 8 .
2 0 0 9 .
I . 2 0 1 0 . II . 2 0 1 0 .
2009.,
19.2%
,
1.18. ( %,
8.3
)
2008.
30.0
, ,
27.51
29.95
- ( ).
19.25
17.97
20.0
17.51
,
10.0
17.6
- 17.5%
14.0
8.0
6.8
7.2
I 2010. 18.0%
II 2010. ( 1.18.).
0.0
2007 .
2008 .
2009 .
I . 2010 .
II . 2010 .
,
:
10
.
( ), ,
, .
21
1.19. ( %,
)
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.3
16.3
15.0
12.6
11.6
8.6
10.0
5.0
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
-15.0
2007 .
2008 .
2009 .
I . 2010 .
II . 2010 .
( )
1.20. ( %,
)
12.0
10.0
11.7
11.5
8.0
6.0
4.4
4.0
2.2
2.3
.
( 1.18.), ,
3.5
.
,
,
,
,
.
II 2010.
153.0 . USD,
,
141.04 . USD.
- 8.6%
.
II
2010. 2.3 %,
0.0
2009. (
-2.0
1.20.). II 2010.
2007.
2008.
2009.
I . 2010. II . 2010.
. ,
2010.
, 2009. 0.6%.
1.21. ( %,
)
15.0
13.2
(25.8%),
11.0
10.6
(21.1%)
10.0
(21.0%).
4.5
2.0
5.0
0.0
2.0
-5.0
-10.0
2007.
2008.
2009.
I . 2010.
II . 2010.
,
5.5% .
. II
2010.
10.6%
, 5
2009.,
22
1.22. ( ) ( %,
)
40.0
20.0
.0
-20.0
-40.0
-60.0
-54.1
-51.8
-73.7
-67.9
( 1.21.).
I 2010.
,
4.7%
.
-69.1
II 2010.
()
-100.0
69.1% (
-120.0
1.22.).
2007.
2008.
2009.
I . 2010. II . 2010.
,
II 2010., 24.3%.
- 42.6% - 33.5%.
:
,
, 33.7% ,
, 2009. 47.1%.
-80.0
, - 2010.
19111.7 . , 14.7%
.
- (84.2%) ;
, 23.0%
; ,
4.9% 2009.
, 3.8% - 2009.
,
14.6%.
, - 2010.
20608.1 . , 6.2%
.
( 11.3%)
( 17.9%).
1496.4 .
, 54.4% .
30 2010.,
29.2% 70.8% .
310.7 .
5415.6 . .
.
13147.1 . , 1094.1 .
, 320.5 . 01
2010.
23
II.
III 2010.
,
2010-2012.,
.
III 2010.
, . , ,
2.1. (%)
%
12
,
9
(7.0% - , 4.0
6
10.0% -
3
, ,
0
).
.
. .
/
-91
() 91
:
7.0%
. ,
/ , - (
) , :
4.50% , 3.92% (
) 5.0% . ,
,
, ( 2.1).
2009.
2010.
2.2.
(%)
20.0
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
CHIBOR 1W
CHIBID 1W
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2008.
:
CHIBOR (1W)
,
(6.94, 6.99 7.01%),
,
7.27 7.30% ( 2.2).
2009.
2010.
()
III 2010.
24
.
.
27 ,
, .
7 ,
6 8 .
- 2010.
2585.4 . 3761.4 . ,
, .
3247.1 . , 187.1 .
5.4% II 2010.
. , III
2010. 7.0% .
REPO ()
III 2010., -,
7 REPO ( ).
.
, - 2009. 2010. (
), III 2010.,
70.8 . . 41.8 .
.
, 30 2010.
1170.6 . , 29.0 . ,
2.5% .
,
. 30 2010.
,
, .
( ),
,
.
III 2010. 295.7 . ,
113.1 . 27.7% .
.
MDL 6 20
2010., 21 5 2010., 1223.5 .
25
, 47.5 . , 4.0% 6 20
2010., 21 2010. 5 2010.
30
2010. 43.7 . USD 51.5 . EUR, 1.6 . USD
(3.8%) 2.8 . EUR (5.8%) 30 2010.
MDL, ,
.
III 2010.
2.3.
(NEER)
.
. USD
8.0
110.0
6.0
108.0
4.0
2.0
106.0
.0
104.0
-2.0
-4.0
102.0
-6.0
100.0
-8.0
NEER
-10.0
-12.0
98.0
11.01.2010
19.01.2010
28.01.2010
08.02.2010
16.02.2010
25.02.2010
09.03.2010
17.03.2010
26.03.2010
07.04.2010
19.04.2010
28.04.2010
07.05.2010
18.05.2010
27.05.2010
07.06.2010
16.06.2010
25.06.2010
06.07.2010
15.07.2010
26.07.2010
04.08.2010
13.08.2010
24.08.2010
07.09.2010
16.09.2010
24.09.2010
96.0
- 2010.
.
, III 2010.
35.04 . .
III 2010. ,
. , ,
2009.,
.
2.4.
M2 (
, %)
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
-10.0
-20.0
-30.0
M2
M0
I .
II . III . IV . I .
2008.
II . III . IV . I .
2009.
II . III .
2010.
M2
5.6% II
2010., -
. ,
6.6%,
2010.,
4.1%.
M2
,
60.2%,
,
39.8%.
M2
24.9%,
26.3%
26
24.1% ( 2.4). ( M0) 1
III 2010. 4.1% , II
3.6% 4.0% I 2010.
, , ,
M2. III 2010.,
38.0%,
1.9 . ,
12.4% - 18.3% ,
2.9% ,
3.4% 18.4%
0.9% II 2010.
III 2010. (M3)2 5.5%
, II 2010.,
. M3
: , ,
. , ,
, 2010.
5.3% II 2010. ,
12.5% 6.1 3.1 II
I, . ,
46.2% II 45.9% III 2010.
.
III 2010. ,
62.6%, 5796.4 . ( 2.5).
II 2010. 5.9%,
.
:
. ,
54.7% III
2009. ( 2970.9
. ).
,
12 .
2.5.
( , %)
120.0
80.0
40.0
0.0
-40.0
-80.0
I . II .
III
.
2008.
:
1
2
IV
.
I . II .
III
.
2009.
IV
.
I . II .
2010.
III
.
35.2%
.
M3 M2 .
27
. ,
,
3.1 III 2009.
, 72.0% III 2009.
75.1%
. , 9.7%.
.
III 2008., . , III
2010. 6.4%
, 8985.0 . ( 2.6).
:
2.6.
( , %)
8.1% III
120.0
2009. ( 4498.1 . )
90.0
4.6% ( 4486.9 .
).
60.0
30.0
.
0.0
-30.0
I . II . III . IV I . II . III . IV I . II . III .
.
.
10.2%,
,
2008.
2009.
2010.
25.1%.
:
,
III 2010. 2009.
. , 14.7%,
21.0% 12.0%.
.
20102012.,
, .
, ,
,
. ,
. ,
, 7.0% III 2010.
. ,
28
2.7.
6 12 MDL (%)
24.0
22.0
20.0
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
6 12
.
( 2.7).
II
2010. 0.72
, 7.73%.
16.07%, 0.63
(. 2.8).
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8.0
2008.
2009.
2010.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0.0
2008.
(
)
2009.
2010.
,
6 12
II 2010. 6.22
:
5.29 ,
III 2010.
2.9.
II 2010. - 5.4
6 12 ( )
( 2.9).
8.0
6.0
,
4.0
2.0
.
0.0
-2.0
-4.0
I . II . III .
IV
.
I . II . III .
IV
.
I . II . III .
2008.
2009.
2010.
,
,
,
III 2010.
29
2.10.
,
(.2000-100%)
( ,
)
NEER
REER
.2006.
.2007.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
150.0%
140.0%
130.0%
120.0%
110.0%
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
,
,
2008
2009
2010
2.11.
. 2010.
(-) / (+)
-1.2
-0.8
-0.4
0.0
0.4
2.12.
. USD
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2009.
2010.
:
3
4
(REER),
2000.
, III
2010. 0.9
( 2.10).
REER
-
,
. ,
62.9%,
24.9% ( 2.11).
(NEER)3
2.4 .
III 2010.
6.4%,
4.4%.
III 2010.
197.5
. USD, 13.9%, 1421.8 .
USD 30 2010. 1619.3 .
30 2010.,
1800 USD
4
1600 4.4
1400
( 2.12).
1200
1000
800
600
40.0 . (60.7 .
400
200
)
0
20.0
. (30.3 . )
2000.
2010.
30
30 2010. III
2010. :
2.1. (. )
345.6 . ),
30.09.2010 30.09.2010
(%)
(-330.6 . )
(28.4
,
-7006.6
-6661.0
-345.6
-2.0
.USD).
,
(. USD)
28.4
5.6
1464.4
1436.0*
10999.4
11330.0
-330.6
-2.9
. 25
5.0 . USD.
31
III.
III 2010. .
, ,
.
, ,
.
,
, 2010.
4.8%
.
2.7%,
7.1%.
. 2010.
1.7% 1.5% 2011.
4.9%, 4.4%.
,
.
, II 2010., 1.5%
,
2010. , ,
,
1.95 ,
( ).
2010 2011. 1.5 1.6%, .
7.5%.
, , ,
,
. ,
,
, . ,
80.9 88.6 USD , .
.
32
, ,
2009., ,
( ). , 2009.
,
. , .
, , .
3,
1.6 2010. 0.1
. 2012. 0.7 .
,
I 4.7% 6.4% II
. ,
2008-2009. .
,
,
.
,
. 2010.
.
7.8%, 0.4
3.
2010. .
0.2
.
,
,
2011. 7.3%
.
2012.
- 5.0%.
2010.
4.0%,
3.9%.
, -
33
, ,
, .
futures
.
7.8% IV
, ,
,
3.
7.3%,
, 0.2
.
, ,
,
.
,
,
.
,
,
, , ,
, .
, ,
. ,
, , ,
.
,
, , , , (
),
.
, ,
. ,
.
, (, ) ,
,
2011 .
34