Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Gerd Sammer o.Univ.Prof. DI Dr. Institute for Transport Studies Department of Landscape, Spatial and Infrastructure Sciences University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
Final Project Symposium TEMPUS III JEP Project: IREITEU Intergration of Road Engineering IT-Technologies at Egyptian Universities 23rd of June 2009, Cairo
Structure
Introduction Bus Priority Measure under Heterogeneous Traffic Condition Parking Management Scheme for Private Car Parks Conclusion
Definition
Traffic management =
Influencing of traffic (flow) and transport with operational measures based on defined goals
(without major infrastructure measures high cost-effectiveness)
Example 1
The Problem
Congested arterial roads in conurbation no space for widening no sense of widening Two principle alternatives
underground railway
Vedagiri 2009
Institute for Transport Studies, BOKU Vienna 8
Vedagiri 2009
Institute for Transport Studies, BOKU Vienna 9
Bus Lane for 14.5 m Wide Urban Road (Dual Carriage Way)
Vedagiri 2009
Institute for Transport Studies, BOKU Vienna 10
11
Speed of Bus and Other Vehicles With and Without Bus Lane, Road-width 14.5 m
60 50
other vehicles with bus lane other vehicles without bus lane bus with bus lane
40 30
bus without bus lane
20 10 0 0
1000
5330
6650
7600
8550
9500
2000
4000
6000 vehicle / h
8000
10000
12
Travel Time Saving of Bus and Other Vehicle Users in Comparison With and Without Bus Lane, Road-width 14.5 m
-60
-20
20 0
1000
5330
6650
7600
8550
9500
2000
4000 vehicle / h
6000
8000
10000
13
Example 2
14
The Problem
Parking management and paid parking zones in public space very efficient traffic management measure Problem: increasing number of private parking slots commuter car parks, car parks of shopping centres etc. Two options of solution
Behavioural Reaction of Users of Cars for Shopping purposes obligatory pay parking schemes for schopping centres in Vienna
share of car users for shopping [%]
% of reactions at 1.8 /h
still use car shift to car sharing reduction of shopping trips car use with new destination shift to public transport new destination with other mode shift to foot others
0% 0,00 0,80 1,30 1,80
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
20 % 3%
20 % 1% 11 % 15 % 25 % 5%
36 % reduction of shopping trips to previous destination 16 % new destination
sample 65-67
17
Change of Modal Split for Shopping Purpose obligatory pay parking schemes for shopping centres in Vienna
Opinion of Operators and Developers obligatory pay parking scheme (OPPS) for shopping centres
50 % 100 % loss of image difficult argumentation to customers refund of parking fee loss of control effect for traffic demand combination of OPPS with parking space levy influence on decisions of location problem at boundary of zones with different fee level equal treatment of all locations is important
90 %
19
Opinion of Operators and Developers parking space levy for shopping centres
73 % influence on the decision of location problem at boundary of zones with different tax level equal treatment of all location is important passing the cost to customers jeopardizing of existing location of shopping centres reductions of number of parking slots
100 % 27 % 64 %
20
Recommendation
Strong demand effects, mitigation of congestion Recommendation for combined measures
OPPS + parking space levy
- in low density areas outside cities - increased graduation of levy dependent on increasing car-orientation - possible application in air quality redevelopment areas - further research needed
21
Strong effect on location choice for shopping centres appropriate locations for obligatory OPPS boundary problem?
22
Conclusion
Traffic management very effective Attention to not negligible side effects Cost-effective contribution for sustainable transport policy
23
Final Project Symposium TEMPUS III JEP Project: IREITEU Intergration of Road Engineering IT-Technologies at Egyptian Universities 23rd of June 2009, Cairo