Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Headwaters MB
April 2012 203-622-1044 byoung@headwatersmb.com
Low-Density Polyethylene Ethylene Glycol High-Density Polyethylene Linear LowDensity PE Polyvinyl Chloride Polystyrene Styrene
13%
Ethylene
13% 13% 7%
Ethylene Oxide
Other EO Derivatives
VCM
Source: ChemSpeak
The cash costs mentioned above are quite variable, since the most important driver of cash cost is the raw material. The volatility of oil prices leads to sharp ups/downs in naphtha costs in almost a direct correlation. Ethane costs typically depend not only on the cost of natural gas, but, on the US Gulf Coast, by a supply/demand relationship for ethane itself as purchases by petrochemical companies drive variability and therefore the cost of this natural gas liquid. Depending on the state of inventories (for ethane, ethylene, and derivatives) as well as demand for ethane, the price can vary considerably. For example, if there are major ethylene plant closures (unscheduled outages as well as planned maintenance turnarounds), ethane costs could drop meaningfully from the higher levels achieved when ethylene operating rates are high and producers are seeking more ethane to run through their steam crackers (versus historical amounts). Moreover, if co-product values (prices) for key outputs from naphtha crackers (such as propylene or butadiene) are especially high, demand (and prices) for ethane could ease as naphtha use could displace ethane. In 2011, ethane sold as high as 89 cents/gallon and as low as 61 cents/gallon. Nevertheless, on balance, the main conclusions from the cash cost curve still hold. (Please see the Ethylene/Ethane Spreads Chart on page 3.) In Alberta, as in the Middle East, ethane prices are set by contract often fixed in the latter region (perhaps with
escalation formulae) and typically by formula (based on natural gas prices) in the former. Dirt-cheap natural gas-derived ethane provides the advantage in the Middle East. The reason Alberta and the US are next on the cost curve is that natural gas prices are so low (relative to oil) and, as a consequence, ethane (one of the natural gas liquids derived from natural gas production) is relatively inexpensive as well. The bulk of the ethylene produced beyond the Middle East and North America is based on naphtha, whose price is closely tied (virtually directly correlated) to that of crude oil.
As is well known, the low natural gas prices in North America are due to an abundance of the commodity that has materialized with the success of gas discovery and production projects in shale deposits. Major NGL sourcing locations are shown in the accompanying map below. We see this low-price situation continuing, even though incremental demand for natural gas will develop in the electric utility, domestic heating, LNG export, and petrochemical sectors.
Average Capacity 98.3 104.6 111.0 Avg Cap Change 6.5% 6.1% Demand 90.5 91.7 96.1 Demand Change 1.3% 4.8% Shipment Rate 92.1% 87.6% 86.5% Capacity Change vs. Demand Change
Source: ChemSpeak LLC, Headwaters Estimates
As mentioned above, internal consumption of ethylene derivatives in the Middle East is less than 20% of production. In the US, which has a large population versus the amount of ethylene produced, a high percentage of production is consumed internally. But, given its lost-cost position versus Europe, Asia, and Latin America, excess production in the US often finds a home outside the country. We estimate that 20-25% of all the polyethylene produced in North America is exported, while 35-40% of the polyvinyl chloride is shipped abroad. Historically, prior to the drop in natural gas costs relative to the price of crude oil, these percentages have been much lower, i.e., in the 10-15% zone. The key markets served by these exports are located in Northern Asia and Latin America. It should be noted that the cost of shipping for these commodities is typically in the range of 5-10 cents per pound. There has been global overcapacity of ethylene in the 2008-2011 time period, with average world plant utilization rates in the 84-86% zone. This has led to below desirable profitability in most regions, specifically in recent times for those facilities that utilize naphtha as feedstock. As noted, the bulk of production in Asia, Latin America, and Europe is based on naphtha. About 30% of North American ethylene is derived from naphtha, although this proportion is declining as producers invest in more flexible production units that can handle more natural gas liquids, especially ethane. Westlake is even considering injecting capital into its Calvert City, KY cracker, to convert the propane feedstock (another natural gas liquid) to ethane, which would be sourced from the Marcellus region.
Since the clearing price of a commodity is based on the cash cost of the least efficient player that can afford to remain open in times of overcapacity, the cost of naphtha is the key determinant of global pricing (typically in the form of derivative netbacks, such as PE). Hence, European and Asian ethylene manufacturers are getting by during this overcapacity period. Meanwhile, low-cost producers in the Middle East and North America which typically utilize ethane -- are generating healthy returns on their ethylene facilities, since the selling price of their ethylene derivatives is also based on the cost of naphtha, which is not that variable across the globe.
Ethylene/Ethane Spreads
$0.80 $0.70 $0.60
Cents Per Pound
$0.00
$0.00
The following link provides a detailed listing of ethylene facilities and capacity around the world as of 2008.
http://www.icpress.co.uk/etextbook/p702/p702_chap01.pdf
We envision global operating rates gradually advancing from 85 % in 2011 to 90-91% in 2014. Utilization could remain in the low 90s through 2016, depending on possible unforeseen incremental expansions that could come on-stream in 2015 and 2016. During the 2012 2016 timeframe, assuming normal economic conditions, demand for ethylene equivalents should increase at a 4.5% rate, while average capacity growth should be in the 2.5% - 3.0% vicinity. This should lead to higher returns for both low- and high-cost producers as the selling prices increase more rapidly than raw material costs. (Note: 92% is typically considered the highest sustainable industry operating rate over a year given seasonality, normal turnarounds, and unscheduled outages. Also, confidence in projections for 2015 and 2016 is lower vs. the 2012-2014 period, given possible unforeseen circumstances that could occur over the longer term.) From this starting point, where is the new capacity going to be built? In the 2008-2011 period, about 67% of world capacity growth emanated from the Middle East, while we expect this to drop to the 30% area in the 2012-2016 timeframe. Chinas proportion of expansions should remain similar in the 30% range, while in North America with its improved feedstock cost position the contribution to global capacity growth in 2012-2016 should approximate 17% versus virtually none in the 2008-2011 period.
result from a rapid run-up in feedstock costs followed by a notable decline. A good example of this can be found in 2008, when energy prices advanced sharply, peaking in mid-summer; by the fourth quarter and into the first quarter of 2009, a major inventory adjustment materialized, causing a sharp downturn in profitability. Another possibility, although an unlikely one, would be a major drop in oil prices relative to natural gas. This could erode the significant raw material cost advantage that ethane-crackers (based on natural gas) enjoy today. One must also consider the push to develop shale gas deposits in regions that typically crack relatively expensive naphtha: Europe and China. It would take several years to develop these reserves and alter naphtha crackers so that they could manufacture ethylene from ethane. Nevertheless, it is a situation which should be monitored.