100%(1)100% нашли этот документ полезным (1 голос)
242 просмотров9 страниц
Phosphating of metals is one of the most important of surface treatment methods. Phosphating can be executed using a variety of sequential processes. Zinc phosphate, iron phosphate and manganese phosphate are of industrial importance.
Phosphating of metals is one of the most important of surface treatment methods. Phosphating can be executed using a variety of sequential processes. Zinc phosphate, iron phosphate and manganese phosphate are of industrial importance.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Phosphating of metals is one of the most important of surface treatment methods. Phosphating can be executed using a variety of sequential processes. Zinc phosphate, iron phosphate and manganese phosphate are of industrial importance.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Phosphating of metals is one of the most important of surface treatment methods and a number of modern metal finishing procedures would not be possible without it. The main areas of application of phosphating are; Corrosion protection in conjunction with organic coatings, e.g., paints and polymer films, Facilitation of cold-forming processes, e.g., wire drawing and tube drawing, deep drawing, Corrosion protection in conjunction with oils and waxes,Corrosion protection with no subsequent treatment. Zinc phosphated metal pieces. Phosphating can be executed using a variety of sequential processes. The list of theseand whether they are in fact called for or not, depends on many factors of which the mostimportant are; Nature of the metal to be coated, Shape and surface condition of the metal, Number of parts and uniformity of their surface state, Anticipated service duty of the phosphate coating, Organisational factors, e.g., limit on number of processing line The phosphating sequence is normally broken down into the following stages; Degreasing and cleaning, Derusting and descalling, Activation, Phosphating, Post-treatment. There is normally a rinse between the individual processing steps in order to remove the solution layer from the metal surface and to avoid carry-over of this as an impurity to the subsequent stage. According to circumstances, the processing sequence may be longer or shorter. Thus, for example, pickling can be omitted if no corrosion products are present on the metal surface. Then, too, some of the individual stages can be combined, for example, cleaning and phosphating. Of the many phosphating systems which have been proposed, the following are of industrial importance: zinc phosphate, iron phosphate, manganese phosphate. Such phosphating systems are predominantly applied to iron and steel, as well as zinc surfaces whereas other metals which can be phosphated, e.g., aluminium, magnesium, are less commonly processed by this method. Phosphate coatings which adhere well to the basis metal and which, so far as possible, cover it completely, can only be formed on clean surfaces which are free from rust, scale, soot and other corrosion products. Oil and grease films likewise inhibit phosphate coating formation, except when they are so thin that they are removed by initial etching stage. The nature of the pretreatment steps used before the phosphating itself, e.g., in the cleaning, can considerably affect the growth rate of the phosphate coating, its thickness and the crystal size. These effects can be chemical or mechanical and sometimes both together. The effect of metal pretreatment on coating weight depends on the phosphatingtemperature. At high bath temperatures, the phosphate crystals form on the blasted steelare largely of uniform size and very fine. On samples which have only been degreased, avery large and very small crystal co-exists, whereas on blasted steel, there is much moreuniform coverage of very small crystals. Chemical pretreatment of the metal, too, can significantly affect the formation of the phosphate coating. These observations have industrial significance in terms of alkaline degreasing and solvent degreasing as well as acid pickling. Phosphating solutions based on zinc, iron and manganese produce rougher phosphate coatings with higher weight per unit area, when strong alkaline cleaners are used, in contrast to solvent degreasing. n addition, longer phosphating times are required for complete coverage of the metal. To suggest that a large range of steels are capable of being phosphated is not to imply that, in all cases, these are suitable for industrial applications. Thus it has been found that deep-drawn steel, as widely used in automobile industry, can be phosphated, painted and subjected to accelerated corrosion testing. All zinc-containing materials industrially used, including electro galvanized and hot-dip galvanized steels, as well as zinc with small additions of copper or titanium, used, for example, in diecastings, can be phosphated without problems. To improve corrosion resistance and "white rust" formation, chromate passivation films must first be removed. The colour of the phosphate coatings lies between light grey and pitch black. The lightest are the zinc phosphate coatings on zinc which, when this is the only metal in the bath, contain no other cationic species. When iron () also is present, and especially zinc and nickel, darker, usually, mid-grey coatings are formed. Whit steel substrates zinc phosphate coatings are darker than on zinc substrates, which is explained in terms of the larger amount of iron in the coating. Zinc-calcium baths produce coatings of similar huesto the zinc-only baths. Very dark, anthracite-black coatings result from the phosphatingof steel in manganese-based solutions. ZNC PHOSPHATNG n most operations where the corrosion resistance of finished workpieces must be especially high, conversion coatings are applied using zinc phosphate . This approach is widely used in the automotive industry and in certain sectors of the appliance and electronics industries. Similarly, zinc phosphating is often specified by the armed services, especially for equipment that may be exposed to severe environments. Moreover, many operations using electrocoating or powder coatings, particularly when a one-coat finish will be exposed to the weather, pretreat workpieces with zinc phosphate. TECHNCAL APPLCATONS OF ZNC PHOSPHATNG; Zinc Phosphating Prior to Powder Coating Zinc Phosphating Prior to Wire Drawing Zinc Phosphating Prior to Tube Drawing MMERSON PROCESS n the immersion mode, zinc and alkali metal phosphating systems do not greatly differ from one other. The individual steps, as normally carried out are ; 1. Cleaning stage; Temperature (C): 55-95Time (min) : 5-10 2. Water rinse Temperature (C): 15-30Time (min) : 0.5-1.5 3. Activation Temperature (C): 20-40Time (min) : 0.5-1.5 4. Phosphating Temperature (C): 40-60Time (min) : 3-10 5. Water rinse Temperature (C): 15-30Time (min) : 0.5-1.5 6. Post-rinse Temperature (C): 20-40Time (min) : 0.5-1.5 Cleaning is usually based on alkaline or strongly alkaline solutions in the concentration range 1-5%, and pH 10-13. Compared to the cleaners used in the spray mode, the cleaners used for immersion contain larger amounts of silicate and sodium hydroxide. The surfactants used often include the strongly-foaming anionic types, usually mixed with non-ionic types. Activation is mandatory for zinc phosphating and in its absence, because of the relatively high pH values involved, a thick and coarse-crystalline coating is formed which is quite unsuited of subsequent painting. Conditions for the rinse, post-rinse and drying stages differ little from spray phosphating. SPRAY PROCESS n case of spray phosphating, major differences are found in the process sequences for zinc phosphating and alkali metal phosphating systems. Zinc phosphating lines are normally based on 5-stage to 6-stage plants. They differ little in the pre-phosphating stages. The 5-stage type includes a rinse between cleaning and phosphating steps. n the case of the 6-stage type, there are either two cleaning and one rinse stages or one cleaning and two rinsing steps. 1.Cleaning; Temperature (C): 40-60Pressure (bar): 1-2.5 Time (min): 2-2.5 2. Water rinse ; Temperature (C): 15-30Pressure (bar): 0.7-1.5Time (min): 0.5-0.7 3. Phosphating ; Temperature (C): 40-60Pressure (bar): 1-2 Time (min): 2-2.5 4. Water rinse; Temperature (C): 15-30Pressure (bar): 0.7-1.5Time (min): 0.5-0.7 5. Post-rinse; Temperature (C): 20-40 Pressure (bar): 0.7-1.5Time (min): 0.5-0.7 The cleaning stage is usually based on weakly alkaline products based on alkali phosphates, alkali carbonates or borates, low-foaming surfactants and alkali silicates. To these, further compounds such as titanium orthophosphates may be added to increase the rate of the phosphating process and facilitate formation of uniform finely-crystalline coatings. t is normal to dry phosphated work before the application of conventional paints and in the case of anodic electro coating paint, it is highly recommended. Circulating air ovens, operating at 120-180 C with a drying time of 5-15 minutes are typically used for such drying.n 4-stage plants the concentrations in the first bath run from 3-10 g/l, somewhat higher (5-15 g/l) in the second bath. The rinse and post-rinse stages are operated on the same basis as normal zinc phosphating systems. RON PHOSPHATNG ron phosphating is the most preferred conversion coating method for indoor equipments due to its advantage of low first investment cost and unit prices of the chemicals. ron phosphate coating chemicals are easy to use products that can be used by wiping, spraying or dipping for the metal surfaces do not require high corrosion resistance. IRON PHOSPHATE CONVERSION COATING BY APPLICATIONS; Wipe Application ron Phosphating Dip Application ron Phosphating Spray Application ron Phosphating ron phosphate coating ranges in color light yellow to blue-red. Coating weight is generally between 0.2 - 1.0 gr/m2. Concentration of the coating solution varies in the range of %1 10 and operating temperature is between room temperature 65 C. Optimum pH value of phosphating solution is 4 to6. Below pH 4 dusty coating may occur and above pH 6 coating may be loose and unsatisfactory. Hence iron phosphate coating is not a thick coating relatively, passivation and drying stages should be operated carefully. When outbreak of oxidation (rust) is observed after the treatment, this indicates insufficient coating on the metal surface. ron phosphate coated but unpainted metal workpieces do not have improved corrosion protection, that's why it is an advantage to paint the phosphated surface immediately after phosphating. ron phosphating increases paint adherence and impact resistance along with improved flexibility. Treated metal surface has the ability to stop progress of oxidation underneath the paint when damaged by an external impact. However iron phosphating suitable for ferrous metals, by the advantage of surfactant content, it can also be employed in cleaning and etching of aluminium or galvanized metals. When iron phosphating applied by spraying, phosphating and degreasing can be operate at the same stage with proper quantity of both chemicals. MANGANESE PHOSPHATNG Manganese phosphate coating has the highest hardness and superior corrosion and wear resistances of general phosphate coatings. Manganese phosphating is extensively employed to improve the sliding properties of engine, gear, and power transmission systems. The use of manganese phosphated coatings for improved corrosion resistance can be found in virtually all branches of the metal working-industry. Typical examples mentioned here include motor vehicle components in brake and clutch assemblies, engine components, leaf or coil springs, dril bits, screws, nuts and bolts, washers, anti-vibration washers, tools, magnet cores, casting interiors and many other small items. Manganese phosphate coatings for conferment of good corrosion resistance, whether a post-treatment such as oil application is to be used or not, are invariably applied by the immersion method. The processing sequence can be summarized as follows: Degreasing and cleaning Water rinse Pickling in mineral acid (where necessary) Water rinse (only after pickling) Activation Manganese phosphating Water rinse Final oven drying (optional) Lubricating with special oils or emulsions. The degreasing and cleaning are usually done with strongly alkaline cleaners at concentrations of 1-5% and temperatures 65-95C. Treatment times range from 5-15 minutes. n recent years, a highly effective activating pre-rinse has been developed for manganesephosphates which permits alkaline cleaning and pickling of the work, without the penalty of coarse-crystalline phosphate formation. This is based on a finely-dispersed manganesephosphate at concentrations 1-2 g/l. Manganese phosphating is mainly by immersion. Treatment times range from 5-20 minutes, the optimum time depending on the surface condition. The bath operating temperature is around 95C and only in special cases can satisfactory coatings be formed at temperatures around 80C. The phosphated components, after drying, are immersed in the oil or lubricant baths for0.5-2 minutes, allowed to drain. The thickness of the resulting oil film depends on the oil used and its concentration. Manganese phosphating as a wear protection measure is widely used in the auto industry. Gearwheels in the gearbox, crown and pinion gears in the differential, cam-shafts, valves and valve-steams as well as pistons in larger diesel engines are frequently treated in this way. n other industries, the process is used to treat components in refrigerator compressors or oil pumps and their associated hydraulic rams for vehicle assembly plants - Operati ng parameters for some thi ck phosphati ng processes - Phosphating System/Accelerator /Concentration(total acidpoints)/Temperature(C)/TreatmentTime min.)/Coating Weight (g/m2) Zinc Phosphate None 20-50 90-98 30-60 20-45 Zinc Phosphate Nitrate 50-80 70-98 5-15 10-35 Manganese Phosphate None 20-50 90-98 30-60 20-45 Manganese Phosphate Nitrate 30-60 90-98 5-15 8-30 The coating weight and crystal size of the manganese phosphate coatings are influenced to an even greater extent than in zinc phosphating by the mechanical, thermal, and chemical pretreatment of the work piece surface prior to phosphating. For example, cleaning in alkaline aqueous cleaning agents or pickling in acids produces coatings with a much coarser texture. Even after such treatments, however, fine crystalline phosphate coatings are still obtainable if the work pieces are pre-rinsed in an activation rinse prior to the phosphating. turn to a light greenish-gray color within a few years, as the coating ages, with the protective coating remaining intact. Cosmoline, especially, interacting with Parkerizing, can cause the highly-desired and attractive greenish-gray patina to develop on firearms that are stored in armories. Manganese and iron phosphating coatings are usually the thickest electrochemical conversion coatings, being thicker than electrochemical conversion coatings such as zinc phosphating and bluing. None of the electrochemical conversion coating finishes are painted coatings, but chemically become part and parcel of the metal surface to which they are applied. As for all electrochemical conversion coatings, the Parkerized surface must be completely covered with a light coating of oil to maximize corrosion and wear resistance, primarily through reducing wetting action and galvanic action. A heavy oil coating is unnecessary and undesirable for achieving a positive grip on Parkerized metal parts. Alternatively, the Parkerized surface may be painted over with an epoxy or molybdenum finish for added wear resistance and self-lubricating properties. Early history Development of the process was started in England and continued by the Parker family in the United States. The terms Parkerizing, Parkerize, and Parkerized are all technically registered U.S. trademarks of Henkel Adhesives Technologies, although the terminology has largely passed into generic usage for many years. The process was first used on a large scale in the manufacture of firearms for the United States military during World War . The earliest work on phosphating processes was developed by British inventors William Alexander Ross, British patent 3119, in 1869, and by Thomas Watts Coslett, British patent 8667, in 1906. Coslett, of Birmingham, England, subsequently filed a patent based on this same process in America in 1907, which was granted U.S. Patent 870,937 in 1907. t essentially provided an iron phosphating process, using phosphoric acid. An improved patent application for manganese phosphating based in large part on this early British iron phosphating process was filed in the US in 1912, and issued in 1913 to Frank Rupert Granville Richards as U.S. Patent 1,069,903. Clark W. Parker acquired the rights to Coslett's and Richards' U.S. patents, and experimented in the family kitchen with these and other rust-resisting formulations. The ultimate result was that Clark W. Parker, along with his son Wyman C. Parker, working together, set up the Parker Rust-Proof Phosphating Company of America in 1915. Colquhoun of the Parker Rust-Proof Phosphating Company of America then filed anotherimproved phosphating patent application in 1919. This patent was issued in 1919 as U.S.Patent 1,311,319, for an improved manganese phosphating (Parkerizing) technique. Similarly, Baker and Dingman of the Parker Rust-Proof Company filed an improved manganese phosphating (Parkerizing) process patent in 1928 that reduced the processing time to 1/3 of the original time that had been required through heating the solution to a temperature in the precisely-controlled range of 500 to 550 F (260 to 288 C). This patent was issued as U.S. Patent 1,761,186 in 1930. Manganese phosphating (Parkerizing), even with these process improvements, still required the use of expensive and difficult-to-obtain manganese compounds. Subsequently, an alternative technique was developed by the Parker Company to utilize easier-to-obtain compounds at less-expense through using zinc phosphating (Parkerizing) in place of manganese phosphating (Parkerizing). The patent for this zinc phosphating (Parkerizing) process (utilizing strategic compounds that would remain available in America during a war) was granted to inventor Romig of the American Chemical Paint Company in 1938 as U.S. Patent 2,132,883, just prior to the loss of easy access to manganese compounds that occurred during World War . Somewhat analogous to the improved manganese phosphating process improvements discovered by Baker and Dingman, a similarly-improved method was found for an improved zinc phosphating process as well. This improvement was discovered by Darsey of the Parker Rust Proof Company, who filed a patent in February 1941, which was granted in August 1942, U.S. Patent 2,293,716, that improved upon the zinc phosphatizing (Parkerizing) process further. He discovered that adding copper reduced the alkalinity requirement over what had been required, and that also adding a chlorate to the nitrates that were already used would additionally permit running the process at a much lower temperature in the range of 115 to 130 F (46 to 54 C), reducing the cost of running the process further. With these process improvements, the end result was that a low-temperature (energy-efficient) zinc phosphating (Parkerizing) process, using strategic materials which the United States had ready access to, became the most common phosphating process used during World War to protect American war materials such as firearms and planes from rust and corrosion. As a tragic aside, during the Great Depression, Parker Company co-founders Clark W. Parker and his son Wyman were found guilty of investor fraud. The details of the story were contained in a 20 July 1931 Time Magazine article: "Clark W. Parker and his son Wyman stood before Federal Judge John Munro Woolsey in Manhattan last week, were fined $11,000 each and sentenced to five years in Atlanta Penitentiary for conspiracy and using the mails to defraud. Worthless was not only $1,250,000 worth of stock in Automotive Royalties Corp. but also that of two previous companies Mr. Parker had formed. Many a mulcted clergyman sadly agreed when Judge Woolsey called him "an enemy to society." Swindler Parker shrugged." "[1] Traditional iron phosphate, zinc phosphate, and manganese phosphate electrochemical conversion coatings, including Parkerizing variations, have all been criticized in recent years for introducing phosphates into surface water systems, encouraging the rapid growth of algae (eutrophication). As a result, in recent years, new, emerging technology alternatives to traditional phosphate coatings have started to see limited use, for replacing all phosphating coatings, including Parkerizing. The majority of these newer conversion coatings are fluorozirconium-based. The most popular of these fluorozirconium-based conversion coatings, introduced in 2005, incorporates the transition metal vanadium. This new, more environmentally-friendly coating is referred to as a vanadate conversion coating. Besides vanadate coatings, arsenate coatings may theoretically provide similar protection, at the risk of being a health hazard to humans and animals. t remains to be seen if these, or other new electrochemical conversion coatings, will ultimately replace traditional phosphating and Parkerizing. Zinc and manganese phosphate coatings are the treatment of iron or steel by immersion in a dilute solution of phosphoric acid and other additives. n the resulting chemical reactions, the surface of the metal is chemically converted to an integral protective layer of insoluble zinc and iron or manganese and iron phosphate crystals. Depending on the physical characteristics of the substrate and the pretreatment methods used, the translucent crystals appear black to light grey in color for zinc phosphate and black to dark grey in color for manganese phosphates. For Lubrication During Cold Forming- A phosphate-based lubricant soap system is superior to all other lubricants for severe extrusions because of the ability of the coating to flow with the metal as it is deformed, reducing metal to metal contact. This characteristic is the result of strong metal-to-phosphate bonds, which are formed during coating and the excellent extreme-pressure properties of the soap used as a supplementary treatment. Phosphate-soap coatings extend tool life, permit faster drawing speeds, allow for maintenance of closer dimensional tolerances, and produce a smooth, glossy surface on the finished parts. Low iron, light zinc phosphate coatings are typically used in this application. For Corrosion Resistance- Alone or in combination with rust-inhibiting oils, waxed, or other organic coatings, zinc and manganese phosphates are a low-cost alternative to electroplating. Depending on the supplemental coating, it can withstand from 48-480 hours of neutral salt spray exposure per ASTM method B-117. Although heavy zinc phosphates are normally considered superior for this application, both types of phosphates extend the shelf life of aftermarket replacement parts in corrosive environments. To Reduce Break-n Wear On Adjacent Moving Surfaces- Nonmetallic, oil absorptive zinc and manganese phosphate coatings on bearing surfaces permit rapid break-in of moving parts without scuffing or welding by preventing metal to metal contact, as the friable coating is easily crushed when a load is applied. Additionally, the oil held by the crystals improves the lubrication of the treated surface and imparts corrosion resistance. After break-in, and even and fine distribution of oil "reservoirs" remains, assuring continued lubrication. Manganese phosphate is generally preferred for this application because of its higher wear resistance. For Torque-Tension Requirements- Zinc and manganese phosphated fasteners sealed with a lubricating oil guarantee repeatable torque-tension relationships in applications where automated assembly equipment cannot be conintually adjusted to compensate for varying surface conditions. The excellent uniform lubrication provided by our special "TORQ-TECH", zinc, and manganese phosphate coatings eliminate stick-slip conditions and galling during assembly. Additionally, the parts are protected from oxidation during storage. For Bonding Organic Coatings to Metals- Reducing the electrochemical activity of the ferrous surface and forming strong physical and chemical bonds with organic coatings, zinc and manganese phosphates are widely used as a bare under adhesives (in rubber to metal bonding), paints, and other organic coatings. The highly absorbent phosphate crystals allow paint to penetrate into tiny fissures and also increase the total surface area available for bonding. Acting as a dielectric film that insulates the active anode and cathode centers which exist over the surface of the base metal, phosphate coatings retard corrosion "creep", extending the life of the finished product. Light zinc phosphate coatings with small, uniform crystal sizes produce the best bond. Hydraulic system manufacturers Military armament suppliers Rod-by-coil manufacturers Nuclear component fabricators Cold-Forming industries Sports equipment manufacturers Automotive fastener companies Aerospace industries Motorcycle specialty groups Marine equipment vendors Various stamping applications Diesel engine manufacturers Electrical connector manufacturers Heavy equipment manufacturers Gear & bearing manufacturers Material to be coated is cleaned by immersion in a hot alkaline solution that removes most oils and loose soil. f surface oxides are present, the parts are then stripped in an acid-cleaning step that undercuts the rust or scale, exposing the bare metal beneath. The work is then rinsed thoroughly and coated in a chemically balanced hot phosphoric acid solution via an autocatalytic reaction. The temperature, time and chemical composition of this bath must be carefully controlled to produce consistent results. After coating is completed, excess acid is neutralized and a supplementary treatment is applied if required. Material to be zinc or manganese phosphated may either be racked or bulk-processed in barrels, depending on the specifications of the end user. Normally threaded parts, soft alloys, or parts which weigh in excess of 6 ounces are racked to avoid nicks, distortion, and coating damage which result from bulk handling practices. Depending on the intended purpose of the finish, the crystal size, shape, coating weight, and color can be modified to meet many industrial military specifications. Because the hardness, composition, and surface condition of the raw material greatly influence the results of a given processing cycle, it is often necessary to use different cleaning cycles, refiners, and phosphate bath formulations to effect identical results on dissimilar substrates. We are currently using more than 70 different zinc and manganese phosphate cycles to accommodate our customers' needs. These processing programs must be selected with great care to match specification requirements with results. The primary indicators of zinc and manganese phosphate quality are coating weight measurement and neutral salt spray resistance. Crystal size and form are important for some applications, but due to the expense of the electron microscopy necessary to make an accurate determination, this characteristic is not commonly checked on a production basis and is normally limited to first article (layout) inspection. Some specifications also include thickness requirements, but much controversy exists regarding the accuracy and methods of testing because the phosphate crystals are extremely friable and crush under even the slightest pressure. Diagnostic tests for coating integrity, torque-tension relationships and for the presence of zinc and manganese are also available. All tests performed on zinc and manganese phosphated material are destructive.