Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Reservoir characterisation.
Faults, layering, areal continuity. y g y
Reservoir temperature. p
Pressure Behaviour
Pressure history vs. time during a test leads to: Determination of average (static) reservoir pressure. Flow capacity (kh=net pay*permeability). Skin. Reservoir discontinuity and limits (fault, ).
CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT
PROD. RATE
OIL
For an Offshore Field the Target Plateau Rate is Typically 10% of Recoverable Reserves p.a.
TIME
Fig 1.1.1
. . . depends on the following factors: Water Depth Oil Price Pipeline Tariff
. . . in the early days of the North Sea development a figure of 5000 STB/d was often quoted (no longer valid)
WELL-HEAD
ps
S EP ARA TO R (1
st
GAS OIL
ST AG E)
WATER
WELL
q
RESERVOIR
p s = Separator Pressure
pwf
Fig 1.1.2
Darcys Law
=u=-
m dx
k dp
Fig 1.2.1
Darcys Law
Definition of the permeability of a porous medium Permeability is an intrinsic rock property q A u m p x k in-situ volumetric flow-rate cross-sectional area superficial fluid velocity fluid viscosity pressure or potential length permeability m3/s 2 m m/s 2 Ns/m Pa m m2
q k dp =u=A m dx
q : cc/s
A : cm
m : cp
p : atm
qs : bbl/day
x : ft
qsB
11271 10 . =A m
-3
1 md = 0.986923 *10
k dp dx
-15
Core Holder
Transducer
q
mL
i. e. k =
A Dp
qmL
Fig 1.3.1
Q=
P L
Units. Units
One Darcy is defined as the permeability which will permit a fluid of one centipoises viscosity to flow at a linear velocity of one centimetre per second f a pressure gradient of one ti t d for di t f atmosphere per centimetre.
Q=
P L
Q=
P L
Use of an empirical equation ( g Timur) & extending the p q (e.g. ) g correlation between measured lab. & log data (porosity & Swi).
Laboratory Measurements. y
Steady-state flow of a fluid & Darcy Law with measured Q & P, reservoir conditions preferable otherwise to be corrected.
f D v s2 36 k 1 (1 - f)
3
k1 = 150
Fig 1.3.2
36 f D k= k1 1 - f
3
k : permeability
a f
2 vs 2
Dvs : Volume - Surface Mean Particle Diameter = 6(1 - f)/a Shows importance of porosity and grain size as determinants of permeability
f : porosity
Investigated the permeability of well sorted detrital rocks with porosities down to 10%
Berg Correlation
-6 5 .1
k : permeability (Darcy) f : porosity MD : Weight median grain size PDa : phi percentile deviation - measure of sorting Cum Wt % Cum Wt %
k = 5.1 10
e j
MD
e -1. 385PD s
1 D= 2
FG IJ HK
phi
Berg : Trans Gulf Coast Assoc of Geol Soc 20, 303 (1970)
phi
Fr =
Ro Rw
Fr =
R Sw = o R t
1/ 2
For n=2
R Sw = o Rt
1/ 2
FrRw = R t
Timur
Af k = C S w ,irr
k 1/ 2
k 1/ 2
w2
exp onent
Sea Bed
MSL
Overburden at Depth =
= total weight of rock plus sea water (obtained from density log)
pc
psi
OverBurden
Formation
pg
psi
pc = pp + pg
Fig 1.3.3
(%)
1 0
pp = 0, pc varying
0 2000
SANDSTONES LIMESTONES
6000
10000
pp
Vpa - Vp Vpa 2
4 3
BEREA = 20%
14000
Fig 1.3.4
pp = 20 bar
FA
k ko
MA
SP
BA = 0.4 md BE = 52 md
ko
FA = 817 md
MA = 737 md SP = 944 md
200
600
pc
BE (bar)
1000
Fig 1.3.5
Ekofisk Reservoir
6 3 km 400 ft 600 ft
Overburden
Seabed
Tight
Zone
Initial Reservoir Pressure = 7000 psi (Pore Pressure) End of 1985 : Initial Net Effective Stress = 2000 psi Pore Pressure = 4000 psi
Fig 1.5.5
40 cm/yr
Time (days)
200
400
km
100 50 0
200
250
Bathymetric Survey
Fig 1.5.6
Ekofisk Reservoir
Very little pressure maintenance
. . . naturally fractured reservoir with solution gas drive and some gas re-injection
Reservoir originally thought to be oil wet were raised by cutting, installing flanges extensions of 6m
In 1987 all six of the steel jacket structures and jacking up the platforms and inserting
55 50
Elastic Plastic
(%)
45 40 35 30
5000
4000
3000
Fig 1.5.7
2000
Half the oil produced from Valhall is a direct result of the rock compressibility mechanism In the crest rock compressibilities can be as high as 15010-6 psi-1 On the reservoir crest a measured PTA permeability of 120 md was corrected to an original value of 300 md Final set of compaction curves shown in Fig 1.5.7
Valhall Reservoir
Flow Regimes
Steady-state, P=f(r), qr=constant.
Strong aquifer support or injection wells.
Semi-steady state, P=f(r,t) Semi steady state P=f(r t) but P/dt=constant P/dt=constant.
Closed no flow outer boundary.
re
ACCESSIBLE FROM
WELL SHUT-IN
pe
RFT DATA
wf
re
Fig 1.4.1
rw
re
Fig 1.4.2
Incompressible Flow
q
Steady-State Radial
q ur ur re q h
pe
rw
pe
rw
ur =
q 2pr h
k dp m dr
re
Fig 1.4.3
q sB k dp ur = = 2 p hr m dr
re
Darcy's Law
q sB m 2 p kh
rw
dr = r
pe
dp
pw
\
Dimensionless Pressure
pe - pw
pD
pe - pw re = = ln = ln rDe q sB m rw 2 p kh
q sB m re = ln 2 p kh rw
pe
pw q
rw
re
rw
re
Fig 1.4.4
p - pw pD = qsBomo 4 2pkh
3 1 2 0
p = ln rD D
1 100
r/rw
200
300
Fig 1.4.5
400
WELL-HEAD
ps
S EP ARA TO R (1
st
GAS OIL
ST AG E)
WATER
WELL
q
RESERVOIR
p s = Separator Pressure
pwf
Fig 1.1.2
qs J ss = pe - p w
1127 10 -3 2 p kh . qsB = pe - p w re m ln rw
Field Units
J sse
1127 10-3 2p kh . = re B m ln rw
bbl/day/psi
qs = Jsss(pe - pwf)
i.e.
pwf
pe
p wf = p e -
J sss
qs
. . . Definition of P.I.
. . . equation of a straight line
slope
qs
IPR
1 Jsss
Solving the above two equations simultaneously for qs & Pwf, k knowing Jss and fVLP f i d functions, specifies ti ifi the well operating conditions.
pe - pw
pw
(pe)2 (pe)3
slope = -
DRAWDOWN
1 J
IPR
qs
Fig 1.4.6
Bottom-Hole Pressure
pwf ps
VL P
pr
pr - pwf
Drawdown Total Dp
Operating Point
Lift
Due to Gilbert
Match vertical lift performance (VLP) to inflow performance relation (IPR) i.e. find qs from nodal analysis
pwf - p s
Fig 1.1.3
pe p
p(r) rw re pw
Fig 1.4.7
p(r) = pw +
ln r rw 2p k h
qm
qm r p r = pw + ln 2 p kh rw
bg
re
Averaged Pressure
p = pw +
pdV V
p r 2 p rhdr p re2 h
bg
rw
qm re 1 p = pw + ln 2 p kh rw 2
LM N
OP Q
1 qm i.e. p e - p = 2 2 p kh
STbbl/day/psi
qs 1127 10 -3 2 p kh . J ss = = p - pw re 1 B m ln rw 2
LM N
OP Q
Pressure in Reservoir
rw
t
TRANSIENT INFINITE-ACTING PERIOD SEMI -STEADY STAT E
re
Fig 1.5.1
PRESSURE
t2 t3
t1
dp = constant . . . all r dt
rw
re
Fig 1.5.2
PRESSURE
p=
rw
re
p r 2prdr
ej
pre2
p wf rw
AT SSS
dp dt
dp dt
re
Fig 1.5.3
1 V c = V p
Compressibility of a Liquid
DV = qdt = cVdp
Volume produced in time interval dt
dp q q sB ==2 dt cV c p re h f
c t = c w S wc + 1 - S wc c o + c f
c o . . . oil compressibility
1 Vp cf = Vp p
Allows for the presence of connate water and formation compaction Latter term is significant in unconsolidated formations
pi
slope , m = *
2 c t p re h f
q sB
Time , t
Fig 1.5.4
q
ur = 2p hr qr
ej
=-
m dr
k dp
re
ur
rw
Fig 1.5.10
Closed System
qr
qr
q
0
Flow Distribution
rw
qr
rw
re
qr = - cVr re
dp dt
re
Fig 1.5.11
qr
q r = - cVr r e
q rw
qr
dp dp 2 2 = - c p re - r h f dt dt
\
q
0
re
qr k dp -ur = = 2 p rh m dr
Darcy's Law
dp 2 q = - c p re h f dt
qr
q r re2 - r 2 r2 = = 1- 2 2 q re re
rw
re
Hence on substitution:
qr
Integration gives:
FG 1 - r IJ = 2 p rkh dp =q H r K m dr FG1 - r IJ dr = 2 p kh dp H r K r qm
2 2 e
2 2 e
re
rw
FG 1 - r IJ dr = 2 p kh H r K r qm
2 2 e
pe
dp
pw
q =
FG ln r m H r
2 p kh
2 2 e
2 p kh
e
1 r - + 2 2 2 re
2 w
bp IJ K
w
- pw
q=
For re >> rw
bp - p g FG ln r - r + r IJ m H r 2r 2r K 2 p kh q= bp - p g FG ln r - 1 IJ m H r 2K
2 w w 2 e
e w e w
p
rw
pe
pw
re
p=
z bg
V
e
p r dV
2p h f
2 p re2 - rw h f
rw
z bg
re
p r r dr
qm p = pw + 2 p kh
qm 1 Dp = p e - p = 2 p kh 4
LM ln r N r
3 4
OP Q
qr q
6 5 4 3 2 1
re = 400 rw
r re2
2
SS FLOW
SSS FLOW
pD
qr q
100
200
r rw
300
0 400
Fig 1.5.12
Well Productivity Index in a Bounded (Closed) Drainage Area The SSS well inflow equation is:
J sss
qs q = = p - pw B p - pw
g
FG H IJ K
q=
2 p kh p - p w
or in field units:
FG ln r m H r
g 3I - J 4K
hence
J SS S
2 p kh = re 3 B m ln rw 4
J SSS =
11271 10 2 p kh .
FG ln r Bm H r
-3
3 4
IJ K
2kh P* Pw Q= re Ln c rw
At Steady-State (SS) conditions, no variation in P & saturation with time, constant external pressure.
P*=Pe, c=0 P*=Pave, c=0.5.
Q=
2kh
P r Ln e c rw
J=
Q 2kh = P - P
1 r Ln e c rw
JD =
2kh
1 r Ln e c rw
. . . Multiwell Reservoirs
p1 V1 q1
p4 V4 q4 p2 V2 q2
p3 V3 q3
Fig 1.5.8
Under semi-steady-state (SSS) conditions the reservoir pore volume drained by a well is proportional to that well's production rate i.e.
qi V Vi = qi
Vi determined by planimetering at joint SSS due to Dietz
V = total reservoir
compartment volume
p1 = p 2 = p 3 = p 4
real no-flow boundaries such as sealing faults must be respected before assigning drainage areas
Real no-flow boundaries SUCH AS SEALING FAULTS MUST BEbe such as sealing faults must REAL NO-FLOW BOUNDARIES respected before assigning virtual drainage areas
RESPECTED BEFORE ASSIGNING VIRTUAL DRAINAGE AREAS
p1 V1 q1
p2 V2 q2
p4 V4 q4
p 3 V3 q3
Fig 1.5.9
Deviation from radial flow in non-symmetric drainage caused by well proximity to a physical boundary
Fig 1.6.1
- note the longer length of flow paths and the bunching of streamlines with a non-central well - areal flow convergence effect The basic radial flow equation for SSS is:
qm p - pw = 2 p kh
FG ln r H r
3 4
IJ K
qm 1 pre2 p - pw = ln 2 3 / 2 2 p kh 2 p rw e
where
qm 1 4A p - pw = ln 2 2 p kh 2 g C A rw
J SSS
For non-symmetric drainage areas and well locations and the PI is smaller than that of a well in the centre of a circle e.g. rectangle Dietz evaluated CA for a wide variety of shapes and well positions Especially important in long narrow reservoirs e.g. channel sands and when well is close to a fault
4 p kh = 4A B m ln 2 g C A rw
FG H
IJ K
CA < 31.62
CA = 4.514
Fig 1.6.2
CA 31.6 tDAsss 0.1 CA 0.098 tDAsss 0.9 CA 3.34 tDAsss 0.7
1/3
7/8
7/ 8
7/8
qm re 3 p - pw = ln - + S A rw 4 2pkh
FG H
IJ K
where:
Total skin factor is a vehicle for allowing for all deviations from ideal radial flow No formation damage contribution to skin in this formulation
1 4p 3 S A = ln + 2 g CA 4
a2
b1 a1
xD = L2 a2
Well
a2 < b2 a1 < b1
b2
L1
yD =
L2
L1
a1
Fig 1.6.3
a = aD L b bD = L c cD = W
A = WL
p wD
b p - p g 2 pkh = 1 ln =
qm
w
4A 2 g C A rw
i.e.
p wD =
ln C A
g = 0.5772
a 1 = 0 = yD a2 L2
b2
L1
Fig 1.6.4
Reservoir Limit
Clusters
Well
Well Spacing Lc
Overall Block
4 3
Fig 1.6.5b
Cluster
Well
Five
Fig 1.6.6
AREA =
re q
2
After Yaxley
ro q
qo
Well
re
+ (ro,qo)
Fig 1.6.7
CA =
LM 4p F r g exp M G ln MM q H r N
e o
OP 3I qr PP - J + 2 ln 4K FG p q IJ 2p sin H q K PQ
o o
4A
. . . Due to Yaxley
Intersection Angle Well Distance from Apex ro 1 5 10 20 50 100 200 300 350 400
q = 60 Dietz Shape Factor, C 9.5289510-27 2.326410-18 3.430410-15 3.5127510-12 3.350010-8 3.430410-5 3.5127510-2 2.0256 9.46298 35.9706
q = 90 Dietz Shape Factor, C 7.116310-16 1.7790710-10 1.138610-8 7.287110-7 1.7790710-4 1.138610-2 0.7287 8.3004 20.9305 46.6372
Table 6.1 Dietz Shape Factors for a Well on the Bisector of Intersecting Faults (re = 1000, rw = 1) Yaxley formula is valid provided ro < 1/3 re Use default value of 31.62 if formula predicts a larger value
pe
Dps
pw pwf rw rs
For a variety of reasons there is often an annular region of altered permeability around the wellbore
Since most of the pressure drop in radial flow occurs within the region from rw to 100rw near wellbore permeability alteration is very important
Formation damage
Fig 1.7.1
Dps
p wf
pw
Ideal Pressure Profile Based on Homogeneous Permeability, k Actual Pressure Profile Steepened by Reduced Permeability, k s, in Altered Zone
pe
ks . . . Altered Zone Permeability rs . . . Extent of Alteration pwf . . . Actual Bottom-hole Pressure Dps . . . Incremental Pressure Drop
rw
rs
Fig 1.7.1
pm
Dpmc psf
ql
pf
Spurt Loss
Dynamic Filtration
Static Filtration
psf - pf . . . Excess Formation Pressure "Supercharging" pm - pf . . . Mud Overbalance psf . . . Sandface Pressure pf . . . Formation Pressure
Time
Fig 1.7.2
Saturation Profiles
Sw
ql
1-Sor Swc
FLUSHED ZONE
t1
ri =
t2
Qe pf 1 - S or - S wc
Qe
rw
ri(t1)
ri(t2)
Fig 1.7.3
Piston-like displacement with the creation of a flushed zone at residual oil saturation
Mud fluid loss rate depends on the overbalance and the filtration properties of the drilling mud
Depends on porosity and cumulative fluid (mud filtrate) injected Q l = cumulative fluid loss per unit height of formation
ri (t)
ri =
Ql p f 1 - Sor - S wc
Often
ri
is synonomous with
rs
SKIN
Dps
pw
pw f
pw f
D ps
= INCREMENTAL SKIN PRESSURE DROP Incremental skin pressure drop (POSITIVE FOR DAMAGE) (Positive for Damage)
D ps qm 2p kh
pw
D ps
Fig 1.7.6
. . . Due to Near Wellbore Permeability Improvement i.e. Stimulation Possible Actual Profile Region of Increased Permeability
Dps
"Skin"
pw
pwf
S=
qm 2p kh
Dp s
Fig 1.7.7
Formation of Permeability, k
pe
pwf
reff rw
Dps
rw, eff = rw e - S
re
Fig 1.12.1
pe
re re p D = ln + S = ln rw rw ,eff
pwf
reff rw
Dps
Well Radius
Effective
re
\ S = ln rw - ln rw ,eff
rw ,eff = rw e
-S
or S = ln
rw rw ,eff
Hawkins Equation
rs
ks rw re
Fig 1.7.8
Hawkins Equation
(Open-Hole)
qm rs qm rs Dp s = ln ln 2 p k sh rw 2 p kh rw
LM F k - 1I ln r OP GH k JK r Q N LM F k - 1I ln r OP Dp S= = G JK r Q qm NHk 2 p kh
qm Dp s = 2 p kh
s s s w s s w
Pressure Drop that would have occurred if the Permeability was unaltered
k 2
Damaged Zone
20 40
rD
60
80
100
Fig 1.7.9
Gas Block Around an Oil Well where BHP is Below the Bubble Point
pb pw f
rw
Fig 1.7.10
V ERTICAL FLOW CONV ERGENC E ADDITIONAL PRESSURE DROP REQUIRED PARTIAL COMP LETION
Fig 1.9.1
GAS OIL BEARING RESERVOIR HIGH GOR HIGH WOR WELL WELL
WATER
OG C
Fig 1.10.1
WOC
Fig 1.10.2
O OW C
qc
ho
pw + rwhap
hap
pw
pe pe + roghap
Fig 1.10.3
C ri ti c a l Ra t e F o r G a s F r e e P r o d u c ti o n
pw - rg g h a p
ho
hap
hp
pw
pe - r0 g h ap
pe
Fig 1.10.4
Flow
Plugged Perforation
Fig 1.9.5
DR AW DO WN IS RE DU CED BY
eff.
hp
INCREA SED AND P.I. AD DITIO NAL F LOW CONV ERG ENCE
Fig 1.9.8
hp
hs
Top or Bottom
hs
Central
hp
hp
hs
b=
hp h
hD =
k hs k v rw
General Position
Fig 1.9.2
30 25 20 15 10 5 20
Sp
= 10000
hD = k h k z rw
Correlation
Marting
Brons and
100
1000
b = Penetration Ratio
0.1
b=
0.4
hp h
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Fig 1.9.3
Lack of Knowledge of the Effective or Average (macroscopic) Vertical Permeability Does not Allow for Layering
pD
Sa
Sp
Sd
NO DAMAGE NO CONVERGENCE
rD
Superposition of Skin Effects Due to Partial Completion and Damage Fig 1.9.4
hp
rw
ks
Al te red Zon e
rs
Fig 1.9.6
Limited Entry with Formation Damage hp rw ks Fig 1.9.6 rs Flow convergence zone
Altered zone
Incremental Pressure Drop over the Altered Zone Note that hp is used in this formulation
p e - p wf
qm re = ln + S p rw 2 p kh
FG H
IJ K
qm rs qm rs Dp d = ln ln 2 p k s h p rw 2 p kh p rw
qm h Dp d = 2p kh h p
or
Dp d = Sd qm 2 p kh
s w
FG k - 1IJ ln r Hk K r =
s
LM F k - 1I ln r OP GH k JK r Q N
s s w
is the intrinsic or true skin factor Formula due to Rowland and Jones and Watts
S tr Sd = b
The effect of damage is enhanced by a limited entry due to the The inflow equation including damage effect and geometric skin becomes: The total skin effect is written as: increased velocity through the altered region Total Apparent Skin
S tr Sd = b
p e - p wf
qm re S tr = ln + S p + 2p kh rw b
FG H
IJ K
S tr Sa = Sd + S p = + Sp b
pws
ETR
MTR
LTR
m SLOPE , m = 4p k h ln tp + D t Dt 0
p*
Hence St r
Sa = S d + Sp =
S tr b
+ Sp
Fig 1.9.7
a
-2 0 15o 30o 45
Sswp
Deviated Wells
-6
-4
10
h rw
10
a =75
60o
o
10
Fig 1.11.1
Effect of Deviation i.e. Flow Divergence Expressed as Another Component of the Skin Factor viz. S sw p
2. 06 1. 865
S swp
0 < a <75
FaI = -G J H 41K
o
FaI -G J H 56 K
h > 40 rw
F h I log G JK H 100 r
w
S a = S d + S swp =
b=
h a s co
hp h
S tr b
h cos a h
+ S swp
cos a
i.e. b > 1
2pk Dp s qm h cos a =
where: S tr =
F k - 1I ln r GH k JK r
s
Fig 1.11.2
Sc = Sdamage + Sperforation
q=
2p kh p e - p wf
FG ln r m H r
IJ +S K
a
where:
Sa = Sc + S p
Sc =
Sc,tr b
xf
re
xf
= Fracture Half-Length
xf
Fig 1.12.2
xf
xf
xf . . . Fracture Half Length
rw ,eff
xf = 2
provided
re >2 xf
Radius of Investigation
J sss =
or
F ln r BmG H r
2pkh
e
w ,eff
3 4
I JK
rw ,eff
xf = 2
J sss
2pkh = re 3 Bm ln - + Spr rw 4
FG H
IJ K
2rw Spr = ln xf
p e - p wf
qm = 2 p kh
FG ln r H r
IJ +S K
p De =
p e - p wf = ln rD e + S qm 2 p kh
J SS
qs = = p e - p wf
2 p kh re B m ln +S rw
FG H
IJ K
p - p wf
or
qm = 2 p kh
FG ln r H r
3 - +S 4
IJ K
pD
Index
SSS Productivity
p - p wf 3 = = ln rDe - + S qm 4 2 p kh
J SSS qs = = p - p wf
FG Bm H
2 p kh re 3 ln - +S rw 4
IJ K
Generalised Formulation
SSS
PI
JSSS =
Bm
OIL VISCOSITY
1 ln 4 A 2 2 g Ca rw
2p k h
5 WELL SPACING
3 WELLBORE DAMAGE
6 WELL DIAMETER
Fig 1.8.1
pwf
pr
VLP
IPR+S
dqs
IPR-S
qs
dqs
Fig 1.8.2
Flooding Pattern
50 49 43 38
Five Spot
C O NF I N E D
P R OD U C E RS
70 57 54
62
46
IN J E C T I O N WELL
30
51
Steady-State, Homogeneous
Fig 1.8.3
Steady-State, Single-Phase Flow Layer Skin Factors Zero q Common External Pressure, p e
Stratified Reservoir
pe
q1 q2 q3
pw
k2 h 2 k3 h3
pe
Fig 1.13.1
2p k i h i pe - pw qi = re m ln rw
g
N
\ qi = q =
N i =1
2p k i h i re m ln rw
i =1
bp - p g
e w
Layered System
q = Sqi
pe
q1
S1
w
q2 p q3
Reservoir Communication
S3
S2
k1 h1 k2 h2 k3 h3
Applicable to Perfect Layered or Stratified Systems with a Common Pressure on Each Flow Face Perfect Layered System
k=
k h
N i =1 N i
h
i =1
k h
N i =1 i
LAYER N
kN
hN
i
LAYER i ki hi
Fig 1.13.3
k1
h1
p1
k i+ 1 k3 k i- 1 ki
k N-2
p2
k2
k = k 1 k 2 ... k i ... k N -1 k N
1/ N
Log k
Geometric (md.ft) 242 312 355 265 193 197 335 Mean
Core kh
1008
Geometric Average
Permeability Averages
kG = P ki
N i =1
FH
IK
1/ N
kA =
k
N i =1
Harmonic Average
kH =
. . . Vertical Flow Perfect Layering kA and kH are Upper and Lower Limits Respectively of Average Permeability
1 k i =1 i
N
Gas Permeability - 1
Klinkenburgh, non-zero velocity at pore walls.
Slippage of gas molecules along the solid grain when the pores diameter is in the range of the gas free path. A function of pressure, pore pressure size and gas type (smaller the molecules, larger effect).
kG = kL +
m P
Gas Permeability - 2
Compressibility.
Use of Boyls law (P1V1=P2V2=>P2/(2Pb) instead of P).
102
10
10
(After Juhasz)
10-1
WELL A, Upper Jurassic
Fig 1.15.6
10-1
100
101
102
103
Forcheimer Equation
r
dp m = u + br u dr k
is comparable to
2 r
br u r
m /k
r
br u k br u Re = = 0.1 m m k
r
Fig 1.2.2
Laminar Flow
Reynolds Experiment
E. Sketne
Dp DL = av
Re p =
D p rv m
< 2100
Hagen-Poiseuille Equation
Re p =
D p rv m
Dp DL
Dp DL
= av + bv 2
= av
Darcys Law
Laboratory Measurement
Core flow at incremental flow rates. Real gas law & Forchiemer Eq.
z & =f(P), negligible. i slope of y vs. x. is l f
M W (P1 P2 )A W 1 = + 2zRTLW A k
2 2
Y = x +
1 k
Laboratory Measurement
Clashach Core, Swi=0%, k=553 mD 2.7E+12 2.5E+12 2.3E+12 2 3E+12 2.1E+12 1.9E+12 1.7E+12 0 2000 4000 x /m
-1
Y /m-2
y = 1.035E+08x + 1.699E+12
/m
-1
6000
8000
10000
From Correlations
There are numerous correlations in the literature. First correlation, Janicek and Katz (1955)
k in md and in (1/cm).
1.82 108 = 54 34 k
Field Measurement
High velocity an additional skin. g y Variable rate test, essential.
Stabilized or Transient.
e.g., Isochronal test or Step rate transient.
ST = S + DQ sc
kM w Psc D= hr RT 2 sc w
ST = S + DQ sc
Lp *1E-8 /in /m-1
(from Slope) )
S
(intercept)
3 6 9 12 15 OH
pwf
pe
DpND = Bqs
VLP
pwh
Operating Point
slope = - A Dp ND
qs
IPR
Fig 1.16.2
DpsD
DpsND
rw
Damaged Region
ks
rs
Fig 1.16.3