Court File No.: ...............

FEDERAL COURT
B E T W E E N: KEVIN MCNAMEE-ANNETT and JASON BOWMAN et al. each on their own behalf and on behalf of all participating status and non-status persons currently residing within Canada (including their executors and heirs) who claim damages arising from acts and omissions on the part of these respondents. Applicants - and o/a VATICAN CITY STATE o/a STATE OF THE VATICAN o/a (HOLY) ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH o/a UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA, ANGLICAN CHURCH OF CANADA, GRAND LODGE A.F. & A.M. OF CANADA IN THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO o/a GRAND LODGE OF CANADA, GRAND LODGE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA AND YUKON, ROYAL ORDER OF JESTERS, CANADIAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION o/a CPhA, BAYER A.G., BAYER INC. o/a BAYER HEALTHCARE, GW PHARMACEUTICALS, PERDUE PHARMA CANADA, BARALEX INC., JOSEPH ALOISIUS RATZINGER a/k/a BENEDICTUS PP. XVI (ROMAN PONTIF), TARCISIO PIETRO EVASIO BERTONE S.D.B. a/k/ a CHAMBERLAIN (CAMERLENGO) OF THE APOSTOLIC CHAMBER, RAYMOND LEO BURKE a/k/a CARDINAL-DEACON OF SANT AGATA DE GOTI, PEDRO LOPEZ QUINTANA a/k/a ARCHBISHOP PEDRO LOPEZ QUINTANA a/k/a/ TITULAR ARCHBISHOP OF ACROPOLIS, ELIZABETH VON-SCHLESWIG- HOLSTEIN-SONDERBURG-GLKSBURG [OLDENBURG] a/k/a HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND QUEEN OF CANADA, STEPHEN JOSEPH HARPER, ROBERT NICHOLSON, VIC TOEWS, LENOA AGLUKKAQ, JOHN DUNCAN, IRVING GERSTEIN, DOUG FINLEY, ALAIN BEAUDET, JEANNINE RITCHOT, ROBERT BOB PAULSON, MURRAY SINCLAIR, JOSEPH AKERS, MARIJN DEKKERS, D. GARRY DOWLING a/k/a M.W. BRO. GRAND MASTER, WILLIAM R. CAVE, a/k/a M.W. BRO. GRAND MASTER, JOSEPH STEPHENS, JOHN DOE, et al. Respondents

NOTICE OF MOTION
(Pursuant to Federal Courts Rules 17(1)(c)(d), 18(1)(a)(b), 34(b), 304(2), and 359) (Filed this 4th day of July, 2012) TAKE NOTICE THAT the applicants will make a motion to the Court on Monday, July 9, at 9:30 in the forenoon, or as soon thereafter as the motion can be heard, at the Federal Court, 180 Queen Street West, Toronto. THE MOTION IS FOR directions as to who are the appropriate persons to be served with a notice of application in these circumstances. THE GROUNDS FOR THE MOTION ARE 1. These plaintiffs intend to act in person in respect of these proceedings at this time. 2. The plaintiffs intend to charge that these defendants are parties to inter alia, criminal conspiracies, involving parties named, and occult parties, et al. 3. Accordingly, the plaintiffs intend to commence concurrent criminal and civil proceedings against relevant named defendants, et al., in this Court, and intend to proceed by way of preferred indictment with leave, pursuant to relevant Rules and provisions as set out in the Criminal Code, Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, Canada Elections Act, Competition Act, Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act, Financial Administration Act, Canada Consumer Product Safety Act, Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act, Canadian Environmental Protection Act, Charities Registration (Security Information) Act, Department of Health Act, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Act, Food and Drugs Act, Freezing Assets of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act, Geneva Conventions Act, Hazardous Products Act, Human Pathogens and Toxins Act, Indian Act, Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act, Judges Act, Lobbying Act Security of Information Act, Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, Conflict of Interest Act, Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, Competition Act with leave of this Court. 4. The plaintiffs wish to intend to seek certification of class proceedings against these named defendants including parties yet unnamed with leave of this Court. 5. The plaintiffs intend to proffer prima facie evidence in support of inter alia, charges of conspiracy against the defendants, et al., as set out in relevant pre-enqute procedure contained within Criminal Code s. 504(b)(c)(d) and 507(a), and pursuant to common law, with leave of this Court. 6. The plaintiff applicants accordingly seek inter alia, directions as to who are the appropriate persons to be served with a notice of application in these circumstances pursuant to rule 302 (2).

7. The plaintiff applicants bring this motion in this instance on both an ex-parte and an urgent basis, and accordingly, undertake to commence the proceeding within a time fixed by this Court pursuant to Rule 372. THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE will be used at the hearing of the motion: 1. July 4th, 2012 Affidavit of Jason Bowman

______________________________ (Signature of solicitor or party) Per: Jason Bowman and Kevin Annett, applicants in person, 140 Victoria Street East Alliston, ON L9R 1K6