Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ASSIGNMENT
Module Code Module Name Course Department
MMD 501
ADVANCED MECHANICS OF MATERIALS
Declaration Sheet Student Name Reg. No Course Batch Module Code Module Title Module Date Module Leader P.PRABHAKAR BAB0911001 MACHINERY DESIGN FT11 MMD501 ADVANCED MECHANICS OF MATERIALS to 05 11 2011 17 11 2011 Mr.SUMAN.M.L.J Batch Full-Time 2011.
Extension requests:
Extensions can only be granted by the Head of the Department in consultation with the module leader. Extensions granted by any other person will not be accepted and hence the assignment will incur a penalty. Extensions MUST be requested by using the Extension Request Form, which is available with the ARO. A copy of the extension approval must be attached to the assignment submitted.
Declaration
The assignment submitted herewith is a result of my own investigations and that I have conformed to the guidelines against plagiarism as laid out in the PEMP Student Handbook. All sections of the text and results, which have been obtained from other sources, are fully referenced. I understand that cheating and plagiarism constitute a breach of University regulations and will be dealt with accordingly.
Date
ii
Abstract
____________________________________________________________________________ In the real world all the structures are subjected to various stresses and strain, The module mechanics of materials gives an idea about traditional method of analyzing the stress and strain were it is the base of for various recent developed software like ANSIS. The factors to be considered like concepts of plasticity, strain energy, various 2D approximations, the concepts of theories of failures and thermal stresses are briefly under gone in this module. The Part-A assignment is about the debate on 2D approximation. As in the real world all structures are built up in 3D structures, to determine the various stresses and strains on these structures the easy and possible way is by converting from 3D into 2D geometry. where 2D approximation plays a vital role, Based on the various conditions the object is brought under any one of the following conditions like plane stress condition, plane strain condition or axis symmetric condition and then the results are calculated. The debate is about whether the result we get by 2D approximation is reliable or only by analyzing the 3D geometry gives the reliable result, the result we get from the 2D approximation is a compromise. The Part-B assignment is based on the pressure vessel where for the given material AISI 1040 cold drawn steel. The ultimate strength and yield strength has to be found initially then the thickness is to be determined. Based on the result it should be categorized under thick or thin cylinder. The hoop stress and circumferential stress is to be found out and by considering minimum values among stress allowable yield and ultimate strength. Then Mohrs circle has to be drawn, were by using AUTO CAD2010 software it is constructed and finally stress transformation has to be determined. The Part- B assignment also includes the usage of MATLAB software. It is required to generate code for obtaining the thickness, stress and its
transformations.
The Part-C assignment is to construct the yield locus as per the theories of failuresMaximum principal stress criteria by considering the given two principal stresses by substituting these stresses in formula yield surface and yield locus can be determined and also criteria for failure is determined. By using AUTO CAD2010 software yield locus is
constructed and comparing it with the yield strength of material to cross check whether the object is subjected to safe working load or not.
iii
____________________________________________________________________________
Contents
Declaration Sheet ......................................................................................................................... ii Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures ..............................................................................................................................vi List of Symbols .......................................................................................................................... vii PART-A......................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 Introduction: ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The results of 2D approximation is reliable due to following reasons: ............................... 1 1.2 Advantages of 2D approximation........................................................................................ 1 1.3.3 Material property considerations. ..................................................................................... 2 1.3.4 Nature of failure. .............................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Case study: .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Conclusion: .......................................................................................................................... 3 PART-B ......................................................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 2 .................................................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Finding out the values of allowable yield strength (Sy): ..................................................... 5 2.5 Finding out the values for yield criteria limit: ..................................................................... 6 2.6 Determination of thick or thin cylinder: .............................................................................. 6 2.7 Finding out the values for principal stresses: ...................................................................... 7 2.8 Constructing the Mohrs circle using 1 &2 ..................................................................... 7 2.9 Steps involved in constructing the Mohrs circle using 1 &2 ......................................... 8 2.10 Introduction to MATLAB (Matrix laboratory): ................................................................ 9 2.11 MATLAB codes to find thickness & transformation: ....................................................... 9 PART-C ....................................................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 3 ................................................................................................................................ 10 3.0 Introduction: ...................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Theories of failure ............................................................................................................. 10 3.2 Yield locus:........................................................................................................................ 10 3.3 Solution: ............................................................................................................................ 11 3.4 Creating yield locus by Maximum principal stress criteria. ........................................... 11 3.5 Steps involved in yield locus creation. .............................................................................. 11 3.6 Comments on the yield locus obtained: ............................................................................ 13 4.0 Comments on learning outcome: ........................................................................................... 13 5.0 References ............................................................................................................................. 14
iv
List of Tables
____________________________________________________________________________
Pg.No. 3
List of Figures
____________________________________________________________________________ Figure No. Figure 1.1 Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2 Figure 2.3 Figure 2.4 Figure 2.5 Figure 3.1 Title of the figure Investigated 2D and 3D RVE type models. Pressure vessel of Part-B. Showing pressure vessel.. Showing Yield surface and Yield locus... construction of Mohrs circle MATLAB coding Showing Yield surface and Yield locus Pg.No. 3 4 4 7 8 9 12
vi
List of Symbols
____________________________________________________________________________ Symbol De Do Ys Us Su Sy N P t 1 & 2 Description stress External diameter Internal diameter Angle Yield strength Ultimate strength Allowable ultimate strength Allowable yield strength Factor of safety Pressure Thickness Principal stresses Units mpa mm mm Degrees mpa mpa mpa mpa ----mpa mm mpa
vii
PART-A CHAPTER 1
1.0 Introduction:
In Part A the debate topic given is 2-D approximations made in the prediction of structural behavior is a compromise to debate on 2D approximation understanding the concepts of when thickness is very less when compared to length and width in which we consider stresses along thickness is zero (z = 0). Similarly in Plane strain condition is suitable only when breadth and height dimension is lesser than length in which the both sides of the length should be constrained we considered (z=0). And in Axis symmetric condition is suitable only when the object is symmetrical about its axis.
loads with high accuracy is required to design and limit the loads while the structure is subjected. Generally two or more loads combined together and acting is to be considered. These loads may be subjected during the function or ideal condition. In 2D approximation we are considering a plane which has 2 axes the entire loads in the cross section is transferred to the elemental area. While considering plane stress condition we consider the plane which has length and width which is greater than thickness. In case of plane strain condition we consider only cross section and loading condition is analyzed since the length is constrained the effect of loading is negligible. In case of axis symmetric condition we consider loading in cross section separately and longitudinal separately. Since the loading conditions are framed with the logic which can be understandable we can able to judge 2D approximation gives reliable solution.
Fig 1.1[1]Investigated 2D and 3D RVE type models Table1.2[1]Comparison of stresses in 2D& 3D From the above case they have analysed the stresssby taking 2D model and also taking 3D model the results of both the cases are similar and the variations are within the allowable limit.
1.5 Conclusion:
In the debate the various factors related to 2D approximation is discussed by which we can understand 2-D approximations made in the prediction of structural behavior is not a compromise it provides us the reliable results with that results many of the traditional structures/components are buildup which is universally accepted. Since in recent days there is advancement of technologies and development of software makes simplicity of calculating the 3D structure we prefer it, but because of that we cannot say the values we get by 2d approximation is a compromise.
PART-B CHAPTER 2
________________________________________________________________________________
Problem: A tank is to be made by rolling flat sheet of AISI 1040 cold-drawn steel into the spiral
shape as shown, where the spiral makes an angle of with the horizontal axis of the tank. Tank is subjected to a maximum internal load of P MPa, whose diameter is to be D mm. (a) Determine the proper wall thickness, t according to the theories of failures, provided N=4 based on Sy or N=6 based on Su (b) Determine the stress condition on an element aligned with the weld and depict the same using Mohr circle. (c) Write a MAT LAB code for obtaining the thickness, stress and its transformations.
Finding out the values of allowable yield stress and allowable ultimate stresses. Comparing the two values considering the minimum value as yield criteria limit. By applying the value to Hoop stress determining the thickness of pressure vessel. With the obtained thickness deciding whether it is thick or thin cylinder. Finding out the values for principal stresses. With the values of principal stresses constructing the Mohrs circle. Determining the stress transformation angle.
The yield strength and ultimate strength for AISI 1040 material are: The yield strength of AISI 1040 material (Ys) = 353.4mpa The ultimate strength of AISI 1040 material (Us) = 518.76mpa
= =
cos 00
x = 60.30mpa = = cos
cos 00
y = 69.37mpa = sin
xy = -26.11sin100 xy =-25.71mpa
PART-C CHAPTER 3
____________________________________________________________________________ Problem: The state of stress at a point on the aircraft wing was found to be The 0 =[0 0 0 0 0 0 0] 0
Let us assume that this (uni-axial) stress state is almost enough to cause the material to plastically deform, or yield. The yield stress was chosen as y= 54mpa, = 0.3, E= 210 GPa (a) Check for the yielding of the above state of stress using the failure criteria. (b) Draw the failure locus for the failure criteria and comment on the same.
3.0 Introduction:
The state of stress at a point is defined as all the stress vectors with all planes that pass through that point. In this matrix since all the shear components remains zero it is to be considered that principal stress are given, Since the value of z is mentioned as 0 it is to be under stood that 2D graph has to be plotted.
10
Advanced mechanics of materials
First quadrant (1,2) = Material subjected to purely tension. Second quadrant (-1,2) = Material subjected to one load in compression and one load in tension.
Fourth quadrant (1,-2) = Material subjected to one load in compression and one load in tension.
12
13
5.0 References
1)[1] D Zeleniakiene The comparative analysis of 2D and 3D micro structural models internet.ktu.lt/lt/mokslas/zurnalai/mechanika/mech.../Leisys353.PDF Retrieved on 04 12 2011. 2) [2]Unknown, Plane Stress and Plane Strain engineering.ucsb.edu/~hpscicom/projects/ME271.htm Retrieved on 04 12 2011. 3) Unknown, Mohrs circle for plane stress www.optics.arizona.edu/optomech/references/.../OPTI_222_W21.pd Retrieved on 28 11 2011. 4) Unknown, Introduction to MATLAB www.mathworks.com/moler/intro.pd Retrieved on 10 12 2011. 5) James M.Gere and Stephen P.Timoshenko (2002) Meccanics of materials second edition PWS Publishers USA. 6)L.S.Srinath() Advanced mechanics of materialsThird edition Tata McGraw hills, New Delhi
14
Advanced mechanics of materials