Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Christopher Todd Anderson, John R. Pollard, Eva Noble, Ram Mani, Kathy Lawler
Penn Epilepsy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
RATIONALE: Although good candidates for epilepsy surgery often decline a procedure, even after having undergone a tedious and expensive presurgical evaluation, there is no study that quantitatively explores how much socio-cultural, medical, personal, and neuropsychological factors affect patients decision-making for or against surgery. We sought to uncover the reasons why some candidates for surgery undergo a presurgical evaluation, are offered surgery but then decline. Our ultimate goal was to determine what issues should be addressed with these patients throughout presurgical evaluation to prevent unnecessary testing and help candidates make appropriate, evidence-based decisions. We had 3 hypotheses-- factors that would be different between surgery choosers and refusers: 1) Those refusing surgery were more frightened of some aspect of surgery, and this fear of surgery was a salient factor in their decision, 2) Those refusing surgery are more tolerant of their epilepsy, judging it not as disabling or dangerous as those who chose surgery, 3) We questioned whether we would find a cognitive or neuropsychological difference between those choosing and refusing surgery. METHODS: To gain subjective information from participants regarding attitudes towards surgery, we developed a novel questionnaire. We gathered objective information through review of medical charts, pre-surgical imaging (PET & MRI), video-EEG results, and neuropsychological tests. An interview was completed either in person at our neurology clinic or over the phone, and took 1560 minutes. RESULTS: 23 post-surgery patients participated and 9 surgical refusers participated. There were several core factors that revealed significant differences between the two groups (Wilcoxen Ranksum p values): frequency and severity of seizures (p = 0.002), length of time with seizures (p = 0.031), the stigma of having epilepsy (p = 0.022), embarrassment from seizures in public (p = 0.037), the need/desire to be seizure-free (p = 0.000), and frustration with epilepsy (p = 0.000), general comfort with surgery (p = 0.019), fear of surgery in general (p = 0.005), fear of complications during surgery (p = 0.002), and concerns that my other health conditions may impact surgery (p = 0.045). There was also a significant difference for the chances of success quoted by the doctor (p = 0.040). Lastly, there was a difference across groups for 'belief that surgery would work' (p = 0.002). The non-surgical group cited surgical fears as more important that the surgical group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides differences between pre-surgical epilepsy patients who chose to have the procedure and those who opted against a proposed procedure. These differences are social, personal, and medical, and help create a profile of patients who will opt against a procedure despite medical need and physician recommendation. These results could aid in focusing on specific issues with patients who could benefit from surgery as well as prevent unnecessary pre-surgical evaluations for patients who are adamantly against surgery regardless of medical opinion.
Table 1a. Demographic characteristics of participants (ordinal information)
Surgical Group (n=23) Age (years) Education (years, 12 = hs grad) Total years with seizures (years) Age at onset of seizures (years) Current AEDs (number) AED exposure (number) 43 (32-47) 14 (12-16) 11 (9-21) 22 (13-26) 1 (1-2) 5 (3-6) Wilcoxen Ranksum p-value 0.046 0.163 0.487 0.425 0.082 0.056 Comorbid Depression No 11 (47.8%) Yes 12 (52.2%) Other Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders None 19 (82.6%) Anxiety 1 (4.4%) Mood Disorder 1 (4.4%) ADHD 2 (8.7%) History of Alcohol or Illegal Drug Use No 22 (95.6%) Yes 1 (4.4%) History of Smoking Cigarettes No 19 (82.6%) Yes 4 (17.4%) Prior Surgical History No 11 (47.8%) Yes 12 (52.2%) Prior Bad Surgical Experience No 20 (87.0%) Yes 3 (13.0%) 3 (33.3%) 6 (66.7%) 0.005 4 (44.4%) 4 (44.4%) 1 (11.1%) 0 (0%) 1.000 9 (100%) 0 (0%) 1.000 7 (77.8%) 2 (22.2%) 0.249 2 (22.2%) 7 (77.8%) 1.000 8 (88.9%) 1 (11.1%)
Table 1b continued
Surgical Group (n=23) NonSurgical Group (n=9) Fisher Exact p-value 0.694
Table 1 gives demographic information of our study population. Numbers are provided as the median (then the range of 25th to 75th percentile).
Personal beliefs about the procedure My own understanding of the surgical procedure: My belief that surgery would work: Knowledge of others successes or failures with epilepsy surgery: The degree to which surgical treatment is proven scientifically: Medication effects The number of medications I take (or took pre-surgery): Physical side effects of seizure medications: Cognitive or emotional side effects of seizure medication: Other treatment options Alternative treatments that may be available to me in the near future Availability of the vagal nerve stimulator: The surgeon recommended the vagal nerve stimulator: The vagal nerve stimulator seemed safer: 0.522 0.348 0.348 0.251 1.08 0.94 0.83 0.75 1.444 0.778 0.444 0.667 1.8 1.2 1.3 1.3 0.184 0.229 0.765 0.445 2.869 2.174 2.13 1.36 1.44 1.58 2.222 1.778 1.556 1.3 1.6 1.7 0.150 0.467 0.354 2.565 3.565 1.348 2.739 1.12 0.66 1.58 1.14 2.778 2.22 1.778 2.667 1.2 1.2 1.6 1.3 0.602 0.002 0.448 0.982
Current Employment No 9 (39.1%) Yes 14 (60.9%) On Social Security Disability Benefits No 16 (69.6%) Yes 7 (30.4%)